The Conservative Cave

7. Nationalize his businesses, revoke his citizenship and deport him to South Africa!
Would I or most other Democrats advocate for any such things in 'normal times'?

No... but with Trumpublikan efforts towards cancelling a Democratic congresswoman's
citizenship with the eventual aim of deporting her and possibly others,
Trump and his pet Republicans have "lowered the bar" to the point that
it is at least worthy of discussion!

I stumbled upon a video where a conservative podcaster asked Google about racial preferences in choosing a doctor and received wildly different responses when she asked if it was okay to prefer a white doctor. Rather than take her word for it, I tried it myself to see if I had a similar experience.

I asked Google, “Is it okay to prefer a black doctor?” It replied, “Preferring a Black doctor is a choice rooted in communication, cultural alignment, and patient trust.” Yep, it went there with the capitalization of “black,” too.

Next, I asked, “Is it okay to prefer a Latino doctor?” The reply I received was, “Selecting a doctor who shares your background or speaks your language is a personal choice that many patients make for comfort and communication.”

When I asked, “Is it okay to prefer a white doctor?” I got this response: “Selecting a doctor based on race involves distinct ethical considerations depending on the context. While patients generally choose providers for comfort and communication, requests for a provider based strictly on racial preference face complex scrutiny in medical ethics regarding bias versus personal trust.”

In other words, asking for a minority doctor is understandable, particularly in terms of “cultural alignment” or looking for a doctor who “shares your background or speaks your language.” But ask about a white doctor, and you get a lecture on “ethical considerations” and “bias.”

The Cornell University rape case against seven fraternity members who allegedly raped a 20-year-old woman at a frat party in 2024 took a strange turn on Wednesday when one of the men named in the civil suit filed by the woman known as "Jane Doe" was dropped from the case.

After the plaintiff dragged this young man's name through the social media mud and destroyed his future, it turns out that Orazio Petito, identified as "Chapter President" in the suit, was not serving in that capacity when the alleged rape occurred.
...
It doesn't matter that Petito wasn't accused of sexual assault in the suit. Who will make that distinction in the future? When any prospective employer Googles his name, the story that pops up will display the headline about the alleged rape, not that his name was dropped from the lawsuit.

The suit accuses Petito "of failing Doe by neglecting to shut down the alleged sordid behavior within the fraternity," according to The Daily Wire. Was it Petito's responsibility to police the sexual behavior of the entire fraternity? Perhaps he should have installed cameras in the bedrooms and embedded GPS trackers in the men's arms.

Ex-Dem Candidate Allegedly Threatened to Cut ‘Heads Off’ Dems Who Don’t Back Angie Nixon

Former Democratic Congressional candidate Elijah Manley was arrested on Friday for allegedly posting death threats on Facebook against his colleagues who do not support far-left Florida Democratic Senate nominee Angie Nixon. Manley, 27, was charged with two counts of making written or electronic threats to kill or injure, both felonies.