The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: formerlurker on July 16, 2012, 06:16:20 PM

Title: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: formerlurker on July 16, 2012, 06:16:20 PM
Quote
Star Member Javaman (37,333 posts)

View profile
 
Not two minutes ago a moron co-worker comes up to me
He's a well known repuke/ ball licker.

My building, where I work in Austin, over looks the Austin Music Hall.

President Obama is speaking there tomorrow. Sadly, I can't go.

Anyway, this moron sidles up to me and says, "you know this would make a great vantage point".

I'm confused right off the bat, I'm thinking, sure this is a great view to see the President, but this moron is right wing.

So I say, "what do you mean?"

He says, "well you would have a clear shot" And he makes the hand gesture of a gun.

The I say, "at whom?" I'm just about ready to speed dial the Secret Service.

Then he says, "well, you know...(long pause)"

"No. I don't", my blood is beginning to boil a this moment. "tell me".

Then he looks me in the eyes, (he's not a bright person, but I think something clicked). "just, you know, anyone".

Then I say, "if you have something to say, say it".

Then he says, "well, you know he has a big contract out on him"

"On Whom?" I kept pressing.

Then he finally says, "the president".

If I wasn't at work, I would have punched him in the mouth, but instead I said, "so are you advocating shooting the president?"

It was at this point, I think it dawned on him that 1) he was certainly speaking to the wrong person 2) I wouldn't have hesitated for a moment to call the Secret Service and finally 3) that he was a colossal jackass.

He then coughs stumbles through some bullshit unintelligible something than finally says, "oh no, no not at all".

then I just looked at him, like the filth that he is and said, "I'm done with this conversation. Don't speak to me again unless it regards something to do with work."

He exclaims, "me too!" and walks away.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002958593



The question here is would Skinner give javaman up when the feds coming knocking to find out if this silly story is true? 


Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: formerlurker on July 16, 2012, 06:17:43 PM
Note that this is a seagull post - javaman posts this extreme accusation and then poof disappears. 


 :popcorn:
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: BEG on July 16, 2012, 06:19:28 PM
Liar lips
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Kyle Ricky on July 16, 2012, 06:26:32 PM
There is another one without the bushes, the big round of applause as he is walking away, how hundreds of people registered as democrat because of him, and how everyone in the room is listening to what he is saying (as he raises his voice). Are they changing the script or something?
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: ChuckJ on July 16, 2012, 06:31:56 PM
Let's look at some of the things that seem out of place in this story.

1) The moonbat has a job.
2) The moonbat remains so quiet concerning politics at the job that the repuke didn't even know he was a moonbat.
3) The repuke, and not the moonbat, suggests violence against a political figure.
4) The moonbat, instead of ranting and raving like a lunatic, remains calm and stern.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: notaDUmmie on July 16, 2012, 06:38:32 PM
Hopefully, Javaman has wallduded himself, as Skins has now contacted the Secret Service.  I would LOVE to be a bug on the wall when Javaman has to explain that he was lying...I'm sure his employer will be thrilled to have the Secret Service crawling all over his business.


Quote
Skinner (56,023 posts)

 FYI: I deleted the Javaman thread.
Last edited Mon Jul 16, 2012, 07:39 PM USA/ET - Edit history (2)

The Secret Service is aware of the thread -- I have discussed it with them. They advised me to remove the thread.

That is all.

Skinner
DU Admin

ON EDIT: There is no need to rec this thread. I just put this up so you all would know where Javaman's thread went.

SECOND EDIT: To those of you who are curious: Javaman did not post anything inappropriate. He shared a story about something inappropriate his co-worker said. 


http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002959675
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Delmar on July 16, 2012, 06:38:43 PM
Quote
Response to RagAss (Reply #104)Mon Jul 16, 2012, 07:01 PM
longship (12,262 posts)
125. Javaman is a longtime citizen of DU.

I presume he did the correct thing. I hope that he cannot post because he's being interviewed by Secret Service. Unless, the Secret Service -- possibly understandably -- asks him not to follow up, I imagine he will post a follow-up.

If he doesn't, do not bust his chops about it. Many of us old timers would gladly vouch for his integrity.

Plus, two DUers in this very thread have indicated that they have called this in.

Nevertheless, we all are -- like National Enquirer readers -- enquiring minds.

And thanks for your service here, Javaman.
Riiiiiight.  Javaman can't follow up because he's working with the Secret Service to bring the rethug to justice.   :bs:

Javaman, walk away from your job and go on the run, the rethug is trying to set you up as a patsy.  Well, that's what the rethug would do in a movie.  

Javaman, if you need some drama in your life maybe you should start watching General Hospital or some other harmless outlet for your fantasies.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Kyle Ricky on July 16, 2012, 06:38:53 PM
Let's look at some of the things that seem out of place in this story.

1) The moonbat has a job.
2) The moonbat remains so quiet concerning politics at the job that the repuke didn't even know he was a moonbat.
3) The repuke, and not the moonbat, suggests violence against a political figure.
4) The moonbat, instead of ranting and raving like a lunatic, remains calm and stern.

