Author Topic: Can I ask you folks for help? (radiation hazards)  (Read 1386 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Habsfan

  • The Conservative Canadian
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 416
  • Reputation: +89/-44
Can I ask you folks for help? (radiation hazards)
« on: September 03, 2011, 07:31:36 PM »
I'm trying to show some Gaia mother-earth worshiper that there is no radiation problem affecting us here in North-America as a result of the Japan earthquake. She insists we are doomed and it's just a matter of time before we all go in full meltdown.

Now this person is not too bright and I just want to give her a few very simple links she can understand and let percolate, even though I think her mind is pretty much made up. I would really appreciate if anyone can give me just a few simple links anyone with an intelligence level higher than a baboon can understand.  

Anyone? Just a couple links. Love you guys.
« Last Edit: September 03, 2011, 07:41:25 PM by franksolich »

Offline NHSparky

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24431
  • Reputation: +1280/-617
  • Where are you going? I was gonna make espresso!
Re: Can I ask you folks for help? (radiation hazards)
« Reply #1 on: September 03, 2011, 08:07:36 PM »
All the sampling done (and AQMD in California does regular sampling even before Japan) showed almost nonexistent increases in rad levels, specifically I-131.

Considering that 10CFR says the legal limit is 5 Rem/year.  Any increases in rad exposure would have been measured in MICRO-Rem.  Compare that to the 200-300 milliRem/year we get simply from existing on this rock.  Nuff said.
“Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the government take care of him better take a closer look at the American Indian.”  -Henry Ford

Offline RonBush

  • Probationary (Probie)
  • Posts: 65
  • Reputation: +1/-37
Re: Can I ask you folks for help? (radiation hazards)
« Reply #2 on: September 03, 2011, 08:44:27 PM »
The closest places would be Hawaii and Alaska, and the radiation measured there from Japan is not enough to be harmful

From a Honolulu Star-Advertiser, the small amount of radiation that is measured in Hawaii is not harmful.  This was in March

http://www.staradvertiser.com/news/20110323_Low_levels_of_Japanese_radiation_found.html

Here are some other links

http://healthland.time.com/2011/04/20/should-radiation-from-japan-scuttle-spring-break-in-hawaii-a-mom-agonizes/

Tiny amount in Hawaiian milk, but not enough to be dangerous:

"Big Island milk is regularly monitored, but health officials say levels of radiation in milk were measured at 18 picocuries per liter, too small to have any health impact. The Federal Drug Administration’s warning threshold is 4,700 picocuries per liter."

http://www.bigislandvideonews.com/2011/04/14/radiation-in-hawaii-milk-not-a-concern-state-health-officials-say/

Same thing in Alaska.  They measure a little radiation from Japan, but not enough to be dangerous:

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/03/18/japan-radiation-risk-alaskas-aleutian-islands-live-with-it.html

http://www.infowars.com/alert-radiation-from-stricken-japanese-plant-reaches-alaska/



Big Island milk is regularly monitored, but health officials say levels of radiation in milk were measured at 18 picocuries per liter, too small to have any health impact. The Federal Drug Administration’s warning threshold is 4,700 picocuries per liter.

Offline Habsfan

  • The Conservative Canadian
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 416
  • Reputation: +89/-44
Re: Can I ask you folks for help? (radiation hazards)
« Reply #3 on: September 03, 2011, 08:47:26 PM »
Thanks Sparky! Much appreciated.

Offline Crazy Horse

  • Army 0 Navy 34
  • Topic Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5602
  • Reputation: +265/-143
  • Sex, Booze and Bacon Minion
Re: Can I ask you folks for help? (radiation hazards)
« Reply #4 on: September 04, 2011, 05:37:52 AM »
SO 4,700 pico curie is 0.0000000047 curies...............yeah we're all gonna die.

Please don't fly in a plane or eat a banana
Disclaimer
Any views, remarks or statements of other military services or it’s members is covered under the Inter-Service Rivalry Act of 1974