The Conservative Cave

Current Events => Breaking News => Topic started by: bijou on January 27, 2009, 12:11:02 PM

Title: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: bijou on January 27, 2009, 12:11:02 PM
(http://hotair.cachefly.net/images/2008-09/palin-flag.jpg)
Quote
...
Quote
She’s also launching her national political action committee. Registered in Virginia, patterned after Hillary’s HillPac, Sarahpac.com is to support ideas and candidates who share the Palin vision that energy independence is this country’s future.
Next month she addresses a Washington gathering of prominent conservatives. She’s going ahead with a book. Her Facebook page has 410,000 friends. She wants to influence policy knowing the nation must turn to Alaska as its energy resource. She’s planning to be president.
...They were probably planning to roll it out later this week and Adams got a tip that the site was already live, but as I say, hang on to your money until someone confirms it. If it is for real, expect some of the money to go to green causes to help recast the ‘Cuda as a centrist. And the media to pay very close attention to how much money her PAC’s raising compared to Huck’s and Mitt’s.
Adams also claims Palin will be at the Alfalfa Club dinner with Obama that’s coming up; take a gander at the membership roll. Exit question: Will she be “nominated”?
Update: The boss just got off the phone with a spokesman for Campaign Solutions, the site’s registrar, who told her it’s for real and that the PAC papers were filed with the FEC yesterday.
http://hotair.com/archives/2009/01/27/palin-launches-new-pac/
So John McCain may helped the conservative cause entirely accidentally.
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: djones520 on January 27, 2009, 12:12:57 PM
I just hope she doesn't push to hard over the next couple of years.  We don't want to be sick of her before the actual run to the election begins.

But the way things are looking, I think she'll have my vote in 2012.
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: john c calhoun on January 27, 2009, 12:15:38 PM
john mccain would've saved the convervative movement...

sarah palin helped destroy it...

palin  will NEVER be  elected to a national position... she may  be an ok gal, but, she had her shot at the national stage & she BLEW IT & helped sink mccain & conservatism in general...

the sooner conservatives back away from palin, the better...

and if you haven't noticed,  ALL media still loves to  exploit her idiocy at the expense of conservatives...

Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: djones520 on January 27, 2009, 12:17:20 PM
john mccain would've saved the convervative movement...

sarah palin helped destroy it...

palin  will NEVER be  elected to a national position... she may  be an ok gal, but, she had her shot at the national stage & she BLEW IT & helped sink mccain & conservatism in general...

the sooner conservatives back away from palin, the better...

and if you haven't noticed,  ALL media still loves to  exploit her idiocy at the expense of conservatives...



I'm starting to see why everyone says what they do about you.
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: Wineslob on January 27, 2009, 12:17:37 PM
McCain sunk himself. Why do you buy into the media bias against her??
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: Atomic Lib Smasher on January 27, 2009, 12:27:01 PM
john mccain would've saved the convervative movement...

sarah palin helped destroy it...

palin  will NEVER be  elected to a national position... she may  be an ok gal, but, she had her shot at the national stage & she BLEW IT & helped sink mccain & conservatism in general...

the sooner conservatives back away from palin, the better...

and if you haven't noticed,  ALL media still loves to  exploit her idiocy at the expense of conservatives...




McCain was the one having conservatives back away, not Palin. Just for a laugh, how did Palin help "sink" McLame's campaign?
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: dutch508 on January 27, 2009, 12:29:13 PM

McCain was the one having conservatives back away, not Palin. Just for a laugh, how did Palin help "sink" McLame's campaign?

He'll never be able to answer, Uncle Johnny is a cock-sucking centralist RINO supporter.
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: crockspot on January 27, 2009, 12:30:39 PM
john mccain would've saved the convervative movement...

sarah palin helped destroy it...

palin  will NEVER be  elected to a national position... she may  be an ok gal, but, she had her shot at the national stage & she BLEW IT & helped sink mccain & conservatism in general...

the sooner conservatives back away from palin, the better...

and if you haven't noticed,  ALL media still loves to  exploit her idiocy at the expense of conservatives...



You're the last person who I would have expected to think that McCain would have saved the conservative movement. The guy is practically a Democrat. And 48% of voters simply LOVE Sarah Palin. If she makes a go I'll even send her money, and I've NEVER sent money to a pol before.
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: Attero Dominatus on January 27, 2009, 12:33:48 PM

I'm a little troll, dumb and stupid


McShame chose Sarah to rally more conservatives around him, but he was a poor campaigner and the Lame Stream Media's bias just made things worse.
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: claret1995 on January 27, 2009, 12:42:36 PM


 If she runs,I hope so. Depends on the running mate. It she chooses well I wilol donate LOTS and lots.

 I will take time off,I have plenty comming,and I will volunteer
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: john c calhoun on January 27, 2009, 01:59:53 PM
You're the last person who I would have expected to think that McCain would have saved the conservative movement. The guy is practically a Democrat. And 48% of voters simply LOVE Sarah Palin. If she makes a go I'll even send her money, and I've NEVER sent money to a pol before.

if MCcain won, then Dems don't have total majority & we at least have some direct representation...

choosing Palin helped Mccain lose...  ...

the left & especially their media had a FIELD DAY w/ palin ...

I know alot of it was unfair & the same could've been done  to joe biden too, but, obviously NBC , CBS & the usual suspects had it out for the GOP & PALIN was exactly what they needed...

her inexperience at national politics  & her 'character' was easy prey for the lib media juggernaut...

 GWB's 6 trillion dollar socialism did more to sink conservatives than did mccain ...

again, wash your hands of palin, or move to alaska if you want to see her on TV everyday, cause as long as she's the 'face of the GOP', forget about EVER getting back into power...

who do you think  made her the face of the GOP ?? ...

if you answer is the DNC & their media, you'd be right...
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: john c calhoun on January 27, 2009, 02:04:58 PM
He'll never be able to answer, Uncle Johnny is a cock-sucking centralist RINO supporter.

stop bringing your mother into this ...

has she got rid of that hairball yet ??...

man I need to shave !!
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: USA4ME on January 27, 2009, 02:16:55 PM
I would call McCain a RINO, but that would be placing him anywhere near being a conservative, which he's really not.  He'd rather have the good press than stand up for something.  McCain reminds me of the type of man who is nice to everyone......... except his own family, and he treats them like dirt.

