Thanks, Obama.
Way to shit on our friends.
Britain has been defriended.
Barry Big-ears has had it in for Britain since LOOOONG before he was Immaculated. I can't believe that any thinking, rational human being can expect that he would do any differently than he has.
Unfortunately, once we can get Lord ObeyWon out of office, it's going to take DECADES to repair relations with our allies.
At the risk of a dummyesque post, doesn't it have something to do with his daddy?
This was on one of those satire sites right?? OMG please tell me this is satire.
KC
For those who were on the fence that this man is the worst president this country has ever had -- well this should clear that right up for you.Juan McCainez still likes him.
There is no recovering from this. This man should step down from office. The total bastard.
I still like them. They have cute accents.
This article said it was obtained through wikileaks. Is anyone sure that wikileaks hasn't been altering the truth? That dude hates America and I wouldn't put it past him to alter facts just to hurt us. I don't know if he did, but I also don't know if he didn't. I don't trust anything from wikileaks until it is verified.
This is unbelievable! and I'll say here what I said in the shoutbox, where the hell are the Republicans? :banghead:
The matter is serious enough to merit Congressional hearings in Washington as well as parliamentary hearings in London. It is easy to see why the Obama team refused to allow the US Senate access to the negotiating documents for New START, as they would have sparked outrage on both sides of the Atlantic that would almost certainly have killed the Treaty. The Telegraph report clearly contradicts repeated claims by the Obama negotiating team that no side deals were struck with their Russian counterparts. Not for the first time, the current US administration has been eager to appease America’s enemies while shamelessly undercutting her allies.
This is unbelievable! and I'll say here what I said in the shoutbox, where the hell are the Republicans? :banghead:
FUBO :argh:
Next he will reveal the detail of Israel's nuclear capabilities to Iran and newly Shariafied Egypt. :censored:
At the risk of a dummyesque post, doesn't it have something to do with his daddy?Yes.
He did WHAT???????????????????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Are you :censored: kidding me right now?????
Juan McCainez still likes him.
Juan McCainez can put a lip-lock on my love muscle... :fuelfire:
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/nilegardiner/100074846/the-obama-administration-betrays-britain-to-appease-the-russians-over-new-start/
There sure as hell better be Congressional hearings -- this just cannot stand.
Yes.He did what??? say it ain't so!!
0bama sees the UK as an oppressive imperialist regime that put its thumb on his native homeland, Kenya, over the first half of the past century. 0bama has it in for the UK - that is why he tossed the bust of Churchill out of the oval office on his first day in the White Mosque.
0bama needs to be impeached and prosecuted for treason...then...
I wouldn't broadcast that too loudly. Juan McLame has been in bed with the Dhimmi'Rats for so *******ed long, that at the very least he swings both ways by now. He may just show up in assless chaps and a sombrero to take you up on the offer.
People pissed off by the Kenyan:
Mossad ------- Check
MI6 ---------- Check
CIA ---------- Check
Hmm. Not looking good.
Ooooo...McLame in assless chaps...`scuse me while I pour a tall 24 oz tumbler full of Clorox to wash my imagination...
He did what??? say it ain't so!!
At what point can he be charged with treason? Could Britain charge him with spying?
IMHO, it's even WORSE than this, kids.
Consider this--Obama and this administration basically sold out the Brits and the capability of THEIR Tridents.
Now consider how much of a stretch it would be to have sold out OUR SSBN capabilities. IOW, not much of one at all. It's as if Obama sailed the Ohio right into Murmansk, handed over the keys, and said, "She's all yours."
As a submariner, I am so pissed right now I can't even think straight, the damage is so deep. Walker/Whitworth is child's play compared to what Obama just did.
So basically, since Obama's been in office, it's "**** yo Churchill bust" and "**** yo secrets" playas. I'm siding with the people that hate America. Gotta one-up 'da wife.
It's worse than that, Reb. He threw BOTH us and the Brits under the bus. He just took one leg of the nuclear triad and shitcanned it.
I don't think it's fair, dammit!
Obama should also have told China. He should apologize to Hu & Lang Lang about this.
He gave it to them as a freebie.
Sooo..
Can we impeach him yet?
:racist:
Call me a racist again and I'll kick out more of those teeth.
:racist:
you talking to me or the black kid? :lmao:
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/nilegardiner/100074846/the-obama-administration-betrays-britain-to-appease-the-russians-over-new-start/
There sure as hell better be Congressional hearings -- this just cannot stand.
Sooo..
Can we impeach him yet?
Obama could, I believe, just unilaterally use the FCC to shut down Fox News, and ignore any judges' rulings against him; he could nationalize the oil companies; he could declare an open border with Mexico; he could take any manner and number of dictatorial acts and the Senate still would not convict him, although it's not impossible the House would impeach, but still, I deem, unlikely. I add here that I am not writing in the least hyperbolically. I mean that. I think, just maybe, if he, say, rounded up 500,000 or so conservatives and put us in internment camps, that he could be impeached and convicted.
