Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10
81
The more videos that come out, the worse this looks for the woman.

These people are like children. Once you tell them you’re going to give them to the count of 3, they continue doing what they are. Up to the point of getting the consequence, then they want to cry foul.

I’m not far from loading up and joining a group of counter protestors who use the same rules the liberals do. They won’t like the outcome.

The more of this that happens, the more people will learn what “peacefully protest” means. They’ve been pushing the envelope and now they’re learning.

KC
82
The DUmpster / Re: Even if we remove him,
« Last post by RonE on January 08, 2026, 11:49:36 AM »
Quote
Blues Heron (8,372 posts)
2. Vance doesn't have the evil mojo Trump has, he's more like a pipsqueak.

"pipsqueak"? Didn't I see a video of Vance training with the Rangers, or the Seals? neither place is known for "pipsqueaks"
83
Breaking News / Re: Worth Knowing, Probably Not Quite Threadworthy 1/8
« Last post by SVPete on January 08, 2026, 11:43:17 AM »
Will Walz Get His War?

https://hotair.com/david-strom/2026/01/08/will-walz-get-his-war-n3810622

Quote
Yesterday, Tim Walz declared that he was at "war" with the federal government and called out the National Guard to defend Minnesotans against "rogue" federal agents. As Ed wrote earlier today, Walz appears to be regretting saying that he wants a violent confrontation with Trump quite so openly, of course, but it's pretty clear that is is what he wants.

Well, the troops aren't out on the streets yet, but as the rhetoric ramps up across the country, the leftist agitators are already attacking federal officers, and the sun has barely risen here in the not-quite-arctic north.

Radical politicians like Tim Walz and Peggy Flanagan, our Lieutenant Governor and Democratic Party candidate for Senate, have been calling for confrontations with ICE, and their followers have been dutifully following their advice.

The basic idea being pushed by Democrats is that they get the equivalent of a "heckler's veto" on law enforcement. As long as they choose to impede law enforcement for whatever reason, they get to veto any law.

Dem pols have been inciting violence against Federal law enforcement, real incitement of insurrection.
84
Breaking News / Re: Worth Knowing, Probably Not Quite Threadworthy 1/8
« Last post by SVPete on January 08, 2026, 11:42:43 AM »
Israel, Syria agree to share intelligence, seek military de-escalation after Paris talks

https://www.france24.com/en/middle-east/20260106-israel-syria-intelligence-military-de-escalation-paris

Quote
Syria's new government and Israel will set up a joint group under US supervision to share intelligence and seek military de-escalation on the ground, they announced Tuesday after talks.

The Syrian foreign minister traveled to Paris in his country's first known meeting in months with Israel, which has pounded its historic adversary despite US unease over the pressure on the fragile government.

A joint statement issued by the US State Department after the talks in the French capital said that Syria and Israel were committed to "achieving lasting security and stability arrangements for both countries".

"Both sides have decided to establish a joint fusion mechanism – a dedicated communication cell – to facilitate immediate and ongoing coordination on their intelligence sharing, military de-escalation, diplomatic engagement and commercial opportunities under the supervision of the United States," the statement said.
85
NBC News Analysis Destroys the Left’s Narrative on the ICE Shooting

https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2026/01/08/nbc-news-just-destroyed-the-lefts-narrative-on-the-ice-shooting-n4948037

Quote
But NBC News did something unexpected.

The network aired a frame-by-frame breakdown of surveillance video that actually showed what happened.

The conclusion vindicated the ICE agent.
NBC correspondent Tom Winter walked viewers through the footage in real time. He showed the angle where the ICE agent is clearly visible, struck by the vehicle Good was driving. Winter's initial on-air description focused on what the video actually showed rather than on partisan rhetoric.

NBC News correspondent Tom Llamas noted that authorities had already made one key point clear. “Stuff we’re learning from the get-go, again, the police chief saying this vehicle was blocking the federal agents right there,” Llamas said.

Winter then revealed a key point. “We don’t know what happened before this, but they’re definitely gonna look at the fact this is an unmarked vehicle, but the lights are on, these are clearly members of law enforcement, so that’s at least known to this driver,” he explained.

As the footage played, Llamas pointed out that agents moved directly toward the vehicle and attempted to make contact. “Let’s play the video, because something else happens right here. Those officers approach the vehicle, they try to open the door,” he said.
...
Moments later, the situation turned deadly. “And then, of course, what the driver does next — let’s play that video — trying to leave there. One of the officers felt like they were forced to fire, and they do,” Llamas said as the footage showed the vehicle moving.

A reverse angle made the danger even clearer. After freezing the frame, Llamas asked what investigators would take from it. Winter’s answer highlighted the core self-defense issue. “Well, this appears to show an officer right in front of the vehicle. That, and between the way that the vehicle was moving and the timeline of that, how was the officer responding in that split second gonna be critical for investigators,” he said.

Walz's shamvestigation will, like many Karens, find the numerous security and bystander videos, ummmmm, inconvenient to Walz's desired/ordered conclusion. As would any sham-prosecution, if the Prog stupidity got that hysterical.
86
Breaking News / Re: Worth Knowing, Probably Not Quite Threadworthy 1/8
« Last post by SVPete on January 08, 2026, 11:01:08 AM »
FireAid Funneled Cash to Podcasters, Illegals and Fungus Planting

https://www.hollywoodintoto.com/fireaid-money-podcasters-fungus/

Quote
“Top Gun: Maverick” actor Miles Teller shared an emotional promise during last year’s FireAid benefit concert.

