Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 10
51
General Discussion / Re: Royal Navy Submarine Legacy’s Sad Deathbed
« Last post by DefiantSix on October 21, 2026, 02:34:50 PM »
You know what's really frightening about this?

The UK is a country whose ENTIRE nuclear deterrent is aboard their submarine force.
52
The DUmpster / Re: Noncitizens do not vote. A total lie.
« Last post by SSG Snuggle Bunny on October 21, 2026, 02:23:17 PM »
Source: Trust me, bro.
53
The DUmpster / Re: Noncitizens do not vote. A total lie.
« Last post by ADsOutburst on October 21, 2026, 02:04:13 PM »
I see. Because something is illegal, that apparently means it must not be happening?
54
The DUmpster / Noncitizens do not vote. A total lie.
« Last post by CC27 on October 21, 2026, 01:39:32 PM »
Quote
Botany (79,465 posts)



To vote you have to be a registered voter and to be a registered voter you have to be a U.S. Citizen.

Btw I have 20 + years in election protection work.

Lying means nothing to these unAmerican shits.

https://democraticunderground.com/100221575785


COUGH COUGH BS. Election protection work? You made that up.
55
Politics / A Pollster Just Admitted Faking Its Numbers, and The Fallout Is Huge!
« Last post by SVPete on October 21, 2026, 12:41:49 PM »
A Pollster Just Admitted Faking Its Numbers, and The Fallout Is Huge!

https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2026/10/21/a-pollster-just-admitted-faking-its-numbers-and-the-fallout-is-huge-n4958532

Quote
A polling firm that spent months pumping out numbers in key races across the country admitted Tuesday evening that nearly all of them were fake.
...
In its statement, Wedgewood cast itself as a kind of whistleblower. "Having previously worked in the polling and research sector, we watched as the public's trust in polling eroded alongside a rise in unverified, low-quality methodology," the firm said.

It then described what it claimed was the project’s goal. "We wanted to test a simple hypothesis: How easy is it for an entirely fabricated polling firm to gain traction, be taken seriously, and expose how little scrutinization exists in media and public commentary? The short answer: Far too easy."

The statement also turned to the aggregators that published its work. "Despite having no history, formal credentials, or real data behind the vast majority of our releases, Wedgewood Polling was added to major polling aggregators, including The New York Times, FiftyPlusOne, and VoteHub, and repeatedly treated as a legitimate data source," Wedgewood claimed.

Next, the firm addressed the press. "Our fabricated numbers were given instant credibility across national media platforms-including being cited on air and in reporting by outlets such as MS NOW," it added. "The ease with which unverified figures were absorbed into mainstream political narratives highlights a systemic breakdown in media vetting and data aggregation."

Implied but not stated in the article, Wedgewood's fauxny numbers were probably very favorable to the Dems. This would explain MSM credulity. Had the numbers favored Rs, the MSM would have split between ignoring and fact-checking the numbers. The next-level thought-question would be whether other "real" pollsters skewed their numbers to increase consistency with Wedgewood's (or their numbers were already just as skewed/fauxny).
56
LA election officials admit no independent way to verify voter citizenship

https://nypost.com/2026/10/20/us-news/socal-election-safeguards-questioned-over-voter-citizenship-verification/

Quote
Los Angeles election officials have no independent way to verify whether voters are US citizens beyond taking their word for it, according to the city’s top federal prosecutor.

Bill Essayli, First Assistant US Attorney for the Central District of California, blasted the state over the gap in its election safeguards, warning that eligible Americans’ votes “are being diluted” while officials refuse to set aside ballots flagged by federal authorities.

“Los Angeles election officials just told a federal court they have no independent way to verify citizenship beyond what voters attest. (They simply take their word for it.),” Essayli wrote in a post on X, sharing highlighted text from the Justice Department’s lawsuit against California over suspected noncitizens on its voter rolls.

“Under federal law, only citizens may vote in federal elections. Yet California has not acted on the list of 20,000 suspected noncitizens or agreed to set aside their ballots. American citizens’ votes are being diluted in California.”

"No way to verify," means the offocials did not care to try ... unsurprisingly.
57
Breaking News / Worth Knowing, Probably Not Quite Threadworthy 10/21
« Last post by SVPete on October 21, 2026, 12:39:28 PM »
Judge Trump called a ‘lunatic’ abruptly backs off demand after showdown with DOJ No. 3

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/judge-trump-called-lunatic-abruptly-backs-off-demand-showdown-doj-3

Quote
A Biden-appointed judge embroiled in a fierce dispute with the Trump administration over the removal of hundreds of trees at a federally owned D. C. golf course reversed course during Monday's nearly seven-hour hearing.

