Author Topic: Hillary is Secretary of State?  (Read 7943 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Chris

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1476
  • Reputation: +522/-16
Re: Hillary is Secretary of State?
« Reply #25 on: November 24, 2008, 08:28:46 PM »
I discover today that not only are Obama & Cheney related, but BOTH of them are related to Bush...

http://www.rense.com/general80/obmw.htm


 :rotf:
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

Offline Thor

  • General Ne'er Do Well, Troublemaker & All Around Meanie!!
  • In Memoriam
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13103
  • Reputation: +363/-297
  • Native Texan & US Navy (ret)
Re: Hillary is Secretary of State?
« Reply #26 on: November 24, 2008, 08:57:58 PM »

 :rotf:

Hey, I just grabbed a link. There are more out there........
"The state must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people. As long as the government is perceived as working for the benefit of the children, the people will happily endure almost any curtailment of liberty and almost any deprivation."- IBID

I AM your General Ne'er Do Well, Troublemaker & All Around Meanie!!

"Congress has not unlimited powers to provide for the general welfare, but only those specifically enumerated."-Thomas Jefferson

Offline Chris_

  • Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46845
  • Reputation: +2028/-266
Re: Hillary is Secretary of State?
« Reply #27 on: November 24, 2008, 09:04:18 PM »
Hillary may not be the SOS, it might violate the Constitution. WaPo

Quote
Even if the vetting problems involving former president Bill Clinton's finances can be resolved, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton may face another roadblock on her way to the secretary of state's chair.

It's called the Constitution of the United States


You think THAT little piece of TP will stop any democrat?  Especially mrs.clinton??
If you want to worship an orange pile of garbage with a reckless disregard for everything, get on down to Arbys & try our loaded curly fries.

Offline Chris

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1476
  • Reputation: +522/-16
Re: Hillary is Secretary of State?
« Reply #28 on: November 24, 2008, 09:47:02 PM »
Hey, I just grabbed a link. There are more out there........

I was about to post the same story from the Volokh Conspiracy.  That's what I get for working during the day with no internets access.
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

Offline SaintLouieWoman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2024
  • Reputation: +500/-6
Re: Hillary is Secretary of State?
« Reply #29 on: November 24, 2008, 10:19:01 PM »
I disagree with a woman being Secretary of State and here's why...... Condi Rice hasn't accomplished all that much in her tenure. After some reflection, I think it's because she's a woman. Many countries look down on women, especially Muslim countries.

Ordinarily I'd disagree that a woman can't do an important job, but think you're on to something with this comment. Condi is, in my humble opinion, a much more accomplished person than Hillary and had more credentials for the position. Hillary visited all the countries that the loyalists talk about, but as a first lady. That has nothing to do with being SOS.

The Muslim countries will treat her as they do all women. It's a scary time for the US.

Offline Hawkgirl

  • Alpha Female
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4291
  • Reputation: +186/-73
Re: Hillary is Secretary of State?
« Reply #30 on: November 25, 2008, 08:14:17 PM »


The Muslim countries will treat her as they do all women. It's a scary time for the US.

But on the flip side, she does have bigger balls than the BarrackStar!  :fuelfire:

Offline Carl

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19832
  • Reputation: +1616/-100
Re: Hillary is Secretary of State?
« Reply #31 on: November 25, 2008, 09:25:43 PM »
ok, so we all agree that he has officially abandoned everything that he spent two years running on . . . and this is the guy who's campaign slogan was "change we believe in" . . . and no one but me thinks this would be funny if it wasn't so tragic?



It is not without precedent,Clinton did the same in 1992.

Worst economy in 50 years,he had an economic plan that all the economists said would work and so on.
He got elected and they immedietly forgot all that and started formulating a new deal style program which eliminated the middle class tax cut and proposed a minor "stimulus" package which was a jobs bill.
That got rejected by a dem Congress and Lloyd Benson was never heard from again at Treasury as they had made it his horse to ride.

Everything that is past comes around again.