The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: franksolich on June 21, 2014, 09:27:57 PM

Title: primitives think maybe we have too much
Post by: franksolich on June 21, 2014, 09:27:57 PM
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025132743

Oh my.

Quote
rsmith6621 (6,835 posts)    Sat Jun 21, 2014, 08:03 PM

Just Maybe we Have To Much......

I was thinking earlier today that maybe part of our economic problem in the good ole USA is WE HAVE TO MUCH FREE MARKET.
 
And that has driven down economics for everyone. Think about what corporations paid in the 50s in taxes compared to now and small business florished. Now major-corps pay -tax% and prosperous small businesses are hardly no where to be found any more, but yet there are more small business now than before with the advent of this WWW thingy.
 
Anyone have a thought.

I dunno the point the primitive's trying to make, but I do agree the primitives are given too much by the rest of us.

Quote
Skidmore (31,544 posts)    Sat Jun 21, 2014, 08:12 PM

2. We have too much of everything.

People don't need the level of consumption we have here to survive. There was a time when not every person was required to work in the work force and one income could support a family. Expectations were lower then and things had real value and were passed on to the next generation because they lasted. There were not a gazillion varieties of every given toiletry item or kitchen gadget or toy known to man (most, might I add, supporting the petrochemical industry because otherwise what would we do with the sludge produced after fuel is obtained?). We need to ratchet down our consumption.
 
Consumption of every little doodad out there continues to inflate the corporate bubble. If our infrastructure would collapse tomorrow--particularly the electrical grid--we would be in a world of hurt because of the way we produce and use products. Think of what you purchase and if you really need it for survival.
 
Free markets are consumer driven, contrary to popular believe. The "makers" wouldn't have squat if people didn't buy.

<<<bets the skidmarked underwear primitive's home is clogged with more toys, gadgets, and geegaws than franksolich's.

Quote
AngryAmish (20,770 posts)    Sat Jun 21, 2014, 08:16 PM

3. Jimmy Carter deregulated both the rails and trucks.

But left basic safety, hours of service, etc. Regulated. The US has the cheapest goods transit on earth.
 
Some regulation. No more books of tariffs.

Quote
elleng (48,094 posts)      Sat Jun 21, 2014, 08:24 PM

4. and beginning 'deregulation,'

ended up dooming us all. For capitalism to thrive, it must be regulated.

President Carter's deregulation of transportation was only a beginning, in those spheres; much more was to follow.

Quote
AngryAmish (20,770 posts)    Sat Jun 21, 2014, 08:30 PM

5. However much flying sucks nowadays

It is available to 90% of Americans. Before deregulation it was available to 20 % of Americans.
 
That I like.

Do you like fruit in winter? I do. not available in the 1970s.

Quote
elleng (48,094 posts)    Sat Jun 21, 2014, 08:43 PM

6. I doubt that 20% number is correct;

I recall those days, many flew, numbers increased every year, and airlines largely stayed financially sound, without charging passengers for hauling our luggage and preferring business travelers.
 
Winter/fruit relates how? Railroads and motor carriers did have refrigerated cars before, and they still fight over freight charges, just in different fora, and small carriers suffer from consolidation which has become much easier to accomplish.

^^^the husband (even though he's dead) hating primitive must have a short memory.

<<<can remember, pre-Reagan, when rural America was vastly underserved in goods and services, usually because of shipping costs.

