The primitives are getting restless. Banging on the war drums, painting their faces, warbling angrily at one another, sending up burnt offerings to Gaia, crapping all over the place. In other words, just like a Saturday night in Zuccotti park.
loudsue (1000+ posts) Mon Nov-14-11 10:48 AM
Original message
I'm sure the DU admins have done a cost/benefit analysis of small donors $$
It's the same type of cost/benefit analysis the rest of the economy in the USA has done. If you can't pay, you can't play -- at least not BY THE SAME RULES as your wealthier counterparts.
I guess there aren't that many $10, $15 and $20 donations among us on DU, because those who have been contributing the smaller amounts will probably not be contributing anything now that the minimum price for a star will be $42. I'm sure the rise in price will make up for all the smaller donations. I've bought a star for a fellow DUer a time or two, but at $42 a pop, I sure won't be able to do that again.
After all, it's all about the numbers. But once again, the numbers will leave me behind. It may not be anything personal on the part of DU, but it sure feels personal to me.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x2303898Octafish (1000+ posts) Mon Nov-14-11 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. With you, loudsue.
Pay to play isn't my game. Can't afford it, currently or in the foreseeable future.
If I was rich? I'd give and support those who contribute.
One thing's for sure: Rich or poor, I still wouldn't be a Republican.
PS: K&R and it stayed at "zero."
RC (1000+ posts) Mon Nov-14-11 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Hopefuly the Admin can see who rec'd and unrec'd and maybe kick out those who
have high unrec'd for any and all OP, without posting why, regardless of content.
Temper, temper.
loudsue (1000+ posts) Mon Nov-14-11 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
14. That would be nice, Capitalocracy, but incentives to lure the poorest
among us is probably not a priority.
SidDithers (1000+ posts) Mon Nov-14-11 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #17
22. Sorry. I guess I read the "if you can't pay, you can't play" part ...
as saying that your ability to "play" at DU3 will be limited by your ability to "pay"
Sid
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Mon Nov-14-11 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. "by the same rules". nt
Beth had better call her buddy Hugo before he takes the dirt nap, and find out how to handle this outrage.
lbrtbell (1000+ posts) Mon Nov-14-11 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
25. You're locked out of the donors-only groups
We're also exposed to flash-based ads that really slow you down if you're on dial-up.
That definitely affects how we can post.
SidDithers (1000+ posts) Mon Nov-14-11 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. Groups will be open to all DU'ers on DU3...nt
Sid
They don't care. They want
all the goodies...for free. It's just not fair that someone else might be able to afford more.
loudsue (1000+ posts) Mon Nov-14-11 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. Well hello Desertrose!!!
Doin' fine! Getting all those Senior discounts while they last, before the rest of the world decides to raise prices on everyone!! I'm more & more convinced that everyone is raising prices because they see the whole globe is going broke, and everyone wants to get theirs while there is still someone to milk.
So good to see you!
hlthe2b (1000+ posts) Mon Nov-14-11 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
5. Yes... loudsue
I wonder if the changes to the community itself have been considered. I understand and respect Skinner's attempts to change for what he believes the "better." Yet, I can't help but find it dismaying that some of the same DUers who have lauded OccupyWallStreet movements across the country and a call for more fairness, a more equitable society are now berating those who express concern with inadvertently converting DU to a "have" and "have not" community. Those who were able to make small contributions still had pride in feeling they were supporting DU--no more. Those who were more flush had the ability to help out those who were struggling, no more.
Again, I respect what Skinner is trying to do and feel certain he will take those concerns to heart, in terms of trying to find some additional solutions. For those who would deride the concern for the disenfranchised members, I say, grow a damned heart and find some compassion. The hypocrisy is astounding.
It's a web site, idiot, not a soup kitchen. These people definitely need to get out more.
loudsue (1000+ posts) Mon Nov-14-11 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #16
26. It may be an error in that it disenfranchises those of us who felt like we were part of a community
only to be put in our proper economic place. But it will probably not be an economic error on the part of the admins, as more an more of the "elite" democrats will find a home here, and us more liberal riff raff will be downsized. It's just more of a shift to the right that has overtaken the entire world. There's really no use in trying to fight it anymore. Money rules. Everything. Values, not so much.
boston bean (1000+ posts) Mon Nov-14-11 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
10. They make more $$ if you have to see the ads. It is a financial calculation.
lower donors aren't carrying their weight and DU can make more if people have to look at the ads.
Their measley contributions and the small donation needed to buy another a star was less $$ for DU. They can make more off the ads.
Then add on top of that, they want to make it even more expensive for people with less money to be able to avoid them, or enjoy DU for the same price as a wealthier donor who can afford $42/year upfront.
All you people who can't afford it, can go on a payment plan of $5/month, but your cost for the same access will be $60/year.
It's regressive, and not in any way progressive.
It's capitalistic. It's the American way!!! It's pathetic.
boston bean (1000+ posts) Mon Nov-14-11 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. There are still other features and bells and whistles that people who cannot afford a star
will not be able to use.