Judge Ana Reyes ended the nearly seven-hour hearing by backing away from her initial demand that Justice Department attorneys arguing the case put their names alongside Associate Attorney General Stanley Woodward Jr.’s Sunday filing. Reyes had invoked Rule 11, which requires attorneys to stand behind the factual basis of court filings and can subject them to sanctions for violations.
...
The about-face from Reyes, who hours before the hearing was dubbed a "crazed lunatic" by President Donald Trump on Truth Social, is the latest development in a court battle over Trump's plans to completely renovate East Potomac Golf Links into a "world-class, U.S. Open-caliber course." The lawsuit, which was first filed in February, reached a boiling point earlier this month when the National Park Service removed roughly 430 trees at the golf course over a weekend. The Interior Department said the tree removals were part of a years-old plan to restore the course’s historic design and were unrelated to Trump’s proposed overhaul.

Though the action did not violate a court order, it prompted Reyes to impose a temporary restraining order barring further tree removals. She also was described as "screaming" at the administration attorneys during an Oct. 12 hearing.

The phrase, "... part of a years-old plan ...," refers to a plan dating to the OhBummer! MalAdministration.
58
General Discussion / Royal Navy Submarine Legacy’s Sad Deathbed
« Last post by SVPete on October 21, 2026, 12:35:39 PM »
Royal Navy Submarine Legacy’s Sad Deathbed

https://cdrsalamander.substack.com/p/royal-navy-submarine-legacys-sad

Quote
Some posts are just sad to write, but they are often the ones you need to write. It is no fun watching a friend intentionally and deliberately destroy themselves for no reason. I guess it is time to pick up the conversation we had back in March and June.

When I first saw this, I thought, ‘This is reporting from The Sun. Just tabloid trash.’

Quote
Not a single submarine commander passed the legendary Perisher course last year.
…
Only three were selected to attempt it, with two failing at the simulator stage.

Surface ships fared little better with less than ten officers passing the command qualification known as CQ2.

The Navy needs 35 passes a year to sustain its sea commands.

Sources say the only reason the shortage has not affected operations is because so many ships have been scrapped or stuck in port for repairs.

Quote
Senior naval sources told Defence Eye that the Royal Navy has not run a Submarine Command Course, which qualifies officers to take command of its submarines, since December 2024.
...
For the past two years, the Royal Navy Astute-class fleet has been hit by a series of breakdowns and a long maintenance backlog. This year alone, it has only been able to put one boat, HMS Anson, to sea for a four month-long cruise to Australia. Since she returned to Devonport naval base for repairs in May no Astute boats have been recorded as going to sea.

With no boats available for operational tasking, it is not a surprise that training has had to be put on the back burner by the Royal Navy. The naval source briefed Defence Eye on the status of the Perisher Course in response to criticism from Australia, that the UK was unable to generate trained personnel to operate its submarines to meet its commitments under the AUKUS deal.

What submarines the British do have don’t get much underway time. You can’t be the best at something—or at least moderately competent—if you don’t actually do it. I don’t fault those who failed.

There is no serious person who thinks there is the political or economic ability right now for a serious recovery in British military capability at sea or ashore, regardless of who gives what speech. How much further can it fall? Things can always get worse, but all the wiggle room is gone.
...
On paper, the Royal Navy today has 10 submarines: six SSN and four SSBN. Only a small fraction of those are combat-ready or could be made combat-ready in a reasonable time.

The US Navy today has 81 submarines: 53 fast attack submarines, 14 ballistic-missile submarines and four guided-missile submarines.

In the mid-1980s, at the height of the Cold War, the Royal Navy had 32+/- submarines:

4 SSBN

28 SSN and SSK patrol submarines.

At the same time, the US Navy had roughly 138 submarines:

37 SSBN

97 SSN

4 SSK

The Royal Navy’s relative collapse is shocking. Since the mid-1980s, the US Navy’s submarine force has shrunk to 59% of its 1985 level. The Royal Navy’s submarine force has shrunk to 31% of its 1985 level. ...

A couple of decades ago, the RN's submarine force professionalism matched the professionalism of the USN's submarine force. The UK government has gutted the Royal Navy without having the Great Depression as an excuse (as was the case in the 1930s when RN budgets suffered).
59
The DUmpster / Re: I don't think I have ever been more disgusted with a politician
« Last post by ADsOutburst on October 21, 2026, 12:17:36 PM »
I saw part of an interview with Acton recently. Although I only saw a snippet, one thing I noticed was an inability to sustain eye contact (which can be an indicator that someone is lying).
60
The DUmpster / Re: I don't think I have ever been more disgusted with a politician
« Last post by DefiantSix on October 21, 2026, 11:53:11 AM »
I’m astonished.

If they’ve never been more disgusted with a politician, that means they’re more disgusted with this than with anything Trump has ever done. :o

Well, the attention span of the average DUmp'Rat - especially DUmp'Rats of rising prominence like gopiscrap - is shorter than the average mayfly's, sooo...
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 10