Sat Nov 23, 2013, 11:52 PM
Locut0s (4,282 posts)
Anyone have rich conservative relatives who like to deny their wealth?
Last edited Sat Nov 23, 2013, 11:52 PM - Edit history (1)
Or even get angry at you when you bring up the possibility that they may in fact be wealthy? I've got 2 sets of uncles who are both fairly wealthy, one more than the other, and both of whom are conservative to some degree, one MUCH more so than the other. Both of them seem to like to play mind games with the rest of the family and if the topic of wealth somehow comes up they seem to like to play the fool. "What me? We aren't wealthy" And there is a tone of "how dare you suggest we are", even when the topic naturally arises. Often this comes about in our family when it comes to splitting a bill for something.
Often the rich members of the family want to do something grand and showy for our grandfather, and now late grandmother, and want the rest of us to chip in. When we suggested we should all pay according to our ability, instead of their idea of a very high flat rate, they would get all high and mighty and bothered about the whole thing. Like it's your fault you don't have as much money as we do and how dare you bring up the fact that we have a lot, we hardly have any (*rolls eyes*). This has come up more than once. Recently there was a conversation between one of the rich uncles and our grandfather in which the rich uncle suggested he could get X mount of money for his house which anyone who knew anything about real estate in this city would know is undervaluing the property but AT LEAST 2x! But of course you could never bring up this fact, he would just get angry.
Anyone else have similar relatives?
When we suggested we should all pay according to our ability
Like it's your fault you don't have as much money as we do
and how dare you bring up the fact that we have a lot
How does the loser judge wealth?
KC
Sat Nov 23, 2013, 11:52 PM
Locut0s (4,282 posts)
i see that the fact that "someone" is paying for his(?) continued forays into psychotherapy, Hawaiian vacations, attempts at college, continued jobless existence in the basement at age 30, etc, etc, etc... doesn't seem to bother him(?).
How convenient.
Good point. Moochers are perennially obsessed with what other people have, and are almost always blind to their own mooching.
How does the loser judge wealth?
KC
Sat Nov 23, 2013, 11:52 PM
Locut0s (4,282 posts)
Anyone have rich conservative relatives who like to deny their wealth?
Last edited Sat Nov 23, 2013, 11:52 PM - Edit history (1)
Or even get angry at you when you bring up the possibility that they may in fact be wealthy? I've got 2 sets of uncles who are both fairly wealthy, one more than the other, and both of whom are conservative to some degree, one MUCH more so than the other. Both of them seem to like to play mind games with the rest of the family and if the topic of wealth somehow comes up they seem to like to play the fool. "What me? We aren't wealthy" And there is a tone of "how dare you suggest we are", even when the topic naturally arises. Often this comes about in our family when it comes to splitting a bill for something.
Often the rich members of the family want to do something grand and showy for our grandfather, and now late grandmother, and want the rest of us to chip in. When we suggested we should all pay according to our ability, instead of their idea of a very high flat rate, they would get all high and mighty and bothered about the whole thing. Like it's your fault you don't have as much money as we do and how dare you bring up the fact that we have a lot, we hardly have any (*rolls eyes*). This has come up more than once. Recently there was a conversation between one of the rich uncles and our grandfather in which the rich uncle suggested he could get X mount of money for his house which anyone who knew anything about real estate in this city would know is undervaluing the property but AT LEAST 2x! But of course you could never bring up this fact, he would just get angry.
Anyone else have similar relatives?
Envy. :mental: :loser:Except liberal dogma turns everyone that pays taxes into the rich uncle while they all see themselves as this greedy dimwit.
Loconuts should be taken by snow machine to a distant spot on the Canadian tundra and left. For the good of the tribe.A snow (making) machine, or a snow (track) machine ?
Your problem is you want the success, but don't wanna pay the dues. In short, you are a damned parasite loser. Save us all the grief and off yourself. I suggest a tall building.
Except liberal dogma turns everyone that pays taxes into the rich uncle while they all see themselves as this greedy dimwit.
I could NOT disagree more.
A tall building would cause no end of trouble -- cops, paramedics, firefighters (it seems they always need 100 or more at this sort of thing), the people in the building get evacuated or are so distracted they can't do their work, the sidewalk and street will have to be resurfaced (I have seen the damage a human body can do to a concrete landing even from a 9 story building), etc., etc. etc. No DUmmy is worth that hassle.