The Reagan-Bush-Gingrich-Bush prosperity resolved that, and what's to be found in the shoppes of big blue cities can be found in the stores of small towns too.
Title: Re: primitives think maybe we have too much
Post by: Chris_ on June 21, 2014, 09:35:08 PM
Quote
AngryAmish (20,770 posts)    Sat Jun 21, 2014, 08:16 PM

The US has the cheapest goods transit on earth.
Spoken like someone who has never had to pay $750 for a tank of diesel fuel.
Title: Re: primitives think maybe we have too much
Post by: GOBUCKS on June 21, 2014, 09:38:49 PM
The enormous increase in air traffic is due to deregulation of routes, the huge increase in normal folks' disposable income resulting from the Reagan Boom and the Great Bush Prosperity, and the advent of non-union carriers, mainly Southwest.
Title: Re: primitives think maybe we have too much
Post by: franksolich on June 21, 2014, 09:39:12 PM
comment 2533:
http://conservativecave.com/index.php?topic=81827.2525
Title: Re: primitives think maybe we have too much
Post by: I_B_Perky on June 21, 2014, 09:39:49 PM
Quote
AngryAmish (20,770 posts)    Sat Jun 21, 2014, 08:30 PM

5. However much flying sucks nowadays

It is available to 90% of Americans. Before deregulation it was available to 20 % of Americans.
 
That I like.

Do you like fruit in winter? I do. not available in the 1970s.

Poor moling here. Just slaps the dummies with some facts and doesn't set it up. Maybe the mole thinks that it's 20,000 posts will protect it. If it continues, granite future I predict.

I can confirm that I deny that this ain't one of my moles. 
Title: Re: primitives think maybe we have too much
Post by: BattleHymn on June 22, 2014, 02:14:50 PM
It's good to see the rsmith primitive has somehow stumbled and bumbled his way back in front of a computer screen again. 

To [sic] much of something certainly contributed to rsmith's ample pair of tired-looking knockers. 


[edit]

With the sheer abundance of saggy, floppy, hanging boobs on display at Skin's Island, I think we're in need of a poll to figure out which primitive is sporting the most disgusting pair.
Title: Re: primitives think maybe we have too much
Post by: GOBUCKS on June 22, 2014, 02:19:48 PM
Quote
Skidmore (31,544 posts)   
Sat Jun 21, 2014, 08:12 PM

2. We have too much of everything.

People don't need the level of consumption we have here to survive.

I thought poor, helpless DUmmy Skidmore didn't have enough of anything.

She debates openly at the DUmp on whether to buy food or pay her light bill.
Title: Re: primitives think maybe we have too much
Post by: BEG on June 22, 2014, 03:00:43 PM
Just shut up you idiots.
Title: Re: primitives think maybe we have too much
Post by: Dori on June 22, 2014, 03:07:33 PM
I agree that we do have too much stuff.  But I see the real costs of living being government made.  Rules, laws, regulations, taxes, licenses, insurances, that make life difficult for the middle class.









Title: Re: primitives think maybe we have too much
Post by: Ogre on June 22, 2014, 03:12:28 PM
Quote
Skidmore (31,544 posts)   
Sat Jun 21, 2014, 08:12 PM

2. We have too much of everything.

Dear Dummy

Christopher Walken and I both disagree, you can't have too much cowbell.
Title: Re: primitives think maybe we have too much
Post by: GOBUCKS on June 22, 2014, 03:14:58 PM
Quote
I agree that we do have too much stuff.

No way. I want more stuff. Better stuff. Newer stuff.

If they invent it, or make a newer model, I'll buy it.

I can't imagine complaining about too much stuff, unless it comes down to a point of no space to keep it.

To make space, all you have to do is set the older stuff out by the road.
Title: Re: primitives think maybe we have too much
Post by: 98ZJUSMC on June 22, 2014, 03:26:55 PM
Quote
Free markets are consumer driven, contrary to popular believe. The "makers" wouldn't have squat if people didn't buy.

 :clap:  Well, bravo (D)Ummy you're (rather simply) correct.  Curious as to what the popular believe is though.

Quote
elleng (48,094 posts)      Sat Jun 21, 2014, 08:24 PM

4. and beginning 'deregulation,'

ended up dooming us all. For capitalism to thrive, it must be regulated.    :o

President Carter's deregulation of transportation was only a beginning, in those spheres; much more was to follow.