Way to go Obozo.
First the START treaty and now this?! This man has got to go.
Sure lends new meaning to the old term, "Level the playing field".Yeah, tell me about it.
wink - wink - hint - hint.
Somewhere Jimmy Carter is smiling like the jackass he is only because he is no longer the worse president ever.Ain't that the truth. This man will be, by far, THE WORST POTUS in history.
Is this even going to make the news? I've had Fox on in the back ground most of the day and have not heard one mention of this. If not Fox, then who will cover it?I know, it's getting bad, even with Fox News. Time to turn to The Drudge Report and conservative radio.
Thanks, Obama.
Way to shit on our friends.
Obama could, I believe, just unilaterally use the FCC to shut down Fox News, and ignore any judges' rulings against him; he could nationalize the oil companies; he could declare an open border with Mexico; he could take any manner and number of dictatorial acts and the Senate still would not convict him, although it's not impossible the House would impeach, but still, I deem, unlikely. I add here that I am not writing in the least hyperbolically. I mean that. I think, just maybe, if he, say, rounded up 500,000 or so conservatives and put us in internment camps, that he could be impeached and convicted.
First of all let me say that I don't like or trust Obama or anyone in his administration. I also don't trust wikileaks. Assange has had this so-called information for several months, who can be sure he isn't doctoring the files? He obviously hates America and I certainly wouldn't put it passed him to leave stuff out or put stuff in to suit his own intrests. Can anyone tell me why I can't find this so-called leak on a wikileaks site? And where did the British find it?
So, would he do something as dumb as that story suggested? No. He is much more coniving than you all are giving him credit for. He would sell them out, but he wouldn't do it in such an obvious way.
They expect to be a lot stronger in 10 years. They expect us to be no stronger than we are now. This treaty is a positive conservation of force exercise for them, a no-gain for us.
I am not even close to a mole. I have googled every thing I know to google. I can not find a wikileaks release that says anything like this. But, apparently they can be found in Europe. That doesn't concern you? And I guarantee that you did try to find it, but couldn't. I also never said that YOU said to impeach him. Scroll back a few pages and you will find plenty of people who said just that.
Like I said. People are over reacting to something we have no or little proof of. It is exactly what people did when Bush was president and it is embarrassing. I don't like Obama or anything about him. But a half story is just that, a half story. I am just saying, let's get all the facts first.
Also, not replying to this is exactly what a president should do. It is one of the few things he has done right. He can't spend his time verifying or denying every accusation against him. If he did, that's all he would have time for because acknowledging it makes it see credible in the first place. Then, more and more people just start saying stuff and when he doesn't reply to all of them, they would claim it's true because he didn't reply to it. It's like the Truthers or Birthers. A president can't be concerned with every single accusation. Show proof first. That is all I'm saying.
If wanting proof makes me sound like a mole, then so is everyone who asked for proof when something bad was said about Bush.
Just like a leftist to demand proof of one thing, yet deny the need for it for another.
How about I'll show the same concern for producing a birth certificate as Barry shows for hiding his student records...
The story was mentioned on Fox this morning, unbiased. The morning hosts were ragging on Stuart Varney about it a bit. Just thought you'd like to know.
:whistling:
The story was mentioned on Fox this morning, unbiased. The morning hosts were ragging on Stuart Varney about it a bit. Just thought you'd like to know.
:whistling:
The story was mentioned on Fox this morning, unbiased. The morning hosts were ragging on Stuart Varney about it a bit. Just thought you'd like to know.
:whistling:
I didn't see that. What did they say about it? I can't find the actual wikileaks report anywhere on the internet, which is a bit disturbing to me. They shut the entire internet down in Egypt so I wouldn't put it passed the government to keep this stuff hidden from us. So far, all I can find is people in Europe saying this was released. I would love to know what Fox News was saying.
Here's HotAir's take. Sounds to me like Obiewan and Hitlery are tryin' to cover their collective asses on this one. It has an excerpt from the document leaked by Assange and his buddies.
I'll let ya make up your own ,mind, but it appears we have always told Russia of transfers from us to the Brits, but we never sent them the identifiers which tells them the exact number the Brits have. Some anonymous source is coverin' for us, but the document speaks for itself.
You'll never see this in American media as the MSM is to Obiewan like Lewinsky was to Clintoon. Heard that from Rush just now. Hehehehehe
Here's HotAir's take. Sounds to me like Obiewan and Hitlery are tryin' to cover their collective asses on this one. It has an excerpt from the document leaked by Assange and his buddies.
I'll let ya make up your own ,mind, but it appears we have always told Russia of transfers from us to the Brits, but we never sent them the identifiers which tells them the exact number the Brits have. Some anonymous source is coverin' for us, but the document speaks for itself.
