The Conservative Cave
Current Events => Archives => Politics => Election 2012 => Topic started by: Benjamin Parish on July 06, 2012, 03:43:07 PM
-
It's been a brutal week for Romney in the conservative media, suggesting that Republicans are sick of their candidate's vagueness and health care fumbles
Mitt Romney's presidential campaign is taking it on the chin from the conservative media. With Team Romney failing to deliver a cogent message in the wake of the Supreme Court's game-changing ObamaCare ruling, Rupert Murdoch tweeted that Romney needed to dump "old friends from his team" and "hire real pros." Then both The Weekly Standard's William Kristol and the editorial board of Murdoch's Wall Street Journal trashed the Romney campaign as overly vague, "politically dumb,"and too focused on talking about the economy. So, just weeks after the press reported thatconservatives had rallied behind Romney, has the Right already soured on its man?
Yes. The honeymoon is over: "Romney is facing the backlash from conservatives that his opponents predicted in the primary, and it isn't pretty," says Matt Negrin at ABC News. The proximate cause is Romney's muddled, awkward message on the Right's No. 1 cause, ObamaCare, but that has simply opened the floodgates of criticism over Team Romney's inability to move the polls in his favor. "Conservatives' displeasure with Romney doesn't mean they won't vote for him," but it sure doesn't help his campaign any.
Mitt Romney, clumsy on health care, is shellacked by conservatives" (http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/07/mitt-romney-clumsy-on-health-care-falls-into-predicted-trap/")
No. Conservatives are still aboard the Romney express: All this griping from Beltway conservatives "is a load of worthless tripe," says Dan Riehl at Riehl World View. Most voters aren't even paying attention, and if they were, they'd see that Romney just hauled in a cool $100 million in June. That's hardly a sign of conservative disenchantment. This is "just the D.C. bubble talking, nothing to see there. Move along, folks."
Since when did Bill Kristol actually know anything?" (http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2012/07/since-when-did-bill-kristol-actually-know-anything.html")
If anything, the GOP has an enthusiasm problem: Republicans do have "increasingly positive views of their nominee," says Scott Clement at The Washington Post. According to Pew, 78 percent of GOP voters voiced a favorable view of Romney in June, up from 62 percent in May. Still, "liking is not loving," and twice as many Democrats are "very enthusiastic" about Obama than Republicans are about Romney. In fact, after their exciting primary, Republicans are mostly "fast becoming bored with the 2012 campaign," at least for now.
Republicans grow bored with 2012 campaign" (http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/post/republicans-grow-bored-with-2012-campaign/2012/07/05/gJQALMe7PW_blog.html")
Can find the links to this at Yahoo! (http://news.yahoo.com/mitt-romneys-honeymoon-conservatives-already-over-105500853.html)
-
Let me guess you think this is a guaranteed win for Ron Paul now? At least that is what all the Paulbots I know would say.
-
Guess that in all reality... im not the one that is actually obsessed with Ron Paul.
:shrug:
-
Guess that in all reality... im not the one that is actually obsessed with Ron Paul.
:shrug:
I'm not obsessed with him. I am just pointing out what Paul supporters think, feel, and say. My actual feeling are that Ron Paul should shut his pie hole and quit trying to go for something that he has no chance of ever getting. He is causing more harm than good. Remember Ross Perot (Oh wait, you weren't born yet)? Ron Paul is worse.
-
Hot damn, we are in trouble. Matt Negro of ABC says so.
Benny Boy. Obama has as much chance of winning the Presidency as your hero the Nutter has of winning a race outside his district. The Magic Negro is doomed for an all out ass whipping.
-
Hot damn, we are in trouble. Matt Negro of ABC says so.
Benny Boy. Obama has as much chance of winning the Presidency as your hero the Nutter has of winning a race outside his district. The Magic Negro is doomed for an all out ass whipping.
I am hoping and praying that it is worse than Jimmy Carters defeat. That would such a beautiful thing to witness again.
-
No. Conservatives are still aboard the Romney express: All this griping from Beltway conservatives "is a load of worthless tripe," says Dan Riehl at Riehl World View. Most voters aren't even paying attention, and if they were, they'd see that Romney just hauled in a cool $100 million in June. That's hardly a sign of conservative disenchantment. This is "just the D.C. bubble talking..."
True.
...and twice as many Democrats are "very enthusiastic" about Obama than Republicans are about Romney.
Have no reason to believe that to be true. I don't see either side being "very enthusiastic" about either candidate.
.
-
Let me guess you think this is a guaranteed win for Ron Paul now? At least that is what all the Paulbots I know would say.
I don't know how you can stand talking to that little pervert Kyle. Didn't you see what he was saying about his sister's breasts & wanting to be the Virgin Mary on the other threads? Bugger makes my skin crawl.
-
Hey Benny...this is for you and your incessant trolling....
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v602/HeroesAtWork/deadhorse.jpg)
-
Just wonder if I'll ever be able to post a thread here without Ron Paul being mentioned... or dude talking about wanting to see me do stuff to my sister (what is it with you? somethings you should probably keep between you and your shrink.)
-
Just wonder if I'll ever be able to post a thread here without Ron Paul being mentioned... or dude talking about wanting to see me do stuff to my sister (what is it with you? somethings you should probably keep between you and your shrink.)
Nope, your stupid little graphic in your signature shows that your support for Dr. Nutz in everyone of your posts. Simple as that.
Well, that and the idiocy you keep posting.
-
Just wonder if I'll ever be able to post a thread here without Ron Paul being mentioned... or dude talking about wanting to see me do stuff to my sister (what is it with you? somethings you should probably keep between you and your shrink.)
Sorry Ben, for good or no you have brought it all down on yourself.
You showed up on on this site and began your stay here as a paultard troll. Folkes tried but your circular logic and goalpost shifting showed that you are nothing but a troll. You even admitted to being banned from a number of other sites for, presumably, the same offence.
I understand the TOS here but it wouldn't break my heart in the least if the ban hammer caught you in the teeth.
By the same token I also understand the fun that some folkes have in stomping a mudhole in your chest.
This is my first and last post on one of your threads.
-
Oh snap..
Obama campaign sounds the alarm over Romney's $100 million haul
By Olivier Knox
July 6, 2012
President Barack Obama says he's not worried about Mitt Romney's prodigious fundraising. But his campaign sounded the alarm Friday about the Republican standard-bearer's eye-popping $100 million haul in June and warned Democrats to open their wallets--before it's too late.
"If we don't take this seriously now, we risk finding ourselves at a point where there is too much ground to make up," Obama campaign manager Jim Messina said in an email request for cash. Subject line: "URGENT."
