Well, look... if you think that pumping CO2 and other pollutants into the atmosphere at the current rate won't eventually have a detrimental effect that's your business but the science seems to indicate that it's a problem.
How can you justify allowing politicians to disrupt a significant portion of the world's economy based on this premise when:
1. The amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is minuscule.......and
2. Research has shown that it has been significantly higher in the past without ending the world as we know it....
It has been established that the eruption of Krakatoa, in 1883 infused the atmosphere with more CO2, and other atmospheric pollutants than mankind has since the beginning of the industrial revolution........how do "climate scientists" account for that. Certainly there was a worldwide climatic effect from this eruption, but the climate reverted to "normal" after a few scant years........does this support the wholesale destruction of the economies of the world.........?
Further......I will restate to you the question that I asked you on this subject a year or so ago in a similar thread on this topic (that you failed to answer......)
........"assuming AGW to be real, what steps
exactly, do you propose to resolve the problem, and
exactly how much of the worlds economic resources are you willing to commit to that effort, and finally,
exactly where should those financial resources come from.......?
doc