On a serious note, I find it disturbing though for the psychologist who quotes on here to tear down women who already look like this in the process of trying to make those with umm..hanging inners feel better(and I've seen this said on a site one time that obsessed over this too) and it is this quote:
Sarah Creighton and psychologist Lih-Mei Liao challenged the ethics of offering women surgery to address such insecurities, suggesting it was adverts for a "homogenised, pre-pubescent genital appearance" which created these anxieties in the first place.
Isn't that a bit insulting to women whose normal development is towards the appearance some of thse women are seeking to gain?
So while trying to make the long lipped ladies feel better, those women who have umm tucked away inners are called basically little girls? WTF? Wouldn't it seem more fitting instead of degrading women who developed small inner labia to just tell women as a whole to be happy with their own development?
It irritates me when people make their point by degrading another variation on normal to make the other portion of normal feel better because they don't look more like 'that' variation of normal. Make sense? No, it shouldn't since it's just silliness!