And to top it off, they have made it more difficult for people to buy STARS for others, by making it $60/year.
Can you not see that this is a huge change?
boston bean (1000+ posts) Mon Nov-14-11 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #19
27. yes, while the better off pay less and the one's who can't afford a lump sum pay more.
Edited on Mon Nov-14-11 11:21 AM by boston bean
And no, you do not know for what access will be limited.
However, I do know for sure this will price some people out, and will make others unable to buy them a "subscription" so they can experience the full DU like a more wealthy or a better off DUer could.
Class warfare comes to the Hive. Oh, this is getting good.
JanMichael (1000+ posts) Mon Nov-14-11 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #27
30. Weird part about these posts
is how that meme "it's just a little less, suck it up" has made it's way into the discourse of this board.
frazzled (1000+ posts) Mon Nov-14-11 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #10
39. Yes, it is truly the American way: pay to play
You can pay for the privilege of not having to wait in line to get through TSA at the airport. Hey, the rest of you--you can stand like pathetic refugees in line for 45 minutes and still make your plane. What are you complaining about?
You can pay thousands of dollars a plate for a dinner to have access to a political candidate and push your agenda. Or you can be a volunteer schlub and get no hearing at all. You still get to vote!
You can buy platinum insurance and get everything from breast implants to open heart surgery, no questions asked. Or you can wait in line, suffering, for twelve hours at the emergency room before someone determines you had a stroke. Hey, a doctor will eventually see you!
I think it's laughable that this discussion board, which rails against corporate greed and the capitalistic way morning, noon, and night is suddenly "wha, me worry" about instituting a full-fledged two-tiered class system (yes, it's always been that way here, but much less dramatically so.) We all questioned why BofA needed to charge people $5 a month for using their debit cards when they were already making handsome profits. But nobody has asked why there should suddenly be an approximate eightfold hike in access to this board during a time of economic difficulty and high unemployment. We don't even stop to ask what the money is needed for. There are 177,366 user registrations on this board. If 10% of those registered users pay the minimum $42 yearly fee, that is $750,000--three-quarters of a million dollars. And we're not even talking advertising revenues. Is that a reasonable amount of money to run this web site? I don't know. Maybe someone else does. But nobody even asks.
-snipped for excessive ranting-
jeff47 (1000+ posts) Mon Nov-14-11 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #39
43. Bullshit, and you know it.
The required fee to post in DU3: $0.
The required fee to use groups in DU3: $0.
The only difference that has been announced so far is no ads if you pay. That's it.
If you're so sure that they'll introduce some critical "pay only" feature in the future, then why the hell are you still here supporting such evil people?
frazzled (1000+ posts) Mon Nov-14-11 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #43
46. Oh, the old bullshit response.
How terribly clever.
This sort of thing is why I don't want to pay $42 for the privilege of not having obnoxious ads flashing in my face. Why would I pay to be abused by stupid people?
You know really, I don't even notice most of the ads here or at DU. They seem incredibly distracted by shiny objects.
JanMichael (1000+ posts) Mon Nov-14-11 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #18
29. for many people, this is an important community in their lives...IE:
Redstone died recently...one of the first things I did was a search on his posts to see if he had been sick, if I had missed something, etc.
Many people read him for years...without the search function, finding his lasts posts on DU would not have been possible. So, no...you cannot get the "full DU experience" without a star beside your name.
"The full DU experience".

You can go to the day room of any local psych ward and get that.
YankeyMCC (1000+ posts) Mon Nov-14-11 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
21. For DU - a web service the new system may be
necessary - I'll leave that to Skinner and his team to decide. It would be nice to keep it more open as it is today, or easier to be a donor. Perhaps at some point they'll find a feasible way to allow the small donater's to participate equally, maybe a subsidy or something.
But your point is very apt when it comes to a society. Ability to pay should not determine you're worth as a human being when it comes to being able to live a life with dignity and reasonable amount of security in all aspects, shelter, food, health...
Shelter, food, health, full access to DUmmyland, all those basic needs of Humankind.
msongs (1000+ posts) Mon Nov-14-11 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. so, who on this thread turns off their TV set everytime ads come on? nt
tkmorris (1000+ posts) Mon Nov-14-11 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #40
49. I DVR everything, primarily for that purpose
On the rare occasion that I want to watch a broadcast as it happens, I pause it as it starts. 8 minutes for a half hour program and 16 for an hour. So no, I don't turn the TV off, but I don't watch the ads either.
And you pay for that DVR, right? Or does your cable provider give it to you free?
tcaudilllg (1000+ posts) Mon Nov-14-11 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
48. I'm looking forward to the decline of this place.
The sites which demand least will always prevail over those who demand more.
Oooooo, them's fightin' words right there. If I were $kimmer, I'd march through there with my ass-kicking boots on and tell all the whiny little bitches to hit the road.