Oh, so it's the evil......Carters' fault?     :thatsright: :mental:
Title: Re: primitives think maybe we have too much
Post by: Mr Mannn on June 22, 2014, 03:32:09 PM
The problem here is how a DUmmy follows up with his stupid a$$ theories.
for example:
We probably have too much stuff.
The DUmmy solution will always be: We need to take things away from you. (also known as redistribution)

Now this is not something that can be done in a free society. That will not deter the little socialist b@$tard, as he is not a fan of freedom in the first place. Taking things away from people is ultimately what a DUmmy wants. Hence the universal cry to disarm the law abiding. Only with an unarmed populace can a democrat fulfill his tyrannical dreams.

Thus we see the DUmmies squirm in their pathetic impotence.
Title: Re: primitives think maybe we have too much
Post by: franksolich on June 22, 2014, 03:40:41 PM
The problem here is how a DUmmy follows up with his stupid a$$ theories.

for example:

We probably have too much stuff.

The DUmmy solution will always be: We need to take things away from you. (also known as redistribution).

Well, here I am. living the minimalist life-style, partly by choice, partly by non-choice.

I challenge any primitive who thinks we have "too much" stuff to ditch all his junk, and join franksolich in adopting the "only what's minimally necessary" life-style.

But all I see are primitives who keep jampacking their houses full of stuff.

It's obvious what's going on; they want us to give up our stuff, while they keep theirs.
Title: Re: primitives think maybe we have too much
Post by: 98ZJUSMC on June 22, 2014, 04:40:40 PM
The problem here is how a DUmmy follows up with his stupid a$$ theories.
for example:
We probably have too much stuff.
The DUmmy solution will always be: We need to take things away from you. (also known as redistribution)

Now this is not something that can be done in a free society. That will not deter the little socialist b@$tard, as he is not a fan of freedom in the first place. Taking things away from people is ultimately what a DUmmy wants. Hence the universal cry to disarm the law abiding. Only with an unarmed populace can a democrat fulfill his tyrannical dreams.

Thus we see the DUmmies squirm in their pathetic impotence.

As usual:

(http://ts2.mm.bing.net/th?&id=HN.607996545569064726&w=300&h=300&c=0&pid=1.9&rs=0&p=0)
Title: Re: primitives think maybe we have too much
Post by: Big Dog on June 22, 2014, 04:50:10 PM
Quote
Skidmore (31,544 posts)   
Sat Jun 21, 2014, 08:12 PM

2. We have too much of everything.

A special message for the skidmark primitive*:

What do you mean "WE", Shit For Brains?

If you believe you have too much, then unburden yourself. How much, or how little, I choose to own- or can afford to purchase - is none of your ****ing business.


(http://www.feelnumb.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/johnny_cash_flipping_the_bird_middle_finger.jpg)

*Lurking DUmmies are encouraged to pass the word.
Title: Re: primitives think maybe we have too much
Post by: franksolich on June 22, 2014, 05:07:00 PM
If you believe you have too much, then unburden yourself. How much, or how little, I choose to own- or can afford to purchase - is none of your ****ing business.

Man, ain't that the truth.

What primitives perhaps don't realize is that material goods are a psychological burden; one has to worry about paying for them, one has to worry about them not getting broken or stolen.

And the psychological burden can be heavier than the physical burden.

Now, I have to be careful here, because I don't want this misinterpreted; many people have lots and lots of things because they need them or use them or appreciate them.  There's nothing wrong with that.

But however there's a category of people who have things just to.....have things.

They don't need them, they don't use them, and the only thing they appreciate about them is that they have them.  Nothing more.

Think of the eBay and flea-market primitives, always out gathering up things with the idea of re-selling them.  But they never do; they just stash things away, they just keep them.  And the pile constantly gets bigger and bigger and bigger.

I dunno the skidmarked underwear primitive's individual situation, but I suspect she has lots and lots of things just to.....have them.

