Author Topic: BainsBane Propositioned By A Pimp  (Read 84436 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline anti-spelunker

  • Banned
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
  • Reputation: +10/-127
Re: BainsBane Propositioned By A Pimp
« Reply #850 on: January 18, 2014, 12:14:33 AM »
So, let me get this straight.

You are using the 'I didn't know any better' defense ?  :rofl:

Okay, if you happen to be in the United Kingdom, the image fell into PD in 1985. (life +70 years) HOWEVER - The legality is kinda grey in the United States, because of Clinton's DMCA.  -Mainly because a tool was used to reproduce it, (in this case, a PC) and according to the DMCA, the tools aren't legal to use in any way. -It's ridiculous.

But let's continue, shall we ?

Here is a common DU avatar that is still VERY protected by copyright.



it comes from here -



..Definitely not 70 years old.

The way the DMCA works, is every reception of this image is a violation. So, if you scroll through a page on DU with posters who use this avatar, every time it pops up on your screen is one count. It also gets lodged in your PC's web cache, so you have actually copied it -in some cases, multiple times.

..and the 'I didn't know any better' defense won't cut it in court. You know that.

The odds of anything actually happening to you (or anyone who has just read this post) - pretty much nil - BUT that doesn't change the fact that a copyright law has been broken, has it ?

And my point is ?

-You seem to be high and mighty with copyrights that you feel have been violated against you, but seem to have no problem doing the same thing against someone else. Get your own house in order first.

Take it up with the site owners.  Legal responsibility falls to them. 

Offline anti-spelunker

  • Banned
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
  • Reputation: +10/-127
Re: BainsBane Propositioned By A Pimp
« Reply #851 on: January 18, 2014, 12:36:22 AM »


Oh, I think your photo is just fine, Alex. You seem like an attractive and intelligent woman, and I admire you for coming over here and mixing it up with us conservatives. And your age would not be a problem.

The problem is--well, there are a couple. I can't figure out your attitude toward men, if you are prejudiced against us or not. On the one hand, you put up this hard feminist shell, like all men are potential rapists. On the other hand, you come over here and flirt with us boys.  :-*

Then there are your political views. You are a Democrat, which means you are in favor of Big Government and the forced redistribution of wealth. I am a conservative, which means I believe that our federal government should be limited to the powers granted it in the Constitution. That rules out wealth redistribution. I am opposed to taking wealth from some citizens, no matter how evil or rich, by force, against their will, in order to give it to other citizens, now matter how nice or needy, or to pay their bills. I believe that's a form of involuntary servitude. I believe in helping the poor and needy, but that such charity should be private and voluntary.

Then there are your moral views. You are OK with abortion. I am opposed to the willful taking of innocent human life.

But as far as your looks--judging by your photo, that would not be a problem.

There is no inconsistency between being a feminist and flirting "with the boys."  I have never said nor do I believe that all men are potential rapists.  I get particularly ticked off at some of the men at DU because they claim to be feminists while insisting that posting about gender issues is "flame bait." Not only that, some feel entitled to tell me I'm not a real feminist because I disagree with them.  I much prefer someone be straight with me then pull that bullshit. It's the dishonesty of it all that really ticks me off.  One even recently claimed that everything since the right to vote (1920) was "small potatoes." They call themselves feminists for rhetorical purposes.  A number have the annoying habit of saying "I support NARAL" while turning around and telling women to keep their mouths shut or referring to a woman as a "skanky snatch."  I get sick of the insinuation that abortion rights are the sum total of acceptable feminist causes.  I certainly do not hate men, even if some of them tick me off.  Some women tick me off too; that doesn't mean I hate women.  So when you see me pissed off over there, it's often because I can't stand the pretense.  I also hate the constant efforts to shut up feminists.  