"Romney and the Republicans announced yesterday that they brought in more than $100 million in June. For context, that's about what we raised in April and May combined," Messina wrote.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/OTUS/obama-campaign-sounds-alarm-romneys-100-million-haul/story?id=16727782
-
From how many people? lol
-
From how many people? lol
I'm one of them.
-
Just wonder if I'll ever be able to post a thread here without Ron Paul being mentioned... or dude talking about wanting to see me do stuff to my sister (what is it with you? somethings you should probably keep between you and your shrink.)
Probably not. You came in guns a-blazin' like an asshole, and you've done nothing to change that opinion. Sorry.
-
Not really, though. It was a post on over 100 hundred delegates filing a federal lawsuit against the RNC and Romney...
Was a pretty reasonable post.. and if you re-read over it, I ignored about the first 7 pages of complete bullshit.
I've been very reasonable since I've come here.
-
If you have a point you should make it.
-
In what regard?
-
100 delegates out of the 2,286 that will be at the GOP convention, hijacking the nomination process in favor of Dr. Nuts.
-
Just flat out state whatever it is you are using so many words to couch. Be honest. Be forthright. Instead of concealing your agenda, simply state it.
-
100 delegates out of the 2,286 that will be at the GOP convention, hijacking the nomination process in favor of Dr. Nuts.
It was a 9th circuit federal lawsuit. Means that it was like a fifth of their already assigned national delegates. (Its pretty substantial, imo)
-
Just flat out state whatever it is you are using so many words to couch. Be honest. Be forthright. Instead of concealing your agenda, simply state it.
I believe that I am.
-
I believe that I am.
Maybe you are but your ideas seem confused and coy at times so I assumed you were holding something back or attempting to be clever.
-
Maybe you are but your ideas seem confused and coy at times so I assumed you were holding something back or attempting to be clever.
I'm reluctant to take a position many times, as the truth on many issues seems well in-doubt.
I remain open minded to as many things as I can, as often as I can.
-
I believe that I am.
Cut the bullshit and state what your agenda is here.
No more half ass vague nonsense.
-
Cut the bullshit and state what your agenda is here.
No more half ass vague nonsense.
Just to post and have conversations.
(Not everything in life has a secrete agenda behind it)
-
Just to post and have conversations.
(Not everything in life has a secrete agenda behind it)
Which is a non answer.
One could do better but what I expected.
-
lol
-
It was a 9th circuit federal lawsuit. Means that it was like a fifth of their already assigned national delegates. (Its pretty substantial, imo)
The Pulbotards can't get their man on the ticket with the votes, so they might as well sue to get him on. Typical. Ron Paul is a joke!
-
Lmao. The convention is gonna be ****ing awesome.
-
Lmao. The convention is gonna be ****ing awesome.
No, not really. But then again, people like you are easily entertained by shiny objects and flashing lights so I can understand why you'd think that the borefest that is both conventions would be great entertainment. I'll bet you think soccer is an exciting sport too.
-
No, not really. But then again, people like you are easily entertained by shiny objects and flashing lights so I can understand why you'd think that the borefest that is both conventions would be great entertainment. I'll bet you think soccer is an exciting sport too.
Beanie has visions of the Paulistinians taking over the convention with their phony balony lawsuit. Or something...It's impossible to get straight answers out of him. Oh, and he is a pervert with mother/sister issues.
-
Ya'll will see.
-
Ya'll will see.
Oh yes, a fascist Paulian takeover negating the legitimate vote of millions of republicans who voted for someone other than Paul.. Like America will follow those who ignore the vote.
Paul lost fair and square. You consistent embrace of a Fascist takeover shows you simply do not value liberty or the constitution. If you loved either, you would have accepted the vote and stepped aside.
Frankly I think if this happens Paul will get himself shot.
-
lol
You scared?
-
lol
You scared?
Troll.
How can you possibly justify bypassing a legitimate vote of the people through trickery?
-
It aint trickery.
The delegate procees is different from the primary (as I've explained).
Show the **** up.
-
Side note: We're the only two signed in right now.. with 41 guest at 4am on a Saturday. lol
-
It aint trickery.
The delegate procees is different from the primary (as I've explained).
Show the **** up.
Maybe a better word if FRAUD. The electors pledge they will represent the will of the people. Paul's minions plan to LIE and vote for a third party who couldn't even win one state.
That, Benny is fraud. F.R.A.U.D.
Your embrace of lies and deceit is why no one here respects you.
-
Whatever makes you feel better.
lol
-
Maybe you are but your ideas seem confused and coy at times so I assumed you were holding something back or attempting to be clever.
That's because Benji here isn't a complete Ron Paul cult follower. He's a Lib that uses Dr. Nutz as a cover for his Libtard beliefs.
We've all seen how Ron Paul is DU's favorite "conservative" due to his blaming America for the worlds evil...his lust to cut the military budget and use the savings to fund entitlement spending...wanting to take the restrictions off of ALL drug use...and his lack of support for Afghanistan and Iraq.
Oh yeah and he's a Troofer.
THAT is why our Liberal troll disguised as a Ron Paul cultist supports him.
Because if you go back and look at what Benji has been posting it's pretty clear he's more at him on DU Kos and HuffPo than he will EVER be on a site like CC.
He scoffs at WMD's in Iraq...bashes religion and supports the gay agenda...and believes that Communism and volunteering are the same thing.
-
Lmao. The convention is gonna be ****ing awesome.
Not for you. I can't wait to see how you've changed your tone once Dr. Nutz doesn't get to employ his voter nullification plan.
-
Beanie has visions of the Paulistinians taking over the convention with their phony balony lawsuit. Or something...It's impossible to get straight answers out of him. Oh, and he is a pervert with mother/sister issues.
The Paulbots believe that there are thousands of delegates that REALLY want to vote for Dr. Nutz but can't because of silly state rules.
They think that is this stupid lawsuit succeeds...it would lead to a brokered convention where Paul would come out on top and be our (God forbid) nominee and he would lead us to the promised Troofer pot smoking America bashing promised land.
When in reality if Paul were the top of the GOP ticket it would be 1984 in reverse.
-
Lmao. The convention is gonna be ****ing awesome.
Which shows your maturity level.
-
So the secret plan is to file some lawsuit,have all delegates freed up and then magically they will give the nomination to Paul?
:bwah: :jerkit: :rotf:
-
So the secret plan is to file some lawsuit,have all delegates freed up and then magically they will give the nomination to Paul?