Those are good points. With those in mind, we know this is one big lie.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: FlippyDoo on July 16, 2012, 06:42:17 PM
Quote
Response to RagAss (Reply #104)Mon Jul 16, 2012, 07:01 PM
longship (12,262 posts)
125. Javaman is a longtime citizen of DU.

I presume he did the correct thing. I hope that he cannot post because he's being interviewed by Secret Service. Unless, the Secret Service -- possibly understandably -- asks him not to follow up, I imagine he will post a follow-up.

If he doesn't, do not bust his chops about it. Many of us old timers would gladly vouch for his integrity.

Plus, two DUers in this very thread have indicated that they have called this in.

Nevertheless, we all are -- like National Enquirer readers -- enquiring minds.

And thanks for your service here, Javaman.

That cottonmouth moccasin won't bite you. All the other vipers will gladly vouch for his kindly, gentle, and non-biting ways.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Kyle Ricky on July 16, 2012, 06:45:59 PM
The Secret Service doesn't mess around. Once they get information of any type threat being made against the President. They are the persons house or place of business with in 24 hours. I know this from experience, as when I was a kid a neighbor called them on my grandfather. He tried to tell them that my grandfather was plotting to shoot President Clinton. When they showed up at my house to talk to my grandfather about it they found a 75 year old man who could hardly walk! After we explained to them that the idiot neighbor is a psycho path, they went to visit him. To this day I am unsure as to what they did to him, or said to him, but after that he didn't talk to us for a couple of years (In fact he finally spoke to us when my grandfather died, and that was for about five minutes to give us his condolences). They must have put a big scare into him.

If that moonbat was lying about his co-worker. He can be in for some real world awakening.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: ScubaGuy on July 16, 2012, 06:48:06 PM
It has to be a bouncy.  Javaman says a coworker said they have a good shooting position?  Sorry but I've never seen a McDonalds that wasn't on the ground floor.  :loser:
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Chris_ on July 16, 2012, 06:49:00 PM
Quote
Skinner (56,023 posts)

The Secret Service is aware of the thread -- I have discussed it with them.
Ahh, it's just like the good old days.

They're a great bunch, but don't question their patriotism.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: ChuckJ on July 16, 2012, 06:50:47 PM
Ahh, it's just like the good old days.

They're a great bunch, but don't question their patriotism.

I wonder of Skimmer has a direct hotline to the Secret Service.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Kyle Ricky on July 16, 2012, 06:52:34 PM
I wonder of Skimmer has a direct hotline to the Secret Service.

He probably has them on speed dial, and has a certain agent that he speaks with personally.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: formerlurker on July 16, 2012, 06:55:08 PM
I wonder of Skimmer has a direct hotline to the Secret Service.

That is probably a lie also - he just wanted the thread deleted.

Of course it is copied here for the SS to review.  :-)
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: formerlurker on July 16, 2012, 06:56:00 PM
Are our esteemed guests from Texas?
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: NHSparky on July 16, 2012, 06:57:42 PM
I wonder of Skimmer has a direct hotline to the Secret Service.

Given their posting history, I'm sure the SS has a hotline to $kammer.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Kyle Ricky on July 16, 2012, 07:01:58 PM
That is probably a lie also - he just wanted the thread deleted.

Of course it is copied here for the SS to review.  :-)

How about we call the Secret Service and let them about it?
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Mr Mannn on July 16, 2012, 07:08:19 PM
I wonder of Skimmer has a direct hotline to the Secret Service.
No/ Its the other way around. DU is infamous for making death threats against President Bush. Hence DU is on a subversive website watch list.

Once this lie was posted, the SS hit the phone and called Skinner, something the skin man is used to by now.

We all know this bouncy is a lie. My only question is this: Will Javaman falsely accuse an innocent man to the SS?
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Kyle Ricky on July 16, 2012, 07:12:09 PM
Will Javaman falsely accuse an innocent man to the SS?


He is a stupid liberal, of course he is going to lie to the Secret Service.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: WinOne4TheGipper on July 16, 2012, 07:21:29 PM
So, your response to a potential assassin is to shame him in front of the retards on DU?
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: notaDUmmie on July 16, 2012, 07:25:54 PM
So, your response to a potential assassin is to shame him in front of the retards on DU?

Um, the Odinnumbers DUmmy doesn't like it when we use "-tard" as a suffix.


 :rant:
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: WinOne4TheGipper on July 16, 2012, 07:26:23 PM
He probably has them on speed dial, and has a certain agent that he speaks with personally.

Agent Mike!
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: dane on July 16, 2012, 07:30:26 PM
One of the lessons JavaDUmmy might take home from this has two parts:

Don't get into political discussions with coworkers while at work.

After ignoring part 1, don't make posts on a public forum while at work.

Whatever company he works for - McDonald's, Starbucks, Walmart - is not paying hime for those activities.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Kyle Ricky on July 16, 2012, 07:35:02 PM
One of the lessons JavaDUmmy might take home from this has two parts:

Don't get into political discussions with coworkers while at work.

After ignoring part 1, don't make posts on a public forum while at work.

Whatever company he works for - McDonald's, Starbucks, Walmart - is not paying hime for those activities.

And if the Secret Service shows up at his place of working asking for him, he will be fired on the spot.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Jasonw560 on July 16, 2012, 07:35:23 PM
Are our esteemed guests from Texas?
Not Texas.....Austin. The San Francisco of Texas. Their unofficial motto is "Keep Austin Weird".