So McCain can't damage what he never was.

.
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: john c calhoun on January 27, 2009, 02:24:08 PM
I would call McCain a RINO, but that would be placing him anywhere near being a conservative, which he's really not.  He'd rather have the good press than stand up for something.  McCain reminds me of the type of man who is nice to everyone......... except his own family, and he treats them like dirt.

So McCain can't damage what he never was.

.

so you're saying you voted for obama & not mccain ??

mccain was my   only choice towards the end, but because dittoheads attacked him & gave the lib media fodder & turned off Indies, obama won...

as for me, I chose mccain over obama & did not bitch, just like I chose GWB over Gore & did not bitch, because we had no choice & it was for the good of conservative america...
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: Attero Dominatus on January 27, 2009, 02:28:06 PM
as for me, I chose mccain over obama & did not bitch, just like I chose GWB over Gore & did not bitch, because we had no choice & it was for the good of conservative america...

So did most conservatives who cared about this country, but he just did not have it in him. This is his own fault, and the media's, not Palin's.
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: Attero Dominatus on January 27, 2009, 02:29:31 PM
stop bringing your mother into this ...

has she got rid of that hairball yet ??...

man I need to shave !!

First, you need to drop the bong and stop buying the bullshit the media spun about her.
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: USA4ME on January 27, 2009, 02:39:25 PM
so you're saying you voted for obama & not mccain ??

I'm saying that all things considered, about the only major difference between the two was that McCain has a respect for the military.  McCain, as he is once again demonstrating, would rather attack conservatives since it means the MSM will print pretty words about him.

.
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: mamacags on January 27, 2009, 02:42:17 PM
I don't usually respond to insane douchebags but I am making an exception.  Sarah Palin is not dumb, the media portrayed her as such and the really stupid people in America bought it.  Name one single conservative that the media ever thought was smart.  It has never happened.
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: crockspot on January 27, 2009, 02:44:22 PM
John, I will agree with you about McCain, but I strongly disagree about Palin. She was the only real conservative on that ticket, and real conservatives love her. She says all the things we want to hear. In four years, she will have a little more experience at handling the Katie Courics and John Gibsons, and she will eat them for lunch, just like she ate her Democratic and Republican opponents for lunch in Alaska. The media hype will be neutralized if she sticks her nose to the grindstone and pushes forward. Whenever a real conservative runs as a real conservative, they win. It's when they get into this McLame appease the center and the left BS that they lose.

The only reason I even voted for McCain was because of her. I was going to sit it out until she came on board.
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: Zeus on January 27, 2009, 02:50:49 PM
Sarah Palin/Suzanna Gratia Hupp 2012.
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: john c calhoun on January 27, 2009, 03:09:24 PM
John, I will agree with you about McCain, but I strongly disagree about Palin. She was the only real conservative on that ticket, and real conservatives love her. She says all the things we want to hear. In four years, she will have a little more experience at handling the Katie Courics and John Gibsons, and she will eat them for lunch, just like she ate her Democratic and Republican opponents for lunch in Alaska. The media hype will be neutralized if she sticks her nose to the grindstone and pushes forward. Whenever a real conservative runs as a real conservative, they win. It's when they get into this McLame appease the center and the left BS that they lose.

The only reason I even voted for McCain was because of her. I was going to sit it out until she came on board.

I agree with you about palins principles & I have MANY inlaws that act & even look just like her..

I did not say I agree'd w/ the lib medias hatchet job on her ...what I said was she was easy prey for them  & it worked like a champ...

mccain was in the lead in the polls until 2-3 weeks after palin hit the scene...

what mccain should've done, if Rove didn't give him bad intel, was chose someone  more mainstream for VP & then later chosen palin for a position that actually matters ...

not just now, but at all times in history,   candidates w/ 'accents' & good ole boy  behavior LOSE at the national level, unless of course they are from the Bush family  after 8 years of clintooon... or they are  powre brokers themselves  & have ALOT of national political experience...unlike palin...

Independents dropped mccain like a hot potato after the media started unleashing on Palin after that couric interview & then it was all over...

Indies determine the elections ...bases are always solidified when things are so  polarized like they are now... mccain had other ways to supposedly appeal to the right, but  the media & his advisors obviously told him  something else...

the media played 'gottcha'  & Rove /Rush fell right into the trap  & dragged mccain down w/ them
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: john c calhoun on January 27, 2009, 03:12:16 PM
Sarah Palin/Suzanna Gratia Hupp 2012.

is she a pron star or what ??

cause to wimmins on a ticket for prez of the Us, won't stand a chance in hell being elected, no matter how hot they are ....

women don't attract women on presidential tickets...contrary to popular belief...

only liberal feminazi women 'can' attract women to thier ticket, but, only if there isn't a better man to elect...

ask hillary...she'll tell  yah how she lost to Nobama ...

this is a mans world & women don't like other women telling them what to do !! :fuelfire:
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: Rebel on January 27, 2009, 03:18:51 PM
I did not say I agree'd w/ the lib medias hatchet job on her ...what I said was she was easy prey for them  & it worked like a champ...

I don't guess you understand that the Damn media was in collusion with the damn libs, do you? She didn't come off as dumb to me, at all. BARACK came off as dumb as a ****ing rock who couldn't speak without a teleprompter. ...and you give him a pass? Maybe your opinion is more steeped in your own sexism.
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: Flame on January 27, 2009, 03:27:43 PM
Maybe your opinion is more steeped in your own sexism.

I think you hit the nail on the head with that one.  Hi5.
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: Attero Dominatus on January 27, 2009, 03:28:34 PM
is she a pron star or what ??

Actually, she is a strong supporter of the right to keep and bear arms.

