Author Topic: A superdelegate solution (hardly)  (Read 1589 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Wretched Excess

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15284
  • Reputation: +485/-84
  • Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happy Hour
A superdelegate solution (hardly)
« on: March 28, 2008, 12:18:05 AM »
Quote
A superdelegate solution

IT’S THE 'Democrats’ nightmare scenario: A bitter nominating fight that lasts all the way to the national convention in late August, giving Republican John McCain a clear field for the entire summer, and leaving their own party split and dispirited even after they settle upon a standard-bearer.
more stories like this

And there’s increasing reason to be worried.

Although this campaign was informative and relatively mild for most of the winter, it has grown markedly more divisive in the last few weeks, with charges and recriminations flying.

New findings from Gallup show the peril that looms as the contest becomes more polarized, with 28 percent of Hillary Clinton supporters saying they would vote for McCain over Barack Obama and 19 percent of Obama supporters saying they would back the Republican over Clinton.

Adding to those concerns are recent suggestions by Clinton that she considers elected, or pledged, delegates fair game. That raises the prospect of a long summer in which her campaign battles not just to secure superdelegates, but also to lure pledged delegates away from Obama.

Bitterness and alienation will subside, but healing takes time, as does readying a nominee and a party for general election combat. So if the nominee isn’t known until the delegates vote at the August 25-28 convention in Denver, the party will be at a distinct disadvantage.

But one proposed solution is gaining currency among prominent Democrats and at the Democratic National Committee. That’s to have the superdelegates declare their preferences in early June, shortly after the last primaries in Montana and South Dakota.

‘‘Personally I think it would be very damaging to go all the way to August,’’ says US Senator John Kerry, the party’s 2004 presidential nominee and now an Obama supporter. ‘‘Once you get the primaries and caucuses under the party’s belt, it’s good for people to make it known where they are and resolve this.’’

The idea arose in part because of Tennessee Governor Phil Bredesen, who is pushing to have the party’s 795 superdelegates convene in June to cast their votes.

As it has evolved, however, the notion is not for an actual meeting of superdelegates, but simply to have those superdelegates who haven’t already done so declare their presidential choice shortly after the final primaries on June 3. That would give the party an unofficial nominee and thus make an internecine summer much less likely.

More


hillary will have to stop this somehow if her plan is to get the MI and FL delegations seated, and somehow twist enough superdelegate arms to grab the nomination.


Offline BlueStateSaint

  • Here I come to save the day, because I'm a
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32553
  • Reputation: +1560/-191
  • RIP FDNY Lt. Rich Nappi d. 4/16/12
Re: A superdelegate solution (hardly)
« Reply #1 on: March 29, 2008, 11:57:00 AM »
WE, if Messalina can't have the presidency, then no Dem can.  That's her thinking.
"Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of Liberty." - Thomas Jefferson

"All you have to do is look straight and see the road, and when you see it, don't sit looking at it - walk!" -Ayn Rand
 
"Those that trust God with their safety must yet use proper means for their safety, otherwise they tempt Him, and do not trust Him.  God will provide, but so must we also." - Matthew Henry, Commentary on 2 Chronicles 32, from Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole Bible

"These anti-gun fools are more dangerous to liberty than street criminals or foreign spies."--Theodore Haas, Dachau Survivor

Chase her.
Chase her even when she's yours.
That's the only way you'll be assured to never lose her.