The skidmarked underwear primitive, as long as I've known her (maybe about seven years), has constantly complained of the burdens life imposes upon her.  I think if she got rid of the material junk in her life, she'd find the psychological, or emotional, burden a great deal lighter.
Title: Re: primitives think maybe we have too much
Post by: thundley4 on June 22, 2014, 06:43:18 PM
A special message for the skidmark primitive*:

What do you mean "WE", Shit For Brains?

If you believe you have too much, then unburden yourself. How much, or how little, I choose to own- or can afford to purchase - is none of your ****ing business.


(http://www.feelnumb.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/johnny_cash_flipping_the_bird_middle_finger.jpg)

Johnny Cash is cool, but let's really piss on the DUmmies.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v675/thundley4/tedcruz_zps502041d0.jpg)

*Lurking DUmmies are encouraged to pass the word.
Title: Re: primitives think maybe we have too much
Post by: DumbAss Tanker on June 22, 2014, 08:54:26 PM
Quote
rsmith6621 (6,835 posts)    Sat Jun 21, 2014, 08:03 PM

Just Maybe we Have To Much......

I was thinking earlier today that maybe part of our economic problem in the good ole USA is WE HAVE TO MUCH FREE MARKET.
 
And that has driven down economics for everyone. Think about what corporations paid in the 50s in taxes compared to now and small business florished. Now major-corps pay -tax% and prosperous small businesses are hardly no where to be found any more, but yet there are more small business now than before with the advent of this WWW thingy.
 
Anyone have a thought.

I do, as a matter of fact.  My thought is that you are an ignorant buffoon, unintentionally amusing us all with your mindless blather and clumsy pratfalls.  Beyond a purely technical legal fiction useful to accountants, businesses do not pay taxes, their customers pay the taxes, whether they are incorporated or ma-and-pa.  Every dime they pay uncle is rolled into the price you pay to them for their goods or services.

You are an idiot, rsmithnumbers, and can never hope to be more than the feckless piece of driftwood that you show yourself to be now.  You should just kill yourself and save fate the trouble.
Title: Re: primitives think maybe we have too much
Post by: thundley4 on June 22, 2014, 08:57:01 PM
I do, as a matter of fact.  My thought is that you are an ignorant buffoon, unintentionally amusing us all with your mindless blather and clumsy pratfalls.  Beyond a purely technical legal fiction useful to accountants, businesses do not pay taxes, their customers pay the taxes, whether they are incorporated or ma-and-pa.  Every dime they pay uncle is rolled into the price you pay to them for their goods or services.

You are an idiot, rsmithnumbers, and can never hope to be more than the feckless piece of driftwood that you show yourself to be now.  You should just kill yourself and save fate the trouble.

A perfect example that is near and dear to the DUmmies is the tax on pot in Colorado and Washington.
Title: Re: primitives think maybe we have too much
Post by: GOBUCKS on June 22, 2014, 09:46:40 PM
Please be nice to DUmmy rsmithnumbers.

He's been gone a long time, and no one at the DUmp can match his bouncy tales.

He's as dumb as Amber, but with far more imagination.

We need to encourage him to stay around and spin his magic.
Title: Re: primitives think maybe we have too much
Post by: DefiantSix on June 22, 2014, 09:54:07 PM
Quote
primitives think...

I see the problem, right here. :thatsright:
Title: Re: primitives think maybe we have too much
Post by: Carl on June 22, 2014, 09:55:28 PM
Please be nice to DUmmy rsmithnumbers.

He's been gone a long time, and no one at the DUmp can match his bouncy tales.

He's as dumb as Amber, but with far more imagination.

We need to encourage him to stay around and spin his magic.

He has been away reading the truck driving book on how to find "reverse".
Title: Re: primitives think maybe we have too much
Post by: franksolich on June 22, 2014, 10:51:48 PM

I thought about the kitchen here this evening, after observing the seditious activities of the cooking and baking primitives.

As you know, this is an old house.

The kitchen measures 26' x 32', which I imagine is pretty good.

