The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: Karin on September 14, 2016, 07:12:40 AM

Title: Oh for ****'s Face
Post by: Karin on September 14, 2016, 07:12:40 AM
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10028163080 (http://www.democraticunderground.com/10028163080)

Quote


Tue Sep 13, 2016, 07:41 PM

Ex Lurker (2,873 posts)

Are whites who stand when people of color are taking a knee showing a lack of allyship?
   
Is it a microaggression, or worse, overt racism? What should poc think of poc who choose not to kneel? There are all kinds of interesting subtexts here waiting to be explored.
 

Quote



Response to Ex Lurker (Original post)

Tue Sep 13, 2016, 08:02 PM

mwrguy (3,135 posts)

5. Yes
 
They have the right to stand if they want, but they are not being supportive, they are not being an ally.

Quote



Response to Ex Lurker (Original post)

Tue Sep 13, 2016, 08:07 PM

ronnie624 (5,327 posts)

7. Yes.
 
Standing is very obviously a failure to express solidarity, whether deliberately or out of ignorance.

Quote

Response to Ex Lurker (Original post)

Tue Sep 13, 2016, 08:42 PM

philosslayer (2,677 posts)

16. I believe so
 
N/t

Quote



Response to Ex Lurker (Original post)

Tue Sep 13, 2016, 10:39 PM

Matrosov (1,012 posts)

23. Definitely

'I am not going to stand up to show pride in a flag for a country that oppresses black people and people of color'

At that point everyone has to examine their priorities.

White people who take a knee? Great.
White people who still stand? I wonder..
Non-black POC who take a knee? Great.
Any POC who still stands? There's always that Uncle Tom..

Quote



Response to Ex Lurker (Original post)

Wed Sep 14, 2016, 12:39 AM

Star Member loyalsister (10,258 posts)

25. Yes
 
It's a disregard of the very real observations that have led the players to kneel. 

Some thought the OP was trolling the board, but weren't sure.  They know DU is insane. 
Title: Re: Oh for ****'s Face
Post by: Carl on September 14, 2016, 07:16:22 AM
Quote
Response to Ex Lurker (Original post)

Tue Sep 13, 2016, 10:39 PM

Matrosov (1,012 posts)

23. Definitely

'I am not going to stand up to show pride in a flag for a country that oppresses black people and people of color'

At that point everyone has to examine their priorities.

White people who take a knee? Great.
White people who still stand? I wonder..
Non-black POC who take a knee? Great.
Any POC who still stands? There's always that Uncle Tom..

Once again the real racists are on display.
Title: Re: Oh for ****'s Face
Post by: Texacon on September 14, 2016, 07:18:25 AM
Wow. There is no other word, just, wow.

KC


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Oh for ****'s Face
Post by: BlueStateSaint on September 14, 2016, 07:59:34 AM
I hate those ****ing ingrates.  There's a lot of us here who damn near died in service of our country, or know someone who died.  The DUmmies shit all over those sacrifices. :censored: :argh: :mad: :banghead:
Title: Re: Oh for ****'s Face
Post by: SVPete on September 14, 2016, 08:45:34 AM
And here I thought the race-card-playing stupidity couldn't get any stupider! Clearly my imagination makes insufficient allowance for stupidity-for-the-cause!

 :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: But, yeah. :thatsright: A teammate - white, black, or pea-green - who doesn't participate in these pampered twerps' "protest" is showing lack of solidarity with that cause. :thatsright: Maybe even (Gasp!) disagreement. :thatsright: Or even (Horrors!!!) opposition! :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh: :doh:
Title: Re: Oh for ****'s Face
Post by: FiddyBeowulf on September 14, 2016, 08:56:00 AM
It is a shame these athletes are forced to stay in the USA and do not have the means to escape.
 
Title: Re: Oh for ****'s Face
Post by: Duke Nukum on September 14, 2016, 09:00:25 AM
If you voted for Obama, definitely not an ally.
Title: Re: Oh for ****'s Face
Post by: Wineslob on September 14, 2016, 01:40:43 PM
What? They aren't taking a knee for those who have died from black on black crime? Po rich players.  :bigbird:
Title: Re: Oh for ****'s Face
Post by: Skul on September 14, 2016, 04:16:29 PM
I would encourage them and praise their solidarity of kneeling.
They could even level-up, by turning their backs to the flag.

Now comes a bit of a delemma.

Wood, for that nostalgic *Crack* and ability to gain a beautiful patina, 
or,
aluminum for that melodic *Pinggg* , longevity and ease of cleaning.

I really do prefer wood. We'll see.
Title: Re: Oh for ****'s Face
Post by: catsmtrods on September 14, 2016, 05:57:01 PM
fOR ****S SAKE INDEED! It's coming to 5.56, 7.62 and 243!
Title: Re: Oh for ****'s Face
Post by: ChuckJ on September 14, 2016, 06:06:45 PM
I know it's probably been posted somewhere on here already, but even so, it is good for lurking DUmmies to see it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LsGGjYaeFqM
Title: Re: Oh for ****'s Face
Post by: I_B_Perky on September 14, 2016, 07:29:18 PM
Quote
Tue Sep 13, 2016, 07:41 PM

Ex Lurker (2,873 posts)

Are whites who stand when people of color are taking a knee showing a lack of allyship?