Quote
Hupp is recognized as a leading advocate for the Second Amendment and an individual's right to carry a concealed weapon. She was elected to her first term in 1996 but did not seek a sixth two-year term in 2006.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suzanna_Hupp
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: TheSarge on January 27, 2009, 03:35:19 PM
I don't guess you understand that the damn media was in collusion with the damn libs, do you? She didn't come off as dumb to me, at all. BARACK came off as dumb as a ******* rock who couldn't speak without a teleprompter. ...and you give him a pass? Maybe your opinion is more steeped in your own sexism.

Reb...Johnnie Jackass is one of those 100%'ers straight from the John Birch Society.

He's so far out on the right fringe that he's bumped into the DU type Libs coming at him from the left and the end result is they both sound a hell of a lot alike.
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: Zeus on January 27, 2009, 03:36:03 PM
is she a pron star or what ??

cause to wimmins on a ticket for prez of the Us, won't stand a chance in hell being elected, no matter how hot they are ....

women don't attract women on presidential tickets...contrary to popular belief...

only liberal feminazi women 'can' attract women to thier ticket, but, only if there isn't a better man to elect...

ask hillary...she'll tell  yah how she lost to Nobama ...

this is a mans world & women don't like other women telling them what to do !! :fuelfire:

[youtube=425,350]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1u0Byq5Qis[/youtube]

Suzanna Gratia Hupp (born January 1, 1959)[1] is a former Republican member of the Texas House of Representatives, who represented traditionally Democratic District 54 (Bell, Burnet, and Lampasas counties) for ten years from 1997-2007. Hupp is recognized as a leading advocate for the Second Amendment and an individual's right to carry a concealed weapon. She was elected to her first term in 1996 but did not seek a sixth two-year term in 2006.

Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: Chris_ on January 27, 2009, 03:39:57 PM
john mccain would've saved the convervative movement...

sarah palin helped destroy it...

palin  will NEVER be  elected to a national position... she may  be an ok gal, but, she had her shot at the national stage & she BLEW IT & helped sink mccain & conservatism in general...

the sooner conservatives back away from palin, the better...

and if you haven't noticed,  ALL media still loves to  exploit her idiocy at the expense of conservatives...



Sjhe is a very smart woman who got thrust into the limelight too quickly.  MANY Conservatives were able to hold their noses and vot for McCain because of her.

She knows more about Conservative values in her little that you will ever know in your entire life, asshole.

Can't you go back to RPU or DU or whatever rock you crawled out from under?
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: Chris_ on January 27, 2009, 03:42:14 PM
I agree with you about palins principles & I have MANY inlaws that act & even look just like her..

I did not say I agree'd w/ the lib medias hatchet job on her ...what I said was she was easy prey for them  & it worked like a champ...

mccain was in the lead in the polls until 2-3 weeks after palin hit the scene...

what mccain should've done, if Rove didn't give him bad intel, was chose someone  more mainstream for VP & then later chosen palin for a position that actually matters ...

not just now, but at all times in history,   candidates w/ 'accents' & good ole boy  behavior LOSE at the national level, unless of course they are from the Bush family  after 8 years of clintooon... or they are  powre brokers themselves  & have ALOT of national political experience...unlike palin...

Independents dropped mccain like a hot potato after the media started unleashing on Palin after that couric interview & then it was all over...

Indies determine the elections ...bases are always solidified when things are so  polarized like they are now... mccain had other ways to supposedly appeal to the right, but  the media & his advisors obviously told him  something else...

the media played 'gottcha'  & Rove /Rush fell right into the trap  & dragged mccain down w/ them

The msm targets the stupid, mindless idiots. And sure enough, they got you!
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: john c calhoun on January 27, 2009, 03:45:54 PM
I don't guess you understand that the damn media was in collusion with the damn libs, do you? She didn't come off as dumb to me, at all. BARACK came off as dumb as a ******* rock who couldn't speak without a teleprompter. ...and you give him a pass? Maybe your opinion is more steeped in your own sexism.

and you don't think Palins' sex appeal wasn't played up by the right wing media ??

and the left wing media, but in a 'bimbo' kinda way ??

welcome to national politics...its dirty  & mccains crew made a MAJOR gaff by thinking palins redneck appeal & tight ass would win them the day...
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: TheSarge on January 27, 2009, 03:47:09 PM
Quote
ohn mccain would've saved the convervative movement...


(http://img299.imageshack.us/img299/3628/giantfailii6.jpg)
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: Zeus on January 27, 2009, 03:49:07 PM
and you don't think Palins' sex appeal wasn't played up by the right wing media ??

and the left wing media, but in a 'bimbo' kinda way ??

welcome to national politics...its dirty  & mccains crew made a MAJOR gaff by thinking palins redneck appeal & tight ass would win them the day...

Where Mccains crew made the gaffe was tethering Palin and controlling her so she didn't outshine McCain. She did anyway.
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: Eupher on January 27, 2009, 03:55:50 PM
McCain looked, sounded, and acted tired throughout the whole campaign.

Palin was vibrant, energetic, and engaging. Compared to McCain, she was stunning in her looks, delivery (for the most part) and in how she engaged and connected with whom she spoke.

Her entire presentation/package went far beyond what the press could do - for ill or for good - for those who paid attention.

But the rampant, incessant mantra about Palin's clothing, her pregnant daughter, that friggin' Bridge to Nowhere bullshit all of that eventually overshadowed her.

Why? Because the sheeple listen to the media. And far more listen to the alphabet soup bullshit than to multiple sources.

And we all know about the alphabet soup bullshit.

Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: Attero Dominatus on January 27, 2009, 04:02:15 PM

blah blah blah


All I can say is that you are one of the simple, primitive minds that the establishment media preys upon. Stop regurgitating lib talking points about how Palin destroyed everything and go watch American Idol.
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: Chris_ on January 27, 2009, 04:17:21 PM
and you don't think Palins' sex appeal wasn't played up by the right wing media ??

and the left wing media, but in a 'bimbo' kinda way ??

welcome to national politics...its dirty  & mccains crew made a MAJOR gaff by thinking palins redneck appeal & tight ass would win them the day...

I am still trying to put together someone putting "McCain" and "Conservative" in the same post. 

