The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: GOBUCKS on January 07, 2013, 10:21:21 AM

Title: A Democrat Discussion Of Firearms
Post by: GOBUCKS on January 07, 2013, 10:21:21 AM
This DUmp thread serves as a good example of how knowledgeable democrats are about firearms.

No one can possibly believe that great minds like Plugs Biden and Sheila Jackson Lee, who will be debating and voting on the jug-eared Kenyan's legislation, have any better understanding than these nameless, faceless, useless DUmp unterprimitiven:

Quote
Sun Jan 6, 2013, 09:53 AM
Justice (4,314 posts)

Are semi-automatics really used for hunting?
Doesn't the spray of bullets destroy the target, including the hide and the meat?

Is it a "sport" when you use a semi? Isn't it akin to shooting fish in a barrel?

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022141095


Quote
Response to Justice (Original post)
Sun Jan 6, 2013, 10:29 AM
samsingh (9,150 posts)
19. by cowards or butchers maybe

 
Quote
Sun Jan 6, 2013, 06:27 PM
hobbit709 (24,471 posts)
53. So you don't let facts get in the way or your prejudices.

the original OP was about semiautomatics and hunting.



Quote
Response to hobbit709 (Reply #53)
Sun Jan 6, 2013, 06:35 PM
BainsBane (2,353 posts)
56. And?

You insisted we all need to learn about guns, as though there was some virtue in spending one's days thinking about and practicing how to kill. We do not need to know about guns. I explained quite clearly why. If a person plans on hunting, obviously they need to choose the right riffle. The authors of legislation need to know which guns to ban.
Hmmmm....
 
Title: Re: A Democrat Discussion Of Firearms
Post by: Rebel on January 07, 2013, 11:11:16 AM
Quote
Sun Jan 6, 2013, 09:53 AM
Justice (4,314 posts)

Are semi-automatics really used for hunting?
Doesn't the spray of bullets destroy the target, including the hide and the meat?

Where do I get one of these bullet-spraying semi-automatics?
Title: Re: A Democrat Discussion Of Firearms
Post by: BlueStateSaint on January 07, 2013, 11:35:40 AM
Where do I get one of these bullet-spraying semi-automatics?

Santa will deliver it . . . once he's through updating the 'Naughty' list.

(http://25.media.tumblr.com/a2282013519b8c9f4fafc99853dde3ac/tumblr_mfnahukhFx1qbwn05o1_500.jpg)

(Blatantly stolen from the photobomb thread in the Lounge. :tongue: )
Title: Re: A Democrat Discussion Of Firearms
Post by: FiddyBeowulf on January 07, 2013, 11:41:51 AM
Quote
BainsBane (2,358 posts)
87. Enough

View profile

Last edited Mon Jan 7, 2013, 10:42 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1)
Bullshit. You ask about ways to restrict violence and then respond by showing you have No interest in doing anything. All meaningful research is funded by the govt. It's the same research that has produced the internet, pace makers, and advanced prosthetics. I happen to know a great deal about federally funded research since I make my living from it. So-called biased research ( what a sophomoric concept) does not make it beyond the rigorous review standards to qualify for federal funding. That you defend that kind of restriction on free speech and public health studies is thoroughly repulsive.

Private gun sales are not subject to background checks because gun companies profit from Selling guns to criminals. You see for no need to change that. Even 70% of NRA members want that changed, but you are to the right of them. The NRA restricts the enforcement of law, prohibits tracking of guns, and restricts the first amendment. The more you write, the weaker your argument gets. Keep it up and no one is going to give a **** about your right to bear arms. No one is more effective at demonstrating the need for dramatic gun control than you and your fellow gungeoneers. You people have done more to pierce the fallacy of concerned and law abiding gun owners than even the mass murder of children. If you lent yourselves out to the Brady campaign, the nation would quickly rally to support dramatic and comprehensive gun control. Enough of your bullshit. Consider yourself my mortal enemy.
Pulled this from the same thread. So much ignorance in this one post alone but I just bolded the one I thought was the most ignorant.

How do gun companies profit from selling to people who by law cannot by their products? How are their products marketed for the "illegal" consumer?
Title: Re: A Democrat Discussion Of Firearms
Post by: GOBUCKS on January 07, 2013, 12:54:51 PM
Where do I get one of these bullet-spraying semi-automatics?
I don't want to spray bullets.