“All of the money raised will go directly to people who need it now.”

Early reports suggested that was hardly the case. Last September, The New York Post revealed that of the $100 million raised by musicians such as Joni Mitchell, Lady Gaga, John Mayer, Billie Joe Armstrong and more, some of the funds went to nonprofits with very little connection to fire safety or reparations.

Think:

* The Buddhist Tzu Chi Foundation
* Podcasters discussing the wildfires
* Sanitizing pre-schools
* NAACP Pasadena
* My Tribe Rise
* The CA Native Vote Project
* The Los Angeles Black Worker Center

Now, Rep. Jim Jordan has released a scathing update on the FireAid money matterLink.

There's a special level in the Inferno for betrayers of trust like this.
87
Homan: I Won't Make a Judgment Call Before the Investigation – And Why Would Anyone Else?

https://hotair.com/ed-morrissey/2026/01/08/homan-i-wont-make-a-judgment-call-before-the-investigation-and-why-would-anyone-else-n3810621

Quote
In the midst of a rhetorical war that nearly turned into a street war, where all sides seem intent on escalating tension and jumping to conclusions, Homan reminded everyone of the proper way to deal with use-of-force events. Newly minted CBS News anchor Tony Dokupil sat down with Homan just a few hours after the fatal shooting during an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operation, and pressed the border czar to offer his conclusions.

Homan refused, and expressed frustration that public officials on both sides had already jumped into that fray. "The investigation has just started," Homan said, and then insisted that he would not reach any conclusion on the justification for the shooting until he's seen all of the evidence. "It would be unprofessional to comment on what I think happened in that situation," Homan explained. "What good would it do for me to prejudge the facts of what happened today?" Homan asked.

Q/ What do you call an "investigation" when the officials organizing it have proclaimed a conclusion?

A/ A shamvestigation!
88
Well she was according to the lib-tards employed as a professional "legal observer" which apparently entitles her to run over ICE officers, who are empowered by laws passed by Congress.

Get over yourself.

new one for me as well, so I had to ask dumbass google AI what was a "legal observer":

Quote
AI Overview
A legal observer is a neutral, third-party volunteer who attends public demonstrations, protests, and other events to monitor and document interactions between law enforcement and the public. Their primary goal is to protect the constitutional rights of demonstrators by providing an objective, credible account of events that can be used as evidence in potential legal cases.

Key Roles and Responsibilities
Documenting Law Enforcement Activity: Legal observers meticulously record the actions of police or other government agents (such as ICE). This includes documenting arrests, use of force, intimidating displays of force, and any behavior that might restrict the demonstrators' First Amendment rights. They often use notes, photos, and video recordings to capture details like badge numbers, officer names, and the context leading up to an incident.

Maintaining Neutrality: Observers are strictly neutral and do not participate in the protest, chant, carry signs, or give legal advice on the ground. They separate themselves from the crowd to maintain credibility as witnesses.

Deterrence and Accountability: The visible presence of legal observers (often wearing distinct vests or hats, such as the National Lawyers Guild's neon green hats) can act as a deterrent to unconstitutional or improper behavior by law enforcement.
Legal Support Coordination: Information gathered by observers is relayed to a broader legal support system, which may include volunteer attorneys and jail support teams, to aid those who are arrested.

Program Management
The most well-known program for training and deploying legal observers is the National Lawyers Guild's (NLG) Legal Observer® Program, established in 1968. Other organizations, such as the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), also train volunteers for this role.

While some chapters require observers to be legal professionals (lawyers, law students, or legal workers), many general programs are open to anyone willing to be trained and commit to the role. The training focuses on proper documentation techniques, understanding their role as a neutral party, and knowing what to do if they are instructed to disperse.
Distinction from "Copwatching"

Legal observing is distinct from "copwatching," an earlier practice started by groups like the Black Panther Party, which typically involves general citizen patrols monitoring police activity in everyday situations. Legal observing is specifically focused on providing support and documentation within the context of organized protests and demonstrations, often linking activists to a larger legal defense infrastructure.
Recent Relevance
The role has gained prominence during mass movements, including the George Floyd protests in 2020 and, as of current events (January 2026), ongoing operations and related incidents involving federal immigration agents (ICE) in cities like Minneapolis.

TL;DR blah blah blah, she wasn't one. More like:



dummies ALWAYS side with the criminal. always
89
The DUmpster / Re: Even if we remove him,
« Last post by Tess Anderson on January 08, 2026, 10:43:57 AM »
feeling hopeless, Mary Beth "fat rolls" Royce? Well, you're right for once, it is hopeless for you. And dumbass "Blue Heron", JD Vance would be much worse - Trump is an open book, Vance isn't.
90
The DUmpster / Re: Even if we remove him,
« Last post by DefiantSix on January 08, 2026, 10:32:34 AM »
Brace yourselves, DUmp'Rats. Life has only begun to **** with you...

Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10