Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 10
51
Denaturalization only requires a "clear and convincing" standard.

The question is: Will the judges allow the evidence and the law to stand or will they puss-out like in 2020 and not want to rock the political boat.

I predict the latter.

This will have to be fought as a political, public opinion fight.
52
I’m hoping she gets found guilty of immigration fraud maybe some involvement with all the billions of dollars that was stolen in Minnesota, and unless she gets stripped of her citizenship, her assets seized, and she gets deported to Somalia the country. She loves more than America. :thatsright:
53
The DUmpster / Re: I missed disaster by a few weeks
« Last post by DefiantSix on October 24, 2026, 02:54:46 PM »
No sympathy for Ugh-Pee in the slightest.

Earlier in Ugh-Pee's incarceration in Skinner's li'l Innnerwebz Insane Asylum, s/h/it posted that at 18 years old, after 3 weeks on the job as a working stiff s/h/it had herself "diagnosed" insane specifically so s/h/it wouldn't have to work for s/h/its own provision going forward.

S/h/it's probably in her late 40s/early 50s now, by my read. I remember when Dubya was the source of everything wrong with Ugh-Pee. When DonaldusMagnus finally retires in 2029, it'll be JD Vance or Marco Rubio who's the new source of all eee-bil. There's no fixing Ugh-Pee, because Ugh-Pee steadfastly refuses to look in the one direction from which every last problem she has originates.

Ugh-Pee refuses to look inward, for even a nanosecond.
54
General Discussion / Re: Meanwhile, in New York City...
« Last post by SVPete on October 24, 2026, 02:34:47 PM »
Quote
... we had a verbal agreement that heating would be included in the rent and that the rent would increase by $50 each year. ...

To be legally binding, agreements regarding real estate must be in writing.

Quote
If the apartment is unregulated and exempt from Good Cause Eviction, am I basically left with only two options: accept the rent increase or move out? ...

Welcome to the real world, oh pampered one. BTDTGTTS, and didn't whine about it. We just moved to a place we could afford. Of course, NYC's rent control laws have constricted the city's housing supply and thereby jacked up the prices of the housing that is available, so enjoy the consequences of rent control.
55
General Discussion / Re: Meanwhile, in New York City...
« Last post by Old n Grumpy on October 24, 2026, 01:47:40 PM »
Quote
When we first moved in, we had a verbal agreement that heating would be included in the rent and that the rent would increase by $50 each year.

Big mistake, the landlord must have seen you arrive in the back of a turnip truck, anyone with a working brain would get a lease!~ :thatsright:
56
The DUmpster / Re: I missed disaster by a few weeks
« Last post by Old n Grumpy on October 24, 2026, 01:42:14 PM »
Quote
I missed disaster by a few weeks

to bad!

You have to blame all your bad decisions and failures on trump.  :thatsright: :loser: :loser:

Who will you blame when he leaves?
57
Treasury traces SPLC to debanking of Christians after group dismissed it as conspiracy

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/investigations/4777156/treasury-traces-splc-debanking-christians-conspiracy-theory/

I wish more debanked orgs were named in the article, but that the Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) was one does not surprise me. The ADF has, among other people and groups, represented people/groups the SPLC hates, thus earning the "hate group" label. The ADF is actually worse, by SPLC standards, as it has won such cases ... all the way to the US Supreme Court.

Just as with voter fraud and riots, I suspect we may see some goalpost-moving on this issue. "It doesn't exist" will turn to "it's only 'hate groups'", then who knows?
58
General Discussion / Meanwhile, in New York City...
« Last post by SSG Snuggle Bunny on October 24, 2026, 12:56:40 PM »



Quote
I’ve been living in my current address for over 5 years. I’d say we’ve been good tenants and have never really had any issues with our landlord.