:bwah: :jerkit: :rotf:
These immature halfwits want to change the platform of the Republican party (which is voted on at the convention every year). They fail on epic level - even though attention whoring they have mastered to a science - to get their own party accepted by civilized society, so this is their only option.
Losers. Every damn one of them. :loser:
-
lol
-
lol
Beanie, I think it is time for a little self examination (definition of crazy & all). You have posted several threads on this forum. Let's see how it's going.
1. Review all threads you have posted; Do you see a single member of this forum agreeing with you about anything?
2. Perhaps you could also review the threads on the forums you bragged about being banned from.
3. Let's look at your life in general
a. Do you wonder why you said "I've said that sex isn't really on my mind anymore"?
b. Do you wonder why you said "Kind of makes me wish that I was a virgin again. lol"?
c. Do you wonder why you have no close personal friends?
d. Do you wonder why your mom looks at you funny & doesn't want to touch you?
e. Do you wonder why your sister doesn't want to be in a room alone with you?
-
Beanie, I think it is time for a little self examination (definition of crazy & all). You have posted several threads on this forum. Let's see how it's going.
1. Review all threads you have posted; Do you see a single member of this forum agreeing with you about anything?
Um. Think that one person did, one time. lol
2. Perhaps you could also review the threads on the forums you bragged about being banned from.
I've been banned from three website, and one has done it to me several times, as I continue to post there with folks that I've grown relationships with (management is ****ed sometimes over there), One of the other ones banned me for making a pretty ****ed up joke; I've no beef with it (It was funny.. but I was drunk and it was definitely a little out of line). And the other one was Democratic Underground. The banned me after I acknowledged that I'll be writing in Ron Paul in Nov (if he is not the Republican nominee). Nothing really all that sinister, or as Im sure that you would have loved it to be.
3. Let's look at your life in general
a. Do you wonder why you said "I've said that sex isn't really on my mind anymore"?
No. I really don, though. I've been enrolled in college and I'm more worried about financial things, politics, sports and just living my life and forming the man that I want to be, than I am about sex. Its on the back-burner (not that I'd deny sex.. its just that I'm not out looking for a way to get it. No time)
b. Do you wonder why you said "Kind of makes me wish that I was a virgin again. lol"?
No. lol. As I've said, chicks digged me more when I was one. Naturally, me being a man, whenever companionship with a woman does cross my mind, It seems the natural logical course for me to wish. lol
If girls liked you better one way than another, most guys would definitely take that into consideration, imo.
c. Do you wonder why you have no close personal friends?
I have a lot of close personal friends. (Its interesting that you think that you know me, though. lol)
d. Do you wonder why your mom looks at you funny & doesn't want to touch you?
I have a great relationship with my mom. Im more of a momma's boy than a daddy's boy, for sure (As my father was barely ever there - outside of the form of a check every now and then).
e. Do you wonder why your sister doesn't want to be in a room alone with you?
I have three sisters, two half sisters and one step sister. They are 15, 16 and 17 years young respectively. I also have a great relationship with my sisters. I also have two brothers, one biological and one step. (Once again, you dont know me)
It seems that you're projecting here. :shrug: Get help?
Just for the **** of it.
-
I do find it funny that a person who didn't win a single state in the primaries thinks that this lawsuit will some get him nominated. It dosn't work like that, Scooter. If Ron Paul shows up at the convention thinking he will magically get nominated, he is smoking more crack than anyone thinks. Plus, a lawsuit from a hundred delegates from a crack smoking location in dumb****california is not going to change the delegate rules.
On a side note: If Ron Paul would some how win the nomination, Obama would even beat him by a landslide, as even I WOULD VOTE FOR OBAMA AGAINST HIM!!
-
I do find it funny that a person who didn't win a single state in the primaries thinks that this lawsuit will some get him nominated. It dosn't work like that, Scooter. If Ron Paul shows up at the convention thinking he will magically get nominated, he is smoking more crack than anyone thinks. Plus, a lawsuit from a hundred delegates from a crack smoking location in dumb****california is not going to change the delegate rules.
On a side note: If Ron Paul would some how win the nomination, Obama would even beat him by a landslide, as even I WOULD VOTE FOR OBAMA AGAINST HIM!!
He needs to have a plurality in 5 states. If he has that, then he can be nominated to be the Republican Presidential nominee. If this is the case, then he will get a substantial floor speech. Also, if Ron Paul has that plurality, then as I've been reading, according to the RNC rules, Ron Paul can be nominated to be the VP by the national delegates (they just added that one after the race in 2008) .
Ron Paul is expected to get his 5th plurality in Nebraska, shortly.
(For those that dont know, a plurality is when one has the most delegates of any state - not a majority of them).
-
Um. Think that one person did, one time. lolName?
I've been banned from three website, and one has done it to me several times, as I continue to post there with folks that I've grown relationships with (management is ****ed sometimes over there), One of the other ones banned me for making a pretty ****ed up joke; I've no beef with it (It was funny.. but I was drunk and it was definitely a little out of line). And the other one was Democratic Underground. The banned me after I acknowledged that I'll be writing in Ron Paul in Nov (if he is not the Republican nominee). Nothing really all that sinister, or as Im sure that you would have loved it to be.
No. I really don, though. I've been enrolled in college and I'm more worried about financial things, politics, sports and just living my life and forming the man that I want to be, than I am about sex. Its on the back-burner (not that I'd deny sex.. its just that I'm not out looking for a way to get it. No time)
No. lol. As I've said, chicks digged me more when I was one. Naturally, me being a man, whenever companionship with a woman does cross my mind, It seems the natural logical course for me to wish. lol
If girls liked you better one way than another, most guys would definitely take that into consideration, imo.
I have a lot of close personal friends. (Its interesting that you think that you know me, though. lol)
I have a great relationship with my mom. Im more of a momma's boy than a daddy's boy, for sure (As my father was barely ever there - outside of the form of a check every now and then).
I have three sisters, two half sisters and one step sister. They are 15, 16 and 17 years young respectively. I also have a great relationship with my sisters. I also have two brothers, one biological and one step. (Once again, you dont know me)
It seems that you're projecting here. :shrug: Get help?
Just for the **** of it.
-
He needs to have a plurality in 5 states. If he has that, then he can be nominated to be the Republican Presidential nominee. If this is the case, then he will get a substantial floor speech. Also, if Ron Paul has that plurality, then as I've been reading, according to the RNC rules, Ron Paul can be nominated to be the VP by the national delegates (they just added that one after the race in 2008) .
Ron Paul is expected to get his 5th plurality in Nebraska, shortly.
(For those that dont know, a plurality is when one has the most delegates of any state - not a majority of them).