The Democratic Party does not favor redistribution of wealth.  That is precisely what the current tax system that penalizes people who work for a wage over the elite who live off investment income.  Some of those guys manage to pay zero taxes, despite being mutli-millionares.  I think we all know Romney must have had a damn good reason for not releasing his taxes.  I see only two logical scenarios: he didn't pay taxes some of those years and/or he applied for amnesty under the IRS program that allowed  tax cheats to declare money that had illegally stashed overseas if they filed amended returns for a few years.  I don't want to refight the election but rather cite that as an example of redistribution.  You and I pay taxes for the roads, airports, and ports through which products sold by big corporations are transported, while we pay the taxes for the infrastructure that guys like Romney get for free, despite using far more of it than we do.  I have one car.  An average family of four might have two.  Rich guys have several, yet some manage to avoid paying taxes at all.  I have nothing against rich people and don't begrudge them their success, but they should pay their way.  A number of corporations also pay no taxes, and while the US has a relatively high marginal tax rate it has a low EFFECTIVE tax rate, meaning what they actually pay.  

I will also note that since I live in MN, my taxes are redistributed to the red states, all of which (except for Texas) live off the federal trough because they take in more in federal money than they send to DC.  States like MN and NJ are the opposite.  That GOP redistribution argument is a smokescreen to hide all the redistribution currently going on.  Add all the corporate subsidies, sweetheart contracts, and special.tax breaks, and the whole thing is rigged against average Americans.  That is something that extends beyond party and any particular presidential administration.  

I
« Last Edit: January 18, 2014, 12:40:45 AM by anti-spelunker »

Offline b-ONE-b

  • Just Off Probation
  • *
  • Posts: 146
  • Reputation: +7/-67
Re: BainsBane Propositioned By A Pimp
« Reply #852 on: January 18, 2014, 12:53:13 AM »
Quote
There is no inconsistency between being a feminist and flirting "with the boys."  I have never said nor do I believe that all men are potential rapists.  I get particularly ticked off at some of the men at DU because they not claim to be feminists while insisting that posting about gender issues is "flame bait." Not only that, some feel entitled to tell me I'm not a real feminist because I disagree with them.  I much prefer someone be straight with me then pull that bullshit.  It's the dishonest of it all that really ticks me off.  They call themselves feminist for purely rhetorical reasons.  A number have the annoying habit of saying "I support NARAL" while turning around and telling women to keep their mouths shut or referring to a woman as a "skanky snatch."  I get sick of the insinuation that abortion rights are the sum total of acceptable feminist causes.  I certainly do not hate men, even if some of them tick me off.  Some women tick me off too; that doesn't mean I hate women.  So when you see me pissed off over there, it's often because I can't stand the pretense.  I also hate the constant efforts to shut up feminists. 

First of all, the Democratic Party does not favor redistribution of wealth.  That is precisely what the current tax system that penalizes people who work for a wage over the elite who live off investment income.  Some of those guys manage to pay zero taxes, despite being mutli-millionares.  I think we all know Romney must have had a damn good reason for not releasing his taxes.  I see only two logical scenarios: he didn't pay taxes some of those years and/or he applied for amnesty under the IRS program that allowed rich tax cheats to declare money that had illegally stashed overseas if they filed amended returns for a few years.  I don't want to refight the election but rather cite that as an example of redistribution.  You and I pay taxes for the roads, airports, and ports through which products sold by big corporations are transported, while we pay the taxes for the infrastructure that guys like Romney get for free, despite using far more of it than we do.  I have one car.  An average family of four might have two.  Rich guys have several, yet some manage to avoid paying taxes at all.  I have nothing against rich people and don't begrudge them their success, but they should pay their way. A number of corporations also pay no taxes, and while the US has a relatively high marginal tax rate it has a low EFFECTIVE tax rate, meaning what they actually pay. 


