The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: franksolich on January 16, 2017, 08:22:19 PM
-
http://www.discussionist.com/10151114029
Oh my.
foia (4,943 posts) Mon Jan 16, 2017, 05:22 PM
The left's biigest fear
That Trump will be successful.
So successful that he'll get re-elected.
NeoKhan (124 posts) Mon Jan 16, 2017, 05:30 PM
3. That's a side effect. Their real fear is
the American people will slip from the leash of government power and be happy on their own terms.
That would be mortal a blow to their egos.
FORD (9,138 posts) Mon Jan 16, 2017, 05:37 PM
4. If Adolf Hitler had created the Autobahn, and commissioned the creation of the Volkswagen....
...and then got hit by a truck on his way to get his mustache trimmed at a barber shop, he might have been considered a "successful leader" of Germany. Even though those who truly paid attention would have known what his intentions were.
So how do you define "success"? I don't see any reasonable definition of success possible with the cabinet he's appointing. With absolutely ZERO experience himself, he has to rely on his cabinet for advice. And the incompetent assholes he's picking are not capable of giving any.
Carl (277 posts) Mon Jan 16, 2017, 05:41 PM
6. Oh look,a Hitler analogy.
How original and profound.
That he has driven the left out into the open as the batshit crazy little tyrant wannabes that they are is a great success in my book.
batcat (6,475 posts) Mon Jan 16, 2017, 05:39 PM
5. Trump will either be one of our truly great presidents or the worst in modern history. ...
If he does a good job the Democratic Party will no longer be a big tent but a little teepee.
Imagine what will happen if he actually improves things in the inner cities. The minorities will wake up to the fact that the Democrats have been taking them for granted for decades and are more interested in keeping them down on the Democratic plantation than improving their lives.
"little teepee" = I like that.
-
By the way, I've been posting more than usual from DU Jr. because I keep going over there to see if Lamond's shown up yet, to "school" everybody on the election, as he promised he would.
Thus far, no Lamond.
-
Trump will be successful. He has overcome every obstacle set before him.
The media was played and tricked all along. Trump actually fights back...
seriously. I don't think the democrats have the first clue how to handle this guy.
-
http://www.discussionist.com/10151114029
Oh my.
"little teepee" = I like that.
Little teepee!!! Excellent!
-
By the way, I've been posting more than usual from DU Jr. because I keep going over there to see if Lamond's shown up yet, to "school" everybody on the election, as he promised he would.
Thus far, no Lamond.
which one is Lamond?
-
which one is Lamond?
Lamond=MrScorpio=MrsCorpio=Pineapple Head=Cap'n Dimwit=The boy primitive
.
-
Trump will be successful. He has overcome every obstacle set before him.
The media was played and tricked all along. Trump actually fights back...
seriously. I don't think the democrats have the first clue how to handle this guy.
I don't think the Republicans do either. Should be an exciting four to eight years for everyone.
-
I don't think the Republicans do either. Should be an exciting four to eight years for everyone.
Exactly. Team Trump used (and still uses) the Dem playbook on fighting back, and neither the Dems or the Republicans have the slightest idea how to counter it. (You'd think that the Republicans, having seen this before, would know by now. :thatsright: )
-
I will admit I didn't like him. I actually felt he was a democrat posing as a republican just to screw around. BUT he has already accomplished so much that he surprises me every time. I think he could have the legendary status of Reagan if he stands by all his campaign promises and doesn't weaken for PC.
-
I will admit I didn't like him. I actually felt he was a democrat posing as a republican just to screw around. BUT he has already accomplished so much that he surprises me every time. I think he could have the legendary status of Reagan if he stands by all his campaign promises and doesn't weaken for PC.
The primitives, as well as the rest of the Democrat Party, fear this.
-
The primitives, as well as the rest of the Democrat Party, fear this.
As does the GOPe.
Probably even more so!!!