He didn't win ONE states. So therefor he gets no delegates. You Paulbots are getting excited and worked up over nothing and trying to spin things to be the way you want. Just like the liberals do.
And like I said: If he does by some miracle get the nomination. I will be voting for Obama.
-
He didn't win ONE states. So therefor he gets no delegates. You Paulbots are getting excited and worked up over nothing and trying to spin things to be the way you want. Just like the liberals do.
And like I said: If he does by some miracle get the nomination. I will be voting for Obama.
How about Gary Johnson? I'd feel better about you Kyle.
-
Even with all of the delegates bound, if that were the case, not every state is winner take all.
Ron Paul will have somewhere around 300-500 'bound' delegates come the convention, as well as many more that support him, but are 'bound' to Romney, Gingrich or Santorum... and a plurality in more than 5 states.
Those are facts.
-
How about Gary Johnson? I'd feel better about you Kyle.
I don't know too much about Gary Johnson. I only know that he is a libertarian, and could be more wacked than Ron Paul is.
-
Even with all of the delegates bound, if that were the case, not every state is winner take all.
Ron Paul will have somewhere around 300-500 'bound' delegates come the convention, as well as many more that support him, but are 'bound' to Romney, Gingrich or Santorum... and a plurality in more than 5 states.
Those are facts.
That still won't be enough to win the Nomination.
Facts:
Mitt Romney - 1522
Ron Paul - 138
1144 delegates are needed to get the nomination. Romney is the nominee. Even with the extra 100 delegates that Paul might be getting. He still doesn't stand a chance. Wherever you are getting your information from is a bogus site.
There are 210 delegates still outstanding, and even with those, Ron Paul doesn't have a chance
Source: http://elections.nytimes.com/2012/primaries/delegates
-
I don't know too much about Gary Johnson. I only know that he is a libertarian, and could be more wacked than Ron Paul is.
Well at least think about it. If you voted for ABM I would have to kill you. Nothing personal you understand.
-
That still won't be enough to win the Nomination.
Facts:
Mitt Romney - 1522
Ron Paul - 138
1144 delegates are needed to get the nomination. Romney is the nominee. Even with the extra 100 delegates that Paul might be getting. He still doesn't stand a chance. Wherever you are getting your information from is a bogus site.
Source: http://elections.nytimes.com/2012/primaries/delegates
Those delegate numbers are way off.
(You do realize that any delegate count is purely based on speculation, mostly as a way for the media to 'keep us informed', correct?)
-
Well at least think about it. If you voted for ABM I would have to kill you. Nothing personal you understand.
:lmao: :rotf: :rofl:
Maybe I will just write myself in this time. The person I used to support I don't support anymore because of me becoming a social conservative.
-
Even with all of the delegates bound, if that were the case, not every state is winner take all.
Ron Paul will have somewhere around 300-500 'bound' delegates come the convention, as well as many more that support him, but are 'bound' to Romney, Gingrich or Santorum... and a plurality in more than 5 states.
Those are facts.
And another fact is Ron Paul will not win, nor will he EVER win the nomination for President of these United States of America, no matter how much you petulant little children stomp your feet in the temper tantrum you always throw when you don't get your way.
-
Those delegate numbers are way off.
(You do realize that any delegate count is purely based on speculation, mostly as a way for the media to 'keep us informed', correct?)
Here (http://thereal2012delegatecount.com/) are the facts.
-
:lmao: :rotf: :rofl:
Maybe I will just write myself in this time. The person I used to support I don't support anymore because of me becoming a social conservative.
I'm down with that. If Ronnie steals the nomination, I'll vote for you too. This could be the beginning of something. Let's get a lawyer & sue someone.
-
Those delegate numbers are way off.
(You do realize that any delegate count is purely based on speculation, mostly as a way for the media to 'keep us informed', correct?)
Your opinion is way off. If they are so wrong, then show me something that says otherwise - And it better not be the Ron Paul website. So you are saying that Ron Paul magically has over 1,000 delegates even though he didn't win a single state? Tell me, do you smoke crack?
-
Your opinion is way off. If they are so wrong, then show me something that says otherwise - And it better not be the Ron Paul website. So you are saying that Ron Paul magically has over 1,000 delegates even though he didn't win a single state? Tell me, do you smoke crack?
No one knows, yet. We wont know till the votes are actually cast. Everything else is speculation.
http://thereal2012delegatecount.com/
-
No one knows, yet. We wont know till the votes are actually cast. Everything else is speculation.
http://thereal2012delegatecount.com/
That site is way off. I don't believe any of it. I will take what they NYT says over that site any day.
This is the whois look up. I don't trust the site. It was just registered in April - and the information is private (If it was reputable, they wouldn't hide who owns it). So it could be being ran by a Ron Paul supporter for all we know.
WHOIS information for thereal2012delegatecount.com:
[Querying whois.verisign-grs.com]
[Redirected to whois.register.com]
[Querying whois.register.com]
[whois.register.com]
The data in Register.com's WHOIS database is provided to you by
Register.com for information purposes only, that is, to assist you in
obtaining information about or related to a domain name registration
record. Register.com makes this information available "as is," and
does not guarantee its accuracy. By submitting a WHOIS query, you
agree that you will use this data only for lawful purposes and that,
under no circumstances will you use this data to: (1) allow, enable,
or otherwise support the transmission of mass unsolicited, commercial
advertising or solicitations via direct mail, electronic mail, or by
telephone; or (2) enable high volume, automated, electronic processes
that apply to Register.com (or its systems). The compilation,
repackaging, dissemination or other use of this data is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of Register.com.
Register.com reserves the right to modify these terms at any time.
By submitting this query, you agree to abide by these terms.
Registrant:
Domain Discreet Privacy Service
ATTN: thereal2012delegatecount.com
12808 Gran Bay Pkwy, West
Jacksonville, FL 32258
US
Phone: 1-902-7492701
Email: 4b3d701f0a1612334690555f748fd2cd@domaindiscreet.com
Registrar Name....: Register.com
Registrar Whois...: whois.register.com
Registrar Homepage: www.register.com
Domain Name: thereal2012delegatecount.com
Created on..............: 2012-04-23
Expires on..............: 2013-04-23
Administrative Contact:
Domain Discreet Privacy Service
ATTN: thereal2012delegatecount.com
12808 Gran Bay Pkwy, West
Jacksonville, FL 32258
US
Phone: 1-902-7492701
Email: 4b3d701e0a16123378ef3d213b335257@domaindiscreet.com
Technical Contact:
Domain Discreet Privacy Service
ATTN: thereal2012delegatecount.com
12808 Gran Bay Pkwy, West
Jacksonville, FL 32258
US
Phone: 1-902-7492701
Email: 4b3d70200a1612332dd4f42ad5031ad0@domaindiscreet.com
DNS Servers:
ns24.domaincontrol.com
ns23.domaincontrol.com
-
I'm down with that. If Ronnie steals the nomination, I'll vote for you too. This could be the beginning of something. Let's get a lawyer & sue someone.
