Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10
81
Politics / Pritzker Says ICE Needs Judicial Warrants. Angel Dad Debunks Him.
« Last post by SVPete on September 06, 2026, 11:08:41 AM »
Pritzker Says ICE Needs Judicial Warrants. Angel Dad Debunks Him.

https://pjmedia.com/catherinesalgado/2026/09/05/pritzker-says-ice-needs-judicial-warrant-angel-dad-debunks-him-n4956936

Quote
The Democrat governor of Illinois, who has so much blood on his hands from sanctuary policies, tried to claim that federal immigration officers need judicial warrants. The father of an illegal alien crime victim promptly set him straight.

Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker (D) was on Fox News, where Bret Baier asked him if he thought “any illegal immigrant charged with or convicted of a felony should be deported.” Pritzker lied blatantly. “I think they ought to take the violent criminals and get them out of my state and get them out of the country,” he claimed. “I absolutely believe that, but that's not what they're doing. They say they were going after the worst...”

Baier then interrupted Pritzker: “You'll [not] help them, because you're a sanctuary state, right?” Pritzker then engaged in his deceptive propaganda: “No, we do. If you bring us a judicial warrant, we will bring you all kinds of help on the ground to go get the bad guys. That's what we want. We want the bad guys off the streets. What we don't want is for people to get racially profiled. That what's happening right now.” He’s full of garbage — he signed legislation last year deliberately to ban arrests of illegal aliens in numerous locations he had no authority to ban them from, so he could protect foreign criminals. But he is also deliberately lying about the powers that federal agents have.

Joe Abraham, whose daughter Katie died in a crash caused by an illegal alien, replied, “‘Bring us a judicial warrant and we’ll remove criminals.’ That’s dishonesty by omission. A judicial warrant is not required for civil immigration enforcement."

He added, “Illinois law itself distinguishes civil immigration warrants from judicial warrants. Leaving that out isn’t harmless wordplay. Illinoisans like Katie can pay the price for policies defended with misleading words.”

For the federal law, 8 USC 1357 includes warrantless arrest powers for federal officers, among them ICE agents. These include interrogating known or suspected illegal aliens, as well as arresting them without a warrant when the statutory requirements for a warrantless arrest are met. ...

The lie that judicial warrants are required to arrest and detain an illegal is Prog Hate-Ice narrative orthodoxy.
82
Breaking News / Re: Worth Knowing, Probably Not Quite Threadworthy 9/6
« Last post by SVPete on September 06, 2026, 11:07:33 AM »
S&P 100 Drops Nike: Formerly Disruptive Shoe Company Is Now Out of Fashion

https://pjmedia.com/tim-o-brien/2026/09/06/s-and-p-100-delists-nike-formerly-disruptive-shoe-company-is-now-out-of-fashion-n4956942

Quote
In a sign of the changing times, the S&P 100 is delisting Nike. To reiterate, the S&P 100 – not the S&P 500 – is delisting Nike, which is a reflection of the company’s poor performance on Wall Street and elsewhere. If you want to buy a share of the stock these days, it’s floundering around $38 to $40 per share, which is as low as it’s been in about 12 years. The delisting will take effect Sept. 21.

That’s a 75% drop from its peak in 2021. So, what gives?

Let’s explore the official reasons (excuses) first. Analysts say that Nike has encountered a perfect storm of stagnant sales growth, “shrinking gross margins,” and problems in China, where its shoes are manufactured and which represents a huge consumer market for the firm. But these aren’t reasons; they’re symptoms. Saying your stock is down because sales are down is like saying the reason I’m hungry is because I haven’t eaten any food.
...
Nike is as much a fashion brand as an athletic performance shoe company. Things go in and out of fashion every day as fickle consumers’ tastes change. For the longest time, just having that Nike swoosh logo on a shirt or a hat or your shoes was enough to signal that you’re on trend, that you buy a certain quality, and that you maintain a certain image.

This branding was reinforced by Nike's status as the dominant sponsor of the major pro athletes in sports. From Tiger Woods to Michael Jordan, if you were a pro athlete, you weren’t “somebody” until you got that Nike shoe contract.