Like I said, the msm targets the mentally feeble.  And they hit you and many like you.
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: john c calhoun on January 27, 2009, 04:19:30 PM
I think you hit the nail on the head with that one.  Hi5.

and the GOP wasn't trying to sell sex & guns w/ Palin ??

did it work ??

you guys  think Rove/GWB's  blueprint is the mold we need to fit for success ??

are you kidding me ??

GWB got elected by the slimest margins possible twice ....

sorry, its the mold to be broken & now that we are currently & TOTALLY owned by liberal demorat fanatics, the proof is in the pudding...

I'm a realist & the reality  is that palin will  4ever be tarnished in the mainstreams eyes & has no chance at national elections (as a candidate)

she wasn't ready for  primetime & Mccain /Rove made a HUGE mistake ...

personally, I don't think mccain even wanted her...thats the feeling I got from the whole think ...
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: john c calhoun on January 27, 2009, 04:22:26 PM
McCain looked, sounded, and acted tired throughout the whole campaign.

Palin was vibrant, energetic, and engaging. Compared to McCain, she was stunning in her looks, delivery (for the most part) and in how she engaged and connected with whom she spoke.

Her entire presentation/package went far beyond what the press could do - for ill or for good - for those who paid attention.

But the rampant, incessant mantra about Palin's clothing, her pregnant daughter, that friggin' Bridge to Nowhere bullshit all of that eventually overshadowed her.

Why? Because the sheeple listen to the media. And far more listen to the alphabet soup bullshit than to multiple sources.

And we all know about the alphabet soup bullshit.

I agree, but perseption is everything &  a main reason the usual suspects in the lefty media  actually had an audience  this time was, because  1/2 the country was sick n tired of GWB's brand of socialism ...

then when they sunk the economy (media, GWB, Dems in congress) , that was it...

mccain had no chance


Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: john c calhoun on January 27, 2009, 04:23:54 PM
Eupher:

I agree, but perception is everything &  a main reason the usual suspects in the lefty media  actually had an audience  this time was, because  1/2 the country was sick n tired of GWB's brand of socialism ...

then when they sunk the economy (media, GWB, Dems in congress) , that was it...

mccain had no chance
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: Chris_ on January 27, 2009, 04:24:44 PM
and the GOP wasn't trying to sell sex & guns w/ Palin ??

did it work ??

you guys  think Rove/GWB's  blueprint is the mold we need to fit for success ??

are you kidding me ??

GWB got elected by the slimest margins possible twice ....

He got elected.

Quote
sorry, its the mold to be broken & now that we are currently & TOTALLY owned by liberal demorat fanatics, the proof is in the pudding...
anyone who would take advice from a lemming like you should have their head examined.  As should you.

Quote
I'm a realist & the reality  is that palin will  4ever be tarnished in the mainstreams eyes & has no chance at national elections (as a candidate)

Well if by "realist" you mean "msm-swallowing sexist idiot," sure.  The msm was 100% against GWB and he was able to win -- twice.  And he doesn't have the Conservative bona-fides Palin does.

Quote
she wasn't ready for  primetime & Mccain /Rove made a HUGE mistake ...

She should have been prepped better, I have to agree.  But she electrified the base and probably single-handedly brought in 10 of the 56 million votes.  You would have voted for the new fuhrer anyway so your opinion really doesn't count


Quote
personally, I don't think mccain even wanted her...thats the feeling I got from the whole think ...

Pretty standard liberal claptrap - speaking from "feelings."
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: Eupher on January 27, 2009, 04:25:23 PM
McCain is done on the national scene. He'll hang out in the Senate for a few more years, then hang it up.

Palin, on the other hand, is just beginning. She has a bright future and for one, I'll be watching her.
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: john c calhoun on January 27, 2009, 04:25:45 PM
I am still trying to put together someone putting "McCain" and "Conservative" in the same post. 

Like I said, the msm targets the mentally feeble.  And they hit you and many like you.


you ain't no conservative ...

you're an athiest & godless people  surely can't understand what being an american conservative is all about ...

obviously, thats why you chose to trash the GOP candidate & let your godless liberals takeover...
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: Chris_ on January 27, 2009, 04:28:09 PM
McCain is done on the national scene. He'll hang out in the Senate for a few more years, then hang it up.

Palin, on the other hand, is just beginning. She has a bright future and for one, I'll be watching her.

(http://onemansblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/sarah-palin-on-a-harley.jpg)

Hell yeah.  And she knows she is hot and doesn't pretend otherwise.  That is further proof of her intelligence.  Only a sexist like crazy uncle jonnie would say otherwise.
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: Chris_ on January 27, 2009, 04:29:48 PM
you ain't no conservative ...

you're an athiest & godless people  surely can't understand what being an american conservative is all about ...

obviously, thats why you chose to trash the GOP candidate & let your godless liberals takeover...

You are such a blazing liberal I am amazed you can get in the right turn lane.  The fact McAmnesty lost is because he turned away from Conservative principles -- not that he had them anyway.  Palin HAS those values.

On edit: am not and never have been an atheist -- that is the stupidest post in a serious of bottom-dwellingly stupid posts.

You are one of the smallest idiots on the internetz.

Crawl back to DU, asshole.
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: Zeus on January 27, 2009, 04:31:30 PM
and the GOP wasn't trying to sell sex & guns w/ Palin ??

did it work ??

you guys  think Rove/GWB's  blueprint is the mold we need to fit for success ??

are you kidding me ??

GWB got elected by the slimest margins possible twice ....

sorry, its the mold to be broken & now that we are currently & TOTALLY owned by liberal demorat fanatics, the proof is in the pudding...

I'm a realist & the reality  is that palin will  4ever be tarnished in the mainstreams eyes & has no chance at national elections (as a candidate)

she wasn't ready for  primetime & Mccain /Rove made a HUGE mistake ...

personally, I don't think mccain even wanted her...thats the feeling I got from the whole think ...

Ronald Reagan ran for President 3 times before being elected.  Some folks were saying the same things about him then you are saying about Palin now.
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: Chris_ on January 27, 2009, 04:34:50 PM
Ronald Reagan ran for President 3 times before being elected.  Some folks were saying the same things about him then you are saying about Palin now.

