Author Topic: primitive has to make hearing surgery decision  (Read 777 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline franksolich

  • Scourge of the Primitives
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58722
  • Reputation: +3102/-173
primitive has to make hearing surgery decision
« on: September 05, 2010, 11:42:13 AM »
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=381x435

Oh my.

This is from the deaf-and-hard-of-hearing forum on Skins's island, that doesn't get hardly any traffic, cobwebs congesting the air.

Quote
sandnsea  (1000+ posts)      Fri Sep-03-10 12:55 PM
Original message
 
Hearing surgery decision

I have two different ear problems. My right ear I had a cholesteotoma which damaged my hearing over a course of years. No health insurance. My left ear gets fluid behind it and my local doctors don't treat it right. My ENT gave me a regimend that worked very well so that problem appears to be solved.

Back to the right ear. I now have insurance through the Oregon pre-existing pool, have had it for a few years. That's how I got the cholesteotoma surgery done. Now I need to decide about hearing restoration... or not. I can get reconstruction, inner bone ear prosthesis I think, but I need all three bones and it is more complicated. I would have to go to Portland which means additional expenses and literally putting myself in the hands of whoever I get. Or, I can get that BAHA thingy, which means a bolt in my head and an attached gadget behind my ear. Has anybody had either of these procedures? I wonder how they compare. I don't like the idea of walking around with equipment sticking out of my head, although I guess I should consider it the same as a set of glasses or hearing aid which wouldn't both me a bit.

A couple of other wrinkles. My ENT's partner can do the BAHA. That is through the local nonprofit health delivery system which means if there's a 20% balance of something, I don't have to pay it. I would have to pay all that stuff in Portland. I imagine a thousand or so at least. Then there's the issue of long term complications. I have no idea whether Medicare covers either of these. What if I end up with no insurance in a few years and get an infection in the bolt or have something happen to the prosthesis inside my head?

I can hear now, as long as my left ear doesn't get fluid behind it. Sometimes if someone is on my right and talks in a certain tone of voice, I can't hear. But that's not too often.

Maybe I should leave well enough alone?

I don't know. I am horrible at making a decision and usually end up letting life sort of push me here and there. Really stupid way to live, I do know that. So I would like to make a very clear choice on this one. Or at least try to.

I dunno; franksolich, being deaf, has no opinion on the matter.

No primitives have shown up at this campfire--poor, lonely, deserted, unnoticed campfire--but perhaps some decent and civilized people might have an opinion on this.
apres moi, le deluge

Milo Yiannopoulos "It has been obvious since 2016 that Trump carries an anointing of some kind. My American friends, are you so blind to reason, and deaf to Heaven? Can he do all this, and cannot get a crown? This man is your King. Coronate him, and watch every devil shriek, and every demon howl."

Offline Ballygrl

  • Lipstick Renegade
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14934
  • Reputation: +983/-120
Re: primitive has to make hearing surgery decision
« Reply #1 on: September 05, 2010, 02:57:26 PM »
Awwwww, I feel bad no 1 has shown up to give advice. I have chronic ear problems but not deafness so I really can't answer this. Is there maybe a board that strictly deals with hearing issues?
Quote
"The nation that couldn’t be conquered by foreign enemies has been conquered by its elected officials" odawg Free Republic in reference to the GOP Elites who are no difference than the Democrats