I suggest more personal means -- drugs or cuts (remember to go N/S, not E/W kids!), maybe over their keyboard in a personal melodrama while typing in some sort of libtard opus. Now THAT would be comedy gold!
Envy. :mental: :loser:Hi5. Envy is the foundation of socialism. It is the sin that has killed so many innocents in the 20th century.
Hi5. Envy is the foundation of socialism. It is the sin that has killed so many innocents in the 20th century.
A snow (making) machine, or a snow (track) machine ?
I vote for putting Loco in the snow making machine.
You can learn a lot saying "You want fries with that?".
Quote from: obumazombie on Today at 05:12:20 pm
A snow (making) machine, or a snow (track) machine ?
I vote for putting Loco in the snow making machine
BWAHAHAHAHA!!!! You made me laugh FD2003!!! H5!!!!
Only reason why I suggested a tall building is cause the dummies in general, this one in particular, screw up everything they do. Kinda hard to screw up once you jump off a tall building... although if it could be done, I bet a dummy will be the one that does it. :cheersmate: :cheersmate:
Loconuts should be taken by snow machine to a distant spot on the Canadian tundra and left. For the good of the tribe.
Wow, some useless bump-on-a-log goes on a tear about how he deserves someone else's hard-earned money and they don't care for it?
I'll be damned.
I think that would put him(?) back in psychotherapy.
(http://ts3.mm.bing.net/th?id=H.4681541354064274&pid=1.7)
Maybe, just maybe, the uncles aren't rich and are telling the truth. Just because they aren't sucking the government tit doesn't mean they're rich.True, DUmptards seem to view anyone not sucking that teat, to be a source for advancing their own "income".
Then again, I remember a story many years ago of a man who jumped from one of the Charleston area bridges, and walked away with cuts and bruises. (Didn't know water was sharp! Neither was the jumper. Had to be a DUmmie.)
Has anyone else noticed that nothing seems to steel Loconuts' resolve and passion more than whining about other people's money? You'd think that if he removed the diaper and the
maxipad and tried to apply that resolve to his own situation, he might get farther along than three weeks in a college.
Can you imagine what a mess he'll be when his parents are no longer around?
I think that's called Stewert.
Something like that happened a long time ago, maybe the 70s in Huntington, WV.
A blind drunk Pittian wino decided to end it all by jumping into the Ohio River.
He staggered out onto the 6th Street bridge, unseen by anyone as it was the middle of the night, climbed the railing and jumped.
He was found midmorning the next day, sober, screaming bloody murder, and stuck up to his waist in mud at the edge of the water.
Apparently in the dark he didn't realize he hadn't walked far enough to be over the river.
He recovered to vote democrat in the next election.
At least Stewart had the motivation to start his lame OReilly Sucks website.Fat che's little brother has the remote, and I'm not saying where it's at. :fuelfire:
Locust O's can't even summon the ambition to get up and get the remote.
I was running a route one Tuesday afternoon in South Charleston, just finished that leg of it, next was to cross over the Kanawah River into Dunbar. Problem was, some DUmbass had climbed to the top of the bridge, threatening to jump. Cops had the bridge blocked off, and I had to backtrack 10 miles round trip to cross the river.Another story from that same 6th Street Ohio River bridge in the 70s. Three Huntington democrats had a disagreement over a bag of marijuana. Two of them solved the problem by killing the third, and then taking his carcass to the 6th Street bridge for disposal. Unfortunately, they were seen tossing their dearly departed into the river, and quickly apprehended. I don't remember if their friend's body was found, but there was lots and lots of blood in their vehicle and on their clothes. Anyway, they were found not guilty of killing their buddy, but were convicted of stream littering and fined $1000 each. For years I had that newspaper clipping on the wall behind my reloading bench, got a laugh every time I glanced at it.
I told someone, don't remember if it was a customer or a cop, to just shoot the stupid bastard!
Another story from that same 6th Street Ohio River bridge in the 70s. Three Huntington democrats had a disagreement over a bag of marijuana. Two of them solved the problem by killing the third, and then taking his carcass to the 6th Street bridge for disposal. Unfortunately, they were seen tossing their dearly departed into the river, and quickly apprehended. I don't remember if their friend's body was found, but there was lots and lots of blood in their vehicle and on their clothes. Anyway, they were found not guilty of killing their buddy, but were convicted of stream littering and fined $1000 each. For years I had that newspaper clipping on the wall behind my reloading bench, got a laugh every time I glanced at it.