Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10
81
ABC Reporter Fabricated Trump Call, Made Himself The Focus After Assassination Attempt
https://modernity.news/2026/05/06/abc-reporter-fabricated-trump-call-made-himself-the-focus-after-assassination-attempt/

Quote
President Trump has slammed ABC News chief Washington correspondent Jonathan Karl for what he calls outright dishonest reporting after Karl inserted himself into the story of the latest assassination attempt on the president.

Karl appeared on ABC’s This Week shortly afterward and claimed Trump had reached out to him personally. “My phone rang shortly after 7 a.m., my landline, George actually. A number that few people call and it was President Trump calling,” Karl told host George Stephanopoulos.

Karl further claimed that Trump “said at first he was calling to see if I was okay with what happened last night. ‘Are you OK?’ And then he reiterated many of the things he said in his press conference last night emphasizing the unity that he felt in that moment that he felt at the dinner before the shooting and certainly after with people who reached out to him… And he was quite firm about this: That dinner must be rescheduled.”

Journalists are unethical.
82
Democrat bill would force you to give Big Tech your ID just to use your phone — or the internet
https://www.theblaze.com/return/democrat-bill-would-force-you-to-give-big-tech-your-id-just-to-use-your-phone-or-the-internet

Quote
Politicians are progressively pushing for harsher age verification legislation. Some lawmakers think certain apps should require an ID to sign in, while others want to limit the reach of AI chatbots under the guise of child protection.

Now, a new bill proposed by Democrat Rep. Josh Gottheimer (N.J.) would require operating system developers — including Apple, Google, and Microsoft — to verify the ages of their users when setting up a new device.

The Dems want to make everyone use an ID to sign into phone or Internet. Another word for government control.
83
Breaking News / Re: Worth Knowing, Probably Not Quite Threadworthy 5/10
« Last post by DefiantSix on May 10, 2026, 04:02:56 PM »
Dim'Rats don't have anything constructive to run on.

If anything the Virginia Power Grab was a false start that demonstrates exactly the kind of shit hole government they intend to build when given power again.
It's not as if even most of their own mind numbed 'Boomer voters can be convinced to pull the lever for a one-party totalitarian dick-tastership just because the extreme leftists in their midst have had their power taken away from them for now.
84
The DUmpster / Re: DUmmies and Their Priorities
« Last post by SSG Snuggle Bunny on May 10, 2026, 02:34:50 PM »
He really thinks human anatomy is like LEGO blocks.
85
Breaking News / Worth Knowing, Probably Not Quite Threadworthy 5/10
« Last post by SVPete on May 10, 2026, 02:27:22 PM »
John Fetterman rips Democrats for running campaigns on 'f--- Trump' instead of constructive messaging

https://www.foxnews.com/media/fetterman-rips-democrats-running-campaigns-f-trump-instead-constructive-messaging

Quote
Pennsylvania Sen. John Fetterman broke with fellow Democrats again Friday, criticizing what he called the party’s overreliance on anti-Trump messaging and urging a shift toward a more constructive approach.

"My colleagues, and people that are running, whether for the Senate or the House, they're literally running on f--- Trump," Fetterman said on the latest episode of "Real Time with Bill Maher"

"They have campaign commercials [with that message]. It's absurd..." he added.

"I refuse to engage in those extreme terms, and we have to find a better way forward, and now I've been punished [for] find[ing] value in certain views."

As some have posted here before, Fetterman has shown a surprising amount of sense among Dems' current hysterical craziness. I've said that he's the Dems' Cassandra, telling them truths they refuse to believe.
86
BREAKING: National Democrats Want to Impeach and Replace Entire Virginia Supreme Court

https://hotair.com/david-strom/2026/05/10/national-democrats-want-to-impeach-and-replace-entire-virginia-supreme-court-n3814792

Why is court-packing such a familiar strategy proposal?

Beat me to it.

For all the accusation from Democrats that "Republicans cheat", surely even Democrats will start to wonder "Are we the bad guys?"

Right?

