Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 10
51
Caitlin Clark Goes Ballistic on Refs After Getting Kneed in the Quad on ANOTHER Dirty Play

https://sportsnaut.com/wnba/caitlin-clark-goes-ballistic-on-refs-after-getting-kneed-in-the-quad-on-another-dirty-play

I disagree with the last sentence I quoted. Clark and the fever have done what the author advised for nearly 3 seasons of hrossly obvious no-calls and infractions being minimized. Calling out the refs on-court has become necessary. I don't follow the WNBA, but the league seems to be playing along with the quasi organized cabal of brutalizing Clark for being white, straight, and successful. That she has been a huge part of attendance and TV audience surges exacerbates the hatred. They are forcing on her the dilemma of risking serious injury every time she steps on the court or leaving the career she has built for two decades and dearly loves. With either outcome, the bigots will find their victory Pyrrhic. Either way, the WNBA will recede back into semi-obscurity.

Of course, my opinion and a tenner will get you a latte and change at a Dutch Bros.

I hope she leaves the NBA heavily subsidized WNBA, or BLBA (Black Lesbian Basketball Association) for Europe, where she would be better appreciated and well-compensated. For full disclosure, Caitlin went to the same high school as my late father, although when my Dad attended the boys went to one school and the girls (my two aunts included) attended St. Joseph's Academy, but they were all part of the same school.

While I do like women's college basketball at least a little bit, although it pales in comparison to the men's NCAA hoops, the WNBA and NBA are on my must ignore list. The NBA was at least entertaining through the in the Jordan/Bird/Magic era, and for maybe a decade afterwards. Now it just advanced thuggery, and that isn't racist because the white European players and American players are just as guilty of such thuggery.
52
Breaking News / Re: Worth Knowing, Probably Not Quite Threadworthy 7/17
« Last post by SVPete on July 17, 2026, 05:11:20 PM »
Veteran Dem breaks party line as Jack Smith spying scandal grips Capitol Hill

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/veteran-dem-breaks-party-line-jack-smith-spying-scandal-grips-capitol-hill

Quote
Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., told Fox News Digital his Republican colleagues are right to be troubled that the Justice Department spied on lawmakers to aid former special counsel Jack Smith’s investigations.

"I think we need to have more facts. Look into it. Republicans are rightly concerned about the possible breach of norms and improper access to email," Blumenthal told Fox News Digital Wednesday.

The GOP-led Senate Judiciary Committee released a trove of documents Tuesday showing that Smith’s investigation into President Donald Trump included the Department of Justice collecting text messages between 44 members of Congress, among them Republicans and Democrats, and White House staff.

Most Dems are Sergeant Schultzing.
53
Breaking News / Re: Worth Knowing, Probably Not Quite Threadworthy 7/17
« Last post by SVPete on July 17, 2026, 04:44:18 PM »
DHS Finds 278,000 Noncitizens on Voter Rolls, White House Says

https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/dhs-finds-278000-noncitizens-on-voter-rolls-white-house-says-6063317

Quote
A review by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has found that about 278,000 noncitizens were illegally registered to vote in U.S. federal elections, according to the White House.

The findings resulted from a DHS review of state voter rolls and public records. The White House said the actual number could be higher because some states did not share their voter files with the federal agency.

In his presidential address on July 16, President Donald Trump said he had ordered DHS “to notify every state about noncitizens on their voter rolls and direct them to remove all ineligible voters from the lists immediately.”
...
DHS said in a one-page document released by the White House that more than 250,000 noncitizens were registered to vote in four states—California, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Nevada—citing its review of public data files.

