The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: SSG Snuggle Bunny on February 18, 2014, 05:01:31 PM

Title: For the ladies
Post by: SSG Snuggle Bunny on February 18, 2014, 05:01:31 PM
WilliamWhoreson makes a vow he knows he'll never have to keep:

Quote
WilliamPitt (56,305 posts)

I would walk through fire for the women of DU, my wife, my daughter, my mother, every woman I know.
   
I strongly, strongly suspect that just about every man here would do the same.

Vote for an anti-choice, trans-vaginal-utrasound supporting politician? Never.

Sexually harass a co-worker? Never.

Witness a man brutalizing a woman? That man is bleeding on the sidewalk at my feet, and I have to go get my knuckles stitched.

Raise your hand if you agree.

The Swimsuit Edition of SI? With every passing year, more and more people of both sexes are coming to see how silly the thing is. I haven't bought a copy of the thing since the Reagan administration. I think it's dying, and the only reason it still exists is because men like looking at pretty girls, and that sells copy. They continue to get away with running the thing year after year because it is "tradition." I think that's slowly dying; a sports magazine running tits and ass is just absurd profiteering under that veil of "tradition," and it won't last much longer, I believe.

A lot of hard feelings around here lately. We men are far from perfect, and the anti-woman evil currently stalking the land leaves wide, deep footprints. It shakes the very ground.

But it's not me. I'm with you, and if I get it wrong sometimes, know that I am trying to be better. Every single day.

I speak only for myself here...but I think I speak for a whole lot of DU men, as well...and if I don't speak for you, then in my humble opinion, you're in the wrong place.

I'm with you. I would walk through fire for you. I would jump off a building for you.

And I don't think I am alone.

Quote
hlthe2b (49,575 posts)

2. Today show (which I rarely watch) made a big deal about Willie "hanging out" with all these models..

A very stereoptypical segment--complete with Willie and Matt and others all but drooling. That they were not embarrassed at the perpetuation of that gross stereotype ought to infuriate all.

I would like to think progressive men would join in saying ENOUGH to that kind of objectification and total devaluation of women. That that segment coincided with the Olympics, where the most incredible women athletes join the men in demonstrating the very "best" they can be, just makes it all the worse to me. If I were a progressive man--hell, any man, I'd be truly ashamed. As a progressive woman working in a traditional "man's" field, I have become all too numbed to this--but angry all the same.

Women are far MORE than their bodies and their WORTH should not, could not, must not be measured by their bra and butt size. Why is that so hard to understand?????

Quote
louslobbs (2,545 posts)

5. I take this stand with you William. I don't even think most people get how large and formidable a
 
force we really are.

Lou

Quote
Warren Stupidity (35,764 posts)

16. We've let the DU women take all the fire on this issue.

Thank you for standing up. More DU men need to stand up and speak out.

Sit down and shut-up before you get the pimp hand, cupcake.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024522530


So, how about it, ladies?

Are you feeling protected?
Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: JohnnyReb on February 18, 2014, 05:05:18 PM
Walk through fire.....with open 5 gallon buckets of gas for my older sister and the wife.....but every woman includes Hillary Clinton and for her I'd spill the buckets of gas and run like hell.
Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: Carl on February 18, 2014, 05:19:57 PM
From a guy banned once for threatening to beat up a homeless woman.  :-)
Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: JohnnyReb on February 18, 2014, 05:22:19 PM
From a guy banned once for threatening to beat up a homeless woman.  :-)
....and trash her spacious Skylark motor home.
Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: Ralph Wiggum on February 18, 2014, 05:30:51 PM
An absolutely stupid street-cred post by Wee Willie that is barely worth commenting on.  That having been said, a few quickie responses by yours truly:

Quote
Witness a man brutalizing a woman? That man is bleeding on the sidewalk at my feet, and I have to go get my knuckles stitched.

Oh please, Wee Willie.  You may pretend to be an internet tough guy, but you are just a giant puss deep down. (pardon my language)

Quote
I would walk through fire for the women of DU, my wife, my daughter, my mother, every woman I know.