Never throw facts at crazy uncle jonnie.  They confuse him and he can't find his bong.
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: Zeus on January 27, 2009, 04:46:58 PM
Never throw facts at crazy uncle jonnie.  They confuse him and he can't find his bong.


There is still somewhat of an unanswered question about Gov. Palin. That being does her social conservatism take a back seat to her fiscal conservatism.
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: Chris_ on January 27, 2009, 04:47:46 PM
There is still somewhat of an unanswered question about Gov. Palin. That being does her social conservatism take a back seat to her fiscal conservatism.

I think they are equal.
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: Eupher on January 27, 2009, 04:51:50 PM
There is still somewhat of an unanswered question about Gov. Palin. That being does her social conservatism take a back seat to her fiscal conservatism.

That's a fair question. Best way to see how she answers that is to observe her record as governor and then later to challenge her on that in debate.

The prevailing view has been almost a complete lack of fiscal conservatism, irrespective of party. It's hard to be the asshole and veto legislation time after time after time when Congress continues to bring you bills laden with pork and earmarks.
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: Attero Dominatus on January 27, 2009, 05:13:37 PM
you ain't no conservative ...

you're an athiest & godless people  surely can't understand what being an american conservative is all about ...

obviously, thats why you chose to trash the GOP candidate & let your godless liberals takeover...

One does not have to be religious to be conservative, idiot  :loser:
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: Chris_ on January 27, 2009, 05:22:34 PM
One does not have to be religious to be conservative, idiot  :loser:

Again, facts and crazy uncle jonnie -- never destined to be in the same place as the same time.
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: MrsSmith on January 27, 2009, 05:41:22 PM
john mccain would've saved the convervative movement...

sarah palin helped destroy it...

palin  will NEVER be  elected to a national position... she may  be an ok gal, but, she had her shot at the national stage & she BLEW IT & helped sink mccain & conservatism in general...

the sooner conservatives back away from palin, the better...

and if you haven't noticed,  ALL media still loves to  exploit her idiocy at the expense of conservatives...


It won't take much of O's presidency before the majority of Americans stop listening to the moron-media, and Palin will look and sound better by the minute.  As it was, Republicans loved her, but too many Americans were in love with the idea of a black president.
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: DixieBelle on January 27, 2009, 06:36:47 PM
Go Sarah! I'll do whatever I can to support her political career.
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: paladin0 on January 27, 2009, 06:52:46 PM
Independents dropped mccain like a hot potato after the media started unleashing on Palin after that couric interview & then it was all over...


People don't vote for a President based on the V.P., otherwise McCain would be President. The economy tanked, and people felt that Obama was better at fixing it then McCain. It's that simple.

Paladin0
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: NHSparky on January 27, 2009, 07:45:58 PM
john mccain would've saved the convervative movement...


That statement alone shows what a clueless POS you really are.  You have no earthly idea of the definition of the word "conservative".

Go play in traffic already.
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: NHSparky on January 27, 2009, 07:50:33 PM
you ain't no conservative ...

you're an athiest & godless people  surely can't understand what being an american conservative is all about ...

obviously, thats why you chose to trash the GOP candidate & let your godless liberals takeover...

Seriously dude, you've been sucking on Ron Paul's crank too long.  Go back to your buddies at Stormfront.
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: Chris_ on January 27, 2009, 08:03:52 PM
I like Palin really well. It will depend for me on who there is running ag'in her though in the next primary election.
So far there just isn't really much competition for her out there, other than maybe Mitt, but he's got the personality
of a semi-wet dishrag.

It comes down to who has can get the best ratings on Leno, Letterman and SNL to become POTUS these days. Sadly.

But I am a Palin fan. It still pisses me off that all of our other potential nominees bailed from the primary election so soon. Right after the first 2 or 3 states, they all quit except for Huck. I wonder what might have been if they had all stayed in longer. I quite liked Duncan Hunter myself.
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: Chris_ on January 27, 2009, 08:10:32 PM
Seriously dude, you've been sucking on Ron Paul's crank too long.  Go back to your buddies at Stormfront.

Like many of his loonie friends, he has gone so far beyond right he is actually more Left than most democrats.
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: john c calhoun on January 28, 2009, 09:43:21 AM
Ronald Reagan ran for President 3 times before being elected.  Some folks were saying the same things about him then you are saying about Palin now.

ronald reagan is absolutely no comparison to Sarah Palin ...

come on zeus....you are alot smarter than that...

Reagan  was alot better negotiator & salesman than is sarah palin & had 2 generations experience when he became prez, unlike palin whose only experience is a failed  VP run that may have cost our country its freedom & her short tenure of a podunk state a million miles north of the border....

reagan was  gov. of THE largest state in the country w/ tons of money, people, banks, industry, electoral votes & POWER......palin may as well be from Mars being that her states support basically means ZIPPO  in presidential elections...

reagan had ALOT of media/hollywood on his side, unlike palin, who will 4 ever have most media ragging her like a dog...

Palin won't win & is the GOPs walter geraldine ferraro &/or Hillary Clinton ...

experience & lacking power issues aside, most women will never vote for a woman like Palin as prez...because most women are sexist (but won't admit it), jealous & envious  of HER...
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: Zeus on January 28, 2009, 10:14:24 AM
ronald reagan is absolutely no comparison to Sarah Palin ...

come on zeus....you are alot smarter than that...

Reagan  was alot better negotiator & salesman than is sarah palin & had 2 generations experience when he became prez, unlike palin whose only experience is a failed  VP run that may have cost our country its freedom & her short tenure of a podunk state a million miles north of the border....

reagan was  gov. of THE largest state in the country w/ tons of money, people, banks, industry, electoral votes & POWER......palin may as well be from Mars being that her states support basically means ZIPPO  in presidential elections...

reagan had ALOT of media/hollywood on his side, unlike palin, who will 4 ever have most media ragging her like a dog...

Palin won't win & is the GOPs walter geraldine ferraro &/or Hillary Clinton ...

experience & lacking power issues aside, most women will never vote for a woman like Palin as prez...because most women are sexist (but won't admit it), jealous & envious  of HER...