-
My predictions of the left in the coming years:
1. The economic success under POTUS Trump will be all because of Obama's groundwork. Nothing will be said of the previous 8 years of Obama economic failure. Also republicans will be blamed for Obama's economic failure because they are racists and want to keep the black man down.
2. The very successful replacement of the unAffordable Care act, AKA ObamaHellcare, will be degraded as this could have been if only republicans were not racist.
3. The POTUS Trump foreign success will also be because of the super intelligent Obama's groundwork. Again, the racist republicans will be the cause of 8 years of Obama's failure.
4. As race relations get better under POTUS Trump it will all be because of Obama's groundwork, Again, the racist republicans will be the cause of 8 years of worsening race relations because they couldn't let a black man heal the country.
In short all of Obama's failures and all of Trump's successes will be because of racism and keeping the black man down.
-
DUmmiecrats greatest fear?
They will have to get off their oversized dead asses, get out of the basement and get a damn job.
They can't live on go-fund-me campaigns forever.
-
NeoKhan (124 posts) Mon Jan 16, 2017, 05:30 PM
3. That's a side effect. Their real fear is
the American people will slip from the leash of government power and be happy on their own terms.
That would be mortal a blow to their egos.
Their greatest fear is going to happen on Friday. They will be out of power and there is not one damn thing they can do about it. That is the reason they are going all apeshit.
I will admit I didn't like him. I actually felt he was a democrat posing as a republican just to screw around. BUT he has already accomplished so much that he surprises me every time. I think he could have the legendary status of Reagan if he stands by all his campaign promises and doesn't weaken for PC.
Same here. I thought he was just doing it for publicity. As time went on I liked how he fought. Then I realized the man was actually serious. Did he make outlandish promises? Sure. Did he lie his ass off half the time? Sure. Do I care? Not in the least. Personally I think he got into the race to try to show the GOP how to fight, and then figured out they were all pansies. I will give the man credit... he worked his ass off to get elected. And he is using the presidential bully pulpit to tell these large companies that the political status quo is no longer gonna cut it.
I actually believe the man cares about the country and not lining his own wallet like the rest of the political establishment.
If he does nothing else but put an end to illegal immigration I will consider it a win. :cheersmate:
-
Same here. I thought he was just doing it for publicity. As time went on I liked how he fought. Then I realized the man was actually serious. Did he make outlandish promises? Sure. Did he lie his ass off half the time? Sure. Do I care? Not in the least. Personally I think he got into the race to try to show the GOP how to fight, and then figured out they were all pansies. I will give the man credit... he worked his ass off to get elected. And he is using the presidential bully pulpit to tell these large companies that the political status quo is no longer gonna cut it.
I actually believe the man cares about the country and not lining his own wallet like the rest of the political establishment.
If he does nothing else but put an end to illegal immigration I will consider it a win. :cheersmate:
Damn right! Build the F'n WALL!
And if the fruits and nuts in California get in the way, pave over them!
OR, build the wall at the Arizona/Nevada state lines and let the illegals come freely into California. Cut off ALL federal money to Cali. Let Gov. Jerry take care of them. He likes 'em! :rotf:
-
My predictions of the left in the coming years:
1. The economic success under POTUS Trump will be all because of Obama's groundwork. Nothing will be said of the previous 8 years of Obama economic failure. Also republicans will be blamed for Obama's economic failure because they are racists and want to keep the black man down.
2. The very successful replacement of the unAffordable Care act, AKA ObamaHellcare, will be degraded as this could have been if only republicans were not racist.
3. The POTUS Trump foreign success will also be because of the super intelligent Obama's groundwork. Again, the racist republicans will be the cause of 8 years of Obama's failure.
4. As race relations get better under POTUS Trump it will all be because of Obama's groundwork, Again, the racist republicans will be the cause of 8 years of worsening race relations because they couldn't let a black man heal the country.