We tolerate it because that's where Governor Perry has to live for now.

Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: dane on July 16, 2012, 07:42:22 PM
That is probably a lie also - he just wanted the thread deleted.

Of course it is copied here for the SS to review.  :-)

None of the DUmmies who are now asking what is going on will ever admit that they have been over here reading the now-deleted post.  But you know they are.  They also shop at Walmart, and deny that on a regular basis.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: shadeaux on July 16, 2012, 10:00:35 PM
It bees that way sometimes.

http://suburbandweller.blogspot.com/2012/05/okay-i-think-im-buzzedpart-4.html

Scroll down.   :-)
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Ballygrl on July 16, 2012, 10:04:12 PM
The OP typed up that entire post within 2 minutes of talking to the co-worker? and why is he using a computer at work for personal use?
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Ballygrl on July 16, 2012, 10:05:55 PM
The post is gone:

Quote
Error

That post cannot be found.

ETA: Oooops, didn't read the whole thread, you guys knew it was pulled.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Ballygrl on July 16, 2012, 10:11:50 PM
Should the thread here be deleted too being that the SS told DU to remove it?
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Evil_Conservative on July 16, 2012, 10:13:19 PM
:rotf:

Enjoy the SS at your place of work tomorrow, Javaman.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Jasonw560 on July 16, 2012, 10:21:43 PM
:rotf:

Enjoy the SS at your place of work tomorrow, Javaman.
Can't wait to hear that bouncy. How many SS members will it take to take the co-worker down? How many more will cower in fear as they hear taunts of  "fascist pig" and " Stormtrooper" and other bigoted epithets from our brave hero? How calm and rational will he be in the face of "the man"?

Tune in tomorrow for "As The Bouncy Ball Bounces......"
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: BattleHymn on July 16, 2012, 10:21:49 PM
Should the thread here be deleted too being that the SS told DU to remove it?

Shucks, now why do you want to go and spoil our fun, Bally?    :hammer::-)
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Ballygrl on July 16, 2012, 10:23:14 PM
Shucks, now why do you want to go and spoil our fun, Bally?    :hammer::-)

I'm sorry, it's just a serious matter when the Secret Service is involved.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Evil_Conservative on July 16, 2012, 10:27:00 PM
I'm sorry, it's just a serious matter when the Secret Service is involved.

It's probably not even true.  As someone else mentioned, Skinner probably just wanted a reason to delete the thread.  I don't really see the Secret Service calling someone personally telling them to take a post down.  I'd expect a visit at my door, not a phone call.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Ballygrl on July 16, 2012, 10:37:09 PM
It would be interesting to see if the OP talks about the SS coming to visit.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: thundley4 on July 16, 2012, 10:48:59 PM
It would be interesting to see if the OP talks about the SS coming to visit.

I'm sure the next bouncy tale will involve the coworker being gone for a couple of days then coming back to work contrite, apologetic and with  his tale between his legs.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Jasonw560 on July 16, 2012, 10:56:14 PM
I'm sure the next bouncy tale will involve the coworker being gone for a couple of days then coming back to work contrite, apologetic and with  his tale between his legs.
And singing the praises of the mighty Zero (with the rim ripped off)
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Revolution on July 16, 2012, 11:07:55 PM
Whether this is a blatant lie, or truth, but it was actually the OP who was telling someone else this, (that's what I suspect) this is off the wall even for DU. What is this guy, the biggest idiot in the DUniverse?
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Airwolf on July 17, 2012, 02:07:38 AM
Words fail me. That level of stupid by DU should never see the light of day but they insist on posting it.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: diesel driver on July 17, 2012, 02:57:15 AM
DUmmie javaman needs to look at the bright side.

If he gets a visit from the SS or is fired, he now will have time to see "TEH WON"!   :lmao:
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: WinOne4TheGipper on July 17, 2012, 07:31:04 AM
Should the thread here be deleted too being that the SS told DU to remove it?

Sure. :rofl:  If the secret service was all that interested in removing a thread from a message board, we would be contacted, too.  $kammer is so full of it.  He just wanted to hide that embarrassing thread anyway he could.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Gina on July 17, 2012, 07:42:28 AM
Quote
Star Member Javaman (37,333 posts)

View profile
 
Not two minutes ago a moron co-worker comes up to me
He's a well known repuke/ ball licker.

You know for the left being so tolerant of people they sure do make alot of crude jokes that are insulting to homosexuals.  They act like licking balls is a bad thing.  Are they saying that underneath it all homosexuality is an insult?
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: ScubaGuy on July 17, 2012, 07:53:20 AM
I'm sure the next bouncy tale will involve the coworker being gone for a couple of days then coming back to work contrite, apologetic and with  his tale between his legs.

That's my guess too.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Karin on July 17, 2012, 07:56:22 AM
You know for the left being so tolerant of people they sure do make alot of crude jokes that are insulting to homosexuals.  They act like licking balls is a bad thing.  Are they saying that underneath it all homosexuality is an insult?

