The Conservative Cave

This Says It All: Democrats Block the Release of the Epstein Files

https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2025/11/13/democrats-block-release-of-the-epstein-files-gee-i-wonder-why-n4945944

Democrats just proved they never cared about Jeffrey Epstein transparency. They only care about attacking Donald Trump.

Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.) tried to cut through the political theater Wednesday by bringing a unanimous consent request to the House floor. His goal was simple: release all remaining Epstein files immediately.

Democrats blocked it.

In a video message after leaving the chamber Wednesday afternoon, Burchett explained how his goal was “to get the Epstein files, get it straight to the floor, just to cut out all this nonsense,” but the Democrats weren't having it.

"They blocked it, oddly enough,” he said. “Now here, they’ve had it for four years, and… obviously, if there’s something there about Trump, they would have released it.”

My emphasis.

gab13by13 (30,632 posts)

Krasnov1. Is A Monster

Anyone who raped a woman in a clothing store change room2. and raw dogged a porn star3. did awful things at Epstein's parties.

There were witnesses who saw him rape 2 little girls4..

1. In the real world, this alludes to an unproven claim that Trump is a Russian operative. Also in the real world, while Trump is trying to bring the Russo-Ukainian War to and end, he has been providing military aid to Ukraine and persuaded European allies to do likewise.

2. In the real world, this is nothing more than the unproven claim of a mentally flaky gossip columnist.

3. Is that the porn star who was unable to prove her claim and thereby lost a defamation lawsuit to Trump?

4. What is the source of this claim? Name the witnesses, where and when they claim it happened, and with what supporting evidence.

The Dems have been holding on to and holding back for several years thousands of Epstein emails. They could have released them at any time while Trump was running for President, in support of LIEden and the floundering Kammie, but did not. Now, in the wake of caving on the Schumer Schutdown, they selectively released 3 emails, with a key name - Virginia Giuffre - redacted by the Dems. They redacted her name because she publicly, in print and under oath, stated that she saw and experienced nothing inappropriate by Trump.

The emails that the Dems and MSM are trying to super-hype into a smoking gun prove three things: Trump was acquainted with Epstein; Trump knew, in (IIRC) 2011, of Epstein's sexual predations. As to being acquainted with Epstein, well, Duh-uhhhhhh! So were tens of thousands more people, ranging from building housekeeping staff to multiple billionaire socialites. As to Trump knowing of Epstein's predations, well, Duh-uhhhhhh! Trump banned Epstein from MaL in 2004, told Epsteing that Maxwell was to stop recruiting MaL employees, and Epstein was prosecuted, starting in 2008. So of course Trump knew in 2011 about Epstein, .

Let me try a little true- hypothetical. I was acquainted with a man who adulterated Anacin-3 in stores to conceal his attempt to murder his wife. I eventually learned what he had done. That does not mean I have adulterated OTC meds in stores or tried to murder any member of my family. IOW, that is a super-Grand-Canyon gap between simple acquaintance and knowledge of a crime and actually also committing that crime.

I'll bet the evidence is at least 80-proof.

Didn't Carter get politically eviscerated for telling people to save energy by putting on a sweater?

This feels worse.