What about my female lesbian mole?  :???:  :-)
Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: GOBUCKS on February 18, 2014, 05:38:13 PM
Quote
That man is bleeding on the sidewalk at my feet, and I have to go get my knuckles stitched.

The drunken Pitt becomes chivalrous only because he thinks it has something to do with Chivas.

If the bloated, staggering alcoholic Pitt has ever been engaged in fisticuffs, it was when he starred in a series of bum fights on YouTube.
Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: SSG Snuggle Bunny on February 18, 2014, 05:41:28 PM
From a guy banned once for threatening to beat up a homeless woman.  :-)

Which is why I refer to him as WilliamWhoreson.

He was quite eager to confront Bobo the Hobo for a perceived slight against his mother; I'm curious if he's as willing to puff up to a timid woodland creature.
Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: thundley4 on February 18, 2014, 05:49:18 PM
I noticed that Wee Willie talks about protecting women, but not younger girls.

We need to stop the force objectification and subjugation of these models.  They only make millions of $ for showing a little skin, whereas the sex workers that the DUmmies support make only hundreds or maybe thousands for putting out.
Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: Chris_ on February 18, 2014, 06:00:01 PM
Quote
A lot of hard feelings around here lately. We men are far from perfect, and the anti-woman evil currently stalking the land leaves wide, deep footprints. It shakes the very ground.
:whatever:

Imagine having to kiss ass to a bunch of DUmp crones for your credibility.  What a life.

I saw a TV interview with those SI girls last night.  Let me tell you, nobody's ogling them for their minds.
Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: DefiantSix on February 18, 2014, 06:02:22 PM
...I'm curious if he's as willing to puff up to a timid woodland creature.

 :rotf: "Timid woodland creature", my left nut! They don't hand out those stripes on your fluffy arm in CrackerJack boxes, Sarge.  By the time you were done ****ing up wall to wall counselling WilliamWhoreson, I fully expect Pittstain would taste cum for a month.
Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: Gern on February 18, 2014, 06:28:06 PM
Quote
WilliamPitt (56,305 posts)


Witness a man brutalizing a woman? That man is bleeding on the sidewalk at my feet, and I have to go get my knuckles stitched.

Have you looked at yourself lately?  I've seen a recent picture of you, William. 

The only way someone is going to end up bleeding on the sidewalk at your feet is if you clobbered them from behind with your beer stein, and even then I doubt you'd see them down there; your ginormous belly would block the view.
Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: Splashdown on February 18, 2014, 06:36:28 PM
What a sexist rant by William Pitt! How DARE he assume that "women" of DU need protecting! Effing Neanderthal.
Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: Big Dog on February 18, 2014, 06:48:00 PM
Mama Raven paid Poor Poor Pitiful Pitt's liquor store tab again this month, so he had to go full Samuel L. Jackson to make himself feel like a man again.
Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: HawkHogan on February 18, 2014, 06:51:56 PM
"I would walk through fire my future wife, my future daughter, my mother, and every woman I know" and they'd let me burn if I ever became an emasculated male like William. 
Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: Mr Mannn on February 18, 2014, 06:59:48 PM
Liberals traditionally support porn as "Free Speech."

Now suddenly it is BAD. Its part of a "culture of rape." DU is not the only place I've heard that term. NOW just used it against a journalist who  disagreed with them.

The next two years will promote "Sexism" and "Rape Culture," as frequently as the Democrats yell racism today. The rats think this will make Hillary as immune to criticism as Obama is.
The rats will pound those words into our skulls.
~~ DU is just a sample of what is coming.

Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: Skul on February 18, 2014, 07:31:39 PM
Quote
Response to Demeter (Reply #18)
Tue Feb 18, 2014, 05:41 PM

Star Member WilliamPitt (56,309 posts)

20. I am the one who goes to the dump.

I change the cat box every week.

I am the primary caretaker for the baby, which includes changing diapers.

I just changed a bunch of light bulbs.

I cook dinner every night.

And I am always nice.

I do not need or expect thanks, either.

This is what I volunteered for. And it is wonderful.
It takes a real pu**ywhipped little metrosexual to wear that as a badge of "honor".
Real men may do those, however they don't need to bandy it about like a poofter.
Wilbur, your mommy wears combat shoes and her vibrator has a kick-starter.
Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: thundley4 on February 18, 2014, 07:47:52 PM
Quote
I just changed a bunch of light bulbs.