Sounds good. Who can we hire as a lawyer? If Ron Paul can sue for the nomination. Then so can I.
-
Here (http://thereal2012delegatecount.com/) are the facts.
You are actually as insane as your hero aren`t you?
Hate to break it to you but none of what you think is ever going to happen so you might as well go back to troofer sites and other havens for lunatics.
-
You are actually as insane as your hero aren`t you?
Hate to break it to you but none of what you think is ever going to happen so you might as well go back to troofer sites and other havens for lunatics.
lol
-
Sounds good. Who can we hire as a lawyer? If Ron Paul can sue for the nomination. Then so can I.
Well, I know personally two TX delegates who, although they have publicly stated support for Romney, secretly support you. I'm sure there are several hundreds more. I think Tavis Smiley's lawfirm might be available.
Kyle Ricky El Presedente!!!!
-
What's funny is, according to that website, none of the delegates are bound to any candidate. So Benny's cult leader, Dr. Nuts, could have less delegates voting for him than what are listed. :rotf: :rotf: :rotf:
-
What's funny is, according to that website, none of the delegates are bound to any candidate. So Benny's cult leader, Dr. Nuts, could have less delegates voting for him than what are listed. :rotf: :rotf: :rotf:
'Cult leader'? Lmao.
Could be... but doubtful.
The national media seems to be run by people like you, and a few others here. They would not be giving Ron Paul such a benefit.
-
You are actually as insane as your hero aren`t you?
Hate to break it to you but none of what you think is ever going to happen so you might as well go back to troofer sites and other havens for lunatics.
I don't think he is clinically insane. He is an immature, sexually frustrated, "mommas boy" with conflicts surrounding his uncontrollable lust for one of his underage sisters. In fact his slavish worship of the Great Ronpaul is the most normal thing about him.
-
Lmao.
-
Lmao.
If that's the only thing you're capable of typing, your high school diploma should be revoked.
-
I don't think he is clinically insane. He is an immature, sexually frustrated, "mommas boy" with conflicts surrounding his uncontrollable lust for one of his underage sisters. In fact his slavish worship of the Great Ronpaul is the most normal thing about him.
Just a crazy troll that is not worth wasting time or breath on here any longer.
-
If that's the only thing you're capable of typing, your high school diploma should be revoked.
I've already given a long winded reply to his non-sense.
It can be found near the top of page 4.
-
'Cult leader'? Lmao.
Could be... but doubtful.
As a Ron Paul cultist, that's exactly what I expected you to say. Good job.
The national media seems to be run by people like you, and a few others here. They would not be giving Ron Paul such a benefit.
People like me you say? Wow, how wrong you are Benny boy. If people like me ran the media then all of the shenanigans done by ANY politician, including this lame assed attempt to circumvent the electorial proceedure that your cult leader Dr. Nutz is engaging in, would be put out there for the world to see, unlike the current crop of "news" organisations that are in the back pocket of Obama.
-
As a Ron Paul cultist, that's exactly what I expected you to say. Good job.
People like me you say? Wow, how wrong you are Benny boy. If people like me ran the media then all of the shenanigans done by ANY politician, including this lame assed attempt to circumvent the electorial proceedure that your cult leader Dr. Nutz is engaging in, would be put out there for the world to see, unlike the current crop of "news" organisations that are in the back pocket of Obama.
Yea, all of the national media is totally in the back pocket of Obama.
Guess that, you're right.. I am a 'cult' member and guess that Ron Paul is a 'cult' leader... cause you're ****ing delusional.
-
What's funny is, according to that website, none of the delegates are bound to any candidate. So Benny's cult leader, Dr. Nuts, could have less delegates voting for him than what are listed. :rotf: :rotf: :rotf:
I have it on good authority Kyle Ricky has way more "secret" delegates than Romney or Paul.
-
Just a crazy troll that is not worth wasting time or breath on here any longer.
Well, theres that too. But, I'm new at this & find it fun to poke the troll.
-
Yea, all of the national media is totally in the back pocket of Obama.
Guess that, you're right.. I am a 'cult' member and guess that Ron Paul is a 'cult' leader... cause you're ****ing delusional.
Says the person who thinks Dr. Nutz has a ****ing snowball's chance in hell of winning the nomination for President. Now who's the delusional one?
-
You.
Just told you.
-
You.
Just told you.
Ah, you must work at a movie theater as a projectionist...you're really good at it.
-
lol
-
Well, I know personally two TX delegates who, although they have publicly stated support for Romney, secretly support you. I'm sure there are several hundreds more. I think Tavis Smiley's lawfirm might be available.
Kyle Ricky El Presedente!!!!
My first action as President: On my first day-
I will deport all illegal immigrants
I will arrest Obama and Holder and have them tried on corruption charges
I will repeal Obamacare
I will repeal the 16th amendment and replace it with a flat tax that everyone pays, even the welfare bums
I will abolish the national reserve
I will put us back on the gold standard
I will remove justice Roberts from the bench and put Rick Santorum in his place
I will sign an executive order making anything that has to with the global warming scheme a federal offense with the punishment being a sentence of 100 years in prison
I will create a national George Bush day
I will create a national holiday for Italians (If the Irish can have one, so should the italians! Any other nationality we should celebrate?)
I will make being a liberal/socialist/communist a federal crime with the punishment being 100 years in prison
I will deport all islamic fanatics (I know there are some truly good muslims in this country. It is the few that ruin it for the rest)
I will pull all troops out of Pakistan and stop all federal funding to the country, I will open all drilling throughout the whole country, screw the stupid environmentalists
I will put a prison fence up at the border of Mexico (One of those ones that are about ten feet high and have razor spools on the top. There will be two of them with a razor spool sandwiched between them. If and even if a mexican moron makes it through that, he will be shot on sight)
I will make gay marriage a federal offense
I will make abortions equal to murder. At which when carried out, the individuals who perform the act; both the doctor and patient will be tried for 1st degree murder
I will saying the name Barrack Obama a federal offense
I will put Nancy Pelosi in the nut house
I will deport Michael Moore and Sean Penn to Cuba
I will pick up the drone strikes (just because I love to hear it when a terrorists dies)
I will make our national language ENGLISH (If you refuse to learn it, then you will be deported). There will also be no more of this having to push one to speak to an english speaking rep
I will make telemarketing a federal offense
I will abolish all unions and make every state a right to work state
I will make the federal government smaller by eleminating stupid departments, like Home Land Security, the dept. of education, and whatever one is wasting our money and consolidate the rest.
