It's very interesting that Grandma has felt it necessary to explain, repeatedly, that her granddaughter IS NOT RELIGIOUS!!!!

The reason you take that book somewhere has everything to do with it's protection under the First Amendment, evidently.

This has turned into quite a bonfire...love this exchange...
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sat Sep-25-10 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
28. Just sad to see yet another child being brainwashed into believing that that repugnant book
is worth treating as a First Amendment right icon.
Hopefully, Americans will eventually move away from thinking that displaying racist, misogynistic, anti-intellectual and anti-human shit like the Bible on their desktops is anymore an appropriate expression of freedom of speech than would the displaying of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.
BTW - why not ask your granddaughter to read through a few chapters of the Bible, especially the ones that outline in no uncertain terms that women are to be considered the property of the men in their lives? Then, you can move on to the Yahweh-ordered and approved genocide of whole tribes of people, followed by the theft of their lands and the use of their women as prostitutes. Might as well start with the good stuff.
After all, there is no right to free speech enunciated anywhere in that ******* book. Quite the opposite. Is your grand-daughter aware of that fact? 
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sat Sep-25-10 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #28
33. Say what?
Missing the point much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sat Sep-25-10 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #33
39. Not at all. I'm talking about an "appropriate" choice to make into a First Amendment issue.
I see no point in availing ones self of such a repugnant book to 1. provoke a response, and 2. make a First Amendment point as a secondary issue.
Provoking a response was the main point of bringing the book to school, at least that's what I gather quite clearly from the OP.
You're the one missing the greater point.
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sat Sep-25-10 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #39
154. The fact that you find it repugnant makes it THE PERFECT First Amendment example. PERFECT.
How can you not get that?
It seems like the bulk of the DUmmies can't get the First Amendment...the idea of religious freedom totally escapes them, as evidenced by
both sides of their little cat fight!