See Reagan had all that going for him yet it still took 3 runs to get elected president.  Granted Palin is not Reagan but saying just because she did not prevail in the intial introduction to national prominance doesn't mean she is a has been before she was ever a has. Palin needs to do what Reagan did to finally win. Bypass the media and go directly to the American People. She also needs to stay away from handlers that are want to package her in the Glitz & glamour of the Intellegencia and let her just be Sarah.
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: john c calhoun on January 28, 2009, 10:21:38 AM
See Reagan had all that going for him yet it still took 3 runs to get elected president.  Granted Palin is not Reagan but saying just because she did not prevail in the intial introduction to national prominance doesn't mean she is a has been before she was ever a has. Palin needs to do what Reagan did to finally win. Bypass the media and go directly to the American People. She also needs to stay away from handlers that are want to package her in the Glitz & glamour of the Intellegencia and let her just be Sarah.

I agree with that zeus...

and if palin can pulloff a grassroots movement, then I'll most likely support her, because she will have  EARNED her nomination...

grassroots  & winning over Oprah is what eventually got Nobama elected too...

so its proof someone with zippo experience  on the big stage 'can' make all the way, its just not very common ...

remember, Reagan still had to grassroots it, even though he had enormous power already . ...

 
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: crockspot on January 28, 2009, 10:51:41 AM
Hey John, are you ass deep in snow down there in the tropical part of Vermont yet?
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: Eupher on January 28, 2009, 11:01:08 AM
Palin needs to do what Reagan did to finally win. Bypass the media and go directly to the American People.

Zeus, the problem with that statement is that Palin, like all politicians, NEEDS the media to go directly to the American people.

Winging it alone, without that bevy of retards known as the MSM, she's doomed to fail. Knowing that there is no such thing as bad press (to a certain extent), Palin needs to be poked, prodded, and queried to get her message and her connectivity across.

The MSM retards may focus on her pregnant daughter or her clothing or her glasses or her 30/06 rifle, but even doing that and allowing her to use that kind of exposure to her advantage (which she's pretty good at), she'll do well overall.

But she needs those retards. Unfortunately.
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: Rebel on January 28, 2009, 11:15:24 AM
....or her 30/06 rifle,

Assuming you're referring to the bikini pic, you know that pic was fake, right?
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: Eupher on January 28, 2009, 11:35:54 AM
Assuming you're referring to the bikini pic, you know that pic was fake, right?

I don't believe I've seen that one. It's reported that she hunts. I'm simply assuming she has a rifle.
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: Rebel on January 28, 2009, 11:43:52 AM
I don't believe I've seen that one. It's reported that she hunts. I'm simply assuming she has a rifle.

http://urbanlegends.about.com/library/bl_sarah_palin_bikini_pic.htm

This is the one the libs were using to talk trash about her. Turns out it wasn't her and it made them look like idiots. It's not a 30.06 though.
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: Eupher on January 28, 2009, 11:47:45 AM
http://urbanlegends.about.com/library/bl_sarah_palin_bikini_pic.htm

This is the one the libs were using to talk trash about her. Turns out it wasn't her and it made them look like idiots. It's not a 30.06 though.

This is the first I'm hearing about the pic and the doctoring of the pic.

Maybe the MSM didn't broadcast this lie as broadly as they should've - surprise!
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: crockspot on January 28, 2009, 11:57:27 AM
http://urbanlegends.about.com/library/bl_sarah_palin_bikini_pic.htm

This is the one the libs were using to talk trash about her. Turns out it wasn't her and it made them look like idiots. It's not a 30.06 though.

Yeah, my moonbat cousin sent that around to our whole family, along with a bunch of MoveOn propaganda that had already been debunked. I had fun pointing that all out to her. She stopped sending lefty bullshit to our family mailing list after that.

I was a bit disappointed though when I learned the photo was a PS job.
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: john c calhoun on January 28, 2009, 12:15:53 PM
Hey John, are you ass deep in snow down there in the tropical part of Vermont yet?

its coming down pretty good...

I think we're only supposed to get about 1- 2 feet ...

anything under 2ft I'm not too worried about ...

specially since  its a daytime storm, so all plows will be running 24-7  ...

and yeah,  ..tropics !!... if ain't below zero, it does feel like the tropics eh !!
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: Vagabond on January 28, 2009, 12:21:25 PM
John, I will agree with you about McCain, but I strongly disagree about Palin. She was the only real conservative on that ticket, and real conservatives love her. She says all the things we want to hear. In four years, she will have a little more experience at handling the Katie Courics and John Gibsons, and she will eat them for lunch, just like she ate her Democratic and Republican opponents for lunch in Alaska. The media hype will be neutralized if she sticks her nose to the grindstone and pushes forward. Whenever a real conservative runs as a real conservative, they win. It's when they get into this McLame appease the center and the left BS that they lose.

The only reason I even voted for McCain was because of her. I was going to sit it out until she came on board.
Ditto.  I don't like McCain enough to vote for him.  He wanted to close down Gitmo.  He ran his mouth against President Bush.  He called people who didn't like his pathetic immigration bill racists and rednecks.  He trashes conservatives generally every chance he gets.  Yet, the GOP created a primary campaign custom designed to ensure either he or July Annie won.

I was sitting it out myself until Sarah Palin was chosen to be his VP.  I only voted for him because of her.
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: Vagabond on January 28, 2009, 12:26:45 PM
I agree with you about palins principles & I have MANY inlaws that act & even look just like her..

I did not say I agree'd w/ the lib medias hatchet job on her ...what I said was she was easy prey for them  & it worked like a champ...

mccain was in the lead in the polls until 2-3 weeks after palin hit the scene...

what mccain should've done, if Rove didn't give him bad intel, was chose someone  more mainstream for VP & then later chosen palin for a position that actually matters ...

not just now, but at all times in history,   candidates w/ 'accents' & good ole boy  behavior LOSE at the national level, unless of course they are from the Bush family  after 8 years of clintooon... or they are  powre brokers themselves  & have ALOT of national political experience...unlike palin...

Independents dropped mccain like a hot potato after the media started unleashing on Palin after that couric interview & then it was all over...

