Obama: ‘Same sex couples should be able to get married’

[Gina]

^That's beautiful Gina. The only thing that would be more beautiful is if you could have ousted him with no severance, retirement or any other compensation.
edited to add second sentence.

Thanks, I was actually scared for a while that I might be knocked off, for realz

[sybilll]

I can't stand Steve Cohen.  He is an asshole.  In fact back in the days when he was pushing the lottery he put out that he wanted people to call his office and let him know what they thought.  I thought the lottery was a cool idea and called and left a message.  He called back but it went to voicemail.  So he left this message about how he was happy that I called blah blah blah and then hung up or so he thought.  Turns out my voicemail recorded this whole convo about how the voters were assholes and him and some female were laughing about it.  Guess what I did?  I turned the recording over to my local talk radio station and they busted him.  A few days later they called for me and him to faceoff.  The radio host asked "what do you think after hearing Mr. Cohen disparage the voters" to which I replied "Well we are his employer and if my employee called me an asshole I would fire them".  Of course the POS didn't resign or apologize.

Gina, I can't wait to hear the local names associated with this story.  WTG girl. 

[indago]

Obama just sealed his loss this November.

LOOK!

UP IN THE SKY...

IT'S A BIRD...

IT'S A PLANE...

NO, IT'S SUPERFAG

[indago]

URBAN RADIO CALLERS SLAM OBAMA OVER GAY MARRIAGE SUPPORT

http://nation.foxnews.com/gay-marriage/2012/05/15/urban-radio-callers-slam-obama-over-gay-marriage-support

CALLER ANTHONY: "a male supposed to marry a female."

[Eupher]

blah, blah, blah...

Are you aware it's generally good form and courteous to introduce yourself to the forum? There is an entire forum set up for that purpose. I'm sure if you actually dig around a little, you'll find it.

Just post a thread introducing yourself. You need not tell your life story - just a few words to say hello.

Right now, you're sitting at 11 posts and you've merely waltzed in and started spreading stories, challenged other members, and otherwise have illustrated a less-than-optimal behavior pattern.

Just sayin'....

[CG6468]

Seems like there's the stench of a troll in the air.

[Kyle Ricky]

Bill Clinton came out and said that he agrees with Obama. I also heard that Chris Matthews called obama and congratulated him when he announced it (Could it be that Matthews is gay?). Now all the MSNBC viewers can get that shiver up their leg as well.

[obumazombie]

Are you aware it's generally good form and courteous to introduce yourself to the forum? There is an entire forum set up for that purpose. I'm sure if you actually dig around a little, you'll find it.

Just post a thread introducing yourself. You need not tell your life story - just a few words to say hello.

Right now, you're sitting at 11 posts and you've merely waltzed in and started spreading stories, challenged other members, and otherwise have illustrated a less-than-optimal behavior pattern.

Just sayin'....

He can't say he wasn't advised. I have as well in other threads.

[Eupher]

He can't say he wasn't advised. I have as well in other threads.

Yeah, I saw it. Just want to use a slightly larger brick to get his attention. Maybe it takes a cinder block.

[obumazombie]

Yeah, I saw it. Just want to use a slightly larger brick to get his attention. Maybe it takes a cinder block.

Not the old "Reginald Denny" brick ?

[indago]

He can't say he wasn't advised. I have as well in other threads.

Yes, I finally found the "Introductions" section.  It looks like The Inquisition:

How do you stand on fiscal issues?

How do you stand on social issues?

How do you stand on military issues?

I'm not into INQUISITION.

Eupher:  "Right now, you're sitting at 11 posts and you've merely waltzed in and started spreading stories, challenged other members, and otherwise have illustrated a less-than-optimal behavior pattern."

I have responded to a few postings, no different than what I have done on many other political message boards.  Over the years I have found that this is what message boards are for: to express opinions; respond to other postings; etc.  Your desire that I should comply with your wishes doesn't comport with free expression in our society.  And tickling your animosity delights me no end.

[obumazombie]

Yes, I finally found the "Introductions" section.  It looks like The Inquisition:

How do you stand on fiscal issues?

How do you stand on social issues?

How do you stand on military issues?

I'm not into INQUISITION.

Eupher:  "Right now, you're sitting at 11 posts and you've merely waltzed in and started spreading stories, challenged other members, and otherwise have illustrated a less-than-optimal behavior pattern."

I have responded to a few postings, no different than what I have done on many other political message boards.  Over the years I have found that this is what message boards are for: to express opinions; respond to other postings; etc.  Your desire that I should comply with your wishes doesn't comport with free expression in our society.  And tickling your animosity delights me no end.