I want one of those movie guns where every shot is followed by two seconds of a ricochet sound.
Title: Re: A Democrat Discussion Of Firearms
Post by: FlaGator on January 07, 2013, 12:59:14 PM
Where do I get one of these bullet-spraying semi-automatics?

The riffle aisle in Walmart.
Title: Re: A Democrat Discussion Of Firearms
Post by: DumbAss Tanker on January 07, 2013, 01:19:34 PM
Quote
Private gun sales are not subject to background checks because gun companies profit from Selling guns to criminals. You see for no need to change that.

Wow, I can just order one of those bullet-spraying semi-automatic rifffles from a Gun Company with no paperwork?!!?  What a fool.  This retard obviously doesn't even know what the term 'Private sale' means, if it did, the DUmmie would realized that gun manufacturers are about as fond of private sales as car manufacturers are of good used cars.
Title: Re: A Democrat Discussion Of Firearms
Post by: Texacon on January 07, 2013, 01:45:32 PM
You can buy them books and buy them books but all they're going to do is eat the covers off them.

I always wondered what that saying meant ... then I saw this thread.

DUmmies have no idea and should never be allowed to own a firearm, of any kind.

KC
Title: Re: A Democrat Discussion Of Firearms
Post by: DefiantSix on January 07, 2013, 01:49:13 PM
You can buy them books and buy them books but all they're going to do is eat the covers off them.

I always wondered what that saying meant ... then I saw this thread.

DUmmies have no idea and should never be allowed to own a firearm, of any kind.

KC

For most of the DUmmies, if their rap sheets don't prevent them from buying a gun legally, then that whole "adjudicated mentally defective" clause is a useful catch-all disqualifier.
Title: Re: A Democrat Discussion Of Firearms
Post by: IassaFTots on January 07, 2013, 01:49:26 PM
Spray of bullets.   :rofl:
Title: Re: A Democrat Discussion Of Firearms
Post by: DumbAss Tanker on January 07, 2013, 02:00:17 PM
Spray of bullets.   :rofl:

I thought about making up a little story about it being just a thinly-disguised Nazi secret weapon marketed to unsuspecting civilians, along with making up a cool German name for it like Kugelspritzgewehr or Sturmspritzer ('Bullet-spraying gun' or 'Assault sprayer'), but then I realized one of the DU halfwits that lurk here would probably take it as true and spread it all over place, which other idiots-at-large might actually believe and react to.
Title: Re: A Democrat Discussion Of Firearms
Post by: IassaFTots on January 07, 2013, 02:06:56 PM
I thought about making up a little story about it being just a thinly-disguised Nazi secret weapon marketed to unsuspecting civilians, along with making up a cool German name for it like Kugelspritzgewehr or Sturmspritzer ('Bullet-spraying gun' or 'Assault sprayer'), but then I realized one of the DU halfwits that lurk here would probably take it as true and spread it all over place, which other idiots-at-large might actually believe and react to.

Pfeffernusse.  :-)  

I don't know how to type an umlaut, please forgive.  

Title: Re: A Democrat Discussion Of Firearms
Post by: Freeper on January 07, 2013, 02:13:30 PM
I don't want to spray bullets.

I want one of those movie guns where every shot is followed by two seconds of a ricochet sound.

I want one of those guns that you can spray bullets for hours and never have to reload.
Title: Re: A Democrat Discussion Of Firearms
Post by: DumbAss Tanker on January 07, 2013, 02:14:08 PM
Pfeffernusse.  :-)  

I don't know how to type an umlaut, please forgive.  



I cheat, I have a small text file on my desktop with the common German and Spanish special characters in it and when I want to use one, I just pull up the window and c&p the letter into my post.  I probably ought to add some French ones to it for place names, but I know less than a dozen common French phrases, and make no pretension of being able to speak it at all.