I will get rid of No Child Left Behind
I will require that in order for kids to graduate from high school, they have to know how to read and add more than just 2+2
I will make it a law that everyone spend at least two years in the military
I will make it a law that everyone either goes to college, or a trade school while giving the option to major in what they want. if it is something stupid like art history or Liberal Arts, I will push them to consider something that will actually help them
I will put a fence around San Francisco and let them have at it
I will put a fence around all the muslim countries and let them kill each other
I will force MSNBC to shut down it's operation.
These I will do on my first day in office. If there is anything else you would like me to do, please let me know and I will consider it.
-
lol
It's a good sign that you can laugh at yourself....means there's a glimmer of hope for your sanity after all.
-
Holy ****ing wowzers.
-
My first action as President: On my first day-
I will deport all illegal immigrants
I will arrest Obama and Holder and have them tried on corruption charges
I will repeal Obamacare
I will repeal the 16th amendment and replace it with a flat tax that everyone pays, even the welfare bums
I will abolish the national reserve
I will put us back on the gold standard
I will remove justice Roberts from the bench and put Rick Santorum in his place
I will sign an executive order making anything that has to with the global warming scheme a federal offense with the punishment being a sentence of 100 years in prison
I will create a national George Bush day
I will create a national holiday for Italians (If the Irish can have one, so should the italians! Any other nationality we should celebrate?)
I will make being a liberal/socialist/communist a federal crime with the punishment being 100 years in prison
I will deport all islamic fanatics (I know there are some truly good muslims in this country. It is the few that ruin it for the rest)
I will pull all troops out of Pakistan and stop all federal funding to the country, I will open all drilling throughout the whole country, screw the stupid environmentalists
I will put a prison fence up at the border of Mexico (One of those ones that are about ten feet high and have razor spools on the top. There will be two of them with a razor spool sandwiched between them. If and even if a mexican moron makes it through that, he will be shot on sight)
I will make gay marriage a federal offense
I will make abortions equal to murder. At which when carried out, the individuals who perform the act; both the doctor and patient will be tried for 1st degree murder
I will saying the name Barrack Obama a federal offense
I will put Nancy Pelosi in the nut house
I will deport Michael Moore and Sean Penn to Cuba
I will pick up the drone strikes (just because I love to hear it when a terrorists dies)
I will make our national language ENGLISH (If you refuse to learn it, then you will be deported). There will also be no more of this having to push one to speak to an english speaking rep
I will make telemarketing a federal offense
I will abolish all unions and make every state a right to work state
I will make the federal government smaller by eleminating stupid departments, like Home Land Security, the dept. of education, and whatever one is wasting our money and consolidate the rest.
I will get rid of No Child Left Behind
I will require that in order for kids to graduate from high school, they have to know how to read and add more than just 2+2
I will make it a law that everyone spend at least two years in the military
I will make it a law that everyone either goes to college, or a trade school while giving the option to major in what they want. if it is something stupid like art history or Liberal Arts, I will push them to consider something that will actually help them
I will put a fence around San Francisco and let them have at it
I will put a fence around all the muslim countries and let them kill each other
I will force MSNBC to shut down it's operation.
These I will do on my first day in office. If there is anything else you would like me to do, please let me know and I will consider it.
So, then . . . what's the agenda for Day 2? :fuelfire: :tongue: O-)
-
So, then . . . what's the agenda for Day 2? :fuelfire: :tongue: O-)
Travel the country and buy everyone a beer while I listen to them and see what they feel would make this country better. I would use it as a means to get and listen to the people; which is something Obama never heard of.
-
Travel the country and buy everyone a beer while I listen to them and see what they feel would make this country better. I would use it as a means to get and listen to the people; which is something Obama never heard of.
Do you suppose you could send the folks in white coats to visit Beannie.
-
Do you suppose you could send the folks in white coats to visit Beannie.
Oh that was already thought of. Ron Paul and his supporters will all be locked in a padded room. That also includes all the Scientologists as well.
-
It's been a brutal week for Romney in the conservative media, suggesting that Republicans are sick of their candidate's vagueness and health care fumbles
Mitt Romney's presidential campaign is taking it on the chin from the conservative media. With Team Romney failing to deliver a cogent message in the wake of the Supreme Court's game-changing ObamaCare ruling, Rupert Murdoch tweeted that Romney needed to dump "old friends from his team" and "hire real pros." Then both The Weekly Standard's William Kristol and the editorial board of Murdoch's Wall Street Journal trashed the Romney campaign as overly vague, "politically dumb,"and too focused on talking about the economy. So, just weeks after the press reported thatconservatives had rallied behind Romney, has the Right already soured on its man?
Yes. The honeymoon is over: "Romney is facing the backlash from conservatives that his opponents predicted in the primary, and it isn't pretty," says Matt Negrin at ABC News. The proximate cause is Romney's muddled, awkward message on the Right's No. 1 cause, ObamaCare, but that has simply opened the floodgates of criticism over Team Romney's inability to move the polls in his favor. "Conservatives' displeasure with Romney doesn't mean they won't vote for him," but it sure doesn't help his campaign any.
Mitt Romney, clumsy on health care, is shellacked by conservatives" (http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/07/mitt-romney-clumsy-on-health-care-falls-into-predicted-trap/")
No. Conservatives are still aboard the Romney express: All this griping from Beltway conservatives "is a load of worthless tripe," says Dan Riehl at Riehl World View. Most voters aren't even paying attention, and if they were, they'd see that Romney just hauled in a cool $100 million in June. That's hardly a sign of conservative disenchantment. This is "just the D.C. bubble talking, nothing to see there. Move along, folks."
Since when did Bill Kristol actually know anything?" (http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2012/07/since-when-did-bill-kristol-actually-know-anything.html")
If anything, the GOP has an enthusiasm problem: Republicans do have "increasingly positive views of their nominee," says Scott Clement at The Washington Post. According to Pew, 78 percent of GOP voters voiced a favorable view of Romney in June, up from 62 percent in May. Still, "liking is not loving," and twice as many Democrats are "very enthusiastic" about Obama than Republicans are about Romney. In fact, after their exciting primary, Republicans are mostly "fast becoming bored with the 2012 campaign," at least for now.
