Author Topic: Kansas sues man for child support after donating sperm to dyke couple  (Read 2449 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Tucker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10937
  • Reputation: +540/-97
  • Making money the old fashioned way- Paid Mole
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022093836

Quote
proud2BlibKansan (95,004 posts)

View profile
Kansas pursues child support from sperm donor
TOPEKA -- A Kansas man who signed away any parental rights when he donated sperm to a Topeka couple is now being pursued by the state for child support after the mother received financial assistance for the baby.

A lawyer for William Marotta argues that the state’s effort to have Marotta declared the baby’s father runs contrary to a 2007 Kansas Supreme Court ruling on sperm donors, The Topeka Capital-Journal reported.

A hearing on Marotta’s motion to dismiss the case is scheduled for Jan. 8 in Shawnee County District Court.

Marotta, a Topeka mechanic who has taken in foster children with his wife, answered a Craigslist ad in 2009 from a lesbian couple seeking a sperm donor.

The women who placed the ad, Angela Bauer and Jennifer Schreiner, described themselves in an email to Marotta as a “financially stable lesbian couple,” with Bauer working outside the home and Schreiner being a stay-at-home mom with their other children

Read more here: http://www.kansascity.com/2012/12/29/3986152/state-pursuing-child-support-from.html#storylink=cpy

Another C&P job from Anne Ryan Pritchett

Quote
bluestateguy (39,642 posts)
3. That's why it's not a good idea to ever donate your sperm

View profile
You never know how the laws or court rulings could change years down the road.

I would never donate to a freak couple under no circumstances.

Quote
appleannie1 (2,511 posts)
6. Nice way to prevent couples from becoming parents if the are lesbian or the husband can't father.

View profile
a child.

Hopefully this suit will do just that.

Quote
Chemisse (18,343 posts)
28. It would sure seem so.

View profile
Although one can hardly blame the mother's actions.

But if the donor is responsible for child support, he could be equally in the running for custody of the child.

This would make freaks everywhere go Apeshitz.

Quote
ProfessionalLeftist (4,254 posts)
14. What bullshit. The man has no parental responsibility here.

View profile
What an effed-up sitch.

We will soon find out.

Quote
Spryguy (64 posts)
15. He needs to "man up" and "pay up!"

Quote
proud2BlibKansan (95,004 posts)
20. What?

Finally an original post. :rofl:

Quote
Nye Bevan (8,937 posts)
21. What a jerk-off thing to do (nt)

Why would someone assist in bringing a child into this world to a queer couple? They change partners like decent and normal people change their underwear.

Same sex couples have a baby is NOT normal. The kid will suffer mental problems their whole life. Probably end up going on a shooting spree, killing a dozen people, before being shot by a person with a legally concealed weapon.
Come to think of it, unions do create jobs. Companies have to hire two workers to do the work of one.

Offline Undies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2515
  • Reputation: +309/-54
Re: Kansas sues man for child support after donating sperm to dyke couple
« Reply #1 on: December 30, 2012, 08:58:03 AM »
I hope more of this happens to stupid men who let their sperm be used for such immoral and harmful purposes.  The same goes for women who use their wombs to supply homosexual men some handy babies/children.

My son asked me the other day why I am so opposed to homosexuals getting "married".  I gave him my standard answer:  Homosexual is not a race of people.  Get back to me when they don't require a third person in order to conceive a child. 

Offline vesta111

  • In Memoriam
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9712
  • Reputation: +493/-1154
Re: Kansas sues man for child support after donating sperm to dyke couple
« Reply #2 on: December 30, 2012, 09:37:42 AM »
I hope more of this happens to stupid men who let their sperm be used for such immoral and harmful purposes.  The same goes for women who use their wombs to supply homosexual men some handy babies/children.

My son asked me the other day why I am so opposed to homosexuals getting "married".  I gave him my standard answer:  Homosexual is not a race of people.  Get back to me when they don't require a third person in order to conceive a child. 

Damn this will put a halt to lesbian couples getting a gay friend to donate sperm to a turkey baster.

Fancy this , a gay male is coursed by friendship or being drunk to donate sperm to a female.  2 years later he is sued for child support.   DNA shows he is the father------- What rights does he now have to see the child that he is paying up the nose for ???

Great scam here, two lesbos , figure they are young woman.   They find a gay man from a wealthy family and get him to donate sperm for them both.

Then the story of an old man that hired a hooker and used a condom, the hooker took the condom and self impregnated herself with the the sperm.   Old man dies and hooker shows up with a child with the old mans DNA,  Hooker demands part of the old mans estate for his leagel child.

Young man, do you know where your sperm is and who make use of this ???? 

