Le Monde quoted Daniele Lochak, a law professor not involved in the case, as saying it was bizarre to consider that excessive submission to men was a reason not to grant citizenship.
So true. It should be a requirement.
Seriously, folks - I know this is France an'all, but - how does one claim a "right" to move around in public places covered from head to toe? How does this "right" trump my "right" to be able to see you, recognize you, pick you out of a line-up if necessary, or otherwise know with whom I am dealing as I go about my business in public?
What if, for argument's sake, the koran said muslims should be completely naked in public? Would that be a "right" we would all have to accept in the name of religious freedom?