chaz4jazz
No cries for proportionality then, were they? ...... Grow up people, this is not a sporting match where one tries to match weights and create a level playing field. It is a war where one uses every tool at hand to do the job. Insisting on proportionality is to give the weaker party the choice of weapons and to define the size of the force. How more stupid could a doctrine be? If you must go to war – not a first choice – then you do so to win,...
My first experince with libs on-line was after 911 at the San Francisco Indymedia board. Yeah, I went straight for the real whack-jobs, no pusssy-footing around.
Of course, they're all anti-Israel (anti-Jew) as are many libs. But what is mentioned above I distinctly remember as being discussed, which simply blew me away, I didn't realize people could be that stupid. They were always crying about Israel not waging a "fair fight" because they had more and better weapons.
To them, I would make note that, in history, typically a King who had an army of 10,000 would weigh the cost of going to battle with a King who had an army of 20,000 before engaging him, and if he saw he couldn't win, he would send an ambassador to try and make peace, and that the palestinians should try and do the same. The typical argument back would be "Why should they negotiate with people who stole their land from them? They're fighting to get it back," to which I would ask them why they're upset then, because obviously the palestinians are willing to die to get back their land, and so they're getting their wish. Oh boy, the sparks and accusations would fly. But when you're dealing with nuts, might as well goof with them and see how far off the handle they'd fly.
Oh, and if you would tell them that they were living on stolen land from the Native Americans, and should they attack them would they up and leave their land, a few would say they would, but most would say it was an unfair comparison, they you can't go back in time and change everything that was done wrong, but this event was recent enough (1948) that one could. I even had a few try and tell me that the Indians never occupied what is now the SF Bay Area because it was too windy and wasn't good hunting grounds, so SF was actually occupying land the Indians never claimed.
But yeah, the cali primitive is a major, big-time Jew hater.
.