There is the large refrigerator, the natural gas stove, and a two-tub stainless steel sink.  Yards and yards and seemingly miles of bare counter-space, with cupboards both above and below.  A lilliputian kitchen table and two chairs--because eating here's usually done in the dining room, or on the front or back porches.

The only small electrical appliance is a food blender.

No microwave oven, no automatic dishwasher, no television, no radio, no telephone, in this kitchen.

And it's just as bare in the drawers and cupboards; in fact, some drawers and cupboards have nothing in them.  The only thing that's ever "full" is the refrigerator.

It's as easy as Hell to keep clean, because there's hardly anything in it.

I imagine primitives, given their propensity to collect stuff just for the sake of having stuff, if primitives lived here, the kitchen would be crammed full of things, things they really don't need or use.  And it'd be pretty dirty too.
Title: Re: primitives think maybe we have too much
Post by: Chris_ on June 22, 2014, 11:11:56 PM
The kitchen measures 26' x 32', which I imagine is pretty good.
Your kitchen was larger than my last apartment.
Title: Re: primitives think maybe we have too much
Post by: franksolich on June 23, 2014, 08:59:57 AM
Your kitchen was larger than my last apartment.

I know it's a reasonably large kitchen, but it looks even larger because it's so empty.

Each of the four rooms here--the kitchen, the dining room, the bedroom, the living room--is 26' x 32', but it looks as if long ago the place had six rooms.  (The attached bathroom is 12' x 18'.)

And the dining room, the bedroom, and the living room are kept just as sparse as the kitchen.

The living room, for example, not counting the built-in bookshelves, has a couch, a recliner, and a floor lamp.  No need to have anything more cluttering it up.  The bedroom has a single-sized bed, a bureau with mirror, and an armed chair; that's it.  The dining room's the most crowded room, because I have the 1920s Sears, Roebuck table expanded with all its leaves so that it seats 14, one at each end and six on each long side.  There's also the buffet with the telephone parked on it.

The 5' x 5' table (a table, not a desk) on which this computer sits, is in the alcove between the dining room and the living room.

<<<likes elbow room.

I tell you, it's a breeze to clean this place; one whizzes right through.

It'd look like the inside of a full trash-compactor, though, if a primitive lived here.
Title: Re: primitives think maybe we have too much
Post by: lastparker on June 23, 2014, 09:16:42 AM

I imagine primitives, given their propensity to collect stuff just for the sake of having stuff, if primitives lived here, the kitchen would be crammed full of things, things they really don't need or use.  And it'd be pretty dirty too.

I think this old picture I got off the cooking and baking forum supports your argument very well, especially considering that odd sign that the DUmmy actually posted in THE KITCHEN.

(http://i1367.photobucket.com/albums/r786/lastparker/DUmmyKitchen_zps57d774e1.jpg) (http://s1367.photobucket.com/user/lastparker/media/DUmmyKitchen_zps57d774e1.jpg.html)
Title: Re: primitives think maybe we have too much
Post by: USA4ME on June 23, 2014, 09:31:09 AM
Quote from:
AngryAmish

Do you like fruit in winter? I do. not available in the 1970s.

Oh, so that must be why all the grocery stores used to shut down the produce section during the wintertime in the 70's.

 :mental:

What in the world is this nutter blathering on about?

.
Title: Re: primitives think maybe we have too much
Post by: BlueStateSaint on June 23, 2014, 09:38:41 AM
I think this old picture I got off the cooking and baking forum supports your argument very well, especially considering that odd sign that the DUmmy actually posted in THE KITCHEN.

(http://i1367.photobucket.com/albums/r786/lastparker/DUmmyKitchen_zps57d774e1.jpg) (http://s1367.photobucket.com/user/lastparker/media/DUmmyKitchen_zps57d774e1.jpg.html)

The telling sign--the one in the upper left corner. :puke:
Title: Re: primitives think maybe we have too much
Post by: franksolich on June 23, 2014, 09:43:27 AM
Oh, so that must be why all the grocery stores used to shut down the produce section during the wintertime in the 70's.

