The Conservative Cave

Somehow I doubt they'd be happy if a President Vance were to do renovations.

I mean, if you want the want the copyright for that idea, I don’t think anyone will attempt to deprive you of that distinction.

Deputy AG Destroys the Left’s Latest Conspiracy Theory About the Epstein Files

https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2025/12/21/deputy-ag-destroys-the-lefts-latest-conspiracy-theory-about-the-epstein-files-n4947353

For four years, the Biden administration sat on the Epstein files and offered the public nothing. Trump made their release a campaign issue, then followed through last month by signing the Epstein Files Transparency Act. That move left Democrats exposed, so they scrambled for cover. Instead of accepting the facts, they have pivoted to spinning conspiracy theories about the Epstein files themselves, in a blatant attempt to explain why the long-promised smoking gun against Trump doesn’t exist.

The conspiracies have become so pervasive that NBC’s Kristen Welker asked Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche on Meet the Press Sunday about one such conspiracy theory regarding the temporary removal of documents from the Justice Department’s release of the Epstein files.
...
Welker asked Blanches about the "15 files released Friday" that "disappeared from DOJ's website yesterday, including this photo of what looks like a desk with a drawer open containing photos of Donald Trump." She pressed Blanche to explain why the files were taken down, asking if it was "at the direction of a judge."

Blanche calmly explained the actual reason, which had nothing to do with protecting Trump and everything to do with protecting victims. "Well, you can see in that photo, there’s photographs of women," Blanche said. "And so we learned after releasing that photograph that there were concerns about those, about those women and the fact that we had put that photo up. So we pulled that photo down."
...
The deputy attorney general went on to explain the DOJ's policy regarding victim privacy in the Epstein document release. "But the reality is anybody, any victim, any victim's lawyers, any victim rights group can reach out to us and say, 'Hey, Department of Justice, there's a document, there's a photo, there's something within the Epstein files that identifies me.' And we will then, of course, pull that off and investigate," Blanche explained.

So there you have it. The breathless speculation from the left about Trump supposedly being protected by the Department of Justice—which is full of people who helped try to take him down, by the way—falls apart under the slightest scrutiny. The files were pulled to protect potential victims whose images appeared in the photographs, not to shield Trump from scrutiny. ...

Have DU-folk been ing over this faux-CT? Progs doing so demonstrate their utter disregard for protection of victims and innocent bystanders in their fantasy-hope of finding a Gotcha-Trump.

NYT Buries the Lede: Admits No Proof Trump Was Involved in Epstein Crimes

https://www.lifezette.com/2025/12/nyt-buries-the-lede-admits-no-proof-trump-was-involved-in-epstein-crimes/

The New York Times acknowledged in a recent report that there has never been any evidence connecting President Donald Trump to the criminal activities of convicted sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, despite years of public speculation and repeated claims pushed by Democratic officials.

The article, written by Times reporters Nicholas Confessore and Julie Tate, was based on interviews with “more than 30 former employees of Jeffrey Epstein, victims of his abuse and others who crossed paths with Mr. Epstein and President Trump.”
...
While much of the article relied on decades-old photographs and quotes from the 1990s to suggest familiarity between Trump and Epstein, the Times ultimately conceded that its review found no evidence tying Trump to Epstein’s abuse or trafficking of minors.

“An examination of their history by The New York Times has found no evidence implicating Mr. Trump in Mr. Epstein’s abuse and trafficking of minors,” the article stated.

1. The NYT could have written this in 2016 or whenever Dems started their guilt-by-association insinuations.

2. "No evidence" is a weaselly evasion after a decade of the false claims - many published by the NYT, BTW - of admitting that the claims are simply false.

3. I've not seen it mentioned before this admission by the NYT, but the pictures of Trump used to support Dems' guilt-by-association insinuations are visually obviously of a relatively young Trump, i.e. from years before Epstein's perversions became known. OTOH, much of the text evidence and many pictures of Dems' associations with Epstein are from when/after Epstein's perversions became known.

Please, please, please keep denigrating the intelligence of American people! It worked so great for HilLIARy and Kammie!

While you're at it, Porgies, keep defending violent criminals, supporting antisemitism, trying to open US borders, defending drug smugglers, trying to force males into women's restrooms, locker rooms, and sports, littering cities' streets with the Sacred Homeless, ...