The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: Freeper on February 28, 2012, 04:38:09 PM
-
dynasaw
How Many Kids Do You Consider Too Many?
Romney has five and Santorum has seven. With their kind of money I guess they can afford it.
Even so aren't five and seven a lot of kids these days??? The Dugurs have, what 20? Why do the right wing religious types have so many kids? Asking because I can't get into their logic.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002360400
You know how many kids I consider too many? None of my damn business, that's how many.
Do you really not understand why people who oppose abortion have so many kids?
seabeyond
2. choice is choice. so i really dont consider what is too many, too few or just right. nt
At least you are being consistent, although you still support murder.
Taverner
3. More than 3
I was so hoping that Taverner would let us all know how many kids he approves of us having.
Stuckinthebush
19. Agree. 3's the limit
Of course that is selfish because I have three.
My logic is that my odds are pretty good that at least one of those kids will be able to take care of me one day! Two is a 50/50 chance and one is putting all my eggs in a single basket. 33% chance is good enough. Four gets to be wild when they are young and five is way too many for me!
So if you only had 2 then the limit would be 2.
I also notice that you want one of your kids to take care of you, that right there is liberalism on display it's always someone else's job to take care of you.
karynnj
9. Unlike the Republicans, I think family planning belongs JUST with the family
Last edited Tue Feb 28, 2012, 01:32 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)
I've known families with just one kid, where that was likely too many. But, I am from a family of 9 - and I value each and every one. My parents by the way are not right wing - nor is the family of a close friend who was one of 13. My mom, college educated and brilliant, always wanted a large family.
Do you want to emulate Rick Santorum and think that you know what is better for people you do not even know? How would you feel if someone decided that you needed precisely n kids?
Liberalism is based on knowing what is better for people you don't even know. Geez how many times have you goons squawked how I vote against my own self interests?
WolverineDG
21. Thought DU was "pro choice"
not "pro choice but only if I agree with someone's politics"
How many kids someone has (or doesn't have) isn't any of your damn business.
DU is pro abortion, not pro choice in any issue.
southernyankeebelle
29. Whatever you can afford to support on your own. For me 1 was more than enough. I am glad
I made that decision.
Wow that sounds almost like a repuke answer.
-
Stuckinthebush
19. Agree. 3's the limit
Of course that is selfish because I have three.
My logic is that my odds are pretty good that at least one of those kids will be able to take care of me one day! Two is a 50/50 chance and one is putting all my eggs in a single basket. 33% chance is good enough. Four gets to be wild when they are young and five is way too many for me!
What is too many for you isn't too many for someone else you stupid pig.
-
One if they are liberal kids.
-
The DUmmies are all for choice, as long as it is the same one they would make. :whatever:
-
dynasaw
How Many Kids Do You Consider Too Many?
It varies from family to family, but just out of curiousity, how many did your parents have, and where were you in the batting order...? Take that last number, subtract 1, and you'll have the answer your parents missed.
-
One is too many if other people are forced at a gun to have to support them.
-
Stuckinthebush
19. Agree. 3's the limit
Of course that is selfish because I have three.
My logic is that my odds are pretty good that at least one of those kids will be able to take care of me one day!
I sure hope one of those kids takes care of his worthless ass, so maybe then we can stop.
-
You know how many kids I consider too many? None of my damn business, that's how many.
That is the correct answer, right there -- However, the consummate DUmmy will say something like 'your decision to have X kids is putting added stress on limited planetary resources, which does make it my business, as well as everybody else's business'
-
That is the correct answer, right there -- However, the consummate DUmmy will say something like 'your decision to have X kids is putting added stress on limited planetary resources, which does make it my business, as well as everybody else's business'
I'm sure the condoms thrown out after buttsex with each other isn't doing mother Earf any good either, but that won't stop em. :-)
-
I'm sure some here remember the worthless freeloading bum the wily primitive, Wiley50, who died earlier this year.
Remember?--the guy who was building that ark in the mountains and forests of Tennessee, that he hoped to float out into the ocean, and collect his American benefits without being in America.
Well, the wily primitive admitted over the years about the hordes of kids he spawned, beginning in the 1960s, with too many different women to count.
In fact, that's why the wily primitive was always working under the table, so he couldn't be caught for overdue child support.
The primitives really liked their pal the wily primitive; thought he was one of the greatest guys around.....and never once chastised him for all the children he had.
