how depressing is this? Scott Ritter goes to prison

[JakeStyle]

Link

librechik
 
how depressing is this? Scott Ritter goes to prison

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/26/magazine/scott-ritter.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all

heh--another Republican Family Values casualty
   

[Rebel]

hfojvt
6. that is a very strange story - in many ways

but I think it is too bad he is going to prison.

But I also don't know how he managed to survive without actually having a job.

AtomicKitten
7. He's a hero for speaking out against the Bush Admin's lies.

However, that does not mitigate much less excuse the fact that he's a perv and got caught.

I agree it's a damn shame, but he broke the law.

He's a pedophile, you stupid DUmbasses! 

[miskie]

"heh--another Republican Family Values casualty"

I have to agree here - Making it a crime to jack off on a webcam when you believe your audience is a 15 year old girl, is definitely a Republican law. Many Democrats & Liberals would have no problem removing age of consent laws altogether.

[Ralph Wiggum]

Republican?  He wrote a book with the DUmp's own Wee Willie Pitt.

Leave it to DUmmies to defend a pedophile.

[BEG]

Look at who their hero's are.  

[BEG]

Liberal_in_LA
22. Like radio host Bernie Ward. Railing against the war, then turned out he was a pedophile

All your perverts are belong to You!

[franksolich]

Has the Bostonian Drunkard weighed in on this yet?

[BEG]

izquierdista
17. Meanwhile.....

Lots of girls will engage in actual acts of prostitution, risking all manner of venereal diseases, so they can have enough money to pay the rent, or pay for their substance abuse, or pay on some of their indebtedness. And once they have tricked that money, it will flow the way it always does, into the pockets of the 1%.

WTF?  Is this some sort of progressive excuse?

[BEG]

Has the Bostonian Drunkard weighed in on this yet?

[Ralph Wiggum]

I described it above as a book, but it is actually a pamphlet.  Less than 100 pages.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_on_Iraq:_What_Team_Bush_Doesn%27t_Want_You_to_Know

To any lurking DUmmies: This PEDOPHILE is one of yours!

[BEG]

Notice I have the "birth control pill blood clot" search up too.  Search it DUmmies.

[franksolich]

This is from a long time ago, but the Bostonian Drunkard remained silent.

Wherefore are thou, W.R. Pitt?

I've been watching Skins's island like a hawk, since the news broke yesterday (Thursday) about a colleague of the Bostonian Drunkard getting into some, uh, trouble.

There's been some campfires on Skins's island about the matter, but conspicuous by his non-presence is the one who knows the former arms-inspector better than anybody else on Skins's island, and out here in the civilized world.

When one's pal is in trouble, one is morally and socially obligated to stick up for him.

Otherwise, one's about as false and fake as a Bela Pelosi promise.

One's lower than dog excresence on the ground, if one doesn't stand up for a pal.

Well, you know, sir, we've all had friends who at one time or another did something really stupid or unhonest or depraved or just plain ridiculous.

A gentleman makes no excuses for such a friend, a gentleman does not try to justify those acts, a gentleman does not ignore those things.....but at the same time, a gentleman does not abandon a bosom pal.

This is a clear-cut black-and-white issue; either Mr. Wm. Pitt is a gentleman, or Mr. Wm. Pitt is an ungrateful sleazeball who doesn't deserve any better than what he gives.

This is a prime opportunity for Mr. Wm. Pitt to show us he can be a gentleman.

Actually, one wonders if there's something else going on under the surface.

When the Bostonian Drunkard and the discredited arms-inspector jointly wrote that book, the latter writing 84% of it, while the former bore the expenses of having it published, the latter walked away with the revenues.

Oh my.

.
.
.
.
.
And then many days later:

Well, Hell, I think we've waited long enough for the Bostonian Drunkard to stick up for his old pal, his good friend, his fellow co-author.

And it hasn't happened.

Regretably, one must then conclude the Bostonian Drunkard is no gentleman.

http://www.conservativecave.com/index.php/topic,39228.0/

[67 Rover]

"heh--another Republican Family Values casualty"

I have to agree here - Making it a crime to jack off on a webcam when you believe your audience is a 15 year old girl, is definitely a Republican law. Many Democrats & Liberals would have no problem removing age of consent laws altogether.

After all the demonrats are on record voting to give Viagra to Pedophiles as part of the health care bill.  This was an amendment from the Republicans who all voted against.

The democrat party is full of perverts and deviants.

[GOBUCKS]

Republican?  He wrote a book with the DUmp's own Wee Willie Pitt.

