Ok, please explain.
Because the woman has children, she automatically deserves more money an hour?
No, you or perhaps me flipped this.
When I asked my manager why someone hired the same day to do the same job as I was and getting more money was told that the Man had children and family to support.
When I pointed out my friend also had a family to support I was told, unbelievably that since she was an attractive woman she could find a MAN to support her.
This is the reason that later on that equal pay for equal work took off for woman's groups.
This took years to fight, it was in professional work as trying to break through the glass ceiling.
Today we still have very good professionals that have a difficult time getting around the Good Old Boys network.
I was reading about the Roman Gladiators and found to my surprise that in the 3 rd century it became illegal for woman to become Gladiators as the Empire was concerned with the huge number of woman that wanted to fight.
I believe this was based on the law at the time that a professional fighter could retire after a set number of fights and was awarded large sums of money and land.
Male fighters were now up against females and because they were use to fighting other men their natural inclination to not harm woman caused them to loose the edge and the females moved in for the kill.
The Empire saw these woman gaining money and influence and had to put a stop to the silly unwomanly conduct.