You'll never see this in American media as the MSM is to Obiewan like Lewinsky was to Clintoon. Heard that from Rush just now. Hehehehehe
I am a little confused here. Tell me if this is what you are saying.
We told russia of transfers to Brits, but did not send identifiers. Is that right? If so, then doesn't that make the original story from this thread bogus? And I didn't see a link to hotair, but I will try to look it up. Thanks for the info. Let me know if I read this wrong.
I get all of that. That is pretty much what I have been saying. Everyone has been getting mad about the serial numbers and that IS NOT WHAT WE SHOULD BE MAD ABOUT! Here is what I have been trying to get through.
1) The treaty itself hurts us and only us. Giving the serial numbers is trivial. No this is where you are missin' the point! This particular info really doesn't hurt us at all! The Treaty itself hurts us, but not nearly to the extent it hurts our most stalwart Ally. It hurts the Brits, because now the Russians know the extent of the Brits sub arsenal! Somethin' I think even you would agree is not a good idea!
2) Apparently they can get the wikileaks releases in Europe, but we can't get them here. All we can get here is hearsay from Europe. Why isn't every single person on this site mad that we are being censored? No shit Sherlock! Every person here has been pissed about this since Lord Zero was elected by morons like you, that never checked him out! The MSM has covered for him since 2006 and it is just more fuel on the fire! We don't bring it up everyday since we all know that, and have known that, from the git go!
Ya wanna be careful of accusing us of not bein' informed. Unless of course ya wanna be a pariah. I'd stick around a little longer and get to know us before you start makin' judgments.
I did not vote for Obama, sure ya didn't. I actually worked the polls for the first time during that election and worked for the republican party, sure ya did. I also didn't call you uninformed. Uh....then what exactly does this mean:Everyone has been getting mad about the serial numbers and that IS NOT WHAT WE SHOULD BE MAD ABOUT! Nor did I call anyone else a name. I'm sorry, point out where I even insinuated such a thing! You, however, made a judegement towards me because I didn't jump to conclusions. No my friend, I merely tried to educate you. I'm sincerely sorry you took offense. That is exactly what the left did with Bush and does to this day with Palin and Beck and Limbaugh....ect. All I want is information without being censored. Just who the hell is censoring you??????I have not called anyone a name. Nor have I! You almost made me do that. If the foo shits, I have no problem with that. Since I don't fall for that, I will choose to believe that you are either drunk or not very smart and therefore I won't call you a name in retaliation. Oooooooooooooooh, I have been bested by a probie! I bow to your superior intelect!Besides, I don't need to impress anyone, especially a newbie!
And, I made no judgements. Again I point you to:Why isn't every single person on this site mad that we are being censored? Uh to me there bouncy boy, that sounds like you're accusing us of droppin' the ball. I was the one saying to calm down BEFORE any judgements were made. Scroll back to page 1-6 and all you will see are judgements without proof. Go to the DUmp, maybe you'd be more comfortable there, and you will read the exact same stuff about this situation written there. They believe a terrorist like Assange to be telling the truth. They are also saying it will make Obama look bad. Yet, not one person can find it on our American computers.Huh??? If you actually research British news media, you will find everything you are lookin' for. Did you not pay attention when I explained the American media is playin' cover for the Messiah? I didn't read anyone besides me, asking why Assange is to be believed. So, you can keep calling me names excuse me, where did I call you a name, I musta missed that part. if that makes you feel better, but ask yourself how that makes you any different than the people who attacked Bush for stuff that wasn't true. You are a real classy person. and you are a little inexperienced to be tellin' me/us we don't have any idea what's goin' on!
Besides, I don't need to impress anyone, especially a newbie!
As this seems to have hijacked the thread, I suggest if you want to take this farther, let's head to the fight club! Otherwise, I have no more time to spend with a "newb" who doesn't have the slightest idea who we are and gets his panties in a wad because he doesn't hear what he wants to.
Ah, I see said the blind man! This is what you consider callin' you names: "since Lord Zero was elected by morons like you". You are a newb, yet it appears you want to question our integrity. What did you expect, I was gonna give you a trophy for exposing our disregard of the facts when you don't have the slightest idea how many times we have addressed the very thing you are bitchin' about?
Sorry but the way you are stickin' up for Zero, what am I to suspect? If you would do a little research other than KOS or MoveON, or the typical MSM, or here for that matter, you will find there is indeed evidence that he gave up info he shouldn't have in order to put his name in the history books. I agree with the last treaty we made, but Obiewan changed the rules even after our friends asked him not to! And it appears you are willin' to give him the benefit of the doubt solely because his cheerleaders in the MSM aren't reporting it.
Buy a vowel, my friend, buy a vowel.
ETA:
Oh, and just so ya know, I start drinkin' scotch around noon every day in order to put up with the 6 screws in my back! If ya care to research anything about me, you will find this to be true! Do not judge, my man, before you know with who you are callin' out!
You're wasting your time on this one, Al. No content, lotta 'tude.