« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: We can't go on this way.  (Read 209 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Online CC27

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7266
  • Reputation: +2180/-31
We can't go on this way.
« on: October 13, 2026, 01:03:55 PM »
Quote
Baitball Blogger (53,368 posts)

We can't go on this way.

We have come to a crossroads now that we've connected the fact that behind the soaring number of Data Centers is the devious plan to control people by controlling the information they hear. It's a process that began decades ago when the Fairness Doctrine ended, followed by the Robert's Court ruling on Citizens United. In two steps, they weakened the media's obligation to properly inform the public, and they gave those with deep pockets more power to attack their opponents using vile lies. Plainly, in a country where there is no controls over the quality of speech, billionaires have succeeded in controlling speech.

Now enters the era of the Data Centers. We already know the damage they can do because of what happened when Zelensky neutralized the Data Centers in Russia. Those foreign bot farms disseminated false information with the intention of triggering the US conservative voters. Sadly, their racist tropes worked, because racism exists in this country. So, essentially, a foreign country, with the blessing of conservative leaders in this country, intentionally keeps us divided. And we all know, a house divided cannot stand.

Now the really bad news: We have to face the fact that there are already enough Data Centers under construction in the US to affect the course of the next general election. There is only one way to neutralize them and that's to bring back some leveling regulation to deter those who are intentionally spreading false, political information. Off the top of my head, we could start by passing the Fairness Doctrine 2.0. But, where there is a criminal attempt to spread false information, like in Texas where they claimed that Talarico had been in a mental institution, there should be stiffer penalties to deter them, and others, from doing it again.

Frankly, I see this as a critical necessity and it should be taking all of our focus. I don't see why, in a country where you can identify a legal cause, there isn't a movement to look for legal remedies. The Supreme Court erred by turning us into second class citizens when they gave billionaires the power to buy airways and politicians. Our words and opinions have been diluted because of it. We have lost our freedom of Speech because of the conservative's malicious long game. But what we can plainly see today, is that if you can't magnify your voice, you lose your voice.

As soon as we make changes to the Supreme Court, the first order of business should involve filing lawsuits to help change the laws to control the data that is coming from those Data Centers. It would be a start in removing the power that billionaires now have to buy elections and politicians.

https://democraticunderground.com/100221559938

BLAH BLAH BLAH with no point
Logged

Offline ADsOutburst

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6590
  • Reputation: +2036/-14
Re: We can't go on this way.
« Reply #1 on: October 13, 2026, 01:23:02 PM »
Quote
We have come to a crossroads now that we've connected the fact that behind the soaring number of Data Centers is the devious plan to control people by controlling the information they hear.

Congrats! You've just pointed what mainstream news outlets, the Democratic Party, globalists, the originators of things like "Russiagate", and the like, have been doing for years.
Logged

Offline SVPete

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 34806
  • Reputation: +3975/-248
Re: We can't go on this way.
« Reply #2 on: October 13, 2026, 01:29:31 PM »
Data Centers, under various terms - Computer Room, server farm, etc. - have been around since, literally, Bletchley Park and the Ultra decrypts. Now Data Centers are a Reich-Wing plot to manipulate the 2026 midterm elections?


 :urmeds:  :urmeds:  :urmeds:  :urmeds:  :urmeds:  :urmeds:  :urmeds:  :urmeds:  :urmeds:
Logged
Whose Shampeachment Is It Anyway, where the high crimes are made up, and the evidence doesn't matter

Offline DefiantSix

  • Captain, IKV Defiant
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19310
  • Reputation: +2115/-189
  • Set Condition One throughout the ship.
Re: We can't go on this way.
« Reply #3 on: October 13, 2026, 01:31:12 PM »
Quote
We have come to a crossroads now that we've connected the fact that behind the soaring number of Data Centers is the devious plan to control people by controlling the information they hear...

Get this clown. S/h/it believes that the information collated in data centers will be processed into PRODUCT for their CONSUMPTION.

Uh-uh.

The powers that be aren't pushing data centers everywhere for YOUR BENEFIT, DUmp'Rat. The data centers are there to collect and collate YOUR DATA, so that the powers that be can read your patterns, predict your intentions and responses before you yourself know the question is before you, and manage your reactions for maximum tranquility and profit.

They're not making product for you, DUmp'Rat. You're the product...
Logged
"Stand your ground. Don't fire unless fired upon, but if they mean to have a war, let it begin here."
-- Capt. John Parker
"I'm not looking for forgiveness, and I'm way past asking permission"
-- Capt. Steve Rogers
"In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem, government IS the problem."
-- Ronaldus Magnus

There's a reason National Command Authority doesn't give me the nuclear 'Football' for safekeeping, and it's NOT because I'm not in the chain of command.