When we first moved in, we had a verbal agreement that heating would be included in the rent and that the rent would increase by $50 each year. However, after a few years, the landlord decided to install wall-mounted AC units. Ever since then, they’ve stopped turning on the heat. We’ve had to rely on those AC units for heating or use our own portable tower heaters, which has significantly increased our electricity bill. Is it legal for a landlord to stop providing heat when heating was part of the original verbal agreement?

Now, when I paid my rent at the beginning of this month, my landlord informed me that the rent would increase by $600 per month starting next year, which is roughly a 31% increase. I tried negotiating with them, but they refused and simply said that the market rate has gone up.

I’ve been doing some research, and it seems that my apartment may not be rent-stabilized or protected by Good Cause Eviction, although I’m still trying to confirm that.

If the apartment is unregulated and exempt from Good Cause Eviction, am I basically left with only two options: accept the rent increase or move out? Or are there other legal protections I should look into?

Has anyone experienced something similar? I’d really appreciate any advice on what I should do next or what resources I should contact. Thanks!


Quote
This happened to me. The only thing we could do was legally they have to give you a 90 day notice your rent is going up since you’ve lived in the apartment for over 2 years. I called the 311 tenant hotline and got some good advice at the time I highly recommend.


Quote
this sub is full of landlords. watch out.

Quote
What do you expect? Landlords don't work, they just extract money. And with all that free time they defend their lazy bullshit on reddit.

https://www.reddit.com/r/NYCapartments/comments/1xe0wu1/landlord_suddenly_raising_rent_by_31_for_existing/
59
Treasury traces SPLC to debanking of Christians after group dismissed it as conspiracy

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/investigations/4777156/treasury-traces-splc-debanking-christians-conspiracy-theory/

Quote
Federal finance authorities have identified the Southern Poverty Law Center’s “hate group” labels as the driving force behind the debanking of conservative individuals and organizations, particularly clients that were giving to Christian causes.

The explosive findings directly discredit a recent proclamation from the SPLC declaring, as part of its “Hatewatch” monitoring project, that anti-Christian debanking was a conspiracy theory spread by the “Christian supremacy movement.”

Though only a regulatory audit, fulfilling an executive order from President Donald Trump to ensure that banks were not discriminating against customers on the basis of their political or religious beliefs, the government’s findings add to the SPLC’s latest woes.
...
The 47-page report said the SPLC played a key role in the debanking of, as well as the denial of financial services to, conservative clients wanting to support Christian groups or individuals financially.

But just last year, the SPLC published a “Hatewatch” memo claiming that institutional debanking of the religious Right was an imaginary threat existing only in the minds of Christian supremacists called “dominionists,” those who believe that Christians are “called by God to exercise dominion over every aspect of society” by taking control of all institutions.

In particular, the SPLC alleged that the “anti-LGBTQ+ hate group” Alliance Defending Freedom, a mainstream Christian conservative legal firm known for taking up religious rights cases, was pushing these “conspiratorial claims of Christian victimhood.”
...
It turns out, however, that many of the banks highlighted in the Treasury report were regularly basing their decisions to debank certain disfavored customers on the SPLC’s classification of “hate groups” operating in America.
...
Treasury Department oversight officials say they discovered that PNC Bank declined to issue a line of credit to a media company in late 2021 due to “reputation[al] risk” concerns about its conservative owners.

The situation was brought before the bank’s environmental and social governance group, and employees at the bank allegedly noted that one owner’s foundation “has funded several Christian conservative groups, including several identified as hate groups by the Southern Poverty Law Center.”
...
According to the Treasury report, WePay was monitoring for violations of its terms of service using particular search terms and phrases, such as “MAGA,” “Make America Great,” and “America First,” to flag merchants who might be involved in “prohibited activities.”

I wish more debanked orgs were named in the article, but that the Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) was one does not surprise me. The ADF has, among other people and groups, represented people/groups the SPLC hates, thus earning the "hate group" label. The ADF is actually worse, by SPLC standards, as it has won such cases ... all the way to the US Supreme Court.
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 10