The document also shows that more than 400,000 voters were listed as deceased in 10 states—Georgia, Ohio, Tennessee, Texas, North Carolina, Idaho, Alabama, Missouri, Louisiana, and Kansas—which the agency identified as “proactive SAVE user states.”
54
Breaking News / Re: Worth Knowing, Probably Not Quite Threadworthy 7/17
« Last post by SVPete on July 17, 2026, 04:32:33 PM »
Trump admin fires new Seattle US attorney Roger Rogoff minutes after his swearing-in

https://nypost.com/2026/07/16/us-news/trump-admin-fires-new-seattle-us-attorney-roger-rogoff-minutes-after-his-swearing-in/

Quote
The Trump Justice Department dismissed the newly appointed US attorney for western Washington state less than an hour after he was sworn in, setting up yet another legal battle over the president’s appointment powers.

Roger Rogoff, a former King County judge and veteran state and federal prosecutor, was sworn in Wednesday morning at the federal courthouse in downtown Seattle after he was unanimously appointed by the district’s 17 federal judges.

Rogoff told the Associated Press in a phone interview that he then went to the federal prosecutor’s office to request a meeting with first assistant US Attorney Charles Neil Floyd, a former immigration judge who had served as interim US attorney for a 120-day period that ended in February.

While waiting to meet with Floyd, Rogoff said, he received an email informing him of his removal by President Trump.

“District court judges can appoint a temporary U.S. Attorney, and POTUS can fire them,” acting Attorney General Todd Blanche posted on X Wednesday evening. “WDWA judges abandoned the time-honored process of consultation with the administration so that the selected U.S. Attorney is qualified to serve in the administration. Roger Rogoff has been fired by the President.”

Per US statute, the President is the one with the authority to appoint US Attorneys. These judges are trying to usurp that statutory authority, because Trump.
55
Caitlin Clark Goes Ballistic on Refs After Getting Kneed in the Quad on ANOTHER Dirty Play

https://sportsnaut.com/wnba/caitlin-clark-goes-ballistic-on-refs-after-getting-kneed-in-the-quad-on-another-dirty-play

Quote
Caitlin Clark went absolutely off on officials following a painful no-call that left her dealing with a quad contusion during the Indiana Fever’s loss to the Golden State Valkyries on Wednesday night.

The WNBA superstar was visibly frustrated after getting kneed in the leg by Golden State veteran Kiah Stokes. Clark had to briefly limp off to the locker room but returned to finish the game, posting 13 points and six assists while clearly playing through pain.

“I got kneed right in the quad, that hurts, the ref can’t miss that,” she told reporters. “And then I have to play with a contusion in my leg for the rest of the game. Ridiculous, you can’t miss calls like that.”

Clark Confronts an Official on the Floor
That clip of Clark yelling straight into the ref’s face blew up instantly online. It turned into the usual online food fight. A lot of fans cheered her on for finally calling out the lack of protection, especially with how often she’s on the receiving end of extra contact. Others slammed her for making a scene and acting too emotional about it.

To be fair, Clark’s reaction was a bit over the top this time. The no-call was wrong. But the tantrum-throwing was a bit much. Complain about it after the game and take your fine.

I disagree with the last sentence I quoted. Clark and the fever have done what the author advised for nearly 3 seasons of hrossly obvious no-calls and infractions being minimized. Calling out the refs on-court has become necessary. I don't follow the WNBA, but the league seems to be playing along with the quasi organized cabal of brutalizing Clark for being white, straight, and successful. That she has been a huge part of attendance and TV audience surges exacerbates the hatred. They are forcing on her the dilemma of risking serious injury every time she steps on the court or leaving the career she has built for two decades and dearly loves. With either outcome, the bigots will find their victory Pyrrhic. Either way, the WNBA will recede back into semi-obscurity.

Of course, my opinion and a tenner will get you a latte and change at a Dutch Bros.
56
The DUmpster / Re: CBS just cut him off
« Last post by Ralph Wiggum on July 17, 2026, 03:25:48 PM »
The MSM and dems don't want to hear what he has to say, so by ignoring it they think it's not happening! :thatsright:
 :ohnoes:

Check out this related thread I just created:

https://conservativecave.com/cave/index.php?topic=139132.0
57
There’s More Proof of Election Fraud Than Global Warming, Israeli Genocide, and Socialism Working

For about a decade, I did PR consulting work for one of the leading fintech companies. I wrote and disseminated dozens of press releases touting its fraud stats. These stats were impressive, too — impressive enough to generate widespread media coverage (which was kinda-sorta the point).