Small correction: He wrote a tiresome anti-Bush moonbat screed, and listed the plagiarist Pitt as co-author, so Pitt's mother would pay a vanity publisher to run off a couple hundred copies.

And speaking of Ritter's fellow pedophiles, why was it that Pitt was banned from his junior high substitute teaching gig?

[zeitgeist]

Pitt is a bit testy:

WilliamPitt (50,394 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore

26. Excuse me

But all this pederast shit only came to light after his actions to try and stop the Iraq war. I saw him speak in July of 2002, had a book written with him by that October, and the first hints of this shit didn't come to light until 2003.

Self-hating liberalism feels good, but you should get your ****ing facts straight before bringing out the lash.

P.S., on WMD and the effects of the war, he was 100% right. Where did you stand in 2003?

And then there is this one  also in defense of the perv.

Matariki (13,304 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore

28. Bullshit. Read the article.

"Ritter maintains that he never engaged with an actual minor online, and there’s no evidence to suggest he did, beyond his interactions with undercover police officers in chat rooms for over-18-year-olds."

Your comment is just the kind of kneejerk rhetoric that allows for unquestioned character smears. Just imply that someone is engaging in sexual activity with a minor and, whether they are or not, they become guilty in the court of public opinion. How convenient. A great way to dispose of political enemies.
 

But this begs the question, did he engage with Wee Willie's Pit?    

[Karin]

librechik (22,615 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore

9. he seems to be an untreated sex addict

he deserves our sympathy not our contempt, IMO

libtodeath (180 posts) Profile Journal Send DU Mail Ignore

21. A shame and a tragedy

we should be trying to treat any person that suffers from what is clearly an illness rather then jail them.
 

Poor babies!!!


Enough of hearing this shit, loses you guys elections.  

[miskie]

23. Depressing that a child perv goes to jail? No. nt

DT is speaking troof 2 m00nbatz again

[GOBUCKS]

Ritter's vanity publisher for the anti-Bush rant he did with Pitt was an outfit called "Context Books".

Their web page is kind of funny.

http://www.contextpublishing.com/home.html

[67 Rover]

Is it plausible that Ritter did not find any WMD because he was busy engaging local Iraqi youths in friendly games of naked twister rather than actually doing his job and looking for WMD?

[Duke Nukum]

Ritter's vanity publisher for the anti-Bush rant he did with Pitt was an outfit called "Context Books".

Their web page is kind of funny.

http://www.contextpublishing.com/home.html

The DUmmy Line: A History of the Democrat Underground January 2001 - January 2011.

Very enteresting(sic).

[Duke Nukum]

Is it plausible that Ritter did not find any WMD because he was busy engaging local Iraqi youths in friendly games of naked twister rather than actually doing his job and looking for WMD?

I remember him being a huge critic of the Clinton administration's abandonment of WMD inspections in the late 1990s, then suddenly, he changed his tune.

I always suspected someone in the Clinton Criminal Family (CCF) found out about his peccadilloes, set him up, and turned him.

[zeitgeist]

I remember him being a huge critic of the Clinton administration's abandonment of WMD inspections in the late 1990s, then suddenly, he changed his tune.

I always suspected someone in the Clinton Criminal Family (CCF) found out about his peccadilloes, set him up, and turned him.

Fits the MO of the Clintonistas, and speaking of which:


 

http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2012/02/24/exclusive_state_department_quietly_warning_region_on_syrian_wmds


Exclusive: State Department quietly warning region on Syrian WMDs



Posted By Josh Rogin  Friday, February 24, 2012 - 3:03 PM  

The State Department has begun coordinating with Syria's neighbors to prepare for the handling of President Bashar al-Assad's extensive weapons of mass destruction if and when his regime collapses, The Cable has learned.

{snip}

[Freeper]

librechik
14. I agree with you about these police stings--

please just address the obvious wrong doing, don't gin up some outrage--like that poor "terrorist" who the FBI gave the suicide vest to, then arrested him. Wrong!

So it is better to wait until the terrorist actually kills someone, or the pedophile actually harms a child? 

[jukin]

My guess would be there is a very high correlation with pedophilia and being associated with the UN.  An even higher one with being associated with the DUmp and progressivism.

[zeitgeist]

My guess would be there is a very high correlation with pedophilia and being associated with the UN.  An even higher one with being associated with the DUmp and progressivism.

What's Pitt's pedigree again?  Something about no longer teaching children at a private school?   Anyone remember this one?

And then there is this:  Ritter to soon be dealing with weapons of ass distruction.