WTF?  Why would you change a bunch of light bulbs?  ither you change one when it burns out,(the smart way), or you change them all at the same time even though some of them still work, and waste money and materials.

I remember us changing all the fluorescent bulbs at the same time on the boat I was on, and all the old bulbs were just tossed in the dumpster.
Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: Big Dog on February 18, 2014, 07:49:05 PM
Quote
Poor, Poor, Pitiful Pitt

20. I am the one who goes to the dump.

Don't you mean the DUmp?

Quote
I change the cat box every week.

I'm not a cat person, but shouldn't a cat box be emptied more often than once a week?

That sounds like a stinking mess.

Quote
I am the primary caretaker for the baby, which includes changing diapers.

Wet nurse, too. Still haven't dropped that baby weight- have you, "Wee" Willy? Christ, you should be wearing a nursing bra.

Quote
I just changed a bunch of light bulbs.

For most of us, the bulbs burn out one at a time, but you had to change "a bunch". What kind of shithole did Mama Raven lock you up in, anyway? An old chicken house?

Quote
I cook dinner every night.

A bottle of cheap Rye and a box of saltines, while the baby licks grease off a used Taco Bell wrapper, does not count as "cooking".

Quote
And I am always nice.

OK, that one made me shoot coffee out of my nose.

Quote
I do not need or expect thanks, either.

Pitt was weeping as he wrote that sentence.  He is such a passive-aggressive emo fag.

Quote
This is what I volunteered for. And it is wonderful.

Sparky, would you please go over to Rindge and bitch-slap that DUmbass for me? Just give him the back of your hand, right across the mouth. Then tell him it was a special delivery on behalf of men everywhere.
Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: Gern on February 18, 2014, 07:52:00 PM
Quote

Star Member WilliamPitt (56,309 posts)

20. I am the one who goes to the dump.

I change the cat box every week.

I am the primary caretaker for the baby, which includes changing diapers.

I just changed a bunch of light bulbs.

I cook dinner every night.

And I am always nice.

I do not need or expect thanks, either.

This is what I volunteered for. And it is wonderful.

When one doesn't really have to go to work for a living, oh...the time on one's hands!!!

Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: GOBUCKS on February 18, 2014, 08:21:11 PM
The stumbling, bumbling, drunken Pitt is still unemployable, even up in the backwoods of New Hampshire.

No one wants an alcoholic employee.

No help getting a job from his mom. After loudly bitching about the ignorant Rindge "fundies", she's not the most popular person in town.

And these days they have computers even in the north woods, so his, uh..problem with preteen girls has almost surely followed him. Oh, wait, that was "temporary sockpuppet", not Pitt, right?

DUmmy Raven is having a shitty forced retirement.

What a great family!
Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: jtyangel on February 18, 2014, 09:20:23 PM
I find the men there 'standing up' for the du gals to be sexist. Does it not assume that women are incapable of asserting themselves without a man's backup and help?  :fuelfire: :fuelfire: :fuelfire: :fuelfire: :fuelfire: :fuelfire: :fuelfire: :fuelfire: :-)

Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: Chris_ on February 18, 2014, 09:28:01 PM
When one doesn't really have to go to work for a living, oh...the time on one's hands!!!
One would expect his DUmp posts to improve, what with all that spare time.

No such luck.
Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: jukin on February 18, 2014, 09:49:34 PM
Translation: I will piss my pants and go into the fetal position while trying to dial 911.

Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: delilahmused on February 18, 2014, 10:08:22 PM
It's not like the women are forced to model. They want to do it, DUmmies! It's their choice. Oh, as a general rule, conservative women are capable of taking care of themselves. We don't need a man to step in and beat an attacker. We're armed. Still, I'd stand there and watch them beat up wee willy before I shot the turd.

Cindie
Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: fatboy on February 18, 2014, 10:10:18 PM
Quote
Star Member WilliamPitt (56,309 posts)

20. I am the one who goes to the dump.

I change the cat box every week.