 :-)
Title: Re: A Democrat Discussion Of Firearms
Post by: Freeper on January 07, 2013, 02:15:14 PM
When you have people who know nothing about guns except for what they see in movies trying to make gun laws it ain't gonna go well.
Title: Re: A Democrat Discussion Of Firearms
Post by: Chris_ on January 07, 2013, 02:17:21 PM
I want one of those guns that you can spray bullets for hours and never have to reload.
I want one of those magic Hollywood guns that have zero recoil.
Title: Re: A Democrat Discussion Of Firearms
Post by: DefiantSix on January 07, 2013, 02:18:42 PM
I cheat, I have a small text file on my desktop with the common German and Spanish special characters in it and when I want to use one, I just pull up the window and c&p the letter into my post.  I probably ought to add some French ones to it for place names, but I know less than a dozen common French phrases, and make no pretension of being able to speak it at all.

 :-)

I just kick open my Windows character map.
Title: Re: A Democrat Discussion Of Firearms
Post by: IassaFTots on January 07, 2013, 02:19:28 PM
I just kick open my Windows character map.


Well pin a rose on your nose then.   :tongue:
Title: Re: A Democrat Discussion Of Firearms
Post by: DefiantSix on January 07, 2013, 02:27:07 PM
Well pin a rose on your nose then.   :tongue:

(http://images.zaazu.com/img/Punk-punk-male-boy-smiley-emoticon-000432-huge.png)

Not the nose; I have some anchor chain hanging from it. Maybe the left cheek?  :-)
Title: Re: A Democrat Discussion Of Firearms
Post by: marv on January 07, 2013, 02:29:16 PM
I want one of those magic Hollywood guns that have zero recoil.

I want a ten shot six shooter........
Title: Re: A Democrat Discussion Of Firearms
Post by: GOBUCKS on January 07, 2013, 03:23:38 PM
I want one of those riffles where you can fire hundreds of rounds without carrying any weight.

And I want one where you can spray bullets for fifteen minutes, then grab the barrel to carry it. 
Title: Re: A Democrat Discussion Of Firearms
Post by: 67 Rover on January 07, 2013, 03:28:10 PM
I want one of those riffles where you can fire hundreds of rounds without carrying any weight.

And I want one where you can spray bullets for fifteen minutes, then grab the barrel to carry it. 


I want one that can shoot through the blade of a bulldozer with "cop killer bullets".
Title: Re: A Democrat Discussion Of Firearms
Post by: Randy on January 07, 2013, 03:40:37 PM

I want one that can shoot through the blade of a bulldozer with "cop killer bullets".

I've got one....wait what?
Title: Re: A Democrat Discussion Of Firearms
Post by: thundley4 on January 07, 2013, 03:42:26 PM
Quote
Private gun sales are not subject to background checks because gun companies profit from Selling guns to criminals.

Pulled this from the same thread. So much ignorance in this one post alone but I just bolded the one I thought was the most ignorant.

How do gun companies profit from selling to people who by law cannot by their products? How are their products marketed for the "illegal" consumer?


I read earlier today that Obama may try to use ObamaCare tactics on gun control legislation. He will go after the "gun show" loophole by getting the Gun manufacturers on his side, since they don't make money on those sales.  He fails to realize that most of those guns come from manufacturers not private gunsmiths.
Title: Re: A Democrat Discussion Of Firearms
Post by: 67 Rover on January 07, 2013, 03:48:50 PM
I've got one....wait what?


I caught the end of a Mel Gibson movie this weekend where he shot a bad guy through the blade of a bulldozer with "Cop killer bullets"   Lethal weapon 2,3 ??

Title: Re: A Democrat Discussion Of Firearms
Post by: Airwolf on January 07, 2013, 05:02:05 PM

I caught the end of a Mel Gibson movie this weekend where he shot a bad guy through the blade of a bulldozer with "Cop killer bullets"   Lethal weapon 2,3 ??



3 or 4. It was one of the last ones because the first two are tied together by the plot.
Title: Re: A Democrat Discussion Of Firearms
Post by: Maxiest on January 07, 2013, 05:10:58 PM
These idiots don't even know that any pistol besides a revolver is a semi-automatic?

That's what scares me when I see bills banning "semi-automatic" guns.
Title: Re: A Democrat Discussion Of Firearms
Post by: DumbAss Tanker on January 07, 2013, 06:10:37 PM
I just kick open my Windows character map.


