We've all seen the posts. Someone disagrees with some DUmbasses "brilliant" point or the thread gets unrec'ed down to sub-zero or some such and out comes the crying that paid infiltrators are at work.
We're also told that the Tea Party is too small to be a real movement...until they can flip the House of Reps by historic margins or put up massive public showings.
We're then told these are rent-a-mobs--not to be confused with unions.
But one must ask: how much does it take to rent mobs? Well, if the 2010 election is any indication the mob is millions strong which means the payment to individuals, plus cost of organizing, plus transportation, plus communications and mobilization would place this in the hundreds of millions. In fact, it is said that it takes so much money that the billionaire Koch brothers are the only real viable suspects.
But why would the Koch brothers pay hundreds of millions in their own money to mobilize these mobs?
Supposedly, to avoid paying tens of millions of dollars more in taxes.
Now, bunnies are not known for their math skills but I think hundreds of millions is more than tens of millions so one wonders how any self-respecting capitalist sees the cost-benefit analysis in this equation especially considering corporations pass along rather than pay taxes.
Moreover, the rent-a-mob is supposedly taking payments from rich people to protest government programs that redistribute wealth from the rich. If the Tea Party rent-a-mob really wanted more money from rich people all they would have to do is stay home and allow the democrats to send them a check via welfare or a tax credit for solar-powered flashlights or some such.
Of course, what the TP is crying for is to be left alone and for life to cost a little less. Contrast this with the unions, Section-8 mafia, welfare army that show up and demand--what?--more of other people's money. They aren't so much a rent-a-mob so much as they are Mob 'o Muggers.