I am the primary caretaker for the baby, which includes changing diapers.

I just changed a bunch of light bulbs.

I cook dinner every night.

I always have my panties in a bunch.

And I am always nice.

I do not need or expect thanks, either.

This is what I volunteered for. And it is wonderful.

There, I fixed it.  :-)
Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: diesel driver on February 19, 2014, 05:15:10 AM
The stumbling, bumbling, drunken Pitt is still unemployable, even up in the backwoods of New Hampshire.

No one wants an alcoholic employee.

No help getting a job from his mom. After loudly bitching about the ignorant Rindge "fundies", she's not the most popular person in town.

And these days they have computers even in the north woods, so his, uh..problem with preteen girls has almost surely followed him. Oh, wait, that was "temporary sockpuppet", not Pitt, right?

DUmmy Raven is having a shitty forced retirement.

What a great family!

I wonder how many times Dummie Raven has had second thoughts about not getting that abortion 40 years ago.  :rotf:
Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: vesta111 on February 19, 2014, 05:46:40 AM
Crazy man here, since when have we not know that boys will be boys ?

Sons at 9 and 12 came home on trash day with something they did not want me to see.  I got curious and went a looking and found a Play Boy in their room.  I left it there, heck it was better then finding a man boy publication.   

Sex sells for goodness sake, what is this mans problem, has he just found his dick ?
Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: Big Dog on February 19, 2014, 06:28:56 AM
It's not like the women are forced to model. They want to do it, DUmmies! It's their choice. Oh, as a general rule, conservative women are capable of taking care of themselves. We don't need a man to step in and beat an attacker. We're armed. Still, I'd stand there and watch them beat up wee willy before I shot the turd.

Cindie

You're too kind.

If I saw a stranger beating up Poor, Poor, Pitiful Pitt, I wouldn't shoot the stranger. I would figure Pitt brought it on himself, and who am I to stand in the way of justice?
Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: landofconfusion80 on February 19, 2014, 06:47:48 AM
You're too kind.

If I saw a stranger beating up Poor, Poor, Pitiful Pitt, I wouldn't shoot the stranger. I would figure Pitt brought it on himself, and who am I to stand in the way of justice?

people get kind of sensitive when somebody tries to steal their beer, even if it is mostly empty.
Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: Karin on February 19, 2014, 09:26:03 AM
Quote
and I have to go get my knuckles stitched.

No, Pitt.  As I recall, you used a large canned good (baked beans?)  the last time you had a confrontation. 

Anybody remember that reference?   :-)

Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: obumazombie on February 19, 2014, 09:37:42 AM
How does "WalksThruFire" feel about Sarah Palin ?
Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: wasp69 on February 19, 2014, 10:26:06 AM
Oh dear....  Where does one begin with this pudgy "badass"?

Quote
WilliamPitt (56,305 posts)

I would walk through fire for the women of DU, my wife, my daughter, my mother, every woman I know.

Vote for an anti-choice, trans-vaginal-utrasound supporting politician? Never.
   
A lot of hard feelings around here lately. We men are far from perfect, and the anti-woman evil currently stalking the land leaves wide, deep footprints. It shakes the very ground.

But it's not me. I'm with you, and if I get it wrong sometimes, know that I am trying to be better. Every single day.

I speak only for myself here...but I think I speak for a whole lot of DU men, as well...and if I don't speak for you, then in my humble opinion, you're in the wrong place.

I'm with you. I would walk through fire for you. I would jump off a building for you.

 :lmao:

Hey, DUmbass, does your "wife" know you're chumming the DUmp for attention from the dick-choppers?  I mean, really, William....  "I would walk through fire for you, DUmmie man hater"...   :rofl:

Pathetic little weasel...

Quote
Sexually harass a co-worker? Never.

But students under 15 are fair game, aren't they, William?

Quote
Witness a man brutalizing a woman? That man is bleeding on the sidewalk at my feet, and I have to go get my knuckles stitched.