Every now and then, they step into it publicly.  They try and accuse some enemy of being gay.  Then, faced with the question, "what's wrong with being gay?"  They twist and squirm, hem and haw.  It's funny to watch. 
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Tucker on July 17, 2012, 09:21:19 AM
For those who don't know, Javaman is a rabid gun grabber, up there with the likes of the Brady Bunch.

They will not hesitate lying to promote an agenda.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Carl on July 17, 2012, 11:05:20 AM
Quote
The I say, "at whom?" I'm just about ready to speed dial the Secret Service.


Sure,everyone has the SS on speed dial. :mental:
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Bad Dog on July 17, 2012, 01:06:49 PM
If the isp goes to the DUmmies work place (I know I'm assuming a lot but, work with me here) & it actually is near where the POTUS is going to be, I'm expecting some serious shit hitting the fan.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Kyle Ricky on July 17, 2012, 01:28:44 PM
If the isp goes to the DUmmies work place (I know I'm assuming a lot but, work with me here) & it actually is near where the POTUS is going to be, I'm expecting some serious shit hitting the fan.

The retard will have to think of another big whopper of a lie to clear himself.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Bad Dog on July 17, 2012, 01:36:28 PM
The retard will have to think of another big whopper of a lie to clear himself.

What's that great line from Men In Black? When being questioned about having a sense of humor, Tommy Lee said "not that we are aware of mam".
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: delilahmused on July 17, 2012, 01:41:57 PM
Wonder what the penalty is for making up a story and lying to the Secret Service. I'd like to have a good vantage point to see that discussion.

Cindie
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Bad Dog on July 17, 2012, 01:43:45 PM
Wonder what the penalty is for making up a story and lying to the Secret Service. I'd like to have a good vantage point to see that discussion.

Cindie

I would hope it would involve some variation on a proctology theme.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Kyle Ricky on July 17, 2012, 01:48:07 PM
If they find out he lied, it wouldn't surprise me if they took him away in the Ricky Taxi Cab.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: vesta111 on July 17, 2012, 01:55:44 PM
If the isp goes to the DUmmies work place (I know I'm assuming a lot but, work with me here) & it actually is near where the POTUS is going to be, I'm expecting some serious shit hitting the fan.

Nah, it will be one mans word against another.   No proof anything like that was said.

To twist this further, this Java dude will next post this, that---

The SS did come to interview me and when they looked out the window the two made quick calls to someone.  They thanked me for pointing out a serious breech in security.  These floors will be locked down when Obama is in the area.  

All the workers crowded around cheering me and then a Cop jumped out of an elevator to shake my hand.




Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Bad Dog on July 17, 2012, 02:04:03 PM
Nah, it will be one mans word against another.   No proof anything like that was said.

To twist this further, this Java dude will next post this, that---

The SS did come to interview me and when they looked out the window the two made quick calls to someone.  They thanked me for pointing out a serious breech in security.  These floors will be locked down when Obama is in the area.  

All the workers crowded around cheering me and then a Cop jumped out of an elevator to shake my hand.



You misunderstand.  I believe this was a phony story but, the SS will still have to investigate it.  Falsly reporting a threat on certain specified public officials is a felony.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: miskie on July 17, 2012, 02:06:42 PM
I certainly hope for Javaman's sake that his little tale is true, because if its a bouncy, the only thing that will be bouncing are Javaman's nuts once they meet up with a steel-toed boot at an accelerated speed.

Remember - the way DU is now hypersensitive to assaulting the president, (not so much during the Bush years) this story qualifies as 'planting the idea' in some idiot's skull by their own decree. Therefore Javaman is guilty of a crime.

I can only suppose this is why other DUmmies are vouching for him.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Kyle Ricky on July 17, 2012, 02:17:23 PM
Nah, it will be one mans word against another.   No proof anything like that was said.

To twist this further, this Java dude will next post this, that---

The SS did come to interview me and when they looked out the window the two made quick calls to someone.  They thanked me for pointing out a serious breech in security.  These floors will be locked down when Obama is in the area.  

All the workers crowded around cheering me and then a Cop jumped out of an elevator to shake my hand.






The part about the cop jumping out of the elevator to shake his hand made me laugh. That must be the new type of hedges.  :lmao:

I also agree that falsifying a report to the Secret Service is no laughing matter. They will take it very seriously.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: dane on July 17, 2012, 02:41:31 PM
What's that great line from Men In Black? When being questioned about having a sense of humor, Tommy Lee said "not that we are aware of mam".
Nads knows the Secret Service and their humor level.   In this thread where Skimmer tells us he deleted the Javaman thread
Quote
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=959675
Skinner (56,027 posts)
 FYI: I deleted the Javaman thread
there is this, perhaps trying to lighten the tone, but who really knows what they are thinking - in any event, we'll find out that Nads knows better
Quote
permatex (773 posts)
41. The Secret Service takes any threats seriously and it's told that they have no sense of humor.
And here she comes, with the real truth, ferreted out via trends, arcs, portents, owl entrails, dots, and photographic evidence found using the good rig
Quote
nadinbrzezinski (106,209 posts)
44. It's not told they have no sense of humor.
Thanks Nads.  I knew you could not let one go by.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Kyle Ricky on July 17, 2012, 02:43:20 PM
^ Add Secret Service Agent to Nads rsume?
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Bad Dog on July 17, 2012, 02:48:36 PM
^ Add Secret Service Agent to Nads rsume?