 :mental:

What in the world is this nutter blathering on about?

I think the primitive's point is that with unregulated transport, hence cheaper transport, there's more sorts of produce available year-round, than there used to be.

I can vaguely remember as a child in the Sandhills, that at certain times of the year, certain sorts of produce weren't available there, while they of course were available near their origin.

Nowadays, although the quality may vary over the year depending upon the season, those things can be found out way here all year round, because of cheaper (i.e., unregulated) transport.
Title: Re: primitives think maybe we have too much
Post by: franksolich on June 23, 2014, 10:03:42 AM
I think this old picture I got off the cooking and baking forum supports your argument very well, especially considering that odd sign that the DUmmy actually posted in THE KITCHEN.

This reminds me.  Only primitives, and only primitives, upon coming here and seeing there's no television, no radio, no stereo, no VCR player (or whatever), and that this computer doesn't do movies or songs, have ever complained, "Oh, there's nothing to do here."

Decent and civilized people have no trouble finding things to do here.

I'm reminded of December 2012--the December before this last one--when the femme decided she was going to do her Christmas baking here, instead of at her place.  It made sense; the kitchen here's big and there's plenty of room to do a lot of things.....not to mention that when one's done, it's easier than Hades to clean up.

She came here with a friend from high school whom she hadn't seen for eleven years, and another friend of hers from the big city.  I disremember why, but by coincidence there was a fourth woman here at the same time.

So.....they came to do Christmas baking, and baked up a storm.

In the meantime, the clouds had unloaded several feet of snow; they were stuck here.

They were stuck here three and a half days.

During which time they baked every sort of Christmas cookie imaginable, in varieties and quantities for which they hadn't planned (but happily all the ingredients were here).

They did this for three and a half days, besides all the usual standard typical girl-gabbing.

I spent most of the time reading.

At night, it was as if a slumber-party, all these late-20s, early-30s females indulging in whatever teenaged girls do at slumber-parties.  (I spent most of the time reading, so didn't pay much attention.)

They still insist it was sheer joy, being stranded here where "there's nothing to do."  They wanted to try it again this past December, but by then Nebraska was locked in the worse Ice Age since the beginning of time, and so it wasn't possible; just too damned cold.

Myself, though, I got rather burned out on women for a couple of weeks afterwards. 
Title: Re: primitives think maybe we have too much
Post by: JohnnyReb on June 23, 2014, 10:35:38 AM

They did this for three and a half days, besides all the usual standard typical girl-gabbing.

Myself, though, I got rather burned out on women for a couple of weeks afterwards.
I guess, some times a hearing impairment just isn't enough. :-)
Title: Re: primitives think maybe we have too much
Post by: thundley4 on June 23, 2014, 11:20:15 AM
The telling sign--the one in the upper left corner. :puke:

It looks like a pile of snot.
Title: Re: primitives think maybe we have too much
Post by: BlueStateSaint on June 23, 2014, 01:11:14 PM
It looks like a pile of snot.
The sign:

Quote
PLEASE USE THE TRASH CONTAINER FOR ANYTHING OTHER THAN TOILET TISSUE.

Behind the wallet and the glass.  They need reminding.
Title: Re: primitives think maybe we have too much
Post by: BattleHymn on June 23, 2014, 01:45:30 PM
Gross!  Good find, parker!
Title: Re: primitives think maybe we have too much
Post by: thundley4 on June 23, 2014, 02:17:47 PM
The sign:

Behind the wallet and the glass.  They need reminding.

:puke:  I've only seen those signs in bathrooms.
Title: Re: primitives think maybe we have too much
Post by: obumazombie on June 23, 2014, 04:02:55 PM
Coach is right in that we should own our "stuff". It shouldn't own us. To that end (aside from sentimental possessions) I have been quite successful at not owning 1 of anything I couldn't afford to have 2 of.
We are here to use things and love people. Not the reverse.
Title: Re: primitives think maybe we have too much
Post by: franksolich on June 23, 2014, 06:07:27 PM
I guess, some times a hearing impairment just isn't enough. :-)

Because the femme was here, it was much more tolerable than it might've been.