I'll stick with my method, it only has a half-dozen words with the letters and languages I actually use to look through, I can take the entire document in at a glance.  I used Windows character sets for the task with a word processor, but the c&p from a very small set was a whole lot faster.  Of course someone who doesn't touch type or has a non-mouse input device like a touchpad or some such would have a different experience with it.
Title: Re: A Democrat Discussion Of Firearms
Post by: Delmar on January 07, 2013, 07:06:44 PM
Quote
We need safer guns and safer bullets.
Rocket Surgeon General Joycelyn Elders
Title: Re: A Democrat Discussion Of Firearms
Post by: SSG Snuggle Bunny on January 07, 2013, 07:13:55 PM
I thought about making up a little story about it being just a thinly-disguised Nazi secret weapon marketed to unsuspecting civilians, along with making up a cool German name for it like Kugelspritzgewehr or Sturmspritzer ('Bullet-spraying gun' or 'Assault sprayer'), but then I realized one of the DU halfwits that lurk here would probably take it as true and spread it all over place, which other idiots-at-large might actually believe and react to.

Do it! Do it! Do it!

Do it or you're a *****!
Title: Re: A Democrat Discussion Of Firearms
Post by: diesel driver on January 07, 2013, 07:55:51 PM
I thought about making up a little story about it being just a thinly-disguised Nazi secret weapon marketed to unsuspecting civilians, along with making up a cool German name for it like Kugelspritzgewehr or Sturmspritzer ('Bullet-spraying gun' or 'Assault sprayer'), but then I realized one of the DU halfwits that lurk here would probably take it as true and spread it all over place, which other idiots-at-large might actually believe and react to.

DO IT!

That would be as epic as the thread on FR about 6 or so years ago, when the DUmmies thought Walmart was building "underground detention centers", at the direction of the BFEE and Haliburton.   :lmao:
Title: Re: A Democrat Discussion Of Firearms
Post by: Airwolf on January 07, 2013, 08:49:31 PM
Well we all know that El Guapo has one called the Sturmweber, an evil assault Riffle so maybe that's the kind we should all get?
Title: Re: A Democrat Discussion Of Firearms
Post by: GOBUCKS on January 07, 2013, 09:06:10 PM
Well we all know that El Guapo has one called the Sturmweber, an evil assault Riffle so maybe that's the kind we should all get?
That's her assault grill.
Title: Re: A Democrat Discussion Of Firearms
Post by: Big Dog on January 07, 2013, 09:23:16 PM
That's her assault grill.

(http://cdn.furniturefashion.com/image/2009/09/Gun%20Barbecue%20Grill.jpg)
Die Sturm Weber
Title: Re: A Democrat Discussion Of Firearms
Post by: BEG on January 07, 2013, 09:24:05 PM
So Mexico makes it basically impossible for law abiding Mexican citizens to own guns. How is that working out for them?  Look at the murder rate of Juarez vs El Paso. They are directly across the river from each other.

The strict gun laws of Mexico really make it impossible for criminals who want to murder people to get guns.  :whatever:

You people are children. You see a shiny object and scream and shout about it for a few months then lose your steam. In a few months there will be yet another shiny object to turn your heads. Maybe it will be the mass layoffs all you idiotic people deserve.

LINK (http://www.theblaze.com/contributions/mexico-proves-strict-gun-laws-won’t-prevent-massacres/)

Quote
Contrary to popular belief, Mexico’s constitution has its own version of our Second Amendment. However, few private citizens own firearms. Federal laws have severely restricted the ability to own and carry weapons to soldiers, police, trained bodyguards, and a few others who can make it through the miles-long gauntlet of the application process. If a Mexican citizen can survive the background checks, the mountains of paperwork, the half-dozen required personal recommendations, and the expense, they are limited to buying guns with low stopping power.

There is also only one gun shop in Mexico where they can legally purchase firearms, and it’s in Mexico City—not exactly a close drive for many Mexicans.
Title: Re: A Democrat Discussion Of Firearms
Post by: Zathras on January 08, 2013, 07:46:57 AM
I found the weapon the DUmbass was talking about. Hard to get though as there's only one and it's used by Chuck Norris....

[youtube=425,350]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z1O-1K1N_Ik[/youtube]