No you stupid ****wad. They are showing respect for the flag, the national anthem and all the people who died protecting this great country of ours.  If anything they are showing disdain for the prima donnas whose sole skill is running/throwing/catching a damned ball in a damned game.  When Kaepernick puts his ass on the line for this country then I might give him a pass. Until then I hope his worthless ass gets nailed by a linebacker that ends his career.

That make me racist?  So be it. If I was in his shoes I would be damned grateful to live in a country where I could make millions of dollars playing a game. Ungrateful spoiled bastard is what he is.
Title: Re: Oh for ****'s Face
Post by: ExGeeEye on September 14, 2016, 07:39:13 PM
Remember those T-shirts with the big words George Michael wore in his 80's videos?  CHOOSE LIFE I think one said.

Big black letters on white shirts.

Anyway....I want one...

NOT
YOUR
ALLY
Title: Re: Oh for ****'s Face
Post by: BadCat on September 16, 2016, 07:58:49 AM
fOR ****S SAKE INDEED! It's coming to 5.56, 7.62 and 243!

Years ago, when I lived in Denver, I was dumb enough to go to a Donkos game wearing a Raiders jersey.  The "fans" were throwing D-cell batteries at me (missing every time and taking out a Donko fan nearby).  Wonder why Kaperdick isn't dodging D-cells?
Title: Re: Oh for ****'s Face
Post by: txradioguy on September 16, 2016, 08:50:41 AM
White Guilt needs to become a new form of mental illness.
Title: Re: Oh for ****'s Face
Post by: SVPete on September 16, 2016, 08:56:46 AM
Years ago, when I lived in Denver, I was dumb enough to go to a Donkos game wearing a Raiders jersey.  The "fans" were throwing D-cell batteries at me (missing every time and taking out a Donko fan nearby).  Wonder why Kaperdick isn't dodging D-cells?

Because 9er fans recycled their dead batteries? Because 9er fans paid so much to get in to the stadium that they didn't want to get kicked out?

I have a feeling 49ers paraphernalia, Kaepernick jerseys especially, have taken a significant hit in sales - football fans showing their disapproval using their wallets. BTW, Kaepernick seems to have lost his role as starting QB - I heard that he played a little in the 4th quarter of the Rams game; he didn't show up in the box scores as having thrown even one pass.
Title: Re: Oh for ****'s Face
Post by: txradioguy on September 16, 2016, 09:05:00 AM
Because 9er fans recycled their dead batteries? Because 9er fans paid so much to get in to the stadium that they didn't want to get kicked out?

I have a feeling 49ers paraphernalia, Kaepernick jerseys especially, have taken a significant hit in sales - football fans showing their disapproval using their wallets. BTW, Kaepernick seems to have lost his role as starting QB - I heard that he played a little in the 4th quarter of the Rams game; he didn't show up in the box scores as having thrown even one pass.

I saw something the other day that between this whole taking a knee crap and the NFL threatening to fine anyone who had some kind of 9/11 tribute on their uniforms week one viewership was down from last year.

Title: Re: Oh for ****'s Face
Post by: SVPete on September 16, 2016, 09:08:08 AM
White Guilt needs to become a new form of mental illness.

It is, just not recognized as such. And won't be, because those who concoct such "diagnoses" embrace it.
Title: Re: Oh for ****'s Face
Post by: SVPete on September 16, 2016, 09:10:58 AM
I saw something the other day that between this whole taking a knee crap and the NFL threatening to fine anyone who had some kind of 9/11 tribute on their uniforms week one viewership was down from last year.

The NFL threatened to fine a player who had 9/11 tribute cleats, but backed down in the face of public outcry and the players union saying they would pay the guy's fine.
Title: Re: Oh for ****'s Face
Post by: txradioguy on September 16, 2016, 09:21:34 AM
The NFL threatened to fine a player who had 9/11 tribute cleats, but backed down in the face of public outcry and the players union saying they would pay the guy's fine.

I'm glad the NFLPA stepped up.

But considering the NFL is headquartered in the largest media market in the U.S. they should have squashed that idea of a fine before it ever was put to paper and sent to the 32 teams.

In the age of social media and the fact that perception is reality...the NFL now looks like it's more supportive of athletes like Kapernick and less sympathetic to those who still have very vivid and raw memories of 9/11.
Title: Re: Oh for ****'s Face
Post by: BlueStateSaint on September 16, 2016, 10:05:25 AM
I'm glad the NFLPA stepped up.

But considering the NFL is headquartered in the largest media market in the U.S. they should have squashed that idea of a fine before it ever was put to paper and sent to the 32 teams.

In the age of social media and the fact that perception is reality...the NFL now looks like it's more supportive of athletes like Kapernick and less sympathetic to those who still have very vivid and raw memories of 9/11.

I didn't hear that the NFLPA stepped up--I thought that it might have been the Fraternal Order of Police and a NYC-area police union.
Title: Re: Oh for ****'s Face
Post by: txradioguy on September 16, 2016, 11:34:29 AM
I didn't hear that the NFLPA stepped up--I thought that it might have been the Fraternal Order of Police and a NYC-area police union.
SVP in his post said the players union was offering to pay the fines.

Sent from my STV100-1 using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Oh for ****'s Face
Post by: SVPete on September 16, 2016, 02:41:45 PM
SVP in his post said the players union was offering to pay the fines.

Sent from my STV100-1 using Tapatalk

I was going from memory, and may have been incorrect about who offered to pay the fine.