Offline CollectivismMustDie

  • American
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4571
  • Reputation: +1900/-42
  • (D)Ummie nightmare.
Re: We can't go on this way.
« Reply #4 on: October 13, 2026, 01:55:12 PM »
The fairness doctrine?

  :rotf:

When was the fairness doctrine ever applied to the msm which leans, twists and spins full on democrat/leftist?

Delusional. That is the only word that comes close to describing these 'people'.
Logged
"Be not intimidated... nor suffer yourselves to be wheedled out of your liberties by any pretense of politeness, delicacy, or decency. These, as they are often used, are but three different names for hypocrisy, chicanery and cowardice." - John Adams

Hillary Clinton will never be the President of the United States.

Offline SSG Snuggle Bunny

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24813
  • Reputation: +2883/-270
  • Voted Rookie-of-the-Year, 3 years running
Re: We can't go on this way.
« Reply #5 on: October 13, 2026, 02:25:57 PM »
BLUF: Data centers will somehow steal the election, so they want to criminalize speech they don't like because fascism.
Logged
According to the Bible, "know" means "yes."

Offline SVPete

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 34806
  • Reputation: +3975/-248
Re: We can't go on this way.
« Reply #6 on: October 13, 2026, 02:54:16 PM »
Quote from: CollectivismMustDie on October 13, 2026, 01:55:12 PM
The fairness doctrine?

  :rotf:

When was the fairness doctrine ever applied to the msm which leans, twists and spins full on democrat/leftist?

Delusional. That is the only word that comes close to describing these 'people'.

Especially when ABC, CBS, NBC, and PBS had an uni-voiced oligopoly on TV skews.
Logged
Whose Shampeachment Is It Anyway, where the high crimes are made up, and the evidence doesn't matter

Offline RonE

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 679
  • Reputation: +306/-1
Re: We can't go on this way.
« Reply #7 on: October 13, 2026, 10:45:42 PM »

Quote
Especially when ABC, CBS, NBC, and PBS had an uni-voiced oligopoly on TV skews.
and you want to use the term "fairness"? Sorry, but the networks listed above were 80+% negative toward Trump on political issues.

Left wing shows have been launched only to watch them crash and burn. If your ideas have merit, your audience will grow. If you can't provide specific, verifiable examples that logically support your stance, your audience shrinks. If your positions are vague, your feelings won't make up the difference. And, that's why the liberal shows failed. And the left will keep losing until they understand this.

Don't you understand why Trump can have unscripted exchanges with the press, but none of your people can? Trump doesn't have to make sure what he says today doesn't conflict with what he said last week. He operates on solid beliefs. Your people don't have that foundation to rely on.

You only stay in the race by playing Santa, and screwing with the election system.

Logged

Online CC27

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7266
  • Reputation: +2180/-31
Re: We can't go on this way.
« Reply #8 on: Today at 07:16:31 AM »
Quote from: RonE on October 13, 2026, 10:45:42 PM
and you want to use the term "fairness"? Sorry, but the networks listed above were 80+% negative toward Trump on political issues.

Left wing shows have been launched only to watch them crash and burn. If your ideas have merit, your audience will grow. If you can't provide specific, verifiable examples that logically support your stance, your audience shrinks. If your positions are vague, your feelings won't make up the difference. And, that's why the liberal shows failed. And the left will keep losing until they understand this.

Don't you understand why Trump can have unscripted exchanges with the press, but none of your people can? Trump doesn't have to make sure what he says today doesn't conflict with what he said last week. He operates on solid beliefs. Your people don't have that foundation to rely on.

You only stay in the race by playing Santa, and screwing with the election system.

High five
Logged

Offline SVPete

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 34806
  • Reputation: +3975/-248
Re: We can't go on this way.
« Reply #9 on: Today at 08:53:43 AM »
Quote from: RonE on October 13, 2026, 10:45:42 PM
and you want to use the term "fairness"? Sorry, but the networks listed above were 80+% negative toward Trump on political issues.
...

And anti-Reagan, anti GHWB, and anti-GWB ... and lockstep-pro Carter, Mondull, Slickster, AlGore, Heinz-Kerry, and OhBummber!.
Logged
Whose Shampeachment Is It Anyway, where the high crimes are made up, and the evidence doesn't matter
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »