The Conservative Cave

The woke judge who ordered the Trump administration to release the illegal alien father who abandoned his kid to escape justice dated his outrageous order for a calendar day that does not and has never existed in reality.

Democrats built up a massive sob story campaign over Adrian Conejo Arias after sharing sad photos of his five-year-old boy alone and in Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) custody. What neither those propagandists nor Clinton-appointed Judge Fred Biery want you to know is that ICE had to take charge of the child because his criminal father abandoned him and his heartless mother refused to take custody. To crown the whole, Biery’s order is dated February 31. I don’t know about you, but I call that the perfect loophole for the Trump administration to ignore the illegitimate order.

Here are some more opportunities for selective non-enforcement of federal law:

Target has a famous logo protected by US trademark laws. If Target is cool with federal immigration laws not being enforced, I’m cool with allowing any retailer to use Target’s logo without any enforcement of federal trademark laws.

3M is an industrial powerhouse that has prospered from its development of patent-protected products. Perhaps the federal government should “de-escalate” enforcement of 3M’s patents when competitors sell knock-offs?

Red Wing Boots is a market leader in premium-priced work boots. Since its CEO is advocating for federal laws not to be enforced, there is a great opportunity to sell cheap imitation boots with Red Wing branding, and have the federal government stand down in protecting Red Wing’s trademark.

US Bank relies on the federal government to enforce laws that protect banks from criminal fraud. Enforcing these laws requires federal manpower and taxpayer money. Since US Bank’s CEO is advocating for the federal government not to enforce immigration laws, perhaps we can extend the same courtesy and have US Bank exempted from federal protections against bank fraud.

If Best Buy’s CEO is going to advocate for the non-enforcement of federal law, I might in turn advocate that any electronics retailer be allowed to put up a sign identifying their store as a Best Buy.

General Mills sells Cheerios, among other cereals, and other well-known consumer products such as Pillsbury and Betty Crocker, which are all protected by trademark law. It seems to me that by signing the letter requesting that immigration law not be enforced, General Mills’ CEO is also announcing that federal laws protecting its trademarks can be ignored too. Selling generic oat cereal as authentic Cheerios sounds like a good business opportunity.

PCIntern (28,068 posts)

I am good and *******ed sick and tired of reading or hearing the following clause:

“Today, President Trump said…”

Since what he says or doesn’t say is either a bald-faced lie or fronto-temporal-influenced gabble -degook, what the actual **** does it really matter at all whatsoever what he said?

It reminds me of the time just prior to the Gulf War when all the news outlets would “report”: “Today, Saddam Hussein said…”

Yes, I am well aware that reportage must needs include the quotation, but isn’t it “something” that our press does not add the proviso “let it be stated for the record that this President has told tens of thousands of lies and gross exaggerations, so it might be prudent to take today’s statement with the proverbial grain of salt until it can be verified.” Or better, “ Our staff has thoroughly researched the validity of this statement and found it to be, as many of his pronouncements are, false in many (all) respects.”

But no. Even though this sociopathic ephedrophile has never knowingly told the truth in his lifetime, it is reported as a fact upon initial presentation, and since we have a torrent/firehose of lies, no amount of evidence to the contrary can possibly make up for the initial statement/lie/untruth/prevarication/bullshit. I had a member of my former family of acquisition who considered himself very bright and informed who bought into this nonsense and was exasperated by sane individuals’ contradictions. Very stupid and frustrating. And moronic. And worthy of gnashing of teeth.

But my favorite thing on the news shows is when they’re interviewing a Democrat and ask him or her “Well, the President said such and such.” and the Democrat responds to the lie with the Truth, the interviewer then says dismissively , “Well, we are going to have to leave it there.” And so without discussion, the topic and victory go to the President/Liar. Now when a Republican is interviewed and asked about a Democrat, he or she is given full rein to blather on and on and ascribe not only the “evil motive” to this Democrat, but every ill in the USAand around the world is the fault of the Dem and of course, the Party at-large. **** these assholes.

Rant complete.

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100220988349