Not really, I think what he's talking about are checks that are technically defective but that both the payor and the payee actually want to be negotiated as presented. Everyone is totally fine with the practice unless and until an actual forged check gets presented and processed, and he doesn't sound like he has the goods on any such casees.
Bingo.
Further he got fired and is headed for a hearing. That means the company is contesting his unemployment claim...
So he got fired for something really serious. I'm betting drug use on the job.
in any case if he thinks he can whistle-blow his way to unemployment bennies, he's dead wrong.
The question will arrise, if you know of wrong doing, why didn't you blow the whistle BEFORE you were fired? Were you OK with fraud as long as you got a paycheck? If you knew and said nothing, you were aiding and abbetting the crime.
Was the DUmmie obstructing justice?Twould be a real shame if someone faxed a few questions to the unemployment office...