The Conservative Cave

In a jaw-dropping twist straight out of an vigilante action thriller, a no-nonsense dad named Aaron Spencer just bulldozed his way to victory in a three-way primary for sheriff in an Arkansas county—while staring down murder charges against him like a boss.
...
Picture this: A sleazy 67-year-old creep named Michael Fosler sneaked around Spencer’s home, lured Mr. Spencer’s young daughter from her bedroom with unknown promises, and bolted away in his dusty pickup truck.

Meanwhile Mr. Spencer’s dad radar sensed that something was amiss.  He looked into his daughter’s bedroom and saw that she was gone.  Dad heard Fosler’s truck leaving with some urgency.  Spencer wasn’t going to wait for the cops to finish their donuts to respond.  He grabbed his gun and tok off in hot pursuit.
...
After Spencer forced the perv’s pickup off the road, words flew. An “altercation” ensued and…boom. Spencer plugged the creep ceasing any respiratory activity and rescuing his little girl from what could’ve been a lifetime of nightmares.

Heroic? Hell yes. But the local prosecutor decided he can’t just let a heroic dad “get away” with doing the right thing.  He slapped Spencer with a murder charge. Because, you know, the justice system gonna justice.
...
He threw his hat in the ring for the sheriff job while awaiting his trial for murder, vowing to torch the failures of the criminal justice circus and rebuild trust in the badge. And…the voters ate it up. He steamrolled the incumbent sheriff and one other candidate in a three-way primary brawl, snagging over 53% of the vote. No run-offs needed. The people spoke, loud and clear.

The BBC mistakenly altered a speech by Pete Hegseth on the war in Iran, making him appear to say the United States was targeting the Iranian “people”.

BBC Persian, which broadcasts to audiences inside Iran, mistranslated remarks by the US secretary of defence, telling viewers Washington was bringing death to the Iranian “people”.

In fact, Mr Hegseth had said the Iranian “regime” was being targeted.

The mistake was seized upon by pro-Israel media campaigners, who claimed that it cast doubt on the BBC’s impartiality. It also triggered a backlash on social media.

The Virginia Board of Education has taken a definitive stance on the instruction of modern American history by advancing a policy that prohibits public schools from teaching that the January 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol was a peaceful protest. This move addresses a growing national concern regarding how educators navigate polarized political events and ensure that students receive an accurate representation of factual history. The decision follows months of public debate and intense scrutiny over state curriculum standards, which serve as the framework for history and social science instruction across the Commonwealth.

State education officials clarified that the new guidelines are intended to preserve the integrity of the historical record. By explicitly forbidding the characterization of the event as non-violent, the board aims to align classroom instruction with the findings of federal investigations and the widely documented evidence of the day’s events. Supporters of the measure argue that allowing schools to present the Capitol riot as a peaceful gathering would be a disservice to students, potentially fostering a distorted understanding of democratic processes and the rule of law. They emphasize that while differing political perspectives are a cornerstone of American life, the physical reality of the violence that occurred on January 6 is not a matter of subjective interpretation.

Does being an European "ally" of America even mean anything anymore? That's a valid question after several NATO nations not only initially denied the use of their military bases during Operation Epic Fury, the ongoing attack on Iran, but also offered tacit support for the Islamic regime.
...
You'd expect better from the United Kingdom, though. Well, at least up until fairly recently. After all, the Brits are supposedly America's closest, most reliable ally. Yet, in a stunning move, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer denied the use of his country's military bases for logistical support. Further, he refused to mobilize any forces for defensive operations in the weeks before Iran's missile and drone barrages began.

That proved disastrous, with several Gulf allies lambasting Starmer for hanging them out to dry, even as hundreds of thousands of British nationals were coming under attack.
...
According to newly revealed details about the British NSC's deliberations, the initial requests for base usage and the deployment of defensive assets (two destroyers, in this case) were denied for political reasons. Even when Starmer finally got in line, his fellow Labour members were more concerned with spiting Trump than stopping Iranian ballistic missiles.

Quote

Starmer was supported by John Healey, the Defense Secretary, but “Reeves and Miliband made it quite difficult for the Prime Minister.” The discussion came down to the legality and whether “a positive relationship with the United States of America was a good thing right now for the party. And many people concluded that it was not.” When asked what role the Labour defeat in the Gorton and Denton by-election played, because the Green party mobilized Muslim voters, a close aide of Starmer says: “Zero.”

But security sources are clear that Miliband, in particular, took a “petulant, pacifist, legalistic and very political” approach, questioning why the UK should support the US. “He fundamentally doesn’t like Trump, and he doesn’t like this Iran thing,” one says. As Labour leader in 2013, Miliband thwarted attempts by David Cameron to bomb Syria after the Assad regime used chemical weapons; many in Westminster regard this as a shameful episode. “He probably thinks it was a success,” the source adds.