A flashback, in case you have burned through that particular set of brain cells:

Quote
WillPitt  [Moderator]   0 minutes ago in reply to bobbolink
You ****ing piece of shit
From: WilliamPitt
Date: May-09-10 03:34 PM
Just to make sure you see this before it gets deleted, here you go:

===

Explain how you have the time and money to post to DU from your ****ing car, you poor ****ing victim.

Leave my mother out of your comments, or meet me in the street, you ****.

Period. End of file. Do it again, I ****ing dare you.

Yes, I ****ing said it. Let the mods delete this. I ****ing hope you read it first, you piece of shit.

**** you. I'll PM you my address. Say that shit to my face. I swear to God, any time, anywhere.

===

Any chance you're anything other than a chickenshit ****?

I promise I will drop you if we ever meet.

I ****ing promise.

Be sure to share this with the Mods.

If you dare, say that shit to my face. I am not hard to find.

You suck. And I will wipe you out if I ever get the chance.

Share this with the mods, please.

I guess you're exempt from your own criteria for an ass whipping, aren't you, hypocrite?

Words are easy, you gutless windbag.  Having the courage of conviction to follow through is the hard part, and I don't see you doing that, coward. 
Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: Karin on February 19, 2014, 10:50:29 AM
Awesome, Wasp!
Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: wasp69 on February 19, 2014, 11:42:46 AM
Awesome, Wasp!

Thanks.   :-)
Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: GOBUCKS on February 19, 2014, 12:02:48 PM
If Pitt saw a DUmpette in distress, first he'd dry out for a couple of weeks, and then:

Pitt would catch a grenade for you,

Throw his hand on a blade for you

He'd jump in front of a train for you
 
You know he'd do anything for you
 
Oh, he would go through all this pain

Take a bullet straight through his brain

Yes, he would die for you, DUmmy

But you won't do the same.

And then he'd ask DUmmy Raven for some money to go to the liquor store.
 
Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: Wineslob on February 19, 2014, 12:08:01 PM
(http://www.quickmeme.com/img/05/057c7c8754af396214cde5da53928f2d42fdf309497b5a4cdf22f12b3e9f75a9.jpg)
Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: 67 Rover on February 19, 2014, 12:39:14 PM
 :rotf:
Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: Wineslob on February 19, 2014, 01:36:28 PM
:rotf:


They really do set themselves up, don't they.

 :lmao:
Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: CollectivismMustDie on February 19, 2014, 02:13:32 PM
No, Pitt.  As I recall, you used a large canned good (baked beans?)  the last time you had a confrontation. 

Anybody remember that reference?   :-)



Wow. If true, this is actually an answer to a question, that I guarantee has been asked many times:

How drunk must someone be, to think its a good idea to use the defensive tactics suggested by DUmmie hoyt?


 :lmao:

CMD
Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: wasp69 on February 19, 2014, 02:14:04 PM
If Pitt saw a DUmpette in distress, first he'd dry out for a couple of weeks, and then:

Pitt would catch a grenade for you,

Throw his hand on a blade for you

He'd jump in front of a train for you
 
You know he'd do anything for you
 
Oh, he would go through all this pain

Take a bullet straight through his brain

Yes, he would die for you, DUmmy

But you won't do the same.

Stop!  Hammer time!

(http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view4/3995761/mc-hammer-dance-o.gif)
Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: Ralph Wiggum on February 19, 2014, 03:01:14 PM
I hope everyone recalls the lovely encounter that Wee Willie had with a brick:

Quote
WilliamPitt  Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore   
Wed Nov-03-04 02:33 AM
Original message
So on top of everything else, some ass just smashed my face with a brick (http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x1294913)
       
Yep. Just got back from the Kerry rally in Copley. Spent nearly eight hours standing in the cold rain and waind waiting for the word...and then the word came, and didn't come, and is hovering like doom...

So I am walking in the back door of my apartment building, and I hear someone behind me. I turn, and this douchebag threw a brick at my head. It mostly hit my shoulder, but bashed into my jaw. Pretty clearly a mugging attempt; the person who did it was young. Nothing is broken, I don't think. I can still work my jaw, and my shoulder is moving OK, and no teeth are loose. I have a big scratch on my face, and everything hurts like hell.

So, the moral of the story: No matter how bad you feel, no matter how crappy was your night, nobody threw a brick at your head.

