Thanks BFDU, and I agree. I'm not especially religious, and certainly don't have the strident views against abortion that many conservatives and fellow members here here on the religious grounds. That having been said, I am certainly against abortion. I just don't wear my political stripes on my sleeve, other than fiscal conservatism. I've just always thought that abortion was wrong and immoral, even when I was a stupid young Democrat who voted for Dukakis in 1988. Thankfully I transformed into a complete conservative (not necessarily always Republican) within a few years after.
I'll leave the anti-abortion discussion to those who are parents and know their bible far better than I do.
There is absolutely no reason to know the Bible in order to debate how wrong abortion is...there are plenty of medical reasons. Point 1, the "fetus" is obviously human. Point 2, the fetus has a beating heart. Point 3, the fetus has brain activity. Point 4, the laws for and against the use of fetal tissue make it clear those tissues are not from some animal or plant.
I have often run across the argument that "Cancer is just like a fetus, it has it's own DNA, is alive, and grows." Of course, this is a stupid argument on the face of it because no cancer ever is born a person even a DUmmy can recognize as such, but that fact hasn't swayed those that use it. So I actually ran across a medical fact that destroys that stupid argument...cancer absorbs radiation when it is attached to a sugar base in ways NO other cells absorb it...including fetal cells. In fact, that is how cancer cells are pinpointed in testing and in radiation of tumors.

Bottom line, the biggest argument against abortion is the simplest one...the child is obviously human, and no human of any specific level of development, specific location, amount of dependency, or size is LESS human than any other human.