Indubitably!
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Karin on July 17, 2012, 02:50:36 PM
I looked all over, and could not find him posting today.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Gina on July 17, 2012, 02:55:17 PM
I looked all over, and could not find him posting today.

They got him!  :II:
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Bad Dog on July 17, 2012, 02:57:13 PM
They got him!  :II:

Would that it were....delicious.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Kyle Ricky on July 17, 2012, 03:04:32 PM
They got him!  :II:

That would be beautiful!  :yahoo:
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: dane on July 17, 2012, 03:30:14 PM
They got him!  :II:
If true, would it be an offense serious enough for a banishment from the island?
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: DefiantSix on July 17, 2012, 03:31:12 PM
If true, would it be an offense serious enough for a banishment from the island?

You're kidding, right? :rofl:
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Bad Dog on July 17, 2012, 03:32:50 PM
If true, would it be an offense serious enough for a banishment from the island?

Nah, he's got another bouncy about how "the man" violated his rights n'all.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Kyle Ricky on July 17, 2012, 03:33:20 PM
If true, would it be an offense serious enough for a banishment from the island?

More like Skinner would give an butt slamming line jump pass to use anytime he wants. Heck they would be rallying around him calling him a hero and chanting his name while they parade him around on the shoulders of the fellow retards.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Airwolf on July 17, 2012, 03:35:47 PM
If true, would it be an offense serious enough for a banishment from the island?


If they could they would give him a promotion and money for life.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Tucker on July 17, 2012, 03:40:05 PM
I certainly hope for Javaman's sake that his little tale is true, because if its a bouncy, the only thing that will be bouncing are Javaman's nuts once they meet up with a steel-toed boot at an accelerated speed.

Remember - the way DU is now hypersensitive to assaulting the president, (not so much during the Bush years) this story qualifies as 'planting the idea' in some idiot's skull by their own decree. Therefore Javaman is guilty of a crime.

I can only suppose this is why other DUmmies are vouching for him.

Keeping in mind that Skimmer and his minions of primitives are well know to the SS. The SS probably suspects that the actual mentioning of a  threat came from Javaman's own mouth and the rest of the conversation is totally made up.

They will find that there was never any actual threat to obama, just a little man looking for street creed.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: dane on July 17, 2012, 04:09:10 PM
You're kidding, right? :rofl:
No.  The DUmmies have been showering Javaman and the Skimmer with all sorts of love ever since the DU-J's original post, and on through the one by the Skimmer.  Would they now turn their back on him after all these expressions of 'how great thou art'?
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: ChuckJ on July 17, 2012, 04:25:06 PM
He's posted today, but it wasn't related to the issue at hand. link (http://upload.democraticunderground.com/112720021)


Quote
hedgehog (27,584 posts)

 
Obama has our back - be sure we have his!

We've been deluged with Homeland Security "If you see something, say something!", but sometimes when you see something, you really do need to say something!

Kudos to Javaman for reporting a threat to the Secret Service.
link (http://www.democraticunderground.com/125156920)

Apparently the story for at least one DUmmie is that Javaman did the reporting to the Secret Service. I guess they are able to pull so much stuff out of their asses because their asses are used as entrances as much as exits.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: vesta111 on July 17, 2012, 04:57:40 PM
The part about the cop jumping out of the elevator to shake his hand made me laugh. That must be the new type of hedges.  :lmao:

I also agree that falsifying a report to the Secret Service is no laughing matter. They will take it very seriously.

I believe you put too much faith in Civil Service.    Sure they take a report seriously, while dissusing this at strip clubs and refusing to pay a hooker while on the job to personally protect the President.   

Get real, the only way to get the SS to investigate one out of 100,000 threats is to send them a nude photo and a link to family over seas.    May get  responce or not, there are so many threats out there.

This is not the days of the movies, most SS spend their lives behind  computer and what ever they find is seldom worth the money to investigate. 

Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Jasonw560 on July 17, 2012, 05:32:58 PM
If it were real, it would be in the Austin paper. Haven't looked online to see if it's in there.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Bad Dog on July 17, 2012, 06:18:10 PM
I believe you put too much faith in Civil Service.    Sure they take a report seriously, while dissusing this at strip clubs and refusing to pay a hooker while on the job to personally protect the President.   

Get real, the only way to get the SS to investigate one out of 100,000 threats is to send them a nude photo and a link to family over seas.    May get  responce or not, there are so many threats out there.

This is not the days of the movies, most SS spend their lives behind  computer and what ever they find is seldom worth the money to investigate. 



Interesting theory.  Tell ya what, post a nice clear threat on this forum & we'll all sit back & see what happens.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: NHSparky on July 17, 2012, 06:19:24 PM
Quote
send them a nude photo


Dear God Vesta, please, DON'T!!!!!
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: seahorse513 on July 17, 2012, 06:22:16 PM


Dear God Vesta, please, DON'T!!!!!
:lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: BlueStateSaint on July 17, 2012, 06:39:13 PM


Dear God Vesta, please, DON'T!!!!!