Think I'm gonna call the cops.

Kerry conceded to President Bush and Wee Willie Pitt got hit by a brick, all in one night.  Good times, good memories... :loser: :loser: :loser:
Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: Chris_ on February 19, 2014, 03:02:44 PM
Kerry conceded to President Bush and Wee Willie Pitt got hit by a brick, all in one night.  Good times, good memories... :loser: :loser: :loser:
:cheersmate:

Quote
I can still work my jaw

Miracle of miracles. :rofl:
Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: shoes off the couch on February 19, 2014, 03:03:32 PM
From a separate, currently raging Klam-fire:

Quote

Wed Feb 19, 2014, 03:23 PM

Whisp (22,044 posts)
141. one white knight threatened a woman here on DU with physical violence

it is recorded, but unpopular to bring it up. In fact you can get juried if you bring it up.

that is why I have just a wee bit o trouble with ones who proclaim themselves saviours to all women when they can't even save a woman from their own bad selves.


http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4528933
Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: Chris_ on February 19, 2014, 03:07:19 PM
Quote
WilliamPitt  (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore  Wed Nov-03-04 02:46 AM
Response to Reply #16
37. I chased the ****er off
 He thought he put me down. I had a can of Chef Boy-ar-Dee in my hand, and chased him down the street.
:rofl:
Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: Karin on February 19, 2014, 03:11:12 PM
Thanks for finding that, Chris!

Whisp says that they get juried if they bring up the fact that Pittstain threatened a woman, homeless at that, with physical violence?  Well, Wasp posted it for all to see.  Will Pitt is a creep, a coward, and a thug. 
Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: wasp69 on February 19, 2014, 03:13:06 PM
Kerry conceded to President Bush and Wee Willie Pitt got hit by a brick, all in one night.  Good times, good memories... :loser: :loser: :loser:

Those halcyon days when the DUmmies were tearing their hair out and making spreadsheets...  *sigh*
Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: wasp69 on February 19, 2014, 03:14:26 PM
Quote
Wed Feb 19, 2014, 03:23 PM

Whisp (22,044 posts)
141. one white knight threatened a woman here on DU with physical violence

You forgot to add "while in a drunken rage", DUmmie.
Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: zeitgeist on February 19, 2014, 03:44:27 PM
:rofl:

Guido and the Chef must have been quite a sight.  The poor bugger being chased was probably terrified.  The besotted Guido, mad man with macaroni, yelling "Bulowski"  and flailing wildly through the cobble stones of Back Bay in 'hot (as in :drunksailor: ) pursuit' .  Yeah, quite a sight indeed.   :whistling:
Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: dane on February 19, 2014, 03:46:07 PM
There are some who try to squeeze the truth into the fawning and foot-kissing, but the DUmmies can't stand the truth.
Quote
madinmaryland (55,772 posts)

84. Ok. Didn't you threaten to beat up a female DUer several years ago and got yourself

tombstoned for a few weeks?

Enough with the sanctimony, Will.
Quote
Whisp (22,044 posts)

94. yep

I'd be honest enough to say I would NOT crawl through hot glass or whatever was said to protect Every Man out there... some People are just not worth it.
 
This whole thing sounds too knightish for me. Thanks but no thanks. I know genuine support when I hear it and I know grandstanding when I smell it.
 
Just so happens I have a building that is doing nothing at the moment...
and also this exchange:
Quote
rudolph the red (227 posts)

47. What short memories we have at DU

The OP was once banned from this site for repeatedly threatening a female DUer.
But it isn't nice to tell the truth, and DUmmy No common sense jumps to the defense with:
Quote
Common Sense Party (13,835 posts)

97. And you would know this HOW? With your 225 posts and your late 2013 join date?

My, but you pay close attention to Will Pitt's past!