In short all of Obama's failures and all of Trump's successes will be because of racism and keeping the black man down.
You are right, but there is one critical thing: The MSM, already considered by and large to be fake news, will have no one other than the extreme fringe to share these talking points with.
Mr. and Mrs. America are tossing them onto the garbage bin of history.
-
graham4anything4HC45 (24,904 posts)
19. It is and will be for 40 years, the Sotomayor Court.
What the hell does that even MEAN? that latina hag is the same age as Roberts so no way will she take over as CJ.
-
Damn right! 1) Build the F'n WALL!
2) And if the fruits and nuts in California get in the way, pave over them!
OR, build the wall at the Arizona/Nevada state lines and let the illegals come freely into California. 3) Cut off ALL federal money to Cali. Let Gov. Jerry take care of them. He likes 'em! :rotf:
1) Sounds good!
2) Sounds good, but but the Enviros might object to that pollution.
3) Sounds good, and even if not necessary, DO NOT BAIL OUT CA! BTW, Gov. Moonbeam is termed out in 2018. I think Gavin Newsom is angling to run for Guber. When Newsom was Mayor of SF, the nickname Major Nuisance worked, but a new one will be needed. This will give you an idea of Newsom's "character". (http://www.sfgate.com/politics/article/AIDE-QUITS-AS-NEWSOM-S-AFFAIR-WITH-HIS-WIFE-IS-2652745.php)
-
What the hell does that even MEAN? that latina hag is the same age as Roberts so no way will she take over as CJ.
I am torn on that nutbag.
Not sure if he is just playing a game or if he ate all the paint off the window sills as a child.
-
I am torn on that nutbag.
Not sure if he is just playing a game or if he ate all the paint off the window sills as a child.
At this point, I lean towards lots of paint consumption. He's just that delusional.
-
Damn right! Build the F'n WALL!
And if the fruits and nuts in California get in the way, pave over them!
OR, build the wall at the Arizona/Nevada state lines and let the illegals come freely into California. Cut off ALL federal money to Cali. Let Gov. Jerry take care of them. He likes 'em! :rotf:
:cheersmate:
Stopping more coming in is paramount. Then we can work on what is best to do with the ones here. Should have been done back in 86, like the lying damned dems agreed to, and then reneged.
Personally I do not think mass deportation is gonna happen, DD. I am open to giving them some sort of work visa but definitely not citizenship. I would like to see a document that they would have to sign to stay here stating that any kids they have had while here illegally renounce their American citizenship and no offspring of theirs could ever be an American citizen in perpetuity or whatever the legal word is.
-
:cheersmate:
Stopping more coming in is paramount. Then we can work on what is best to do with the ones here. Should have been done back in 86, like the lying damned dems agreed to, and then reneged.
Personally I do not think mass deportation is gonna happen, DD. I am open to giving them some sort of work visa but definitely not citizenship. I would like to see a document that they would have to sign to stay here stating that any kids they have had while here illegally renounce their American citizenship and no offspring of theirs could ever be an American citizen in perpetuity or whatever the legal word is.
The key is to turn off the gigantic electromagnet that is drawing them here in the first place:
- Absolutely ZERO social benefits for any non-citizen: no SNAP, no WIC, no Section 8, etc.
- Severely punish anyone who employs an illegal alien, and by "severely" I mean complete forfeiture of business and serious jail time
- Mandate e-verify for all employment
- Complete asset forfeiture for anyone caught here illegally on a second or later offense
- A complete shut-off of any and all federal funding for any sanctuary city and the state where that city is located; that means cutting off everything from Medicaid to SNAP to highway funds
- Harsh prison sentences for anyone who provides or attempts to provide government benefits for illegals
- Harsh prison sentences for any state or local official who attempts to provide "sanctuary" to illegals
Do that, and the illegals will flee here like crazy and we won't have to deport them.
