Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 10
51
God Protects Those Who Prepare: Church Security Shouldn’t Be Controversial

https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/concealed-carry/god-protects-those-who-prepare-church-security-shouldnt-be-controversial/

Quote
I appreciate feedback. It keeps me grounded, honest and on point. Once in a while it stings, but I learn from those mistakes. Sometimes, though, it makes me shake my head. In this case, there’s just no saving people who refuse to acknowledge that bad people exist. That evil exists. Sure, God will protect you. But God also protects those who protect themselves.

I received some critical feedback after The Urgent Case for Better Church Safety ran last month and it exposed a stubborn blind spot.

Critics attacked the allegedly crazy idea of armed people standing between evil and the congregation. One critic in particular dismissed safety teams as the mark of people who are merely “playing church.” Real churches that “know who God is,” he claimed in so many words, need no security because “He [God] has got them.” The commenter’s prescription was repentance, baptism, and seeking God’s face—while the rest of us should stop playing church.

That reasoning is short-sighted and dangerous. It treats prudence as a lack of belief and preparedness as spiritual failure. It’s the same logic that would refuse seat belts because one trusts God to protect them. Or refusing to seek immediate emergency medical treatment for chest pains. Scripture never equates faith with willful blindness to human evil or physical frailty. God protects those who take wise steps to protect themselves and the vulnerable in their care.

The proven benefits of a church safety team make the case stronger than any slogan. Medical emergencies vastly outnumber violent ones. Cardiac arrests, strokes, seizures, diabetic crises, falls, and choking incidents occur far more often than active threats.

The God who gave humans brains would not object to use those brains. More directly, among Jesus's instructions to his disciples was that they go out prepared - food, cothes, a sword.

One of the things I learned about my parents' church as a young teen when I was trained to be an usher was that it had a folding stretcher and other preparations against the possibility of a medical emergency (it was also located across the street from a hospital, but that location choice was based on land availability). It's sad that armed security is now necessary, but it has, literally, saved lives (e.g. the Colorado Springs church shooting).
52
Breaking News / Re: Worth Knowing, Probably Not Quite Threadworthy 8/13
« Last post by SVPete on August 13, 2026, 01:22:17 PM »
ACLJ Files Lawsuit Against New York Town for Excluding Nativity Scene From Public Square

https://aclj.org/religious-liberty/aclj-files-lawsuit-against-new-york-town-for-excluding-nativity-scene-from-public-square

Quote
Last month, we warned officials in Brighton, New York, that they could not constitutionally exclude a Nativity scene from a Christmas display in the town square while allowing other displays commemorating special religious holidays and events throughout the year. We gave the town every opportunity to correct its unconstitutional policy voluntarily.

Instead of complying with the Constitution, town officials chose to ignore our demand for compliance with the law and have decided to continue to engage in viewpoint discrimination to exclude our client’s religious speech: a Nativity scene.

The ACLJ just took the next step by filing a federal lawsuit to protect our client’s First Amendment rights.

At the heart of this case is a simple constitutional principle: Government officials cannot open a public forum for private holiday expression and then exclude certain speech simply because it is religious or less favored. The First Amendment requires government neutrality toward religion – not hostility.
53
US Marines sets sight on Epirus’ microwave weapon to defeat drone swarms

https://interestingengineering.com/military/us-microwave-weapon-epirus-drone-swarms

Quote
The country has awarded tech company Epirus an $11-million contract to deliver HAVOC, a vehicle-mounted high-power microwave system designed to disable multiple drones simultaneously.

Derived from the company’s Leonidas weapon, the High-power Microwave Autonomous Vehicle Operational Capability will be integrated across manned and unmanned Marine Corps ground vehicles.

The contract includes training, servicing and sustainment support, along with options for another system and related capabilities.
...
HAVOC represents the next stage of the Expeditionary Directed Energy Counter-Swarm system, or ExDECS, delivered to the Marine Corps in 2025.

While ExDECS introduced a deployable “one-to-many” approach for countering drones, its successor is expected to provide three times the power, greater range and improved ruggedness.

The system uses solid-state high-power microwave weapon components and gallium nitride amplifiers to generate and strengthen electromagnetic energy.

For some reason, the idea has been spread about that the US military is cluelessly unprepared for drones. Not only will this system become one of several layers in anti-drone defenses, it will be the second generation system in that layer.

One of the techniques Russia (and probably Ukraine) has been using to shield drones from RF interference is fiberoptic bable guidance. It's not a magic bullet, since the current maximum range is 12 or 13 miles, barely past front lines support areas. Also, while systems such as this one might not jam guidance signals, it may be strong enough to disrupt drones' control electronics generally (shielding entails weight, and more weight means shorter range).