How are your FReeper buddies?
Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: Splashdown on February 19, 2014, 04:12:33 PM
I hope everyone recalls the lovely encounter that Wee Willie had with a brick:

Kerry conceded to President Bush and Wee Willie Pitt got hit by a brick, all in one night.  Good times, good memories... :loser: :loser: :loser:

The great daveman had a photoshop of this event that was hilarious! Good times...
Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: JakeStyle on February 19, 2014, 05:07:13 PM
What a weasel

Quote
Response to madinmaryland (Reply #84)

Star Member WilliamPitt (56,312 posts)      Wed Feb 19, 2014, 02:31 PM

179. Your first sentence is factually correct.

But there's a little more meat on the bone.

1. The poster in question went after my mother, who posts here, in a vile way. I saw bright, flaming red, and reacted in a way I'm ashamed of to this day...but it was my mother being attacked. Not me. Her, to get to me. It got to me.

2. At the time I responded, I did not know the poster in question was a woman. That is not an excuse - threatening bodily harm against anyone is shameful - but it is a fact. I did not know the poster in question was a woman. Screen names do not always provide gender information. Hers didn't. I didn't know, and I never clicked the icon to check.

So. Sit in judgment as you wish. I ****ed up, no doubt and for sure...but it's not as cut-and-dried as your comment would suggest. Go after my mother and you're going to hear about it from me...but if it makes any difference, that my-fault fiasco profoundly altered the way I approach online conversation, here and elsewhere. I no longer allow vile shit to get so far under my skin that I erupt the way I did against that person. It's not worth it; that happened years ago, and here you are chucking it in my face. The Internet never forgets. Neither, apparently, do you.

Now you know maybe a little more than you did when you posted that comment. Hope it helps.

**** the Eagles.
Anger is a gift.

If I recall correctly, the context of Bobolinks post that set Will off was, "what if it was your mother that was homeless and needed help".  That's some vile, hateful stuff right there.
Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: wasp69 on February 19, 2014, 05:25:05 PM
Quote
Response to madinmaryland (Reply #84)

Star Member WilliamPitt (56,312 posts)      Wed Feb 19, 2014, 02:31 PM

179. Your first sentence is factually correct.

But there's a little more meat on the bone.

1. The poster in question went after my mother, who posts here, in a vile way. I saw bright, flaming red, and reacted in a way I'm ashamed of to this day...but it was my mother being attacked. Not me. Her, to get to me. It got to me.

I guess that answers the question of whether or not your own actions meet your own criteria for physical violence, doesn't it, you craven little bitch?

Quote
2. At the time I responded, I did not know the poster in question was a woman. That is not an excuse - threatening bodily harm against anyone is shameful - but it is a fact. I did not know the poster in question was a woman. Screen names do not always provide gender information. Hers didn't. I didn't know, and I never clicked the icon to check.

You're a lying sack of shit, William.  You knew exactly who and what she was.

****ing coward...
Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: GOBUCKS on February 19, 2014, 06:00:16 PM
Quote
WilliamPitt  (1000+ posts)
Wed Nov-03-04 02:46 AM
Response to Reply #16
37. I chased the ****er off
He thought he put me down. I had a can of Chef Boy-ar-Dee in my hand, and chased him down the street.

It was probably Ty the bouncer.
Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: JakeStyle on February 19, 2014, 06:39:35 PM
Hehe

Quote
Response to WilliamPitt (Reply #179)

Wed Feb 19, 2014, 03:31 PM

Star Member madinmaryland (55,773 posts)
182. William. A couple of things to in regards to your comments...

1.) I actually had an email (DU) exchange with your during the time before that even happened. I was concerned that she was giving away too much information about you and herself, given that the freaks over at CC were going after you and I didn't want them to get any information about you that they shouldn't have. I was very familiar with what those vile pieces of shit did to Andy Stephenson.

2.) As I remember at the time, she was quite well known on DU as being homeless and very acerbic (by most of the regulars here). You are right, it was shameful. I do believe that Skinner made the right decision to TS you for that outburst, regardless whatever her issues were. I also felt that he made the right decision bringing you back. I am not referring to the insightful political commentary you provide, but the fact that you did admit you were wrong.

I tend to remember things that people say (or do), such as is the case with trumad. Rather than admit you are a human being and have your faults (I know damn well that I have my faults), everyone seems to go all sanctimonious. It just really bothers the shit out of me when someone comes on DU and says how great they are personnally.
:rotf:
Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: wasp69 on February 20, 2014, 07:53:07 AM
Quote
Response to WilliamPitt (Reply #179)

Wed Feb 19, 2014, 03:31 PM

Star Member madinmaryland (55,773 posts)
182.

