81
Breaking News / Re: Worth Knowing, Probably Not Quite Threadworthy 3/05
« Last post by SVPete on March 05, 2026, 11:59:15 AM »A SCOTUS Decision so Unanimous That Justice Jackson Wrote the Majority Opinion
https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2026/03/05/a-scotus-decision-so-unanimous-that-justice-jackson-wrote-the-majority-opinion-n4950277
Confirmed porcine aviator sighting. This defines on what kind of basis a Federal court can overturn immigration law judges' decisions, and the bases are quite narrow. It may take a few Prog district judges getting smacked down before the ACLU and immigrant "rights" orgs give up on this tack.
https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2026/03/05/a-scotus-decision-so-unanimous-that-justice-jackson-wrote-the-majority-opinion-n4950277
Quote
On Wednesday, the Court handed down its ruling in Urias-Orellana v. Bondi. The ruling is a genuine win for the Trump administration and for anyone who believes that immigration law should mean something. And not only was Jackson, Joe Biden’s DEI hire for the Supreme Court, not the sole dissenter; she actually wrote the majority opinion. There aren’t even any concurring opinions.
Jackson held that federal appeals courts must apply a "substantial-evidence standard" when reviewing immigration judges' findings on whether an asylum seeker faces a credible risk of "persecution" if deported. In plain terms, that means a federal court can't simply override an immigration judge's decision because it sees things differently. The judge's finding stands unless the evidence is so overwhelming that no reasonable person could reach the opposite conclusion.QuoteJackson emphasized the high bar courts must meet before overturning an immigration judge’s findings, potentially making it more difficult for migrants to challenge their deportations as the Trump administration cracks down on illegal immigration.
"The agency’s determination… is generally ‘conclusive unless any reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude to the contrary,’" Jackson wrote.
Confirmed porcine aviator sighting. This defines on what kind of basis a Federal court can overturn immigration law judges' decisions, and the bases are quite narrow. It may take a few Prog district judges getting smacked down before the ACLU and immigrant "rights" orgs give up on this tack.
Recent Posts
.