I will also note that since I live in MN, my taxes are redistributed to the red states, all of which (except for Texas) live off the federal trough because they take in more in federal money than they send to DC.  States like MN and NJ are the opposite.  That GOP redistribution argument is a smokescreen to hide all the redistribution currently going on.  Add all the corporate subsidies, sweetheart contracts, and special.tax breaks, and the whole thing is rigged against average Americans.  That is something that extends beyond party and any particular presidential administration. 

thanks for playing with us Alex.
Just a note about your (and your friends) assertion about Corporations. What IS a Corporation? A Corporation is a business venture that in most cases are Companies of interest to you that is owned by multiple people.

Let's take an average "evil corporation" that the DUmmies frequently criticize. Let's start, XYZ Corp has 3 billion shares outstanding. That means that XYZ is divided up into 3 billion tiny little pieces. So WHO owns XYZ Corp? Some evil little guy in a suit with an elevator in his garage?  Nope.

XYZ Corp is owned by MILLIONS of people in the USA and all over the world. XYZ Corp is owned by school teachers, university professors, union plumbers, railroad retirees and millions of other Americans.

So the DUmbest of the DUmmies advocate taxing the shit out of XYZ Corp. Ok so what then? The value of XYZ Corp will be reduced because of lower profit and lower Market Cap. This means that the taxing entity, the Federal Government is taking money from whom? From a rich guy on a throne in Malibu? Nope.

By taxing a Corporation you reduce the value of the stock owned by millions of Americans. Think of all the reduced retirement accounts, the shrinking 401k's, the reduction in money to send ones grandchildren to college.

Even you, Alex... probably own shares (if not directly, through your retirement fund) of EVIL companies like EXXON, Sempra Energy, AMGEN and DOW.

SO... you tell me Alex, what happens if Corporations are taxed more than they are now? Where will that money come from? Hmmm?

And while I have you here Alex, are you one of those lunatic liberals who believes that life starts upon first breath? Yeah, I saw some DUmmies claim that until a breath is taken, the woman has the right to do whatever she wishes.

Oh and one more thing lol... I'm white and male and I despise Odumbo. Does that make me racist?

I would support Ben Carson for POTUS because he's a brilliant man, a good person and he's incredibly intelligent. AND he's black!!

So all the DUmmies that claim that all conservatives and Republicans MUST be racists... how does that add up in my case? I will answer that, it doesn't.
« Last Edit: January 18, 2014, 01:07:30 AM by b-ONE-b »

Offline txradioguy

  • Minister of Propaganda
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18686
  • Reputation: +1292/-1116
  • Rule 39
Re: Re: BainsBane Propositioned By A Pimp
« Reply #853 on: January 18, 2014, 01:07:09 AM »
Alex you still haven't answered one basic question that seems to stump all gun grabbers and you've also avoided it too both times you been here.

If there are already 20k or more rules on the books at the federal...state...and local level about the use of firearms...what's one more gonna do?

Shouldn't we enforce the existing laws first?

I don't wanna hear your silly deflection about abortions...that's a diversion tactic and a rather silly one at that.

Just be honest...what is the outcome you'd hope to see from one more law added to the already overcrowded regulation book?
The libs/dems of today are the Quislings of former years. The cowards who would vote a fraud into office in exchange for handouts from the devil.

Creator of the largest Fight Club thread ever!

http://conservativecave.com/index.php?topic=83285.0

Offline RobJohnson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8876
  • Reputation: +333/-109
Re: BainsBane Propositioned By A Pimp
« Reply #854 on: January 18, 2014, 01:27:30 AM »
There is no inconsistency between being a feminist and flirting "with the boys."  I have never said nor do I believe that all men are potential rapists.  I get particularly ticked off at some of the men at DU because they claim to be feminists while insisting that posting about gender issues is "flame bait." Not only that, some feel entitled to tell me I'm not a real feminist because I disagree with them.  I much prefer someone be straight with me then pull that bullshit. It's the dishonesty of it all that really ticks me off.  One even recently claimed that everything since the right to vote (1920) was "small potatoes." They call themselves feminists for rhetorical purposes.  A number have the annoying habit of saying "I support NARAL" while turning around and telling women to keep their mouths shut or referring to a woman as a "skanky snatch."  I get sick of the insinuation that abortion rights are the sum total of acceptable feminist causes.  I certainly do not hate men, even if some of them tick me off.  Some women tick me off too; that doesn't mean I hate women.  So when you see me pissed off over there, it's often because I can't stand the pretense.  I also hate the constant efforts to shut up feminists.  

The Democratic Party does not favor redistribution of wealth.  That is precisely what the current tax system that penalizes people who work for a wage over the elite who live off investment income.  Some of those guys manage to pay zero taxes, despite being mutli-millionares.  I think we all know Romney must have had a damn good reason for not releasing his taxes.  I see only two logical scenarios: he didn't pay taxes some of those years and/or he applied for amnesty under the IRS program that allowed  tax cheats to declare money that had illegally stashed overseas if they filed amended returns for a few years.  I don't want to refight the election but rather cite that as an example of redistribution.  You and I pay taxes for the roads, airports, and ports through which products sold by big corporations are transported, while we pay the taxes for the infrastructure that guys like Romney get for free, despite using far more of it than we do.  I have one car.  An average family of four might have two.  Rich guys have several, yet some manage to avoid paying taxes at all.  I have nothing against rich people and don't begrudge them their success, but they should pay their way.  A number of corporations also pay no taxes, and while the US has a relatively high marginal tax rate it has a low EFFECTIVE tax rate, meaning what they actually pay.  

I will also note that since I live in MN, my taxes are redistributed to the red states, all of which (except for Texas) live off the federal trough because they take in more in federal money than they send to DC.  States like MN and NJ are the opposite.  That GOP redistribution argument is a smokescreen to hide all the redistribution currently going on.  Add all the corporate subsidies, sweetheart contracts, and special.tax breaks, and the whole thing is rigged against average Americans.  That is something that extends beyond party and any particular presidential administration.  

I

Romney did produce tax records.

Quote
Mitt Romney made $13.7 million last year and paid $1.94 million in federal income taxes, giving him an effective tax rate of 14.1%, his campaign said Friday.

That was after he and his wife donated 4M to charity.

http://money.cnn.com/2012/09/21/pf/taxes/romney-tax-return/index.html

So even if you made a few valid points in your reply, I have to dismiss it as you included too many things that are not true.


Offline Freeper

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17779
  • Reputation: +1311/-314
  • Creepy ass cracker.
Re: BainsBane Propositioned By A Pimp
« Reply #855 on: January 18, 2014, 03:53:31 AM »
The democrat party does not support the redistribution of wealth?  That is either a cute attempt at humor or you are ignorant of the policies of those you support. The main function of the democrat party is to redistribute wealth in order to buy votes.
I may not lock my doors while sitting at a red light and a black man is near, but I sure as hell grab on tight to my wallet when any democrats are close by.

Offline Carl

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19837
  • Reputation: +1617/-100
Re: BainsBane Propositioned By A Pimp
« Reply #856 on: January 18, 2014, 04:48:17 AM »


The Democratic Party does not favor redistribution of wealth.  That is precisely what the current tax system that penalizes people who work for a wage over the elite who live off investment income.  Some of those guys manage to pay zero taxes, despite being mutli-millionares.  I think we all know Romney must have had a damn good reason for not releasing his taxes.  I see only two logical scenarios: he didn't pay taxes some of those years and/or he applied for amnesty under the IRS program that allowed  tax cheats to declare money that had illegally stashed overseas if they filed amended returns for a few years.  I don't want to refight the election but rather cite that as an example of redistribution.  You and I pay taxes for the roads, airports, and ports through which products sold by big corporations are transported, while we pay the taxes for the infrastructure that guys like Romney get for free, despite using far more of it than we do.  I have one car.  An average family of four might have two.  Rich guys have several, yet some manage to avoid paying taxes at all.  I have nothing against rich people and don't begrudge them their success, but they should pay their way.  A number of corporations also pay no taxes, and while the US has a relatively high marginal tax rate it has a low EFFECTIVE tax rate, meaning what they actually pay.  

 

You are a brainless idiot that listens to talking points drivel and believes it without question.

"Dems do not favor redistribution"...that is either a lie as big as anything spewed out of odumbos mouth or proof of a stupidity beyond human recognition.
That is precisely what the new mayor of NYC carries on about,it is the,for the moment,desperation campaign dems are going to try in 2014 and is exactly what Ocare does and was intended for.

Do you have any clue why capital gains are taxed at a lower rate then income?
You either don`t or once more are content to sit back and spew the lie because you think the politics of envy is a winning scheme.
The latter is probably the case as your ilk worships Soros and happily cheered Buffet as he said the rich should pay more,all the while as one of or the richest men in America he fights the IRS to not pay taxes they say he owes.

Educated ****ing cretin.

Offline miskie

  • Mailman for the VRWC
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10461
  • Reputation: +1035/-54
  • Make America Great Again. Deport some DUmmies.
Re: BainsBane Propositioned By A Pimp
« Reply #857 on: January 18, 2014, 05:57:27 AM »
Take it up with the site owners.  Legal responsibility falls to them. 

So, what you are saying is that linking to the image is fine, but actually hosting it is the problem. Gotcha.


Your site has been informed that you are using that photo if violation of Photobucket's privacy and Photobucket provisions.  In downloading it or continuing to use a photo which is not legally publicly accessible on the web, you are engaging in THEFT.  That shows a complete disregard for property rights and makes you a CRIMINAL.  Each and every time someone here uses that photo, they are willfully and purposefully violating the property rights of others and engaging in criminal activity.  Photobucket removed those pictures for a reason, yet you lack enough respect for PROPERTY rights to follow the law.  That shows how completely hollow your political ideology is.  If property rights can be used to justify allowing 25,000 people to die every year, it's all good, but if violating property rights allows you to make fun of someone who dares to think differently from you, the hell with the law.  That is hypocrisy, which is of course the hallmark of teabaggers.  

Here is your problem.

YOU posted the image on DU, making it 'legally publicly accessible on the web'. Once you did that You GAVE PERMISSION for it to be used via DU's TOS.

Voluntary Public Disclosure

The Democratic Underground Site may include features, such as discussion forums, blog comment forms and related tools, that allow users to publicly share information about themselves. Any information a user discloses in these areas is publicly available on the Internet. Such information may be read, archived, collected, or used by other Internet users, including automated services such as search engines. Democratic Underground is not responsible for personally identifiable information you choose to publicly disclose, and urges users to exercise caution when disclosing information that may be personal in nature.

Once you posted that picture, you gave it to the world. -And once something falls into being free to distribute, it cannot be reclassified as no longer free to distribute. The best you can do is make it no longer available, but the copies that exist while it was available are still legal to own.

Now is someone went and hacked your PB account to get that image, you would have a case. But that didn't happen.

-If I were you, I'd consider that a lesson learned and not post something that you don't want the world to have copies of on DU again.

 

Offline SSG Snuggle Bunny

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23553
  • Reputation: +2479/-270
  • Voted Rookie-of-the-Year, 3 years running
Re: BainsBane Propositioned By A Pimp
« Reply #858 on: January 18, 2014, 07:09:17 AM »
I HATE that 9/11 BS.  I hate all that conspiracy bullshit.  You can't tie me to any of that garbage.  

And when you came here and accused of planting the bombs in Boston? What was that?
According to the Bible, "know" means "yes."

Offline Skul

  • Sometimes I drink water just to surprise my liver
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12475
  • Reputation: +914/-179
  • Chief of the cathouse
Re: BainsBane Propositioned By A Pimp
« Reply #859 on: January 18, 2014, 07:22:37 AM »
Interesting...

Quote
The 1961 Report of the Register of Copyrights on the General Revision of the U.S. Copyright Law cites examples of activities that courts have regarded as fair use: “quotation of excerpts in a review or criticism for purposes of illustration or comment; quotation of short passages in a scholarly or technical work, for illustration or clarification of the author’s observations; use in a parody of some of the content of the work parodied; summary of an address or article, with brief quotations, in a news report; reproduction by a library of a portion of a work to replace part of a damaged copy; reproduction by a teacher or student of a small part of a work to illustrate a lesson; reproduction of a work in legislative or judicial proceedings or reports; incidental and fortuitous reproduction, in a newsreel or broadcast, of a work located in the scene of an event being reported.”

Comment?
Then-Chief Justice John Marshall observed, “Between a balanced republic and a democracy, the difference is like that between order and chaos.”

John Adams warned in a letter, “Remember democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet, that did not commit suicide.”

Offline SSG Snuggle Bunny

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23553
  • Reputation: +2479/-270
  • Voted Rookie-of-the-Year, 3 years running
Re: BainsBane Propositioned By A Pimp
« Reply #860 on: January 18, 2014, 07:23:55 AM »
Meanwhile, here's an entire thread of Proglodytes making excuses as to why a rapist-murderer who had trial, discovery, counsel, appeals, etc. should not be put to death

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024351106

but 1.5 million children (overwhelmingly minority) can be snuffed for free and without question every year.

And then they will discuss why the victim should never be allowed to own a gun for defense.

And then they'll discuss the "culture of rape."

Save the criminal.

Disarm the victim.

Accuse the innocent

Slaughter the unborn

THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY: WE KNOW WHAT'S FAIR
According to the Bible, "know" means "yes."

Offline obumazombie

  • Siege engine to lib fortresses
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21814
  • Reputation: +1661/-578
  • Last of the great minorities
Re: BainsBane Propositioned By A Pimp
« Reply #861 on: January 18, 2014, 07:46:23 AM »
Meanwhile, here's an entire thread of Proglodytes making excuses as to why a rapist-murderer who had trial, discovery, counsel, appeals, etc. should not be put to death

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024351106

but 1.5 million children (overwhelmingly minority) can be snuffed for free and without question every year.

And then they will discuss why the victim should never be allowed to own a gun for defense.

And then they'll discuss the "culture of rape."

Save the criminal.

Disarm the victim.

Accuse the innocent

Slaughter the unborn

THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY: WE KNOW WHAT'S FAIR

And we are going to impose what's fair on our minions at the threat of a point of a gun.
There were only two options for gender. At last count there are at least 12, according to libs. By that standard, I'm a male lesbian.

Offline wasp69

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7567
  • Reputation: +907/-520
  • Hillbilly Yeti
Re: BainsBane Propositioned By A Pimp
« Reply #862 on: January 18, 2014, 09:25:30 AM »
The Democratic Party does not favor redistribution of wealth.  

You are so full of shit...

Quote
I think we all know Romney must have had a damn good reason for not releasing his taxes.  I see only two logical scenarios: he didn't pay taxes some of those years and/or he applied for amnesty under the IRS program that allowed  tax cheats to declare money that had illegally stashed overseas if they filed amended returns for a few years.

You think "we all know"?   :whatever:

Romney released what he was legally obligated to release and gave the finger to the liberal vermin who would have never been satisfied with anything he said or did.  But, it's all good, you cretins ****ed everybody that lives off of an investment income when the rate was raised in 2013.  In your greed, you screwed everyone from the retired billionaire to the retired teacher.

As for the rest of your assumptions, they are just that - your assumptions.  Had any of what you said actually happened, it would have been wall to wall news forever.  Instead, it was a bunch of bullshit rumors that no one could prove, not even Little Harry Reid.  

Quote
I will also note that since I live in MN, my taxes are redistributed to the red states, all of which (except for Texas) live off the federal trough because they take in more in federal money than they send to DC.  States like MN and NJ are the opposite.  That GOP redistribution argument is a smokescreen to hide all the redistribution currently going on.  Add all the corporate subsidies, sweetheart contracts, and special.tax breaks, and the whole thing is rigged against average Americans.  That is something that extends beyond party and any particular presidential administration.  

This bullshit meme?   :whatever:  Link it, DUmmie...
« Last Edit: January 18, 2014, 09:28:51 AM by wasp69 »
"We make men without chests and expect of them virtue and enterprise. We laugh at honor and are shocked to find traitors in our midst. We castrate and then bid the geldings to be fruitful."

C.S. Lewis

A community may possess all the necessary moral qualifications, in so high a degree, as to be capable of self-government under the most adverse circumstances; while, on the other hand, another may be so sunk in ignorance and vice, as to be incapable of forming a conception of liberty, or of living, even when most favored by circumstances, under any other than an absolute and despotic government.

John C Calhoun, "Disquisition on Government", 1840

Offline Traveshamockery

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4391
  • Reputation: +373/-54
  • Nana to Kyle and Garrett
Re: BainsBane Propositioned By A Pimp
« Reply #863 on: January 18, 2014, 09:45:44 AM »
Why is she still here?  She was banned once.  While I believe in giving people second chances, Alex is not people.  She's soylent green.   :rant:

Offline DumbAss Tanker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28493
  • Reputation: +1710/-151
Re: BainsBane Propositioned By A Pimp
« Reply #864 on: January 18, 2014, 10:02:40 AM »
Quote
I will also note that since I live in MN, my taxes are redistributed to the red states, all of which (except for Texas) live off the federal trough because they take in more in federal money than they send to DC.  States like MN and NJ are the opposite. 

There are so many holes in that meme that it is hardly worth addressing, but let me just say that the vast majority of that money goes into buying votes in Blue enclaves and Federal programs which we could do without handily, and military spending which by its nature is going to be concentrated in States where there are military installations and the host state governments are not actively hostile to the military using training land within the state.
Go and tell the Spartans, O traveler passing by
That here, obedient to their law, we lie.

Anything worth shooting once is worth shooting at least twice.

Offline obumazombie

  • Siege engine to lib fortresses
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21814
  • Reputation: +1661/-578
  • Last of the great minorities
Re: BainsBane Propositioned By A Pimp
« Reply #865 on: January 18, 2014, 10:47:15 AM »
Why is she still here?  She was banned once.  While I believe in giving people second chances, Alex is not people.  She's soylent green.   :rant:

How dare you ?
Soylent green is people !
Spoiler alert ?
There were only two options for gender. At last count there are at least 12, according to libs. By that standard, I'm a male lesbian.

Offline Traveshamockery

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4391
  • Reputation: +373/-54
  • Nana to Kyle and Garrett
Re: BainsBane Propositioned By A Pimp
« Reply #866 on: January 18, 2014, 12:00:15 PM »
How dare you ?
Soylent green is people !
Spoiler alert ?



How dare you dare me?!?!?! 11111 eleventy 1111111!!!!!!!

Offline BattleHymn

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8758
  • Reputation: +981/-63
  • Not right, but not left, either.
Re: BainsBane Propositioned By A Pimp
« Reply #867 on: January 18, 2014, 12:25:45 PM »

How dare you dare me?!?!?! 11111 eleventy 1111111!!!!!!!

I thought you would have learned your lesson last night after the switching and paddling you probably got!  Daring people?  That's a paddlin'. 

[youtube=425,350]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKDnviT0FIQ[/youtube]

Offline anti-spelunker

  • Banned
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
  • Reputation: +10/-127
Re: BainsBane Propositioned By A Pimp
« Reply #868 on: January 18, 2014, 03:59:53 PM »
So, what you are saying is that linking to the image is fine, but actually hosting it is the problem. Gotcha.


Here is your problem.