I do not have the knowledge/visibility to make definitive statements, but within my scope of observation:

1. Among brands I see at running events - organized trail and community street/road - the brands I currently see most often are Hoka and Saucony. Nike is in the lower pack with New Balance, Adidas, and On.

2. The brands I see most often at work (200 or 400 work in my building), I see Hoka most often, with New Balance and Nike vying for second most common.

Fifteen years or so ago (when I started walking in running events), Nike was most common in both contexts. Whatever the mix of reaction against Nike's embrace of activists and waves of fashion, Nike's Marketing Mojo has slipped. FWIW, Caitlin Clark has a Nike contract, and Sophie Cunningham an Adidas contract.

I've had very good experiences with the Hoka Clifton series, though my bank account and feet are good with New Balance 680 and 880 (both are "Fresh Foam" series) for daily wear and for work-outs and events.
83
AND THEN THERE ARE THE FACTS: About That ‘Historic Learning Loss” of Sen. Elizabeth Warren

https://marktaps.substack.com/p/and-then-there-are-the-facts-about

Quote
So here we go again with former Oklahoma resident-turned-Harvard professor-turned-U.S. senator putting something up on X that bears only the slightest resemblance to the truth:

“Among other agencies, Trump has gutted the Department of Education, weakened food safety protections, and hollowed out the IRS. The result?
Historic learning loss in our schools. More food safety crises. And tax cheats getting away with skirting the bill.”

Where do we start this time around? How about let’s compare how America’s graduating high school seniors scores in the National Assessment of Education Progress (NAEP) in 1992 compared to 2024? Here’s what NAEP says:

Reading is the most basic skill our students must learn if they are to have even the remotest chance of succeeding as adults, and yet here we see — after the Department of Education (DoED) was formed in 1980 and had a decade to improve public schools — the results show continuous decline in student achievement.

Quote
“The average reading score for twelfth-grade students in 2024 was lower by three points compared to 2019 and was lower by 10 points in comparison to the first reading assessment in 1992.
...
“Compared to 1992, the 2024 reading scores for twelfth-grade students were lower for lower-, middle-, and higher-performing twelfth-grade students at all but the 90th percentile. Scores for twelfth-graders at the 10th and 25th percentiles were lower by 24 and 15 points, respectively. The score for twelfth-graders at the 50th percentile was 8 points lower and the score for students at the 75th percentile was 2 points lower in 2024 compared to 1992.”
...
But look what Warren does, she points to Donald Trump, claiming his radical reduction of the DoED workforce from more than 4,000 highly paid federal bureaucrats to a little over 2,000 getting taxpayer-funded pay checks caused an “historic learning loss.”

But Trump’s DoED worforce(sic) cuts only began in 2025 and continue during the current year, yet DoED’s own data shows steadily growing failure on the most vital skill began more than three decades ago!/quote]

It took 12 years of Reagan and GHWB to create a framework that could measure and track what was happening in US PSs academically. So, allowing for the USDE to get organized and doing whatever they did, that's not knowing where the US started (ca. 1980) and not knowing 6-8 years of the results/consequences of USDE actions.

Fauxcahontas ASSumes that everything pre-Trump was great. It was not, as measured decline demonstrates. The USDE was never about improving education, it was always about funneling Federal $$$$$$ to the teachers unions, which include educrats along with actual teachers.
84
The DUmpster / Re: DAMN IT, GRIM!!! QUIT TAKING OUR WOMEN!!!
« Last post by CollectivismMustDie on September 06, 2026, 09:51:34 AM »
Quote
Do you hate women? Why not take the men who are ruining our lives and our world, NOT the women who were trying to make things better and bring joy and beauty...

Perhaps 'Grim' knows what most sensible people.do.

That it isn't men who are ruining your lives, but feminism and the delusions it creates that is doing the ruining.

Your life would be significantly harder to the point of impossibility without the patriarchy, and thats IF the savages of the world didn't step in to fill the vacuum left by the patriarchy and turn you and your strong women boss babe buddies into the next taliban womens franchise.

You should be grateful that 'grim' seems to be taking it easy on the patriarchs around you, but you're too stupid and filled with feminist delusion to understand why that is so.

Now shut up and go feed your cats.