There's a natural tendency among people--both female and male--to wish to include all who are around them at any particular moment; after all, it's not decent and civilized to shun someone who wishes to be in on things.

It's an admirable tendency, even if one's doing it just to be "nice."

However, there are exceptions.

If some sort of barrier exists that makes communication difficult, sometimes it's just too much trouble to be worth it, for both persons involved.  Each is trying to be polite, one trying to include, the other trying to be included.

But it's like laboring a mountain to bring forth a mouse.

I am by nature and genetics (just as the rest of my family had been) outgoing and gregarious, an enthusiastically sociable social animal.  There's this barrier, though; I simply can't hear, and it's a great deal of trouble--actually physically wearying--to figure out what others are saying.

As the femme figured out years ago, the best way to deal with me in a group is simply by leaving me alone.  I can't ever recall being "hurt" from being ignored; and after all, God ignores no one, and so what does it matter?

And if it's truly important and truly necessary to be "involved," one naturally slips in, using one's own imaginative and creative means of paying attention, and reacting.

I am the one with the problem; let me deal with it.

Cook-outs, for example, are very popular here.  The place is, logistically, a "natural" for entertaining, not least because everything's so accessible and it's so easy to clean up afterwards.  There are streaks of several evenings in a row during spring, summer, and autumn, that there's people here for supper, rather than in their own more-crowded homes.

I'm usually off to the side, nowhere near the "center" of things, and it suits me because it's too much trouble to be included.

When I first moved here, this being nearly invisible bothered many people (who thought it was discourteous to me), but it no longer does, and things are great.

Title: Re: primitives think maybe we have too much
Post by: delilahmused on June 23, 2014, 08:38:58 PM
I agree that we do have too much stuff.  But I see the real costs of living being government made.  Rules, laws, regulations, taxes, licenses, insurances, that make life difficult for the middle class.

What's too much? Who gets to decide? If you've worked hard for what you have, even if others think it's too much, how should we deal with that? There are ways to reduce people's income (or take what they already have) so they won't have too much but all of them involve the government taking from people what isn't there's to take.

Cindie
Title: Re: primitives think maybe we have too much
Post by: freedumb2003b on June 23, 2014, 08:44:41 PM
This reminds me.  Only primitives, and only primitives, upon coming here and seeing there's no television, no radio, no stereo, no VCR player (or whatever), and that this computer doesn't do movies or songs, have ever complained, "Oh, there's nothing to do here."

Decent and civilized people have no trouble finding things to do here.

I'm reminded of December 2012--the December before this last one--when the femme decided she was going to do her Christmas baking here, instead of at her place.  It made sense; the kitchen here's big and there's plenty of room to do a lot of things.....not to mention that when one's done, it's easier than Hades to clean up.

She came here with a friend from high school whom she hadn't seen for eleven years, and another friend of hers from the big city.  I disremember why, but by coincidence there was a fourth woman here at the same time.

So.....they came to do Christmas baking, and baked up a storm.

In the meantime, the clouds had unloaded several feet of snow; they were stuck here.

They were stuck here three and a half days.

During which time they baked every sort of Christmas cookie imaginable, in varieties and quantities for which they hadn't planned (but happily all the ingredients were here).

They did this for three and a half days, besides all the usual standard typical girl-gabbing.

I spent most of the time reading.

At night, it was as if a slumber-party, all these late-20s, early-30s females indulging in whatever teenaged girls do at slumber-parties.  (I spent most of the time reading, so didn't pay much attention.)

They still insist it was sheer joy, being stranded here where "there's nothing to do."  They wanted to try it again this past December, but by then Nebraska was locked in the worse Ice Age since the beginning of time, and so it wasn't possible; just too damned cold.