Offline seahorse513

  • I don't take shit from anyone!!
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5260
  • Reputation: +492/-247
  • British by birth, American thru naturalization
Re: Kansas sues man for child support after donating sperm to dyke couple
« Reply #3 on: December 30, 2012, 09:49:03 AM »
The man should have had legal paperwork absolving him of any financial responsibility, before he donated the sperm....
The sea is treacherous, but an even hand on the keel brings it safely to port.

Nothing is sexier than a man and his gun!!!

A man should prefer his own company to that of others, because no matter where he goes,he'll find himself there..

"The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money".  Lady Maggie Thatcher

Offline miskie

  • Mailman for the VRWC
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10462
  • Reputation: +1035/-54
  • Make America Great Again. Deport some DUmmies.
Re: Kansas sues man for child support after donating sperm to dyke couple
« Reply #4 on: December 30, 2012, 09:57:53 AM »
Craigslist was this guy's first mistake.

CL has become the place where people trade in services and goods that a reputable source wouldn't list because they are scams, illegal, or both.

Offline Tucker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10937
  • Reputation: +540/-97
  • Making money the old fashioned way- Paid Mole
Re: Kansas sues man for child support after donating sperm to dyke couple
« Reply #5 on: December 30, 2012, 10:03:27 AM »
Craigslist was this guy's first mistake.

CL has become the place where people trade in services and goods that a reputable source wouldn't list because they are scams, illegal, or both.

He got scammed, big time.

When the dyke was asked who the father was, why didn't she say "unknown" instead of naming names?
Come to think of it, unions do create jobs. Companies have to hire two workers to do the work of one.

Offline DLR Pyro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9389
  • Reputation: +1560/-29
Re: Kansas sues man for child support after donating sperm to dyke couple
« Reply #6 on: December 30, 2012, 10:33:49 AM »
[youtube=425,350]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fUspLVStPbk[/youtube]
Biden is an illegitimate President.  Change my mind.

Police lives matter.

Basking in the glow of my white privilege

ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Wed Mar-09-11 08:50 PM
64.I'd almost be willing to get a job in order to participate in
A NATIONAL GENERAL STRIKE
  https://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x4763020

Online jukin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16251
  • Reputation: +2125/-170
Re: Kansas sues man for child support after donating sperm to dyke couple
« Reply #7 on: December 30, 2012, 11:24:39 AM »
Just so I understand another One Way Street for the left.

A man is totally responsible for a baby.
A man can have no say in if the baby makes it out of the womb alive.

Sounds just as fair and balanced an approach as a leftist will take.

Let's compromise and do everything my way.
When you are the beneficiary of someone’s kindness and generosity, it produces a sense of gratitude and community.

When you are the beneficiary of a policy that steals from someone and gives it to you in return for your vote, it produces a sense of entitlement and dependency.

Offline DumbAss Tanker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28493
  • Reputation: +1710/-151
Re: Kansas sues man for child support after donating sperm to dyke couple
« Reply #8 on: December 30, 2012, 12:25:45 PM »
The man should have had legal paperwork absolving him of any financial responsibility, before he donated the sperm....

It wouldn't work, the right to support is the child's, not the mother's, and when the State pays out bennies they are standing in for the child's other parent.  She could have waived HER right to collect from him, but not the child's or the State's.
Go and tell the Spartans, O traveler passing by
That here, obedient to their law, we lie.

Anything worth shooting once is worth shooting at least twice.

Offline thundley4

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40571
  • Reputation: +2224/-127
Re: Kansas sues man for child support after donating sperm to dyke couple
« Reply #9 on: December 30, 2012, 01:05:28 PM »
The reason the DUmmies are so upset is that they see this as an attack on the rights of ghey couples to have children.  If sperm donors can be made to be culpable for child support, then men are less likely to donate to dykes.

However, how would this affect normal couples who use sperm banks for IVF treatments?  Could the anonymous donors be tracked down and made to pay child support?

Offline GOBUCKS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24186
  • Reputation: +1812/-339
  • All in all, not bad, not bad at all
Re: Kansas sues man for child support after donating sperm to dyke couple
« Reply #10 on: December 30, 2012, 01:11:47 PM »
Serves the moron right for getting involved in such a perverted enterprise.

Offline andhe78

  • Banned
  • Just Off Probation
  • *
  • Posts: 121
  • Reputation: +7/-10
Re: Kansas sues man for child support after donating sperm to dyke couple
« Reply #11 on: December 30, 2012, 03:53:06 PM »
Wow, just when I thought things in this country couldn't get any dumber.