:runaway: :bolt: :exactly: :agree:
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: miskie on July 17, 2012, 07:47:09 PM
(http://www.myfacewhen.net/uploads/20-do-not-want.jpg)
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: BattleHymn on July 17, 2012, 08:08:41 PM
Holy shit, vesta!!


Quick everybody, throw some on your brain, before it's too late!
(http://i1146.photobucket.com/albums/o528/dummieland/bottle-of-mind-bleach-1.png)
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Bad Dog on July 17, 2012, 08:10:30 PM
Holy shit, vesta!!


Quick everybody, throw some on your brain, before it's too late!

Now that's just mean.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Evil_Conservative on July 17, 2012, 08:16:43 PM
I have been thinking about this all day at work... and that's a really long time.  I just want to know if SS showed up to Javaman's place of employment.  :rotf:
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Revolution on July 17, 2012, 09:40:12 PM
Quote
nadinbrzezinski (106,209 posts)
44. It's not told they have no sense of humor.

Nuh-HUH!!!
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: BEG on July 17, 2012, 09:51:08 PM
From Skinners thread.

Quote

longship (12,289 posts)
49. That is the way I read it.

I was one of the responders to Javaman's post.

What was telling is that he didn't respond. I thought that it meant that he did the right thing and reported it.

Little did I, let alone other DUers, know that Javaman, Skinner, and undoubtedly others had things well in hand.

It is just another example of the social responsibility that DU bears. Having been part of the thread makes me proud to be a DUer. Although I agree that it should be deleted, I also think it is one of the proudest moments in DU history.

We are a community who sticks together.

Thank you, Javaman. Thank you, Skinner. Thank you to all who stood tall and supported a long-lived compatriot, Javaman. This is what DU is about.

Humbled by the collective intelligence here, I bow at your heals. This is DU at its best.

I wonder when Javaman will be back and if we will hear anything about this in the Austin news?!?
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Evil_Conservative on July 17, 2012, 09:54:42 PM
Proudest moment on DU?

You mean it's a really good thing when the SS speed dials you and tells you to delete something... (allegedly)
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Revolution on July 17, 2012, 10:35:02 PM
Quote
Humbled by the collective intelligence here, I bow at your heals. This is DU at its best.

1. You spelled "heels" wrong, you heel.

2. That might be why Javaman left, and Skimmer wants nothing to do with you.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: GOP Congress on July 18, 2012, 01:39:44 AM
What's Obama doing in Texas anyway? Makes as much sense as Romney going to California.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: BEG on July 18, 2012, 04:54:21 AM
What's Obama doing in Texas anyway? Makes as much sense as Romney going to California.

He likes to pretend he is Bush


(http://www.tdpri.com/forum/attachments/bad-dog-cafe/60050d1286060726-why-do-county-artists-feel-compelled-wear-cowboy-hats-obama_cowboy_hat-jpg[img]http://angrywhitedude.com/wp-content/uploads2/2012/03/cowboy-hat-obama-300x287.jpg)

This made me LOL for reals:

(http://angrywhitedude.com/wp-content/uploads2/2012/03/cowboy-hat-obama-300x287.jpg)
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: vesta111 on July 18, 2012, 05:47:34 AM
Now that's just mean.

Not really my dear, picture this.

I send a naked pictures of Helen Tomas wearing a garter belt and fish net hose to the SS.  Include a threat to Obama,   It will take 18 months before the SS can find an agent with the balls to actually visit me.

Far as I am conserned, if I wish to send naked pictures of myself --ALA Patty Hurst with a machine gun----
now what???    SS on the look out for a naked old lady in the crowd toting a machine gun ? :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: 

Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Karin on July 18, 2012, 07:13:57 AM
That post from longship was so ridiculous, so over-the-top, so nauseating, I don't know what to say.  Bow at your heals....WTF.   :loser:
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: thundley4 on July 18, 2012, 09:01:03 AM
What's Obama doing in Texas anyway? Makes as much sense as Romney going to California.


Some DUmmies think Obama can flip Texas to a blue state.  They must be counting on the voter ID law being stopped and all the illegals voting for Obama.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Skul on July 18, 2012, 10:43:16 AM
That post from longship was so ridiculous, so over-the-top, so nauseating, I don't know what to say.  Bow at your heals....WTF.   :loser:
Remember, Karin.
Keep the rules of moling in mind.
I'm a bit in awe.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Bad Dog on July 18, 2012, 10:48:51 AM

Some DUmmies think Obama can flip Texas to a blue state.  They must be counting on the voter ID law being stopped and all the illegals voting for Obama.

The case Holder presented last week against TX was ripped to shreds by lawyers on the internet.  But, many said the court will rule against TX anyway.  With Roberts going all weird, the Supreme's ruling is also seriously in doubt.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Kyle Ricky on July 18, 2012, 10:50:10 AM
Quote
longship (12,289 posts)
49. That is the way I read it.

I was one of the responders to Javaman's post.

What was telling is that he didn't respond. I thought that it meant that he did the right thing and reported it.

Little did I, let alone other DUers, know that Javaman, Skinner, and undoubtedly others had things well in hand.

It is just another example of the social responsibility that DU bears. Having been part of the thread makes me proud to be a DUer. Although I agree that it should be deleted, I also think it is one of the proudest moments in DU history.

