Not really, an extra 10% of the Black vote is still only 1% of the total vote. And the factor Gina mentions is one of the big reasons why I think the way I do on this one.
That might be true if the presidential election were a popular national vote, but it's not.
This year's election depends on four dead heat swing states: Ohio, Florida, Virginia, and North Carolina.
The other forty-six (or in the muslim's case, the other fifty-three) are not so important.
In those four critical states, the black population ranges from 12% to 22%, I think, and blacks turned out in 2008 at a higher rate than whites.
The muslim counts on close to 98% of those votes. If he only got 85%, the swing would be enormous.
A thirteen percent change in the black vote would mean 13% of 12%-22%, or 1.5-2.9%.
If you give the Republican 1.5% and take 1.5% away from the jug-eared Kenyan, that's a swing of 3% in Ohio.
In North Carolina, the swing would be nearly 6%.
In other words, the Republican would likely win all the otherwise close states and their electoral votes.
I may be all wrong on this. To prove the math, I'd need to have help from former DUmmy TruthIsAll.
At any rate, I think it's dreaming to suggest the muslim will only get 85% of the black vote.
Some blacks may not like the democrat gay agenda, but deep down they know the Kenyan would much favor Sharia law,
under which all sex perverts would be stoned.
