A totally useless formulation that pre-supposes what it presumes to answer, i.e. that ETIs exist. It essentially says, "to prove ETIs exist I shall give you a formula that will always yield the result that ETIs exist so long as the variables are long enough."
Liberals a very ANTI_SCIENCE. This is exactly what they do with global warming. Input any values into Mann's computer program and it spits out the world is getting hotter.
Liberals are emotional and not logical and use emotion to appear logical. After I have brought forth facts to prove my point in a debate with a libtard, they universally reply one of two things.
1. Yeah but don't you think..... To which I reply, I theorize ad then run experiments to prove my theory. Rarely do I disregard the results in favor of my theory.
2. I can get facts/statistics/history to rebut your claim. To which I reply, bring them on. That is what debate is about.
Both result in the leftard insulting me and/or walking away.