:bird:
85
The DUmpster / Re: DAMN IT, GRIM!!! QUIT TAKING OUR WOMEN!!!
« Last post by SVPete on September 06, 2026, 09:41:03 AM »
Um, who is Robin Morgan?

I also have never heard of her. Consulting W'pedia, she was a feminist writer and activist (some good causes, e.g. battered women and rape victims, among them). Like many leftist activists, her upbringing was of relative wealth/privilege. As feminist "inside baseball" goes, she was deep in the shower rooms. I doubt that many ordinary feminist-ish women know much of her.
86
The DUmpster / Re: DAMN IT, GRIM!!! QUIT TAKING OUR WOMEN!!!
« Last post by Ralph Wiggum on September 06, 2026, 08:46:53 AM »
Um, who is Robin Morgan?
87
The DUmpster / DAMN IT, GRIM!!! QUIT TAKING OUR WOMEN!!!
« Last post by CC27 on September 06, 2026, 08:35:39 AM »
Quote
niyad (137,516) Posts

DAMN IT, GRIM!!! QUIT TAKING OUR WOMEN!!!

Just in the last couple of weeks: Shelley Fabares, Dolly Parton, Cassandra Wilson, Gloria Steinem, and now Robin Morgan..and possibly others we have not yet heard about. WTAFH is WRONG with you? Do you hate women? Why not take the men who are ruining our lives and our world, NOT the women who were trying to make things better and bring joy and beauty..

https://democraticunderground.com/100221488321

I know what this is code for...🙄
88
Breaking News / Worth Knowing, Probably Not Quite Threadworthy 9/6
« Last post by SVPete on September 06, 2026, 08:27:08 AM »
Trump Was Right About the Kennedy Center... In a HUGE Way!

https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2026/09/05/trump-was-right-about-the-kennedy-center-n4956928

Quote
President Donald Trump has spent months trying to return the Kennedy Center to its former glory, and leftists have been trying to stop him at every turn. This week, the building did their work for them. A chunk of the Grand Foyer ceiling came crashing down onto the red carpet.

I’m guessing that’s still not enough proof for Democrats that the place needs work.

The collapse hit overnight into Thursday, after a powerful storm tore through Washington, D.C. Meteorologists say it was the strongest system to hit the city since the derecho that flattened trees and power lines back in 2012. This time, it took out part of the ceiling in one of the Kennedy Center's most recognizable rooms, leaving debris scattered across the carpet where donors and dignitaries usually walk.
...
Last month, Justice Department lawyers told a federal court that the building's "dangerously dilapidated, outdated, and decrepit" condition, combined with millions of dollars in financial losses, has put the Kennedy Center in a "financial and structural death spiral." Fixing it, they said, will take two years of closure. Without that work, they warned, "the Center will deteriorate further into an unsafe, decrepit structure that will be required to be taken down, with a determination to follow on what to build on the site, such as a large outdoor amphitheater overlooking the Potomac River that has been proposed, by some, for many years."

While the the noise is being made about adding Trump's name to the Kennedy Center, his effort to repair and refurbish it are also being obstructed. I think the chances are 50-50 or worse that this incident will clear opposition to Bogey-Trump carrying out necessary repairs and needed upgrades.
89
The DUmpster / Re: Now it's the wolves.
« Last post by ADsOutburst on September 05, 2026, 07:19:00 PM »
Wild hogs are an invasive species (David Ellis rocks!), but activists don't care about that or about the eeeee-vile farmers and ranchers whose crops get destroyed and land damaged.

And because the hogs breed so fast, it seems impossible to kill them fast enough.
90
Breaking News / Re: Worth Knowing, Probably Not Quite Threadworthy 9/5
« Last post by ADsOutburst on September 05, 2026, 07:17:43 PM »
Nick Shirley SUES California Over ‘Stop Nick Shirley Act’

https://www.dailysignal.com/2026/09/04/nick-shirley-sues-california/

The law arrogates to the State of California the rights to determine: 1. Who is a "real" journalist; 2. What "real" journalists are allowed to investigate and on what they can report. Had Trump tried something like this in 2017 tom squash the Trump-Russia Collusion Delusion, journalists, Dems, and Rs would have roared in protest, rightfully.

Democrats really aren't too fond of this whole transparency thing.
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10