I am getting a bit weary of the equation of the president elect to hitler.
he isn't hitler.
In the absence of reliable intelligence on Der Fuhrer's CAPABILITIES, I have to operate on the assumption that he's capable of following through on his STATED INTENTIONS.
He (Obama) may not be Hitler, but Hitler was not the originator of most of the operational methods and tactics he employed - and that we "enlightened" 21st century New Men look down upon with such disdain. Hitler was merely following in the dictatorial footsteps of the American President cum dictator that went before him - WOODROW WILSON.
Is it acceptable then to refer to Dear Leader as "the next Wilson"?