It's interesting that the output power devices are gallium nitride rather than travelling-wave or cavity tubes. Very high microwave frequency and high power are niches in which vacuum tubes still perform best. Evidently, the frequency this system operates at is not super high and/or semiconductors continue to improve.
54
The DUmpster / Re: Posting Without Comnent
« Last post by SVPete on August 13, 2026, 12:24:09 PM »
Someone just outed themself as a learing center graduate.

 :-)

 :hi5: And proved that (s)he will never lear.
55
The DUmpster / Re: Posting Without Comnent
« Last post by CollectivismMustDie on August 13, 2026, 12:07:10 PM »
Someone just outed themself as a learing center graduate.

 :-)
56
The DUmpster / Re: This May Be the Biggest Coverup In Our Nation's History
« Last post by SVPete on August 13, 2026, 11:58:36 AM »
Now they care what intelligence agencies think?

... supplying weapons to Ukraine?

1. Trump is continuing to do this.

2. Trump has pressured EuroLanders to continue assisting Ukraine.

3. Trump is continuing to provide intelligence to Ukraine - battlefield and locations of "shadow fleet" tankers.

4. Trump is arranging to provide the "blueprints" for the Patriot missile to Ukraine so they can manufacture the missiles.
57
The DUmpster / Re: This May Be the Biggest Coverup In Our Nation's History
« Last post by ADsOutburst on August 13, 2026, 11:17:35 AM »
Now they care what intelligence agencies think?

Quote
1. nothing in the last 10 years convinces me that putin does not totally control this drone
if oxferd comma was about to clear krasnov, their report would be on the best seller list.

Nothing?! Not rebuilding America’s military? Not attacking Russia’s allies? Not supplying weapons to Ukraine?
58
Former Secret Service Agents: Trump’s Secret Plane Swap Unusual, Not Unprecedented

https://time.com/article/2026/08/11/trump-secret-plane-swap-Turkey-UK-Secret-Service-Air-Force-One/

Quote
In 2000, President Bill Clinton secretly switched to an unmarked plane for a trip to Pakistan. At least one member of the White House pool, a reporter covering the trip for USA Today, was briefed on the operation beforehand, according to The Washington Post.

On the secrecy around the maneuver in Turkey—with even journalists traveling with Trump left in the dark—McDonald said limiting the circle of those informed is standard practice, especially now. “We're in a time now where instantaneous news articles are going out—TikTok, Instagram, Facebook,” he said. “That doesn't help the plan that the Secret Service needs to implement.”

Despite the "Not Unprecedented" in the article title, the info about the precedent involving President Clinton is buried almost at the bottom of the article. How unsurprising.

The article also omits a - or THE - major reason the reporters were not informed. MSM "reporters" hate Trump so much that it would not have been a question of whether the switch was leaked, but of how many would have leaked it.
59
The DUmpster / Re: This May Be the Biggest Coverup In Our Nation's History
« Last post by SVPete on August 13, 2026, 11:13:10 AM »
1. The shamvestigation was opened in 2017 in retaliation for trump firing FBI Comey, with zero evidence of what supposedly was to be investigated.

2. The shamvestigation continued into 2019 or 2020 without finding any evidence of what supposedly was being investigated.

3. In the 4 years of the LIEden MalAdministration, this shamvestigation was not reopened.
60
The DUmpster / Re: Posting Without Comnent
« Last post by SVPete on August 13, 2026, 11:07:28 AM »
Former Secret Service Agents: Trump’s Secret Plane Swap Unusual, Not Unprecedented

https://time.com/article/2026/08/11/trump-secret-plane-swap-Turkey-UK-Secret-Service-Air-Force-One/

Quote
In 2000, President Bill Clinton secretly switched to an unmarked plane for a trip to Pakistan. At least one member of the White House pool, a reporter covering the trip for USA Today, was briefed on the operation beforehand, according to The Washington Post.

On the secrecy around the maneuver in Turkey—with even journalists traveling with Trump left in the dark—McDonald said limiting the circle of those informed is standard practice, especially now. “We're in a time now where instantaneous news articles are going out—TikTok, Instagram, Facebook,” he said. “That doesn't help the plan that the Secret Service needs to implement.”

Despite the "Not Unprecedented" in the article title, the info about the precedent involving President Clinton is buried almost at the bottom of the article. How unsurprising.

The article also omits a - or, IMO, THE - major reason the "reporters" were not informed. MSM "reporters" hate Trump so much that it would not have been a question of whether the switch was leaked, but of how many would have leaked it.
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 10