-
Hey dummies, I can tell your parents when they had enough kids:
1) Take the order of your birth (let's say, for example, that you were number three)
2) subtract 1 from that.
3) there you have it. That's how many kids that your parents should have had. You were more than enough. You were a mistake. Therefore, you should make every effort to make sure that you don't continue the errors of your parents.
Self esteem for DUmmies.;)
-
It varies from family to family, but just out of curiousity, how many did your parents have, and where were you in the batting order...? Take that last number, subtract 1, and you'll have the answer your parents missed.
Damn it! You beat me to it! :censored: :banghead:
:rofl:
-
Taverner
77. It's not like there are criminal penalties
And they are using more services then they are paying for.
We really need to stop families like the Duggars who are selfish enough to have that many children
Sure, it's their right but rights aren't free
-
zorahopkins
50. Sustainability Is Key
With the world's population already at more than SIX Billion, it seems to me that any discussion of the number of children should start with recognition of the fact that there are ALREADY too many people.
We cannot feed the world's people now. Every hour, something like 25,000 people die from hunger.
There is not enough clean water for the world's people now.
There is not enough. Not Enough.
I'm not sure how many kids are "too many".
But I do know that unless we REDUCE the number of people we have on this planet, we are doomed.
The 1% will always be able to survive.
But the 99% will suffer.
How short sighted, who will be left to pay for your entitlements?
-
But I do know that unless we REDUCE the number of people we have on this planet, we are doomed.
You first.
-
Response to dynasaw (Original post)Tue Feb 28, 2012, 06:13 PM
tinrobot
66. Two. The planet really needs to cut back on people.
Last edited Tue Feb 28, 2012, 06:14 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)
If every couple had one kid, we'd be back on a path to sustainability.
-
Excerpt from quote by zorahopkins, quoted by Beg,
"But I do know that unless we REDUCE the number of people we have on this planet, we are doomed."
So by reducing the number of people on the planet, the rest become immortal ?
Anyway, El Rushbo addressed this in his book "The way things ought to be". Overpopulation is another libscam roughly on the intellectual level of global cooling/warming, depending on what generation is being propagandized.
-
Excerpt from quote by zorahopkins, quoted by Beg,
"But I do know that unless we REDUCE the number of people we have on this planet, we are doomed."
So by reducing the number of people on the planet, the rest become immortal ?
Anyway, El Rushbo addressed this in his book "The way things ought to be". Overpopulation is another libscam roughly on the intellectual level of global cooling/warming, depending on what generation is being propagandized.
Yep. They've been beating that poor horse since before 1970. We were all supposed to have starved to death long before now, instead of fighting obesity. Or died from the next ice age, instead of listening to them whine about global warming or climate change or whatever. :yawn: I"m so scared... :yawn:
-
So once again they prove to be hypocrites. I thought that they believed in a woman's right to choose....which would include choosing how many children to have.
-
Sure, it's their right but rights aren't free
Now all of a sudden rights aren't free according to you goons?
Try saying that about birth control pills, Taverner and you will be run off of DU.
The ironic thing is, this time the idiot is correct, but he will never make the connection to all of the other things the left demands for free.
:banghead:
-
Now all of a sudden rights aren't free according to you goons?
Try saying that about birth control pills, Taverner and you will be run off of DU.
The ironic thing is, this time the idiot is correct, but he will never make the connection to all of the other things the left demands for free.
:banghead:
You're missing the main point...the number of children you choose to have IS an actual right. Of course the DUmmies have no problem with restricting an actual right. We've seen over and over their love for restricting free speech, free religion, gun ownership, and any other actual right they dislike. The only restrictions that they can't stand are the ones on things they want.
-
The number of children you should have depends on how much help you will have to get on the co-Us residents time.. If five kids without Government help, you can **** yourself to death for all I care...
-
Threads like these make me want to get knocked up again just to make the democrats angry. I might run around barefoot in the kitchen too.
-
Threads like these make me want to get knocked up again just to make the democrats angry. I might run around barefoot in the kitchen too.
Hello!
-
I'm sure some here remember the worthless freeloading bum the wily primitive, Wiley50, who died earlier this year.
Remember?--the guy who was building that ark in the mountains and forests of Tennessee, that he hoped to float out into the ocean, and collect his American benefits without being in America.