Right??
87
BREAKING: National Democrats Want to Impeach and Replace Entire Virginia Supreme Court

https://hotair.com/david-strom/2026/05/10/national-democrats-want-to-impeach-and-replace-entire-virginia-supreme-court-n3814792

Quote
Democrats, who are openly talking about packing the United States Supreme Court to basically rewrite the Constitution of the United States, are so panicked by their failure to illegally redraw the Congressional map in Virginia that they are, according to The New York Times, contemplating a move to remove the current Supreme Court justices in Virginia with a new, less legally-minded group appointed by Abigail Spanberger.

Ah, norms. You gotta break a few norms and laws in order to make that progressive omelet.

This is not some fever dream cooked up by Alex Jones. The New York Times actually reported that Hakeem Jeffries and company held a panicked phone call discussing measures to override the Virginia Constitution through illegal or legally dubious means.

Why is court-packing such a familiar strategy proposal?
88
The DUmpster / Re: The DUmp is racist - Oreo, Uncle Tom... etc
« Last post by SVPete on May 10, 2026, 12:32:00 PM »
Well, here's the good thing from Thomas that renewed DUmmies hatred for him"

The Race-Obsessed Left Complains When the Supreme Court Issues a Colorblind Ruling

https://hotair.com/larry-elder/2026/05/10/the-race-obsessed-left-complains-when-the-supreme-court-issues-a-colorblind-ruling-n3814758

Quote
Supreme Court Associate Justice Clarence Thomas wrote a concurring opinion, joined by Justice Neil Gorsuch, in the recent case that restricted the use of race in designing a Louisiana congressional district.

Thomas wrote: "This Court should never have interpreted (Section) 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 to effectively give racial groups 'an entitlement to roughly proportional representation.' ... By doing so, the Court led legislatures and courts to 'systematically divid(e) the country into electoral districts along racial lines.' ... 'Blacks (we)re drawn into 'black districts' and given 'black representatives'; Hispanics (we)re drawn into Hispanic districts and given 'Hispanic representatives'; and so on. That interpretation rendered (Section) 2 'repugnant to any nation that strives for the ideal of a color-blind Constitution.' ... Today's decision should largely put an end to this 'disastrous misadventure' in voting-rights jurisprudence."

Critics argue the ruling is not colorblind in effect because race-neutral districting can dilute minority voting power. But this assumes a) non-black and non-Hispanic voters would not vote for black or Hispanic candidates; and b) the interests of black and Hispanic voters can only be pursued by black and Hispanic members of Congress.
89
The Race-Obsessed Left Complains When the Supreme Court Issues a Colorblind Ruling

https://hotair.com/larry-elder/2026/05/10/the-race-obsessed-left-complains-when-the-supreme-court-issues-a-colorblind-ruling-n3814758

Quote
Supreme Court Associate Justice Clarence Thomas wrote a concurring opinion, joined by Justice Neil Gorsuch, in the recent case that restricted the use of race in designing a Louisiana congressional district.

Thomas wrote: "This Court should never have interpreted (Section) 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 to effectively give racial groups 'an entitlement to roughly proportional representation.' ... By doing so, the Court led legislatures and courts to 'systematically divid(e) the country into electoral districts along racial lines.' ... 'Blacks (we)re drawn into 'black districts' and given 'black representatives'; Hispanics (we)re drawn into Hispanic districts and given 'Hispanic representatives'; and so on. That interpretation rendered (Section) 2 'repugnant to any nation that strives for the ideal of a color-blind Constitution.' ... Today's decision should largely put an end to this 'disastrous misadventure' in voting-rights jurisprudence."

Critics argue the ruling is not colorblind in effect because race-neutral districting can dilute minority voting power. But this assumes a) non-black and non-Hispanic voters would not vote for black or Hispanic candidates; and b) the interests of black and Hispanic voters can only be pursued by black and Hispanic members of Congress.
90
The DUmpster / Re: The DUmp is racist - Oreo, Uncle Tom... etc
« Last post by FlippyDoo on May 10, 2026, 11:41:27 AM »
So they hate Jews, Blacks and us, who else is left for them to hate?

I'm pretty sure that "hate" is the programmed default setting on the DU mindless minion automatons.
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10