Indies determine the elections ...bases are always solidified when things are so  polarized like they are now... mccain had other ways to supposedly appeal to the right, but  the media & his advisors obviously told him  something else...

the media played 'gottcha'  & Rove /Rush fell right into the trap  & dragged mccain down w/ them
Try again.  Palin delivered a great speech at the party's inaugaration.  Then McCain and the snooze crew sequestered her for more than a month, instead of using that energy and that connection she had to the people.  What killed McCAin was running off to Washington when the financial crisis hit.

As far as a folksy candidate winning?  Lyndon Johnson, Jimmy, Carter, Ronald Reagan, and Bill Clinton all had accents, they all won.  Rove's intel was right on.  Don't  blame the signals analyst when the captain fouls up.
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: john c calhoun on January 28, 2009, 12:29:26 PM
Ditto.  I don't like McCain enough to vote for him.  He wanted to close down Gitmo.  He ran his mouth against President Bush.  He called people who didn't like his pathetic immigration bill racists and rednecks.  He trashes conservatives generally every chance he gets.  Yet, the GOP created a primary campaign custom designed to ensure either he or July Annie won.

I was sitting it out myself until Sarah Palin was chosen to be his VP.  I only voted for him because of her.

GWB supported the immigration bill too...oh yeah, it was HIS...

and if we would've passed the immigration bill, not only would we have more taxpayers sharing our burdens about to come, but, maybe Mccain would've been elected pres ??

GWB knew that the only option for mexicans is amnesty, because nothing else will be done...no grand roundup, no closing down borders etc.etc....   Reagan gave amnesty to the cubans & we won bigtime ...

now Dems get to do it & we're totally out of power...

as far as mccain trashing bush  ...hardly, but, I do like the FACT that mccain wanted alot less socialism than did GWB in the most costly areas  & I'm glad SOMEONE from the right actually spokeout about some of GWB's  liberal boondoggles  ...

as far as Gitmo.... who cares ??

you honestly think the military ain't gonna find  good homes for the scumbags currently there ??... Mccain wouldn't have just let them go...

you do realize the lefty baffoons used gitmo as one of their BIGGEST battlecrys & was a giant noose around GWB's/GOPs neck ...??
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: Vagabond on January 28, 2009, 12:51:44 PM
GWB supported the immigration bill too...oh yeah, it was HIS...

and if we would've passed the immigration bill, not only would we have more taxpayers sharing our burdens about to come, but, maybe Mccain would've been elected pres ??

GWB knew that the only option for mexicans is amnesty, because nothing else will be done...no grand roundup, no closing down borders etc.etc....   Reagan gave amnesty to the cubans & we won bigtime ...

now Dems get to do it & we're totally out of power...

as far as mccain trashing bush  ...hardly, but, I do like the FACT that mccain wanted alot less socialism than did GWB in the most costly areas  & I'm glad SOMEONE from the right actually spokeout about some of GWB's  liberal boondoggles  ...

as far as Gitmo.... who cares ??

you honestly think the military ain't gonna find  good homes for the scumbags currently there ??... Mccain wouldn't have just let them go...

you do realize the lefty baffoons used gitmo as one of their BIGGEST battlecrys & was a giant noose around GWB's/GOPs neck ...??
Okay, John.  Why didn't Johnny Mac vote for disallowing criminals and gangbangers recieving amnesty?  You do realize that those Cubans who were criminals are still sitting in a prison outside of Atlanta never to be freed, don't you?  There are paths that are not amnesties and not round-ups, that would have had the general support of the American people instead of the piece of crap congress tried to shove on us.  Plus these Mexicans and central americans are not Cubans.  Cubans were greatful to be here.  Cubans had built up their island prior to Castro and his thugs taking over, Havana in 1950 was the most beautiful city in the western hemisphere.  Do you speak Spanish?  Do you have any Spanish stations in your area?  They aren't grateful to be here and say generally vile things about us and generally have never done a single thing to improve their own countries.  DO you really think they would have fallen over in their gratitude and voted Republican?  Ever?  Put down whatever hallucinogen you're smoking it ain't happening.  It wasn't going to happen, it was a stupid pipe dream.

Also, do you remember where Bush hit the wall?  It was the illegal immigration issue that finished him off.  He wasted all his remaining political capitol dying on that hill and wasn't seen or heard from after that,
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: Tnafbrat on January 28, 2009, 03:27:21 PM
I'm starting to see why everyone says what they do about you.

agreed  :cheersmate:

I voted McCain, but he is not a conservative's conservative JCC. and saying he would have saved the "conservative party" is just showing ignorance .... or a preference for stirring shit.  To say Palin destroyed his chances .... hmmmmm try again, she brought in more support and gave him what chance he had by that time.
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: Redstatecka on January 28, 2009, 04:03:11 PM
john mccain would've saved the convervative movement...

sarah palin helped destroy it...

palin  will NEVER be  elected to a national position... she may  be an ok gal, but, she had her shot at the national stage & she BLEW IT & helped sink mccain & conservatism in general...

the sooner conservatives back away from palin, the better...

and if you haven't noticed,  ALL media still loves to  exploit her idiocy at the expense of conservatives...

Yeah, we noticed that the advocacy/adversary media still loves to exploit her. It's because they, with testicles the size of chipmunks, if that big, are afraid of her. Obama is afraid of her. You are afraid of her. All Democrats, liberals and leftists are afraid of her.

As for her blowing her shot at national office? You wish.

If the advocacy/adversary media had actually done their work and investigated Barack Hussein Obama/Barry Soetero/whatever-his-real-name-is to the level that they did with Palin, he would've cried and whined and folded like the proverbial cheap hat.

That she endured the malicious, misogynist campaign from Obama and his campaign, the DNC, the advocacy/adversary media and the filth and lies from the lefto-blogosphere such as the Democrat Underground, Daily Kos and Andrew Sullivan is a testament to her grit.

Didn't help that the McCain campaign muzzled her, either.

She's the real deal--and that's why you and your species hate her, revile her, fear her.

And someday you'll have to deal with her as at least VPOTUS and then POTUS.

Regardless of your insults, lies, malice and filth.

