CBS complicit in news coverup
“Powerful reporting on an important story. Two problems: It didn’t run until yesterday, and CBS didn’t run it. The quote is from the New York Post. And it was The Wall Street Journal that reported “the separation and assault lasted roughly 20 to 30 minutes.â€
But CBS? They sat on their own story. For five days, as reporters reveled amid giddy celebrations in Tahrir Square, and as President Obama praised President Obama’s handling of the Egyptian crisis, CBS reported nothing.
Only when other media had the story did CBS break the news that its own chief foreign correspondent was the victim of “a brutal and sustained sexual assault.â€
How is that not news?
---------------------------------------------------
Is anybody surprised that Al Jazeera light (CBS) didnt cover this? Im sure they wouldnt want to let any little thing like this to muss up their true agenda to use this event in Egypt for their Messiahs re-election campaign.
CBS was caught between a rock and a hard place on this issue....and probably wondering what their legal responsibility would be towards their employee.
Logan was representing the network when she was not just severely attacked....but most likely raped. I think it's been reported, that she was raped, but I think it's been either assumed or stated "allegedly". Since it has been stated that she was "sexually" attacked...it is presumed that her personal parts were attacked. A lot of damage can done to the female body without a penis being used...especially within a crowd of 200 (who counted them?) and occuring for as long as 20-30 minutes. Not only to her body, but to her psyche.
I would think as a rep of CBS, regardless of what papers she may have signed releasing CBS from responsiblility....CBS's lawyers were saying to keep quiet. Not only because of employer/employee liability, but also because the attack was sexual.
Where exactly does CBS's responsibility to report begin and end?
In the majority of rape/sexual assault cases, the media... whether it be print, television or internet...does not report the victim's name unless the victim was murdered, or the case comes to trial.
If CBS had reported that one of their journalists was sexually attacked in the Egyptian protests, it would have taken maybe all of 5 minute... for someone not connect to CBS...to figure out who the journalist was, by process of elimination, to publicly announce that it was Logan.
I'm not sure if it's legal to report rape/sexual assault victims' names, or if it is just an "unspoken" rule to not report the vicitim's name out of consideration for the victim. Legally, it may vary from state to state.
Taking out the legal ramifications of responsiblity of CBS to Logan as an employer...this happened to someone they knew and cared about. Maybe they weren't reporting it out of consideration for her and her family. I know it's been reported that she is hospitalized...and as of yesterday, she was still hospitalized.
Like a said...between a rock and a hard place.
namvet - 2/17/2011: if she's going back over there i have some doubts about this story
I have not seen or heard it reported that she is going back over there. She and some of her crew was detained by Egyption police/military, questioned and released earlier in the protests, returned to the US and did go back.
She apparently has been to Iran and Afghanistan several times as a journalist. After going into war zones, I would think most reporters wouldn't overthink going back to Egypt.
http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2011/02/15/business-broadcasting-amp-entertainment-financial-impact-us-tv-lara-logan-attack_8310139.htmlI did see Anderson Cooper, who was attacked there and got a concussion, interviewed early last week...and he said that
he would go back.