We are a community who sticks together.

Thank you, Javaman. Thank you, Skinner. Thank you to all who stood tall and supported a long-lived compatriot, Javaman. This is what DU is about.

Humbled by the collective intelligence here, I bow at your heals. This is DU at its best.

Now this is the biggest pile of ass kissing shit I have ever heard! This douchebag must be competing to be the first in line for the Skinner ass pounding session. Man, what a moron...





Not really my dear, picture this.

I send a naked pictures of Helen Tomas wearing a garter belt and fish net hose to the SS.  Include a threat to Obama,   It will take 18 months before the SS can find an agent with the balls to actually visit me.

Far as I am conserned, if I wish to send naked pictures of myself --ALA Patty Hurst with a machine gun----
now what???    SS on the look out for a naked old lady in the crowd toting a machine gun ? :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: 



Sending them a nude pic of Helen Thomas would be classic!  :lmao:
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Kyle Ricky on July 18, 2012, 10:52:07 AM
I think obama should just stick the states that he will probably win and let Romney handle the rest. So that means that obama will only visit 8 states, and Romney will visit 44 :-)
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Ballygrl on July 18, 2012, 10:54:38 AM
Has Javaman spoken about this at all?
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Bad Dog on July 18, 2012, 10:58:15 AM
Has Javaman spoken about this at all?

I think he was sworn to secrecy by Agent Mike.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Kyle Ricky on July 18, 2012, 11:00:03 AM
Quote
Star Member hedgehog (27,586 posts)
15. Correct me if I'm wrong, but Javaman posted here about someone

View profile
mouthing off about Obama. After some discussion, Javaman realized that he was describing a real threat, and called the Secret Service. A lot of people were posting in the thread without realizing that Javaman had made the call.

Kudos to Javaman, an example for the rest of us!

SUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUURE HE DID! javaman is a hero! yeah! yeah! yeah!

I can't get over how stupid they are. Wow...

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002959675
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: JohnnyReb on July 18, 2012, 11:06:29 AM
God forbid someone assassinate the bastard....50 years on and the dems are still passing stuff in the name of JFK....shoot Obama in TEXAS...oh hell no, don't do it. You know Bush would get all the credit.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Bad Dog on July 18, 2012, 11:13:28 AM
God forbid someone assassinate the bastard....50 years on and the dems are still passing stuff in the name of JFK....shoot Obama in TEXAS...oh hell no, don't do it. You know Bush would get all the credit.

Pretty sure I saw Nixon at the Waco airport yesterday.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: thundley4 on July 18, 2012, 11:14:08 AM
Quote
madinmaryland (48,798 posts)
66. I wonder what the freeper's screen name was. Bet he won't be posting for a while.

Curiously enough, has, Javaman been seen  lately?  
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Kyle Ricky on July 18, 2012, 11:35:40 AM
Quote
Star Member SheilaT (10,149 posts)
60. Thank you for posting this.

View profile
I had replied to the thread, and several hours later, when next on DU, saw I had 9 replies. But then couldn't get back to the thread. Damn. I wish I knew what reasoned responses there were to my thoughtful post.

 :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:

Those morons think they just did a great service. Their are a lot of people patting themselves on the back! I am waiting for the talk about a DUmp cookout so they can all sit around and talk about the wonderful Javaman. I bet they get a big cake for him and have skinner jump out of it.

Edited for spelling
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: JohnnyReb on July 18, 2012, 11:38:44 AM
I wish I knew what reasoned responses there were to my thoughtful post.

Treasoned, seasoned........no way it was reasoned.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: txradioguy on July 18, 2012, 11:44:55 AM
Quote
..."if Iraqi commandos landed at George W. Bush’s compound, assassinated him, and dumped his body...

http://election.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x1058507

And who can forget this popular crap from the left?

(http://s.michellemalkin.com/archives/images/bushgun.jpg)

Here's the problem with your stories DUmmies and javaman in particular...they're fake.  When we talk about this stuff there is credible verifiable proof to back it up.

You just make up shit throw it on the wall and hope it sticks.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Kyle Ricky on July 18, 2012, 11:50:58 AM
http://election.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x1058507

And who can forget this popular crap from the left?

(http://s.michellemalkin.com/archives/images/bushgun.jpg)

Here's the problem with your stories DUmmies and javaman in particular...they're fake.  When we talk about this stuff there is credible verifiable proof to back it up.

You just make up shit throw it on the wall and hope it sticks.

I wonder if that one was reported to the Secret Service? It wouldn't surprise me one bit if the Secret Service was already monitoring that site. Wouldn't it be something if they had moles there?  :lmao:
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: txradioguy on July 18, 2012, 11:54:24 AM
I wonder if that one was reported to the Secret Service? It wouldn't surprise me one bit if the Secret Service was already monitoring that site. Wouldn't it be something if they had moles there?  :lmao:

Yes they monitor the site.  They've visited DU offices in D.C. on at least three occasions.  Any time you see a reference to "Agent Mike"...that's their stupid code that they think the government is monitoring them.

