The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: dutch508 on November 03, 2021, 12:03:02 AM
-
Initech (89,681 posts)
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100216010712
Can we all agree that "defund the police" was terrible messaging?
I don't want to "defund the police". Instead I want to reform the police. And it wouldn't take much either. Just 4 things:
1. Strict psychological vetting when they sign up, and pull the abusive jerks out of the force before they become a problem. Also annual psych evaluations.
2. Take away their weapons of war. No one needs armored tanks, bazookas, and sub machine guns to patrol the suburbs.
3. Body cameras. AT ALL TIMES. NO EXCEPTIONS.
4. Hold them accountable in the event that a weapon gets discharged or they injure or kill someone in the line of duty.
That's it. That's all it would take. Don't defund. Reform.
qazplm135 (6,397 posts)
2. it was
and inaccurate.
No one literally wanted to do what the dictionary definition says.
Why we couldn't have simply run on police reform I do not know.
But when you say defund, people see get rid of, and few folks actually want that.
Initech (89,681 posts)
3. I'm sure Fox News was behind that or some Facebook propaganda arm.
qazplm135 (6,397 posts)
6. No
activists were.
In a rush to create a bold and simple phrase, they failed to ask, does this actually communicate to folks who aren't immediately on our side the way it does to folks who are?
The answer was very much, no.
::)
In It to Win It (2,252 posts)
5. No argument here
I don't even know where that came from or how it caught on
Star Member pstokely (9,884 posts)
7. BLM activists don't hire consulting firms or ad agencies
like they have any $ for those
:thatsright:
BlueCheeseAgain (107 posts)
9. Agreed.
It took a bunch of sensible, popular, ideas, and gave them a name that would cause the great majority of people to recoil.
And then we had a bunch of people saying, "defund really means reform", and another bunch of people saying, "defund means defund".
If we had let Republicans choose the description, they couldn't have come up with one that was more harmful to Democrats.
:loser:
-
What's really scary is that with that name it got 44% yes votes.
There must be a lot of pro-crime voters in Minneapolis.
-
What's really scary is that with that name it got 44% yes votes.
There must be a lot of pro-crime voters in Minneapolis.
Have you seen Minneapolis? Little Mogadishu right there
-
Au, contraire, mon frere.
I think it's LOVELY messaging.
The best.
Please run on that in 2022, 2024, 2026, etc.
:rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf:
-
Interesting how they are all running from it now. Most of them claiming it never actually meant defund and stating no one wanted to see police disbanded.
Don't they remember all the threads they had on their site where people were literally talking about getting rid of the police and how a lot of them went into some revisionist history of policing claiming the police were put together to only run down escaped slaves? They were all on board at that time ...
And claiming BLM doesn't have the money to hire advertisers/marketers? Uh, if they weren't spending literally millions of dollars on multiple homes for one of the marxist founders, I'm quite sure they could find a little money.
KC
-
Initech (89,681 posts)
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100216010712
Can we all agree that "defund the police" was terrible messaging?
It was literal defunding and attempts to defund, DU-liars, not "messaging". And it has multiplied crime wherever tried.
:ownit: :ownit: :ownit: :ownit: :ownit:
-
Initech
Can we all agree that "defund the police" was terrible messaging?
Because we should.
We should all just sit down and shut up for a few years.
If the primitive had written something like that, at least one would know they had some grasp of what just happened. Instead, they start trying to figure out how to fix things. They don't listen. They just go into "fix-it" mode without realizing they aren't even bright enough to know the problem
.
-
Interesting how they are all running from it now. Most of them claiming it never actually meant defund and stating no one wanted to see police disbanded.
Don't they remember all the threads they had on their site where people were literally talking about getting rid of the police and how a lot of them went into some revisionist history of policing claiming the police were put together to only run down escaped slaves? They were all on board at that time ...
And claiming BLM doesn't have the money to hire advertisers/marketers? Uh, if they weren't spending literally millions of dollars on multiple homes for one of the marxist founders, I'm quite sure they could find a little money.
KC
Feet planted solidly in the air, holding firmly onto whatever principles fit the need at any given moment, and happy to forget what they were so entrenched in when it no longer suits their needs. Moonbats take pragmatism to a sickening art form.
-
qazplm135 (6,397 posts)
2. it was
and inaccurate.
No one literally wanted to do what the dictionary definition says.
Words mean things DUmmy. Say what you mean, not what you think is a clever line to rile up your base.
-
Interesting how they are all running from it now. Most of them claiming it never actually meant defund and stating no one wanted to see police disbanded.
Don't they remember all the threads they had on their site where people were literally talking about getting rid of the police and how a lot of them went into some revisionist history of policing claiming the police were put together to only run down escaped slaves? They were all on board at that time
KC
Yep. The history of the world with primitives started 5 minutes before they posted.
.
-
Words mean things DUmmy. Say what you mean, not what you think is a clever line to rile up your base.
Well, to be honest ... they ARE too nuanced for us to understand, since they mean something different than what they actually said.
Smartest people on the internet indeed!
KC
-
A Caver with a burnable mole could probably spend 5 minutes or less finding DU threads defending the defund-the-police movement and then just posting the links. Their mole would get tombstoned, but the entertainment value ....... :rotf: