What?
We've all been told:
(a) the primitives think Barry "Goldwater" Obama can win without the votes of a significant number of supporters of the worthier Democrat candidate.
(b) the primitives think Barry "Goldwater" Obama can win without the votes of those pro-Second Amendment.
(c) the primitives think Barry "Goldwater" Obama can win without the southern states.
(d) the primitives think Barry "Goldwater" Obama can win without the bigot vote.
(e) the primitives think Barry "Goldwater" Obama can win without the "fundie" vote.
(f) the primitives think Barry "Goldwater" Obama can win without the pro-life vote.
We've all been told this by the primitives; there's been lots and lots of bonfires on these subjects.
So now the primitives think Barry "Goldwater" Obama CAN'T win without Michigan?
Why did the thinking of the primitives suddenly take this unexpected twist?