Offline Tucker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10937
  • Reputation: +540/-97
  • Making money the old fashioned way- Paid Mole
Re: Kansas sues man for child support after donating sperm to dyke couple
« Reply #12 on: December 30, 2012, 03:58:06 PM »
Wow, just when I thought things in this country couldn't get any dumber.

Never think that while DUmmies still live.
Come to think of it, unions do create jobs. Companies have to hire two workers to do the work of one.

Offline USA4ME

  • Evil Capitalist
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14835
  • Reputation: +2476/-76
Re: Kansas sues man for child support after donating sperm to dyke couple
« Reply #13 on: December 30, 2012, 05:30:58 PM »
Quote from:
The women who placed the ad, Angela Bauer and Jennifer Schreiner, described themselves in an email to Marotta as a “financially stable lesbian couple,” with Bauer working outside the home and Schreiner being a stay-at-home mom with their other children.

...couple is now being pursued by the state for child support after the mother received financial assistance for the baby.

Doesn't sound so financially stable, does it?

.
Because third world peasant labor is a good thing.

Offline GOP Congress

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2334
  • Reputation: +274/-113
Re: Kansas sues man for child support after donating sperm to dyke couple
« Reply #14 on: December 30, 2012, 05:47:45 PM »
I'm curious about something.

Let's say the guy donated his junk sauce to a "financial stable HETERO couple," say because the guy was impotent. Now let's further say this guy leaves his girl, and now she has to go hit the Obama stash. Can the state still sue the original donor? I"m just throwing this out there because I believe this problem is actually more of a selfish issue than it is a sexual-orientation issue. In short, I would prefer a homosexual couple not on the dole than a heterosexual couple who takes benefits, but I guess that's the Libertarian in me. Of course, my preference will always be one woman/one man, no government dole, but that's not part of my question.
"The main purpose of the Democrat Party and the Left is to destroy the United States, transform Western Civilization to a tribal-based dystopia, and to ultimately kill all conservatives and non progressives." - Jonah Kyle

Offline Tucker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10937
  • Reputation: +540/-97
  • Making money the old fashioned way- Paid Mole
Re: Kansas sues man for child support after donating sperm to dyke couple
« Reply #15 on: December 30, 2012, 06:16:42 PM »
I'm curious about something.

Let's say the guy donated his junk sauce to a "financial stable HETERO couple," say because the guy was impotent. Now let's further say this guy leaves his girl, and now she has to go hit the Obama stash. Can the state still sue the original donor? I"m just throwing this out there because I believe this problem is actually more of a selfish issue than it is a sexual-orientation issue. In short, I would prefer a homosexual couple not on the dole than a heterosexual couple who takes benefits, but I guess that's the Libertarian in me. Of course, my preference will always be one woman/one man, no government dole, but that's not part of my question.

Which couple would be more likely to fall apart, a hetro couple or a dyke couple?

No need to answer as it rhetorical.
Come to think of it, unions do create jobs. Companies have to hire two workers to do the work of one.

Offline DumbAss Tanker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28493
  • Reputation: +1710/-151
Re: Kansas sues man for child support after donating sperm to dyke couple
« Reply #16 on: December 30, 2012, 07:10:43 PM »
I'm curious about something.

Let's say the guy donated his junk sauce to a "financial stable HETERO couple," say because the guy was impotent. Now let's further say this guy leaves his girl, and now she has to go hit the Obama stash. Can the state still sue the original donor? I"m just throwing this out there because I believe this problem is actually more of a selfish issue than it is a sexual-orientation issue. In short, I would prefer a homosexual couple not on the dole than a heterosexual couple who takes benefits, but I guess that's the Libertarian in me. Of course, my preference will always be one woman/one man, no government dole, but that's not part of my question.

Several states whose high courts have decided cases in this area in the past 15 years or so have drawn the line between situations where the donor has no idea where the goop is going (I.e. he just donated or sold it to a legally-licensed sperm bank, with no control over what they did with it) versus situations where a specific donor knew there would be a specific identified recipient in advance, with no support obligation in the first case but an affirmative obligation in the second.  In this situation though it sounds like Kansas has a statute that may directly control the case without resorting to hairsplitting over the meaning of any precedent cases.
Go and tell the Spartans, O traveler passing by
That here, obedient to their law, we lie.

Anything worth shooting once is worth shooting at least twice.