Republicans grow bored with 2012 campaign" (http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/post/republicans-grow-bored-with-2012-campaign/2012/07/05/gJQALMe7PW_blog.html")
Can find the links to this at Yahoo! (http://news.yahoo.com/mitt-romneys-honeymoon-conservatives-already-over-105500853.html)
The GOP doesn't have an enthusiasm problem contrary to what the Paulbots would hope for, yes we want Romney to be a little more assertive in his attacks but I have no doubt that will start soon, nor do I doubt Romney will go after Obama during the debates. We'll crawl on glass on our knees to vote for Romney, and if we have to we'll drag him over the finish line even if he's kicking and screaming, although I doubt he'll have to be dragged.
I think the time has come for the Paulbots to face reality, his message overall is rejected by the right and the left, and the time has come for you to just start your own party starting with Ron Paul, he needs to stop running as a Republican in his district, and then y'all can gather together at your little meetings smoking joints and waving your version of the Constitution around and talk about condemning Israel and basically have the Paulbot version of the "circle jerk" you can come up with your own name for it.
-
Travel the country and buy everyone a beer while I listen to them and see what they feel would make this country better. I would use it as a means to get and listen to the people; which is something Obama never heard of.
Can I haz mine now?
-
Here (http://thereal2012delegatecount.com/) are the facts.
I am pretty sure we already covered this in another thread. It's like that thread never happened.
You may not recover when reality catches up to you.
From this I see that MA must send 38 bound delegates and 3 unbound.
http://www.fairvote.org/a...012RNCDelegateSummary.pdf
LMAO.
Actually the RNC rules state that states develop their own rules for binding delegates.
http://www.gop.com/images...al/2008_RULES_Adopted.pdf
MA rules - delegates MUST pledge to a candidate, and therefore vote for that candidate unless they are released by the candidate to vote for someone else.
http://www.massgop.com/wp...ection_2012_FINAL_PDF.pdf
Delegates at large and their alternate delegates and delegates from Congressional districts and their alternate delegates to the national convention shall be elected, selected, allocated, or bound in the following manner:
(1) In accordance with any applicable Republican Party rules of a state, insofar as the same are not inconsistent with these rules; or
(2) To the extent not provided for in the applicable Republican Party rules of a state, in accordance with any applicable laws of a state, insofar as the same are not inconsistent with these rules; or
(3) By a combination of the methods set forth in paragraphs (a)(1) or (a)(2) of this rule; or(4) To the extent not provided by state law or party rules, as set forth in paragraph (d) of this rule.
Dude, I told you once already - do your own due diligence. You are a sheep here to the Paulistas. Use your own brain, and in homage to Nads - google is your friend.
http://www.conservativecave.com/index.php/topic,74579.375.html
-
I am pretty sure we already covered this in another thread. It's like that thread never happened.
You may not recover when reality catches up to you.
http://www.conservativecave.com/index.php/topic,74579.375.html
Does the phrase "pissin in the wind" have a familiar ring?
-
I already replied to that.
-
I already replied to that.
I told you before Bungie, when you post without referencing another post, you appear to be talking to yourself. You're not are you?
-
Holy ****ing wowzers.
Talking to yourself is a sure sign of insanity....that and supporting a candidate that doesn't have a snowball's chance in hell of winning.
-
I already replied to that.
Without addressing the points made. It appears you are incapable of doing that also unless it is a cut and paste from the Daily sainted Paul, or some other leftist website.
:)
-
I let Jennifer, the RNC's legal counsel, do it:
- 1. Rule 38 was not intended "to prohibit the individual states from adopting rules that would bind or allocate delegates to specific candidates".
What I need clarified is the following:
1. Do the RNC Rules require a state's delegation to follow its state laws or state party rules in the matter of binding of their national delegates to vote for a particular candidate?(I believe the answer is no; the RNC Rules are silent on this issue. My understanding is that any “legal" or “moral†obligation of the delegates, under either state law or state party rules, is simply that -- a state party matter. The RNC will not get involved in any such issue unless it deems that there is a violation of Rule 38 - an attempt to invoke the "Unit Rule" - during the time of the national convention.)
2. Do the RNC Rules prohibit a state party from changing its rules regarding the binding of their national delegates after the 2nd Tuesday in the September the year before the convention but before the national convention begins? (I believe the answer is no - the RNC Rules are again silent on this issue.)
3. Do the RNC Rules allow a national delegate to cast their vote for anyone they choose at the national convention, regardless of any vote-binding rules in their state or regardless of whether or not that "candidate" has been officially nominated under the RNC "majority of delegates from five states" rule?(I believe the answer is yes. I cite the actual rolling roll call of the states vote in 2000 as an example. In several states, even though George W. Bush had for many months been the presumptive nominee, several states, including Arkansas (19 for Bush, 5 for Alan Keyes) in the 2nd session on Monday evening, Massachusetts (35 for Bush, 1 for McCain, and 1 abstention) in the 3rd session on Tuesday evening,
4. Is the process of the "rolling roll call of the states" the process by which it is determined which candidates have met the RNC "majority of delegates from five states" rule in order to have their name officially placed in nomination? In other words, or as a corollary, do only those candidates who receive a "majority of delegates from five states" votes during the "rolling roll call of the states" become an official nominee, while any candidates receiving votes who did not receive the required majority of five states' votes simply fall to the floor, having not met the threshold?
Is there any way that you can clarify the answers to these questions in writing before tomorrow morning?
Nancy Lord
Utah Republican Republican National Committeewoman
From: Jennifer Sheehan - Legal
To: Nancy Lord
Cc: Sean Cairncross - Legal ; Blake G. Hall
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2008
Subject: RE: The Unit Rule
Mrs. Lord:
I am going to attempt to clearly answer your questions as listed below.
1. You are correct - the answer is no. The national convention allows delegates to vote for the individual of their choice, regardless of whether the person's name is officially placed into nomination or not.
2. National Party Rule No. 15(e) does prohibit State Parties from changing their delegate selection and allocation process that the State Party had to submit to the RNC no later than Sept. 4, 2007. However, the time frame for submitting a challenge to the national convention delegation based upon these Rules has expired, as any delegate contests had to be filed by August 2, 2008.
3. Yes - see #1 above.
4. Your question is mixing two separate issues. The first issue involves the nominating process, which requires the majority of delegates from five states to put a candidate's name into the official nominating process. The delegates from these five states must sign a nominating form that is then submitted to the Secretary of the Republican National Convention. After the Secretary receives these forms, the candidates are announced who have been officially placed into the nominating process and are therefore eligible to accumulate votes from the national convention delegates.