-
The key is to turn off the gigantic electromagnet that is drawing them here in the first place:
- Absolutely ZERO social benefits for any non-citizen: no SNAP, no WIC, no Section 8, etc.
- Severely punish anyone who employs an illegal alien, and by "severely" I mean complete forfeiture of business and serious jail time
- Mandate e-verify for all employment
- Complete asset forfeiture for anyone caught here illegally on a second or later offense
- A complete shut-off of any and all federal funding for any sanctuary city and the state where that city is located; that means cutting off everything from Medicaid to SNAP to highway funds
- Harsh prison sentences for anyone who provides or attempts to provide government benefits for illegals
- Harsh prison sentences for any state or local official who attempts to provide "sanctuary" to illegals
Do that, and the illegals will flee here like crazy and we won't have to deport them.
Pretty much, yes. If illegals are incapable of scoring free benefits and work, most will leave voluntarily.
-
Hmmmmm ... DU-folks' (and other Progs') greatest fears (I would say political fears, but they really have made politics the core of their lives, sometimes along with recreational chemicals):
* Trump will succeed with the nation's economy (they still pretzellate themselves to transmogrify Reagan's resounding success into a disaster);
* Trump will be reelected in 2020 and pave the way for another more or less conservative R President in the 2024 election (I'm not counting chickens from unlaid eggs, just listing what I think are DU-folks' greatest fears);
* Trump will succeed in crushing ISIS, A-Q, et al where BHO wouldn't take them seriously until they were resurgent;
* Middle and working lower class (economically, not in character!) will fully realize the Ds are @#$%ing them over economically and viciously attacking things they hold dear;
* Blacks and Hispanics (folks who are part of the above) will fully realize the Ds are using them as political pawns and viciously attacking things they hold dear (e.g., CA's Proposition 8 could never have passed without a very substantial % of blacks' and Hispanics' votes).
These could be summed up as a long-term loss of power, but deserve to be recognized individually.
As they did in 2001-2006, the Rs can @#$% up their advantage by going tax-and-spend. That, actually, should be Libs' and Progs' greatest hope.
-
The key is to turn off the gigantic electromagnet that is drawing them here in the first place:
- Absolutely ZERO social benefits for any non-citizen: no SNAP, no WIC, no Section 8, etc.
- Severely punish anyone who employs an illegal alien, and by "severely" I mean complete forfeiture of business and serious jail time disagree. heavy penalties, yes, up to and including driving the owners bankrupt. But I'm generally against civil asset forfeiture. Besides, what does the government need a construction company, farm, or any other business for?
- Mandate e-verify for all employment Continue voluntary use, but incentivize by granting exemption from penalties for hiring illegals, as long as e-verify records are maintained by the business.
- Complete asset forfeiture for anyone caught here illegally on a second or later offense disagree. Again, generally opposed to civil asset forfeiture.
- A complete shut-off of any and all federal funding for any sanctuary city and the state where that city is located; that means cutting off everything from Medicaid to SNAP to highway funds Just focus on the cities. Why hammer the people of upstate NY or central CA for what the idiots in NYC and LA/SF do? There's enough grants/business in those cities already to cut off funds to.
- Harsh prison sentences for anyone who provides or attempts to provide government benefits for illegals
- Harsh prison sentences for any state or local official who attempts to provide "sanctuary" to illegals
Do that, and the illegals will flee here like crazy and we won't have to deport them.
There's a few places for debate in this list, not main points, just matters of degree.
-
There's a few places for debate in this list, not main points, just matters of degree.
Indeed. My reasoning below.
heavy penalties, yes, up to and including driving the owners bankrupt. But I'm generally against civil asset forfeiture. Besides, what does the government need a construction company, farm, or any other business for?