I'm not aware an intro is mandatory, but it is quite polite, in this forum to introduce yourself. No one is going to be contemptuous of you opinions. This forum has wide latitude for all kinds of political and other views, but it's not a free for all. You don't have complete freedom of expression, nor should you unless you own the site, or maybe are the biggest contributor. We could very easily disagree in an agreeable fashion. But from what it seems you just want to be disagreeable. If you add dishonest to it, you won't be long for this forum.

[indago]

I'm not aware an intro is mandatory, but it is quite polite, in this forum to introduce yourself. No one is going to be contemptuous of you opinions. This forum has wide latitude for all kinds of political and other views, but it's not a free for all. You don't have complete freedom of expression, nor should you unless you own the site, or maybe are the biggest contributor. We could very easily disagree in an agreeable fashion. But from what it seems you just want to be disagreeable. If you add dishonest to it, you won't be long for this forum.

...and life goes on...

[Eupher]

Yes, I finally found the "Introductions" section.  It looks like The Inquisition:

How do you stand on fiscal issues?

How do you stand on social issues?

How do you stand on military issues?

I'm not into INQUISITION.

Eupher:  "Right now, you're sitting at 11 posts and you've merely waltzed in and started spreading stories, challenged other members, and otherwise have illustrated a less-than-optimal behavior pattern."

I have responded to a few postings, no different than what I have done on many other political message boards.  Over the years I have found that this is what message boards are for: to express opinions; respond to other postings; etc.  Your desire that I should comply with your wishes doesn't comport with free expression in our society.  And tickling your animosity delights me no end.

Ah, got it.

You want to be an asshole. Gotcha.

Oddly enough, I think we have room for yet another asshole.

[NHSparky]

I have responded to a few postings, no different than what I have done on many other political message boards.  Over the years I have found that this is what message boards are for: to express opinions; respond to other postings; etc.  Your desire that I should comply with your wishes doesn't comport with free expression in our society.  And tickling your animosity delights me no end.

We're a bit different around here, noob.  Not so big that you can come in anonymously like FR or elsewhere, but not so small and/or insecure that we'll drop the ban hammer on you for disagreeing with the hive mind like they do over on Kos (your former home, I take it?) and DU.

But either way, we don't take kindly to people who just come in and start shitting on the carpet, then pointing out the mess.

[JohnnyReb]

‘Same sex couples should be able to get married’ Able being the operative word...yes they should be "able" to get married otherwise they'd be marrying dead bodies and such. ....and a VD (STD) test used to be a requirement for a marriage license.

The question and statement should be, "Should same sex couples be allowed to get married?"

[Lacarnut]

I wonder when or if the Congressional Black Caucus will endorse queers marrying queers. I doubt it cause black folks don't like that crap. Plus, it could wind up being political suicide come reelection time.   

[CG6468]

We're a bit different around here, noob.  Not so big that you can come in anonymously like FR or elsewhere, but not so small and/or insecure that we'll drop the ban hammer on you for disagreeing with the hive mind like they do over on Kos (your former home, I take it?) and DU.

But either way, we don't take kindly to people who just come in and start shitting on the carpet, then pointing out the mess.

He/she/it doesn't care, Sparks.

[Kyle Ricky]

I wonder when or if the Congressional Black Caucus will endorse queers marrying queers. I doubt it cause black folks don't like that crap. Plus, it could wind up being political suicide come reelection time.   

Yeah it would be suicide, which is why I am wondering what they will do now that the NAACP endorsed same sex marriage.

[Lacarnut]

Yeah it would be suicide, which is why I am wondering what they will do now that the NAACP endorsed same sex marriage.

That could have some legs when the current crop of sprockets go up for reelection.

[Kyle Ricky]

That could have some legs when the current crop of sprockets go up for reelection.

Or it could pull the legs out from underneath them.

[Lacarnut]

Or it could pull the legs out from underneath them.

That is what I am thinking. Challengers are fools if they do not use that issue. Would that not be a kick in the ass if a bunch of the old dogs got defeated.

[Kyle Ricky]

That is what I am thinking. Challengers are fools if they do not use that issue. Would that not be a kick in the ass if a bunch of the old dogs got defeated.

Yes, it would be. I look for a lot of Dems to lose their seats this election as it is. So it should be sweet.

[wasp69]

Yes, I finally found the "Introductions" section.  It looks like The Inquisition:

How do you stand on fiscal issues?

How do you stand on social issues?

How do you stand on military issues?

I'm not into INQUISITION.

Have you found the door?

[obumazombie]

Not only that, but the inquisition can be fun. Look what Mel Brooks did with it.