The late and unlamented DUmmy Wileynumbers was a true prototypical DUmpmonkey.
He planned to float his ark out from Tennessee to the Pacific Ocean, not the Gulf or the Atlantic.
He did recognize there was a problem with the continental divide.
-
I'm sure the condoms thrown out after buttsex with each other isn't doing mother Earf any good either, but that won't stop em. :-)
Now that is funny right there, I don't care who ya are!
Was 9 in my family, and 8 in "Toots'" And not a single one is some lilly livered ****in' liberal, ya ****in' pukes!
Me, we only had two, but it was more do to medical problems than anythin' else. "Toots" had a pretty tough time of it. We wish we could have had more, especially later in life when they grew up. The more grandkids the better, doncha know!
-
Now that is funny right there, I don't care who ya are!
Was 9 in my family, and 8 in "Toots'" And not a single one is some lilly livered ****in' liberal, ya ****in' pukes!
Me, we only had two, but it was more do to medical problems than anythin' else. "Toots" had a pretty tough time of it. We wish we could have had more, especially later in life when they grew up. The more grandkids the better, doncha know!
Grankids ARE great! :-) :-) We're expecting our 7th this year, can't wait. And since only 4 of our 7 kids have had children so far, we're expecting quite a few more as time goes on! :-)
Personally, I hope all our kids go on to become "filthy, selfish breeders" in the eyes of the left. We need more native population! :-)
-
Grankids ARE great! :-) :-) We're expecting our 7th this year, can't wait. And since only 4 of our 7 kids have had children so far, we're expecting quite a few more as time goes on! :-)
Personally, I hope all our kids go on to become "filthy, selfish breeders" in the eyes of the left. We need more native population! :-)
Ain't that the truth! Maybe we can breed 'em out of existence!
I'm afraid I only have 5 grandkids, nowadays it's pretty tough to raise more than a few because of the expense. Both my kids are "fixed" now, but it's undo-able since it was the boys who got neutered, and I can wish, can't I! heheheheheh
-
How many kids do I consider too many?
However many your mother had, you filthy liberal!!! :bird:
-
Hit the section 8 housing market up and then tell the welfare moms how many kids are too many. Of course you will have to be specific as to whether your are referring to the amount total vs. with each baby daddy.
-
How many kids do I consider too many?
However many your mother had, you filthy liberal!!! :bird:
Ding, ding, ding, ding! We have here the post of the day!!!!
-
When liberal is said, filthy is implied.
-
I don't care how many children people have....as long as they can financially provide for them and provide them with love, care and guidance to grow up to be productive adults.
2 was enough for me. Not because I couldn't provide for more or love on more, but because I didn't want more badly enough to be pregnant 2 more times. My ex and I had decided that we either wanted 2 or 4, but not 3. He was the middle child of 3 and said he never wanted the same family dynamics that were in his family.
-
If I had the room and the money, I'd have another ASAP. Viv is almost in Kindergarten, the baby is almost 1...I could do another.
Now, if I had unlimited resources (and a housekeeper and a nanny) I'd have as many as my body could produce, just to tick off these liberal assholes.
-
So once again they prove to be hypocrites. I thought that they believed in a woman's right to choose....which would include choosing how many children to have.
Liberals are wanna be tyrants. Gals have the right to choose, but only if the choice is allowed by a liberal.
in this case, the only choice allowed is death.
give a liberal power and he will attempt to control every aspect of your life. Liberals despise freedom and self sufficient people. Choice is just a word to hide murder.
-
Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » How Many Kids Do You Cons...
Tue Feb 28, 2012, 01:23 PM
dynasaw (731 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore
How Many Kids Do You Consider Too Many?
>snip<
That's an easy question.
It's the one you can not raise in a responsible manner, and see to his/her needs.
For you DUmpmonkeys, that amounts to zero.
No, no, don't thank me. Very happy to help.
-
Ask a liberal how they feel about 'choosing life' and you'll see just how "pro choice" they really are.
-
Stuckinthebush
19. Agree. 3's the limit
Of course that is selfish because I have three.
My logic is that my odds are pretty good that at least one of those kids will be able to take care of me one day! Two is a 50/50 chance and one is putting all my eggs in a single basket. 33% chance is good enough. Four gets to be wild when they are young and five is way too many for me!
almost like she is breeding future slaves to be at her beck and call