This isn't about the feds taking up some business. It's about putting "teeth" behind the requirement. With every punitive fine, it eventually becomes a cost of doing business. So if X business can save $5000 per year using illegal labor, and the fine is $10,000 per illegal laborer, then it's still worth it to the business to chance it that the illegal in question will manage to work more than two years before getting caught, in which case the fine is less than the cost of doing business with legal labor instead. If we can fine X business $10 billion per illegal or whatever, then fine, but that's not likely to pass legal muster. Hence, better to make the "teeth" sharp enough that XYZ Megacorp risks a lot more than just a fine if they use illegals. I should clarify that I'm not saying that every case should involve asset forfeiture, just that it should be a tool in the bag as needed. The sentence would be better written "severe penalties up to and including serious jail time and complete asset forfeiture."
Continue voluntary use, but incentivize by granting exemption from penalties for hiring illegals, as long as e-verify records are maintained by the business.
Probably a distinction without a difference at the end of the day. If you have to maintain records that you complied with e-verify, then at some point you have to actually comply with e-verify. I don't really care how we come about it, so long as we utilize this simple tool to combat illegal labor and identity theft.
Just focus on the cities. Why hammer the people of upstate NY or central CA for what the idiots in NYC and LA/SF do? There's enough grants/business in those cities already to cut off funds to.
Because it's very quickly going to force Albany and Sacramento to slap NYC, SFO, and L.A. into line. I guarandamntee you that the legislature in Springfield is going to tell Rhambo in Chicago that he can try to call Chicago a sanctuary city, but they're going to shut him off from state and federal funds right away, and Chicago wouldn't last a week without that flow of cash coming from the other end of the state. Same goes for California: it would take about ten minutes for legislation to pass, veto-proof, in Sacramento that all of the state funding that was going to San Francisco will suddenly be building new roads and sidewalks in Fresno and Modesto and Shasta Lake and Stockton.
Also, much federal funding flows through states to get to cities, so the only real way to punish cities is via states. Unfortunate, but reality.
-
Another great BUT real fear for the left is that Trump is gong to appoint over half of all federal judges that rule by feat. Pretty sure that the left will begin to think, like deficits, that judicial activism is a bad thing.
-
Another great BUT real fear for the left is that Trump is gong to appoint over half of all federal judges that rule by feat. Pretty sure that the left will begin to think, like deficits, that judicial activism is a bad thing.
Only thing one has to do to make the dummies hate any idea/policy is have an R propose it. I swear Trump could say he was going to give each dummie a million dollars and they would bitch.
I hope Trump gets the chance to do two USSC justices in his first 4 years. Ginsburg has got to be close to shuffling off to the great beyond. Now that would be great. Especially if we get two Scalia like judges in their 40's or 50's.
-
The e-verify question is simple - make it work like SOX. If a business is caught either employing an illegal alien or not using e-verify during the hiring process the CEO or owner gets the mandatory perp walk and jail time. Publicly toss a few CEOs/owners in jail and the rest will get with the program.
This is the strategic solution to the problem. Address the root cause and the rest of it will sort itself out. We will have to enlarge the southbound lanes at the border crossings...
-
Because it's very quickly going to force Albany and Sacramento to slap NYC, SFO, and L.A. into line. I guarandamntee you that the legislature in Springfield is going to tell Rhambo in Chicago that he can try to call Chicago a sanctuary city, but they're going to shut him off from state and federal funds right away, and Chicago wouldn't last a week without that flow of cash coming from the other end of the state. Same goes for California: it would take about ten minutes for legislation to pass, veto-proof, in Sacramento that all of the state funding that was going to San Francisco will suddenly be building new roads and sidewalks in Fresno and Modesto and Shasta Lake and Stockton.
Also, much federal funding flows through states to get to cities, so the only real way to punish cities is via states. Unfortunate, but reality.
Unfortunately, the areas outside the metro areas don't have nearly the political power that the metros do. The states in question will just raise taxes, which will disproportionately affect those in the suburbs/rural areas. Now, some of those citizens/businesses will be able to move to better climates, but how do you move a farm or mine, etc?