Sun Dec 16, 2012, 04:03 PM
nadinbrzezinski (113,326 posts)
.223 AR type assault weapon
Those are the words of the State Police Lieutenant doing the presser.
I think we have passed an important marker.
Oh and fair warning, you want to argue this is not an assault weapon...well, go argue with the state police.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022001706Response to nadinbrzezinski (Original post)
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 04:06 PM
frank380 (17 posts)
2. Assault weapon is a made up term.
That one very well may be an assault weapon. It's just a list of some guns some people made up.
It is NOT and assault rifle.
Response to frank380 (Reply #2)
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 04:11 PM
nadinbrzezinski (113,326 posts)
5. So Sturmweber is a made up term?
This is the grand daddy. Translates to assault riffle.
Thanks for the NRA talking point.
"Sturmweber" isn't a made up term.
It's a very lethal type of barbecue grill.
Response to justanidea (Reply #17)
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 04:24 PM
nadinbrzezinski (113,326 posts)
21. You are right
And the muzzle velocity and size of NATO round somehow is less damaging in a far more precise fire mode.
Look, we crossed the rubicon. I got the feeling these types of guns will be, rightly so, be heavily regulated it ain't even funny. Potential ROF, I want really tough background checks.
These are infantry riffles. So they can't do suppressive fire.
You want to keep them in civilian hands, cause, well they look gnarly and cool...work on the mechanism so they reduce their ROF significantly.
I thought we crossed the Rubicon when that nut shot the blue dog democrat in Arizona.
If we've crossed it again, does that mean we're back on the right side?
Are there riffles in the Rubicon?
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Original post)
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 04:08 PM
ileus (8,332 posts)
3. My ARs assault Coyotes and paper.
In the wrong hands rifles like these can assault humans...it's a sad world we live in these days.
Response to ileus (Reply #3)
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 04:12 PM
nadinbrzezinski (113,326 posts)
6. Damn overkill for the coyotes.
Crazy bald dwarf give proof she has no understanding whatsoever of weapons.
Response to aquart (Reply #10)
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 04:19 PM
nadinbrzezinski (113,326 posts)
16. People used to use a perfectly serviceable varmint gun for coyotes (.22)
But no...
More evidence of no understanding whatever.
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Original post)
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 04:12 PM
TheMastersNemesis (1,770 posts)
7. When I Was In Vietnam The .223 M-16 Was A Formidable Weapon ----
I walked up to two enemy that our squad leader shot in a skirmish. They were not initially hit in a vital part. The bullets migrated through the rest of their body. I also had report of a 2nd Lieutenant who was hit in the foot by a .223. It nearly took his foot off.
If you are hit by one of these rounds the story is that you would wish to be dead because of all the damage and hurt it puts in. It is deadlier and has more stopping power than a .45 caliber. It is mean to stop and maim and kill and nothing else. It is a bullet that is actually acts like a hollow point that is still technically legal.
This DUmpmonkey clearly thinks hollow point bullets are illegal.
Wonder what he'd think of the ultra-thin jacketed bullets we use for varmints that are designed to fragment on impact?
Nutcase nadin again refers to her Shootout at the Bullshit Corral.
Response to TheMastersNemesis (Reply #7)
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 04:16 PM
nadinbrzezinski (113,326 posts)
11. Due to the shootouts in TJ, and thanks to the cartels
I saw what these guns, in both popular types, NATO and Warsaw Pact, do to the human body.
An eight year old ate lead from one in his tummy. It wasn't pretty, and we worked our asses to keep him alive. According to the surgeons, who did manage to keep him alive, his spleen was ground round.
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #11)
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 04:26 PM
zappaman (6,282 posts)
24. Not to mention all those shootouts that you were involved in!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=1996780
Du's greatest and bravest warrior???