I was very familiar with what those vile pieces of shit did to Andy Stephenson.

For someone who has such clarity of recall, you sure did fall short of remembering who actually threw the wrench in Andy's hospital stay.  I'll give you a hint:  You're kissing his ass in this post...
Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: DumbAss Tanker on February 20, 2014, 10:33:19 AM
Quote
WilliamPitt (56,305 posts)

I would walk through fire for the women of DU, my wife, my daughter, my mother, every woman I know.

Large talk for someone who lives off a trust and has never known any form of hardship.
Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: Ralph Wiggum on February 20, 2014, 11:11:40 AM
Large talk for someone who lives off a trust and has never known any form of hardship.

Oh come on, DAT!  Pitt-stain probably had to beg for drinks at Bukowski's one night when he was too intoxicated to figure out how to find his wallet.  That's some hardship for ya'.
Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: DumbAss Tanker on February 20, 2014, 12:55:53 PM
Oh come on, DAT!  Pitt-stain probably had to beg for drinks at Bukowski's one night when he was too intoxicated to figure out how to find his wallet.  That's some hardship for ya'.

His image as a protector of womanhood is somewhat tarnished by a certain matter involving one or more underage schoolgirls.
Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: landofconfusion80 on February 20, 2014, 01:22:02 PM
His image as a protector of womanhood is somewhat tarnished by a certain matter involving one or more underage schoolgirls.

He was just trying to keep them warm on the mattress out in his van.  Purely good intentions obviously.
Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: Ralph Wiggum on February 20, 2014, 01:24:14 PM
His image as a protector of womanhood is somewhat tarnished by a certain matter involving one or more underage schoolgirls.

Scott Ritter's name ring a bell?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scott_Ritter

Quote
Despite identifying himself as a Republican and having voted for George W. Bush in 2000,[15] by 2002 Ritter had become an outspoken critic of the Bush administration's claims that Iraq possessed significant WMD stocks or manufacturing capabilities, the primary rationale given for the US invasion of Iraq in March 2003. His views at that time are well summarized in War on Iraq: What Team Bush Doesn't Want You To Know a 2002 publication which consists largely of an interview between Ritter and anti-war activist William Rivers Pitt. In the interview, Ritter responds to the question of whether he believes Iraq has weapons of mass destruction:

Quote
Ritter was detained in April 2001[41] and arrested in June 2001[42][43] in connection with police stings in which officers posed as under-aged girls to arrange meetings of a sexual nature. The first incident did not lead to any charges.[41] He was charged with a misdemeanor crime of "attempted endangerment of the welfare of a child" after the second, but charges were dropped after he completed six months of probation[44] and the record was sealed on condition that he avoid further trouble for a period of time.[41][45] After this information was made public in early 2003, Ritter said that the timing of the leak was politically motivated.[42][43][46]

Ritter was arrested again in November 2009[47] over communications with a police decoy he met on an Internet chat site. Police said that he exposed himself via a web camera after the officer said she was a 15-year-old girl; Ritter said he was not made aware of the ostensible age of his correspondent before the act. The next month, Ritter waived his right to a preliminary hearing and was released on a $25,000 unsecured bail. Charges included "unlawful contact with a minor, criminal use of a communications facility, corruption of minors, indecent exposure, possessing instruments of crime, criminal attempt and criminal solicitation".[48] Ritter rejected a plea bargain, testified in his trial and was found guilty of all but the criminal attempt count in a Monroe County, Pennsylvania courtroom on April 14, 2011.[1][49] In October 2011 he received a sentence of one and a half to five and a half years in prison.
Title: Re: For the ladies
Post by: DumbAss Tanker on February 20, 2014, 06:53:55 PM
Scott Ritter's name ring a bell?

I was more thinking of the rumors concerning Pitt's own debacle concerning his prematurely-terminated career teaching at a certain private middle school, but I suppose there is a 'Birds of a feather flock together' aspect to it, as well.