The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: GOBUCKS on June 05, 2015, 12:21:21 AM
-
Considering the sickening way they talk about their "fur babies"...
Considering how they cheer whenever a human is attacked and killed by a wild animal...
Considering the vicious way they speak about normal people who enjoy hunting...
I'd say marriage between a democrat and an animal would be a small step for them, and in a lot of cases would be a union of equals.
So I'm pretty sure the percentage of DUmp democrats that favor marriage with animals would be between the mid-thirties and upper forties.
-
Considering the sickening way they talk about their "fur babies"...
Considering how they cheer whenever a human is attacked and killed by a wild animal...
Considering the vicious way they speak about normal people who enjoy hunting...
I'd say marriage between a democrat and an animal would be a small step for them, and in a lot of cases would be a union of equals.
So I'm pretty sure the percentage of DUmp democrats that favor marriage with animals would be between the mid-thirties and upper forties.
Bill Clinton would screw a snake, if somebody held its head. I estimate the percentage of pro-bestiality DUmmies is 50%.
-
Bill Clinton would screw a snake, if somebody held its head. I estimate the percentage of pro-bestiality DUmmies is 50%.
Seems high, but I'm biased.
And it might depend upon the animal.
-
South Park had an episode about some of the Dummies.
(http://i.ytimg.com/vi/i5AJ5xGaIdM/maxresdefault.jpg)
-
Seems high, but I'm biased.
And it might depend upon the animal.
I hate giving any lib any kind of credit.
So it is with extreme reluctance that I give you credit for a clever post.
No way can you be a dyed in the wool lib.
Libs can't see past their own blanket of prejudices.
Then again it could have come from your devious nature.
Libs are nothing if they aren't devious.
That's a quote from Sam the Sham and the Pharaohs.
-
Seems high, but I'm biased.
And it might depend upon the animal.
I should have been more clear.
Fully half of the DUmmies support whatever a Clinton does. That includes bestiallity, if Bill or Hillary did it.
-
I should have been more clear.
Fully half of the DUmmies support whatever a Clinton does. That includes bestiallity, if Bill or Hillary did it.
Hildebeestiality?
-
Considering the sickening way they talk about their "fur babies"...
Considering how they cheer whenever a human is attacked and killed by a wild animal...
Considering the vicious way they speak about normal people who enjoy hunting...
I'd say marriage between a democrat and an animal would be a small step for them, and in a lot of cases would be a union of equals.
So I'm pretty sure the percentage of DUmp democrats that favor marriage with animals would be between the mid-thirties and upper forties.
A few other considerations:
1. How many of them are members of rabid animal- rights groups like PETA which view all animals as equal to if not superior to humans. After all, as PETA's clinically insane founder Ingrid Newkirk famously said, "A rat is a pig is a dog is a boy."
2. How many of them clearly buy into the mentality of "Love is love, it's discriminatory and bigoted to support one form of love and outlaw another."
3. How many of them are "Furries."
4. How many of them have no luck romantically with fellow humans.
I'd say mid- to upper- forties.
-
Hildebeestiality?
I'd have to ask Huma Weiner about that one.
-
Considering the sickening way they talk about their "fur babies"...
Considering how they cheer whenever a human is attacked and killed by a wild animal...
Considering the vicious way they speak about normal people who enjoy hunting...
I'd say marriage between a democrat and an animal would be a small step for them, and in a lot of cases would be a union of equals.
So I'm pretty sure the percentage of DUmp democrats that favor marriage with animals would be between the mid-thirties and upper forties.
100%
I just sort of assumed they already thought it was legal and a constitutionally protected right.
-
I hate giving any lib any kind of credit.
So it is with extreme reluctance that I give you credit for a clever post.
No way can you be a dyed in the wool lib.
Libs can't see past their own blanket of prejudices.
Then again it could have come from your devious nature.
Libs are nothing if they aren't devious.
That's a quote from Sam the Sham and the Pharaohs.
Speaking of whomm ...
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b_K5b-JNc7E[/youtube]
-
^I was thinking more wooly bully, but that works.
-
^I was thinking more wooly bully, but that works.
If you say "wooly bully" 3 times, Michelle Obama will apoear in your living room.
For the love of Dog, man, don't do it!
-
If you say "wooly bully" 3 times, Michelle Obama will apoear in your living room.
For the love of Dog, man, don't do it!
I'd rather have Beetlejuice as a houseguest !
-
The democratics regularly screw the pooch. I'd have to say 100%
-
125% including the dead DUmmies.
-
I would say 110% - you would have 10% of the population that would vote multiple times...
-
I'd say marriage between a democrat and an animal would be a small step for them, and in a lot of cases would be a union of equals.
You must have a very low opinion of animals.
-
:fuelfire: About half seriously ... if enough DU-folk could be convinced it's somehow a "human rights" thingy, you could wind up with a very entertaining urination match between those who see it as a human rights thingy and DU's animal rights folk. :fuelfire:
-
Once the DUmmies read that chimpanzees like to cook, the percentage will shoot up to 75%.
If somebody told them that chimps like to clean house and roll joints, 95% of DUmmies would want to marry a chimp themselves!
-
Once the DUmmies read that chimpanzees like to cook, the percentage will shoot up to 75%.
If somebody told them that chimps like to clean house and roll joints, 95% of DUmmies would want to marry a chimp themselves!
It would be chimp torture. :runaway: to the chimp!
-
It would be chimp torture. :runaway: to the chimp!
(http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2008/06/18/article-0-001A8D4500000258-881_468x415.jpg)
Stevenumbers would hit it.
-
And it might depend upon the animal.
Being an 'ass man' will never be the same!
-
(http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2008/06/18/article-0-001A8D4500000258-881_468x415.jpg)
Stevenumbers would hit it.
Ooooh, Dude. :lmao: :lmao: :cheersmate:
-
Being an 'ass man' will never be the same!
(https://s.yimg.com/fz/api/res/1.2/uZIvSiqkId7fUpf9iqfQ2A--/YXBwaWQ9c3JjaGRkO2g9MzYwO3E9OTU7dz00ODA-/http://i1.ytimg.com/vi/o2X_XNdmWws/hqdefault.jpg)
-
I'd rather have Beetlejuice as a houseguest !
Likewise!
At least Beetlejuice has a good sense of humor, and wouldn't give you pompous, hypocritical, unsolicited lectures about what you eat.
He probably has better personal hygiene than Moo- chelle, too.
-
80% I've heard several state it quite plainly -- most of the ones I know.
-
80% I've heard several state it quite plainly -- most of the ones I know.
You're probably right. In my estimate of mid-thirties to high forties I was considering only the male DUmmies.
-
Eighty percent based on "hearing it clearly". Amazing. (bounce, bounce, bounce)
And 40% of male liberals are probably "into animal fur" but when we consider females, that goes up to 80%. I'd like you to explain the math on that.
(I really do understand the nature of this thread, but ... geez)
-
Eighty percent based on "hearing it clearly". Amazing. (bounce, bounce, bounce)
And 40% of male liberals are probably "into animal fur" but when we consider females, that goes up to 80%. I'd like you to explain the math on that.
(I really do understand the nature of this thread, but ... geez)
As soon as you and your ilk explain your unending support for NAMBLA and every other form of sexual depravity.
And just so you can't say no one told you, geez is an abbreviated variation of Jesus.
Since your religion is the liberal agenda, you probably won't want to call his name in that fashion anymore.