So let me get this straight, just because someone does not want to pay for your inability to use the other 20 plus contraceptives completely covered available to you and you need to use an abortificant, I somehow don't like sex personally?
Really, is there any other reason to justify shit when the have made such a tremendous leap in fallacy based on my previous statement?
If one does not like sex, one can simply choose not to partake of it. There is no reason to dictate birth control to others, however that said, there is a massive difference between telling someone they can't use something and telling them it is their own responsibility to provide that something for themselves. It would appear to me those unwilling to foot the bill for their own sexual habits are the ones who don't think sex worthy enough to even lay out(pardon the pun) 30 bucks a month to participate in those activities.
Also, for all those war on women nitwits, can they please tell me why their sexual partners are not helping to foot the bill for their mutually gratifying(assumption) activities? Why I am proclaiming a war on you because I don't think I should pay for your recreational activities, but the loser you picked to bed has no such inclination to the same war when he doesn't offer up the money to help his woman du jour put out in safety? Seems like the war on women if it is based on paying for one's own birth control is being waged in the individual dummies beds, not by the folks unwilling to foot the bill for an activity and person they are not engaged with between the sheets. Just some thoughts jackasses.