The last time I know of for sure they got a warning from the Secret Service was when someone photoshopped a bombsight over the center of the main house at Crawford Ranch.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Kyle Ricky on July 18, 2012, 11:57:20 AM
Yes they monitor the site.  They've visited DU offices in D.C. on at least three occasions.  Any time you see a reference to "Agent Mike"...that's their stupid code that they think the government is monitoring them.

The last time I know of for sure they got a warning from the Secret Service was when someone photoshopped a bombsight over the center of the main house at Crawford Ranch.

I am glad they are monitoring the site....
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: txradioguy on July 18, 2012, 11:58:21 AM
I am glad they are monitoring the site....

And I suspect these days this administration monitors sites like this one.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Kyle Ricky on July 18, 2012, 12:00:10 PM
And I suspect these days this administration monitors sites like this one.

In a way, that wouldn't surprise me either.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Bad Dog on July 18, 2012, 12:05:45 PM
In a way, that wouldn't surprise me either.

Boobiezzzzz
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Kyle Ricky on July 18, 2012, 01:46:49 PM
Boobiezzzzz

Hi5
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Texacon on July 18, 2012, 01:51:47 PM

Some DUmmies think Obama can flip Texas to a blue state.  They must be counting on the voter ID law being stopped and all the illegals voting for Obama.

I fear that Texas is turning blue due to liberal policies.  These companies in states like CA that are closing shop and moving to Texas are also bringing some of their liberal employees!  The damage that was done in the state they left, due to their voting, is being brought to our state.

KC
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Kyle Ricky on July 18, 2012, 01:55:06 PM
I fear that Texas is turning blue due to liberal policies.  These companies in states like CA that are closing shop and moving to Texas are also bringing some of their liberal employees!  The damage that was done in the state they left, due to their voting, is being brought to our state.

KC

I think Texas has as much chance turning Blue as California does turning Red....
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: txradioguy on July 18, 2012, 02:17:36 PM
I fear that Texas is turning blue due to liberal policies.  These companies in states like CA that are closing shop and moving to Texas are also bringing some of their liberal employees!  The damage that was done in the state they left, due to their voting, is being brought to our state.

KC

Obama probably doesn't realize that Texas extends West of Brady and Llano.

Which means he's like Texas Liberals...too scared to come out to where the REAL Texans are.

There's a reason the entire state with a couple small exceptions is bright red.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Thor on July 18, 2012, 03:15:12 PM
I fear that Texas is turning blue due to liberal policies.  These companies in states like CA that are closing shop and moving to Texas are also bringing some of their liberal employees!  The damage that was done in the state they left, due to their voting, is being brought to our state.

KC

Obama probably doesn't realize that Texas extends West of Brady and Llano.

Which means he's like Texas Liberals...too scared to come out to where the REAL Texans are.

There's a reason the entire state with a couple small exceptions is bright red.

True, Texas is big, but the population centers are what control the vote. DFW, Austin, San Antonio & Houston. All are turning EXTREMELY Liberal due to the influx of damned Yankees from the NE coast &  the fruits & nuts from Commiefornia......
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: txradioguy on July 18, 2012, 03:22:03 PM
True, Texas is big, but the population centers are what control the vote. DFW, Austin, San Antonio & Houston. All are turning EXTREMELY Liberal due to the influx of damned Yankees from the NE coast &  the fruits & nuts from Commiefornia......

They might be shifting a little bit...but the Dems seem terrified of coming to W. Teas...to me that's part of the reason Republicans control most of the state.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Bad Dog on July 18, 2012, 03:44:03 PM
They might be shifting a little bit...but the Dems seem terrified of coming to W. Teas...to me that's part of the reason Republicans control most of the state.
Our County (on the Coastal Bend) has gone from about 50/50 20 years ago to literaly 95R - 06 D this year.  All but one local seat (sheriff) is uncontested.  We have a lot of Hispanics voting R who take pride in themselves & their work.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: txradioguy on July 18, 2012, 04:02:18 PM
Our County (on the Coastal Bend) has gone from about 50/50 20 years ago to literaly 95R - 06 D this year.  All but one local seat (sheriff) is uncontested.  We have a lot of Hispanics voting R who take pride in themselves & their work.

I can't ever remember a time when Midland wasn't R.

For that matter I can't even remember Mark White or Ann Richards coming out there when they were campaigning for Governor.

I don't even think Tony Sanchez came out there.  He scheduled an event but cancelled IRRC.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Bad Dog on July 18, 2012, 04:08:03 PM
True, Texas is big, but the population centers are what control the vote. DFW, Austin, San Antonio & Houston. All are turning EXTREMELY Liberal due to the influx of damned Yankees from the NE coast &  the fruits & nuts from Commiefornia......

The aliens we are getting around here tend to be conservatives that couldn't stand their liberal states.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Jasonw560 on July 18, 2012, 08:27:26 PM
And the aliens we have down here all vote Democrat...
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Bad Dog on July 18, 2012, 10:52:15 PM
And the aliens we have down here all vote Democrat...

The aliens I was referring to are the Yankees and Californicators who can't stand to live in liberal states.
Title: Re: Shooting the president bouncy
Post by: Jasonw560 on July 18, 2012, 11:32:56 PM
The aliens I was referring to are the Yankees and Californicators who can't stand to live in liberal states.
I got that.