Help Me To Understand This Reply I Got Back From an Employer

[docstew]

The DUmmy's outrage comes from the constant sense of entitlement that progressives have.  If they apply for a job, they think they must get it.  If they don't, it means that there's something wrong with the company.

I would think it's more along the lines of "I applied, they should create a job for me whether I'm qualified or not, or their lousy greedy corporate pigs."

[Karin]

Thelaughingman, to wit:

Fridays Child  (1000+ posts)        Sat Mar-05-11 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
11. First of all, it's a boilerplate response...
 ...and you should not take it as having been custom generated for you. Second, I would not work for a company whose corporate culture would allow such a letter to go out to anyone. Whoever creates the standard form letters there has a real attitude problem and he or she is being allowed to get away with it. That says something about the company, and it's not a good sign.

Long story short: **** 'em and the proverbial horse they rode in on.

After which, Hannah Bell the raving communist says that that was the best response ever. 

[vesta111]

Thelaughingman, to wit:

After which, Hannah Bell the raving communist says that that was the best response ever. 

Then there is another point here even if he was taking a hit on his pay from getting the job, perhaps the company decided to get a Temp with his education and pay them minimun wage.

This is becoming very common in the work place, with all these educated people out of work they go to a Temp agency and will work for what ever they can get.      So someone who has worked for the company for 20 years is fired for what ever reason and a younger person with a newer degree in education replaces him for 1/4 the salary. the new worker is told that if they work out they will be hired on permint with health insurance and a 401K   After a year the new Temp is hired and does get a pay raise to 3/4 of the salary of the man he replaced and feels lucky.

This is one reason companys do not want unions, ----Just saying as I am anti union  except in severe cases.

[true_blood]

   I would not have published that on a forum   

A DUmmie would. They love to stir the pot and rake the "evil rich corporations" over the coals because he/she/it got denied a job.

[NHSparky]

Then there is another point here even if he was taking a hit on his pay from getting the job, perhaps the company decided to get a Temp with his education and pay them minimun wage.

This is becoming very common in the work place, with all these educated people out of work they go to a Temp agency and will work for what ever they can get.      So someone who has worked for the company for 20 years is fired for what ever reason and a younger person with a newer degree in education replaces him for 1/4 the salary. the new worker is told that if they work out they will be hired on permint with health insurance and a 401K   After a year the new Temp is hired and does get a pay raise to 3/4 of the salary of the man he replaced and feels lucky.

This is one reason companys do not want unions, ----Just saying as I am anti union  except in severe cases.

One-quarter?  So a guy retires or leaves a company making $100K and the company thinks they can fill the position with some kid making $25K, WITHOUT benefits?  Do you REALLY believe that?

My head hurts.