Offline vesta111

  • In Memoriam
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9712
  • Reputation: +493/-1154
Re: Kansas sues man for child support after donating sperm to dyke couple
« Reply #17 on: December 31, 2012, 06:59:59 AM »
Several states whose high courts have decided cases in this area in the past 15 years or so have drawn the line between situations where the donor has no idea where the goop is going (I.e. he just donated or sold it to a legally-licensed sperm bank, with no control over what they did with it) versus situations where a specific donor knew there would be a specific identified recipient in advance, with no support obligation in the first case but an affirmative obligation in the second.  In this situation though it sounds like Kansas has a statute that may directly control the case without resorting to hairsplitting over the meaning of any precedent cases.

Some times the Twilight Zone comes to town.

Sometime ago in Norfork VA. the darnedest case came up that still has ramifications for about 50+ family's. 

Screw ball doctor at fertility clinic went round the bend and did the unthinkable.

How it was Suppost to work, -----When the husband was sterile for some reason,  he and wife would come into doctors office and spend an hour going over pix of Medical students needing cash that donate [sell ] sperm.

Matches in race, blood type and eye color, body build were made to find someone most resembling the husband.

This was how it usually goes,   However the Doctor did not take take everything into account.   Being a Military Town with people moving in and out all the time he must have thought he would not get caught.  Dumb s*it of a doctor did not think of the Military that retires or gets out to take a civilian job and stays in that area.

Up shot of this dastardly deed is a Female Doctor at one of the Military hospitals became concerned as the number of pregnant women she saw in one years time that had sperm donors was 10+ times the amount she saw in 5 years and all had been to this clinic in town.

She began to poke around talking to other female doctors in the area from other hospitals and alerted her CO that something was very fishy. The success rate of pregnancy's from that clinic was quite surprising.

Meanwhile the Doctor that headed up the whole shebang made a major mistake.  He took a month off for vacation and someone he put in charge screwed up everything royal. 

Seems a white woman gave birth to a Black child.  Holy Crap broke out and the doctor had some explaining to do.  Law suits ensued big time and records of successful pregnancy's sought.  Clinic put up a patient privacy claim but the family's of the children began to waver that policy and some how DNA tests tracked the children's biological father to the scum bag doctor. At least 50+ children in school from K-6 grade involved.[ that they could find ].

All the legal top lawyers somehow managed to protect the Doctor and his clinic Until one woman talked others into charging him with RAPE.     This brings another dimension to the case.  Was the doctor responsible for child support ??  Stripped of his Medical license by the State but he could move out of State and get a new one under 
clinics that were so far out west or even another country that had no idea of his past record.

Moral thing this:  children of both sexes getting to the age of dating in a few years, What If.

Moral, sell your sperm and 20 years later wonder about who your daughter or son is in love with.

Life is a crap shoot, never know when something will come along to destroy it.

BTW all parents including the white couple with the black baby kept their children, Allot of divorces but that may have happend anyway.   



   


Offline miskie

  • Mailman for the VRWC
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10462
  • Reputation: +1035/-54
  • Make America Great Again. Deport some DUmmies.
Re: Kansas sues man for child support after donating sperm to dyke couple
« Reply #18 on: December 31, 2012, 08:41:10 AM »
I'm curious about something.

Let's say the guy donated his junk sauce to a "financial stable HETERO couple," say because the guy was impotent. Now let's further say this guy leaves his girl, and now she has to go hit the Obama stash. Can the state still sue the original donor? I"m just throwing this out there because I believe this problem is actually more of a selfish issue than it is a sexual-orientation issue. In short, I would prefer a homosexual couple not on the dole than a heterosexual couple who takes benefits, but I guess that's the Libertarian in me. Of course, my preference will always be one woman/one man, no government dole, but that's not part of my question.

I don't think its a matter of sexuality in this case - I think that the couple was looking for a 'sugar-daddy' and managed to find one by posting a sob-story on Craigslist. Its pretty difficult to become a lesbian 'welfare mom' otherwise. 

Offline wasp69

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7567
  • Reputation: +907/-520
  • Hillbilly Yeti
Re: Kansas sues man for child support after donating sperm to dyke couple
« Reply #19 on: December 31, 2012, 09:18:21 AM »
Quote
appleannie1 (2,511 posts)
6. Nice way to prevent couples from becoming parents if the are lesbian or the husband can't father.

a child.

Welcome to the world you have created, leftist trash.

:ownit:
"We make men without chests and expect of them virtue and enterprise. We laugh at honor and are shocked to find traitors in our midst. We castrate and then bid the geldings to be fruitful."

C.S. Lewis

A community may possess all the necessary moral qualifications, in so high a degree, as to be capable of self-government under the most adverse circumstances; while, on the other hand, another may be so sunk in ignorance and vice, as to be incapable of forming a conception of liberty, or of living, even when most favored by circumstances, under any other than an absolute and despotic government.

John C Calhoun, "Disquisition on Government", 1840