Oh, yeah: She was the one conservative on the McCain-Palin ticket. And she and others of her age and fire who call themselves conservatives and/or Republicans will resurrect conservatism politically.

And you and your ilk know that. That's why you are so scared of her.
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: Lacarnut on January 28, 2009, 04:47:06 PM
From the start of the Presidential race, Obama had it in the bag unless he made some serious mistakes. Eight years of the Repubs and Bush was enough for most independents to want a change. The economy was tanking and I doubt that any Repub outside of digging up and reviving Reagan would have worked against the Magic Negro.

Palin did energize the Repub base and without her McCain would have lost by more than 10% rather than 6%. Many hard core conservatives would have stayed home if he had picked a moderate or another RINO. McCain put the final nail in his coffin when he suspended his campaign, went to DC and supported the bank bailout. The public was against this. Since he supported the bailout, it was like he rode into town on a jackass rather than a knight in shining armor on a white horse. That stupidity plus muzzling his VP doomed McCain.

Sarah Palin is the only hope I see in 012. That may all change if Obama's economic program is a disaster and the Repubs gain back seats in the House or Senate.
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: AllosaursRus on January 28, 2009, 05:03:28 PM
so you're saying you voted for obama & not mccain ??

mccain was my   only choice towards the end, but because dittoheads attacked him & gave the lib media fodder & turned off Indies, obama won...

as for me, I chose mccain over obama & did not bitch, just like I chose GWB over Gore & did not bitch, because we had no choice & it was for the good of conservative america...

You are by far the dumbest **** I have ever come across on this web site! Not even the Night Owl is this ****ing stupid!!!!!!

If you voted for McCain because you thought he was the less of 2 evils, then surely it shows you don't have a brain in your head!

I voted for McCain and by the way Bush, because I did not want MY COUNTRY to turn into France or, heaven forbid, Venezuela!

You have the intelligence of an amoeba! Why do you waste our time with your drivel?

Do you just need to have someone change your diaper? Friggin PUTZ!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: Zeus on January 28, 2009, 05:06:12 PM
Rick Perry/Sarah Palin 2012
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: Redstatecka on January 28, 2009, 06:55:02 PM
I voted for McCain and by the way Bush, because I did not want MY COUNTRY to turn into France or, heaven forbid, Venezuela!

I voted for McCain and Bush X 2 because I didn't want the U.S. to turn into not just France (never though about Venezuela), but also not into an incinerated wasteland or one in which parts of it, if not all of it, were under seige.

That and I figured the Constitution had worked for a long whle and it was and remains worth preserving.
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: Crazy Horse on January 28, 2009, 07:17:04 PM
Rick Perry/Sarah Palin 2012

Mark Sanford/Say-Rah Palin 2012
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: Chris_ on January 28, 2009, 11:32:25 PM
Rick Perry/Sarah Palin 2012

I'm not so sure I'd agree with that Zeus. Maybe if you have them the other way around. Perry would be an ok VP, but I don't see him as POTUS. He'd try to push a nationwide trans-US corridor down our throats. He hasn't exactly been my favorite governor. It's gonna be really interesting here in the Republic of Texas when he and Kay Baily-Hutchinson start rollin' in the dirt.
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: Chris_ on January 28, 2009, 11:33:23 PM
I'm not so sure I'd agree with that Zeus. Maybe if you have them the other way around. Perry would be an ok VP, but I don't see him as POTUS. He'd try to push a nationwide trans-US corridor down our throats. He hasn't exactly been my favorite governor. It's gonna be really interesting here in the Republic of Texas when he and Kay Baily-Hutchinson start rollin' in the dirt.

Hey what about Jindal?  He seems to be true to real Conservative principles.
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: Rebel on January 29, 2009, 07:48:31 AM
Whatever Sanford runs for, he has my vote.
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: john c calhoun on January 29, 2009, 09:22:40 AM
From the start of the Presidential race, Obama had it in the bag unless he made some serious mistakes. Eight years of the Repubs and Bush was enough for most independents to want a change. The economy was tanking and I doubt that any Repub outside of digging up and reviving Reagan would have worked against the Magic Negro.

Palin did energize the Repub base and without her McCain would have lost by more than 10% rather than 6%. Many hard core conservatives would have stayed home if he had picked a moderate or another RINO. McCain put the final nail in his coffin when he suspended his campaign, went to DC and supported the bank bailout. The public was against this. Since he supported the bailout, it was like he rode into town on a jackass rather than a knight in shining armor on a white horse. That stupidity plus muzzling his VP doomed McCain.

Sarah Palin is the only hope I see in 012. That may all change if Obama's economic program is a disaster and the Repubs gain back seats in the House or Senate.

great points lacarnut....

Mccain supporting the bailout, was more of his affirmation of being Bush's guy...

yet the very same morons around here & the majority of 'the base' that trashed mccain, still doesn't see that mccain supported nearly everything bush did...and THATS WHY HE LOST ...

GWB's mold is NOT the one to follow...

these neo cons  don't seem to get that...
Title: Re: Palin launches new PAC
Post by: Redstatecka on January 29, 2009, 12:28:47 PM
great points lacarnut....

Mccain supporting the bailout, was more of his affirmation of being Bush's guy...

yet the very same morons around here & the majority of 'the base' that trashed mccain, still doesn't see that mccain supported nearly everything bush did...and THATS WHY HE LOST ...

GWB's mold is NOT the one to follow...

these neo cons  don't seem to get that...

If Bush's mold is not the one to follow, then why does Barack Hussein Obama seem to be sounding more and more like him in certain ways?

Could it be that Obama, unlike you and most of the other 63 million who voted for the empty suit from Chicago, knows things now that help explain certain of President Bush's actions and policies?

BTW: Guess you've missed Obama's full-out support for the bailout, which really is the 2009 Democrat/Liberal/Leftist Pork-Barrel Giveaway. On this Obama-inspired madness, any criticism of Bush is misplaced.

And BTW, your slinging around "neo-cons" sounds hip, but do you even know what a neo-conservative or conservative is? No need to answer.

Enrolled in those civility and social-adjustment courses yet, along with the reading-comprehension programs?