YOU posted the image on DU, making it 'legally publicly accessible on the web'. Once you did that You GAVE PERMISSION for it to be used via DU's TOS.

Once you posted that picture, you gave it to the world. -And once something falls into being free to distribute, it cannot be reclassified as no longer free to distribute. The best you can do is make it no longer available, but the copies that exist while it was available are still legal to own.

Now is someone went and hacked your PB account to get that image, you would have a case. But that didn't happen.

-If I were you, I'd consider that a lesson learned and not post something that you don't want the world to have copies of on DU again.

 

How do you know Skinner hasn't paid for copyright to use that avatar?  I would assume he has.  It often doesn't cost much.  I know at work we paid a small sum to use a design for our website and flyers and the payment we made, I was told, covered future use. 


I took the photo off DU.  I changed access on Photobucket so it is no longer public.  Photobucket removed the photos from this site (the links I knew about) and informed you use of the photo constituted a violation of copyright and their terms of service.  You have no excuse.  Unless of course you really don't respect property rights.  And yes, I'm quite aware that I used your own arguments against you (the irony Big Dog referred to),  That was the point.  Do you really care about the principals you espouse?  It appears not.  You make excuses about violating property rights when it suits you. 

Offline anti-spelunker

  • Banned
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
  • Reputation: +10/-127
Re: BainsBane Propositioned By A Pimp
« Reply #869 on: January 18, 2014, 04:10:22 PM »
Quote
Romney did produce tax records.

Romney provided one year and then a promise to provide another.  He eventually provided an estimate for that second year (2011) and IIRC released the second year shortly before the election.  Presidential candidates in recent years have released multiple years of tax returns. http://www.taxhistory.org/www/website.nsf/Web/PresidentialTaxReturns?OpenDocument  He took a lot of heat for refusing to release them. and it came up often during the election.  In my opinion, it looked like he had something to hide.  Some voters came to the same conclusion.  My belief is that refusing to release more of his tax returns and the 47% comment were his biggest liabilities in the election. That and the fact he's a prat, but he was always going to be a prat.  It's who he is, so he couldn't help that.  The other two things he could have controlled, particularly releasing his taxes.  It was the only thing he didn't flip flop about during the election.  He must have had a damn good reason why.   

Offline Carl

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19837
  • Reputation: +1617/-100
Re: BainsBane Propositioned By A Pimp
« Reply #870 on: January 18, 2014, 04:11:05 PM »
You are a dumb,idiotic moron...God help those you "teach" as they have no hope if they listen to your lunatic crap.

Why did your party dump Hillary in 2008?
How does that make you feel?

Offline anti-spelunker

  • Banned
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
  • Reputation: +10/-127
Re: BainsBane Propositioned By A Pimp
« Reply #871 on: January 18, 2014, 04:11:49 PM »
And when you came here and accused of planting the bombs in Boston? What was that?

That was a joke.  You all seem to think I actually believed you were the bombers. I did not. 

Offline anti-spelunker

  • Banned
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
  • Reputation: +10/-127
Re: BainsBane Propositioned By A Pimp
« Reply #872 on: January 18, 2014, 04:15:11 PM »
FYI, I won't be responding to posts that are insulting. 

Offline Carl

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19837
  • Reputation: +1617/-100
Re: BainsBane Propositioned By A Pimp
« Reply #873 on: January 18, 2014, 04:26:29 PM »
No idiot,you want to play here then you ovary up.
If not then run away like the coward leftists are.

Offline redwhit

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1046
  • Reputation: +242/-11
Re: BainsBane Propositioned By A Pimp
« Reply #874 on: January 18, 2014, 04:32:02 PM »
FYI, I won't be responding to posts that are insulting. 

But you feel free to "joke" about bombs in my town that maimed hundreds and would have killed thousands had the bombers been more patient. Bullshit and you know it.  You've been dying for an act of violence to occur with a "Tea Party" flag on it but, unfortunately for you, all the violence comes from leftists.