Myself, though, I got rather burned out on women for a couple of weeks afterwards.

Frank, you have a MUCH more interesting life than many of us.

We all can agree that "interesting" doesn't always mean good (twin tornadoes anyone?) but your life narrative just keeps moving.

And I am 99.453% sure I SPEAK FOR ALL CCers in saying we all appreciate your sharing it with us.

You have a book in you: I suggest you go back, scour you posts here and elsewhere, and write it!

:)
Title: Re: primitives think maybe we have too much
Post by: freedumb2003b on June 23, 2014, 08:46:03 PM
What's too much?
Cindie

That is the easiest answer in the world.  To a liberal, "too much" is:

More than me.
Title: Re: primitives think maybe we have too much
Post by: obumazombie on June 23, 2014, 09:22:04 PM
That is the easiest answer in the world.  To a liberal, "too much" is:

More than me.
Some would quote Marx.
Title: Re: primitives think maybe we have too much
Post by: Big Dog on June 23, 2014, 09:37:36 PM
What's too much? Who gets to decide? If you've worked hard for what you have, even if others think it's too much, how should we deal with that? There are ways to reduce people's income (or take what they already have) so they won't have too much but all of them involve the government taking from people what isn't there's to take.

Cindie

Well said, Cindie.
Title: Re: primitives think maybe we have too much
Post by: Big Dog on June 23, 2014, 10:33:39 PM
I agree that we do have too much stuff. 

Dori,

I didn't think I'd have to say the same thing to a conservative that I'd say to a DUmmy, but I do.

If you believe you have too much, unburden yourself.
Title: Re: primitives think maybe we have too much
Post by: GOBUCKS on June 24, 2014, 12:42:24 AM
There's no difference between "stuff" and money, just two different forms of wealth.

Of course, the DUmmies also say that people, except them, have too much money.
Title: Re: primitives think maybe we have too much
Post by: BattleHymn on June 24, 2014, 05:56:50 PM
There's no difference between "stuff" and money, just two different forms of wealth.

Agreed, but where does that leave people like Judy the Addled grasswipe, who has lots of "stuff"? 

Title: Re: primitives think maybe we have too much
Post by: Big Dog on June 24, 2014, 07:13:04 PM
Agreed, but where does that leave people like Judy the Addled grasswipe, who has lots of "stuff"?

It's her stuff. More accurately, it's her wealth, her expression of the natural right of Property.

A hoarding DUmmy is naturally contradictory; but DUmmies are naturally contradictory about a lot of things.
Title: Re: primitives think maybe we have too much
Post by: obumazombie on June 24, 2014, 07:47:51 PM
It's her stuff. More accurately, it's her wealth, her expression of the natural right of Property.

A hoarding DUmmy is naturally contradictory; but DUmmies are naturally contradictory about a lot of things.
Libs want to share stuff, just not theirs. They want everyone else to be forced to at the threat of a gun. About that they are rarely contradictory.
Title: Re: primitives think maybe we have too much
Post by: Dori on June 24, 2014, 08:03:46 PM
Dori,

I didn't think I'd have to say the same thing to a conservative that I'd say to a DUmmy, but I do.

If you believe you have too much, unburden yourself.

I keep planning too, but I don't seem to get very far with it.  It always amazes me when I pack a bag and go somewhere, just how much "stuff" I can live without.

Title: Re: primitives think maybe we have too much
Post by: GOBUCKS on June 25, 2014, 01:01:06 AM
Agreed, but where does that leave people like Judy the Addled grasswipe, who has lots of "stuff"?

Well, when you have heaps of stuff that other people have set out by the road on trash day, you still don't have much wealth.

It's kind of like having barrels of cash, but all of it in small-denomination Zimbabwe currency.
(http://i883.photobucket.com/albums/ac32/gobucksnumbers/zimdollar_zpsa06900eb.jpg)