Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10
81
B is equating this false reporters to CPS with SWATting, https://pjmedia.com/scott-pinsker/2026/06/29/something-is-very-very-strange-about-the-medias-fixation-on-pete-buttigiegs-cps-swatting-story-n4954491 . Having a CPS social worker and an ordinary police officer knocking at your door and having a polite discussion is VASTLY different from having an armed police team loudly demanding entry into your home, with their weapons at ready.

If what B claims is accurate, the false reporters deserves to be prosecuted (filing a false police report?). But he was not SWATted.

As the article linked above points out, real SWATting has been done to conservative pols and officials pretty frequently in recent years, and the MSM have given the SWATting incidents cursory coverage (or less). But when a Dem gets false-reported to CPS and an unexpected visit from a social worker, it’s a national-level mini-crisis.
82
But you believe all anonymous claims against Trump and other conservatives! :loser:

yeah, look what this dummy posted on his FB page:



https://www.facebook.com/markpkessinger

he seems especially butthurt about "Mayor Pete":

Quote
This is outrageous!  Pete Buttigieg and his family were targeted by an anonymous caller to CPS, resulting in his not being permitted to be alone with his children overnight.  The caller said that a woman he knows told him that she had met Buttigieg at an event in Alabama, and that he told her he had committed "unspeakable crimes."
It isn't just the fact that some crazy idiot called in a false allegation -- although that is bad enough.  It's that the police and CPS responded to a hearsay allegation by a THIRD PARTY!  And even the third party didn't claim to have witnessed anything, but only claimed that Pete Buttigieg had admitted to her that he had engaged in "unspeakable acts."  That shouldn't be enough to get police to respond.  At a minimum, an allegation like that should only be responded to when the original person making it calls in the complaint.  And that person should have more knowledge about a situation than just what she claims an alleged perpetrator told her!

just another self-hating Jew (big Mandummy supporter):



 :mental:
 :rotf:

83
The DUmpster / Re: Katie f'n Phang!
« Last post by SVPete on June 29, 2026, 02:42:01 PM »
Per this, https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5941665-doj-epstein-files-lawsuit/ , Phang is demanding unredactions in some of the files. In Prog fantasies, Trump’s will be among the names revealed. In real life, innocent “nobodies”’ names will be revealed and the doxxhunds will be hounding them. Just like Rep. Ro Khana did to four “nobodies”.
84
The DUmpster / Re: Katie f'n Phang!
« Last post by Old n Grumpy on June 29, 2026, 02:30:33 PM »
why all the concern with the epstein files? Slo joe didn't release them and no dems cared. Most likely the redactions will implicate dems. :thatsright: :loser:
85
If, as he claims, the report to CPS is false, sharing the guilt with the false-reporter is Walter Mondale, who wrote the Federal law requiring states’ CPS-type agencies to investigate anonymous child abuse reports as seriously as reports by reporters giving their names (e.g. a school teacher or admin). How Mondull did not foresee malicious false reporters entangling families with social workers who might have a mini-messianic complex … well he was moronic if he did not … or a Hitler/Stalin-grade statist.
86
Quote
I have been furious for several days after hearing about the false allegations against Pete Buttigieg . . .
So how do you know they are false?

Quote
As I understand the details of the case, some guy anonymously called either CPS or police, and claimed that some woman he knows told him that she had met Pete Buttigieg as some event in Alabama, and that Buttigieg confessed to her that he had committed "unspeakable crimes" against his children, which led to CPS separating him from his family overnight, while they looked into the allegations.

But you believe all anonymous claims against Trump and other conservatives! :loser:
87
General Discussion / Re: Oh, look! Election fraud.
« Last post by SVPete on June 29, 2026, 02:07:12 PM »
Let me guess. The torn up ballots were votes against the union shill-candidate(s).
88
General Discussion / Re: Democrat treason and sedition
« Last post by SSG Snuggle Bunny on June 29, 2026, 02:02:47 PM »
Quote
10 states—Connecticut, Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, and Pennsylvania—have confirmed they will not send an official delegation to the “Great American State Fair” on the National Mall in celebration of America’s 250th.

9 of the states are led by Democratic governors, with Vermont being the only Republican-governed state to decline involvement so far.

Notably, PA Gov. Josh Shapiro tops the list of highest paid governors.

https://x.com/Jules31415/status/2071196628157935664



Meanwhile, Dems celebrate Somali Independence Day...


Quote
One of the dumbest things about the debate over “nationalism” is that the same people who tell you it’s toxic and dangerous in the West will then dance on stage in a nationalistic frenzy over a country so dangerous they can’t even live there.

https://x.com/bonchieredstate/status/2071545588437393524

89
General Discussion / Re: Oh, look! Election fraud.
« Last post by ADsOutburst on June 29, 2026, 01:57:48 PM »
But I was told by Democrats that voter fraud doesn't exist is only done by Republicans. :whatever:
90
Quote
But at the same time, in the current climate, when people are so willing to weaponize anonymous allegations against public figures…

Yes, the left and their use of SWATting come to mind.
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10