It was all made up.

Not in a malicious way. To my knowledge, nothing was illegal or unethical. But the God’s honest truth is, nobody knows the true rate of fraud, because you can’t always quantify successful crimes. (Especially cybercrimes, which include theft, hacking, credit card misuse, and data breaches.)

So, we guestimate.

Almost all fraud stats are works of fiction — or more accurately, works of art: We’re painting a picture “inspired” by the data — plus certain (self-serving) assumptions, guesses, extrapolations, and biases.

If you’re gonna accuse me of cherry-picking data points and “artistically” creating statistics that benefited my client, well, you’re exactly right!

Everyone has biases. If you’re a fintech company, you’re incentivized to instill urgency for your services. It’s usually a straightforward calculation: The bigger you claim your fraud category is, the more valuable your fintech services are.

“Follow the money.”

But at least I’m being upfront about my bias. The mainstream media, however, is not.

The network TV giants, the New York Times, CNN, and others are still claiming to be fair, impartial, and right down the middle. We see this conceit in the New York Times’ original mission statement from 1896: “To give the news impartially, without fear or favor, regardless of any party, sect, or interest involved.”

Which is why it’s so awfully revealing to examine which stats the media elites accept at face value — and which stats they refuse to accept at all.

Take, for instance, President Donald Trump’s speech last night on voter fraud:

New York Times: Trump Exaggerates Claims About Election Vulnerabilities in Speech

The New Republic: Declassified Docs Expose Trump’s Made-Up Election Fraud Claims

USA Today: Trump’s Chinese Election Meddling Claims Face Skepticism

The Hill: Democrats Call ‘Bulls---’ on Trump’s Election Interference Claims

Washington Post: Trump’s Speech Stops Short of Offering Evidence of Vote Tampering

New York Times: Multiple Investigations Refuted Trump’s Claim That Fraud Altered the Outcome in 2020

Salt Lake Tribune: Trump Makes Outlandish Claims About Election Results in Address

Los Angeles Times: Trump Repeats Debunked Claims About Voting Vulnerabilities in Prime-Time Speech

Irish Star: CNN Host Brands Donald Trump ‘Delusional’ As He ‘Spews a Bunch of Lies’ in Election Rant

CBS News: In Primetime Speech, Trump Revisits Disputed Claims About Election Security and Declassifies Documents

New York Times: Warnock and Ossoff, Georgia’s Senators, Ridicule Trump’s Election Fraud Claims

The Atlantic: Trump Just Did More Damage to American Elections Than China

The Free Press: The President Who Cried ‘Election Fraud’

The Hill: Senate Democrat Calls for Trump Impeachment After Election Claims

USA Today: Trump Overstates Election Weakness in Primetime Speech: 5 Takeaways

New York Times: Trump’s Obsession With Relitigating the 2020 Election Carries a Cost for Democracy

The mainstream media messaging was undeniable: Trump is exaggerating how bad the problem is! We demand more truth! We demand more evidence! Why, these unsubstantiated, unproven claims are doing more harm than good!

Fine. If media outlets want to demand strict scrutiny of sociopolitical claims, that’s entirely their prerogative.

In fact, good for them. We could use more skepticism in the media.

But why does the mainstream media have the EXACT OPPOSITE standard when it comes to covering global warming, allegations of Israel committing genocide, and the theory that socialism leads to prosperity?

More at link:

https://pjmedia.com/scott-pinsker/2026/07/17/theres-more-proof-of-election-fraud-than-global-warming-israeli-genocide-and-socialism-working-n4955159

I really like this comparison because it is so spot on.
58
The DUmpster / Re: CBS just cut him off
« Last post by Old n Grumpy on July 17, 2026, 03:23:06 PM »
The MSM and dems don't want to hear what he has to say, so by ignoring it they think it's not happening! :thatsright:
 :ohnoes:
59
The DUmpster / Re: CBS just cut him off
« Last post by Old n Grumpy on July 17, 2026, 03:19:01 PM »
They are definitely fact checking him!!