The Rules require that a roll call be taken from each state who announces the number of votes that its delegates cast for any eligible candidates, as well as for any person someone would like to cast a vote for in the roll call. You are correct that a person does not have to be officially nominated in order to receive votes, however, this vote is essentially pointless as it will not count towards the official tally.
Therefore to clarify, a candidate must receive the support of the majority of five state delegations in order to be officially placed into the nomination. Only candidates that have been officially nominated can accumulate votes that will count towards the majority of delegates necessary to officially nominate the Republican nominee for President. The Republican nominee for President must receive at least 1191 votes from the national convention delegation in order to receive the official nomination.
Please let me know if you have additional questions or need further clarifications related to this process.
Sincerely,
Jennifer Sheehan
Associate Counsel
Republican National Committee
-
Albeit, sh!t's confusing.
-
Which was already negated with the excerpts from the rules I posted from the RNC and MA GOP. What else can you cut and paste?
:)
-
Which was already negated with the excerpts from the rules I posted from the RNC and MA GOP. What else can you cut and paste?
:)
Oh crap!!! here we go again. Never!.....Never!! ask him that question.
-
Yea. I'm sure that you negated the RNC's own legal counsel on the RNC's rules.
Makes perfect sense.
-
Yea. I'm sure that you negated the RNC's own legal counsel on the RNC's rules.
Makes perfect sense.
I did because of the date of her letter vs. the date of the RNC rules. We discussed that also.
:)
-
We'll know at the end of August.
-
We'll know at the end of August.
RNC can change the rules again prior to voting. :)
-
Just tell your boy to run as a Libertarian. He couldn't stand the lack of attention, but it would be the honorable thing to do. :)
-
Just tell your boy to run as a Libertarian. He couldn't stand the lack of attention, but it would be the honorable thing to do. :)
Well, if Benny boy actually knew what honor was then he could.
-
Albeit, sh!t's confusing.
And there you go again, spoofing the profanity filter like a 13 year old. You sure you're 23?
-
Just tell your boy to run as a Libertarian. He couldn't stand the lack of attention, but it would be the honorable thing to do. :)
12 term Republican, who never never held elective office on the libertarian banner... but its the honorable thing?
Yes, makes perfect sense.
Anyway, no one really has that much of a chance at third party. I mean... how many 'independents' are elected representatives at the nation level? Less than 5?
-
And there you go again, spoofing the profanity filter like a 13 year old. You sure you're 23?
Its to add emphasis.
-
Its to add emphasis.
It's immature and idiotic. I guess that's why you do it.
-
No. I do it to add emphasis.
Your temper tantrum over it is 'immature' and 'idiotic'.
-
No. I do it to add emphasis.
Your temper tantrum over it is 'immature' and 'idiotic'.
There you go again....projection.
The only one throwing a temper tantrum here is you about your candidate not getting the votes he didn't earn in the primaries and how you want usurp the process through the courts.
-
12 term Republican, who never never held elective office on the libertarian banner... but its the honorable thing?
Yes, makes perfect sense.
Anyway, no one really has that much of a chance at third party. I mean... how many 'independents' are elected representatives at the nation level? Less than 5?
He ran and lost as a libertarian - saw the writing on the wall. He is not a Republican. It would be honorable for him to leave the party, but the man has no honor.
-
If that aint some of the most elitist shit that I've ever heard.
-
If that aint some of the most elitist shit that I've ever heard.
:bawl: :bawl: :bawl: :bawl: :bawl: :bawl: :bawl: :bawl: :bawl: :bawl:
Yeah you're pretty elitist here aren't you with your "holier than thou" attitude.
-
If that aint some of the most elitist shit that I've ever heard.
By all means point out the isolationist, anti-Israel, truther portions of the Republican platform. :)
-
If that aint some of the most elitist shit that I've ever heard.
Speaking of shit...if you took a good dump, there would be nothing left. :loser: :lmao:
-
Those delegate numbers are way off.
Then provide a link to the correct numbers.
-
There aren't real numbers. Every delegate count is speculative at this point.
This (http://thereal2012delegatecount.com/) is about as close to the truth as there is, though.
-
There aren't real numbers. Every delegate count is speculative at this point.
So you saying the numbers are way off is jut you again talking out your ass. Figures. :whatever:
This (http://thereal2012delegatecount.com/) is about as close to the truth as there is, though.
How is this any more valid than the other websites? It looks and sounds from reading it...like a pro Ron Paul site.
-
There aren't real numbers. Every delegate count is speculative at this point.
This (http://thereal2012delegatecount.com/) is about as close to the truth as there is, though.
You lie
-
Is Benny still flashing that website around? Man, I already told you that it is a hack site that was made up by a Ron Paul supporter. I wouldn't be surprised if Benny owns that site. Only thing is that you can't tell who owns it because their registration info is hidden. If it was reputable, the registration info wouldn't be private.
-
12 term Republican, who never never held elective office on the libertarian banner... but its the honorable thing?
Yes, makes perfect sense.
Anyway, no one really has that much of a chance at third party. I mean... how many 'independents' are elected representatives at the nation level? Less than 5?
He never HELD electED office, but he sure as shit ran a few times as one. Then again, how many Libertarian candidates have EVER won statewide or national office? Yeah, thanks for playing.
Seriously, the hole is way deep enough. Quit digging.
-
(http://fastcache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/39/2010/04/vintage-pie-lady.jpg)
-
Nope, your stupid little graphic in your signature shows that your support for Dr. Nutz in everyone of your posts. Simple as that.
Well, that and the idiocy you keep posting.
He sounds like a poster on CU. He keeps getting the dead horse reply and is as Nutz about Dr Nutz as the recently departed from the Cave Benjamin. It's probably the same person.
-
He sounds like a poster on CU. He keeps getting the dead horse reply and is as Nutz about Dr Nutz as the recently departed from the Cave Benjamin. It's probably the same person.
Are 3/4 of his replies 'lol', 'lmao', or something equally stupid?
-
Are 3/4 of his replies 'lol', 'lmao', or something equally stupid?
The proper term would be were since the MILF got him yesterday. Top notch chew toy though except, he had a kinda fishy flavor & smelled funny.
-
He sounds like a poster on CU. He keeps getting the dead horse reply and is as Nutz about Dr Nutz as the recently departed from the Cave Benjamin. It's probably the same person.
I don't think so....Benny was able to post about other subjects than Mitt Romney, unlike the Expired Equine Clubber at CU.
-
The proper term would be were since the MILF got him yesterday. Top notch chew toy though except, he had a kinda fishy flavor & smelled funny.
Must because he wore out his welcome within his first few posts