60
Breaking News / Re: Worth Knowing, Probably Not Quite Threadworthy 7/17
« Last post by ADsOutburst on July 17, 2026, 12:55:46 PM »
House Dem: Leftists' Threats Intimidated Me Into Voting Against Israel

In case anyone wonders whether the violence on the Left can be considered "fringe" or overblown, as some suggested after Marco Rubio's address yesterday, this offers a moment of clarification. Not only have leftist violence and threats ramped up significantly over the last three years since Hamas' October 7 massacres, but it has also already had an impact on the legislative process. And that admission comes from a leading House Democrat, not Republicans or conservative commentators.

Thomas Massie forced a vote to defund aid and defense sales to Israel this week, in a dumb stunt that ended up damaging Hakeem Jeffries and Democrat leadership far more than it threatened Israel. The caucus split down the middle while Republicans ignored Massie, and the bill failed by a wide margin. However, the top Democrat on the Armed Services Committee put out a statement after he voted with Massie that insinuated he did so out of fear of violent leftists and their threats against his family. Jewish Insider picked it up, and Power Line flagged it immediately:

This would be quite an accusation, and one that should get the attention of anti-terrorist investigators at the FBI and Department of Justice. Smith's full statement offered a weaselly and more ambiguous approach around the direct quotes picked out by JI's Matthew Shea, but it's clear that Shea read between the lines pretty accurately:

This is a very strange concatenation of excuses from Smith. He seems to understand that voting to cut off aid to Israel will be unpopular outside of the fever-swamp radical Hamasniks on the Left, so Smith offers a smorgasbord of excuses for his gutless alignment against an ally thrown into a war by two Iranian-backed terrorist networks. It's Benjamin Netanyahu's fault! No, wait, it's Smotrich's and Ben Gvir's fault! No, wait, it's the fault of "U.S. supporters of Israel"! No, wait, it's violent leftists and their threats against my family!

The words get even weaselier when attempting to explain why he's blaming Israel for fighting a war that Hamas and Hezbollah have waged against them for decades. "I understand that Israel has to confront threats to their existences and cannot let them go unchecked," Smith declares. "But Israel does not have to fight the way they have chosen to do so – a way that has caused enormous suffering and led to endless war." Well, whose fault is the "endless war"? The US and the West keep forcing Israel into ceasefires with Hamas and Hezbollah with which neither group will comply, and which have resulted in continuing attacks, especially from Gaza. The main component of US aid to Israel is for Iron Dome anti-missile defense systems, an enormous expense that exists because Israel has tolerated Iranian proxies' continuous attacks on Israeli civilian populations to forego fighting an actual war.

How did that get repaid? By October 7 and the following explosion of Jew-hatred from the Left, and on the fringes of the Right where Massie belongs. Israel has tried the incremental approach for 20 years with Hamas and over 40 with Hezbollah in Lebanon, and the result was the single greatest single-day loss of Jewish lives since the Holocaust. And in response to that, Smith voted to cut off funding for their defensive systems that has kept Israelis alive and willing to work for peace.

Nevertheless, I tend to credit Smith in his intimidation by radical leftists issuing threats to impose their will on Democrats first, and then the US as a whole later. Smith does not appear to have a plethora of intestinal fortitude, as evidenced by his post-vote statement. The DoJ needs to investigate these threats, and the funding behind them, as part of the new program announced by Secretary of State Rubio this week to demolish the structures that promote and organize the violent Left.

https://hotair.com/ed-morrissey/2026/07/17/house-dem-leftists-intimidated-me-into-voting-against-israel-n3817059

The anti-Jewish coalition of the left is getting really f*cking dangerous, and they're spreading like monkeypox.

It occurred to me that this is a sneaky way leftists avoid having their activities show up in crime statistics. They're often able to extract what they want without actually needing to act on their threats.
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 10