I forgot to add;
It's interesting to me how the "journalist" put quotation marks around "racist" and "black supremecist." Why the quotation marks? Is it because you're quoting her? Or is it because the "journalist" is having a hard time believing that black folk can be racist?
KC
"Journalism" has changed drastically in our lifetimes. It used to be inhabited by shoe-leather type reporters who were either out pounding the pavement in search of a story, in a local watering hole talking to the local political big shots, and then going back to the newsroom to type their stuff in a smoke filled newsroom. Now, most "journalists" are Ivy-League educated dumb-asses who think their job is to tell you what really matters. And the young clowns who are essentially running the asylums believe that Twitter is the real world.
An example headline one might see would be: DeSantis' Wins Re-Election: Here's What It Means
Every time I see a headline such as that I want to cringe. Those of us are actually have functional brain cells determine what the story actually is rather than being preached to by a leftist media apparatus of the Democrat Party.
Before I exit this response: Regarding your use of quotation marks, I've been listening to Chris Plante on his radio show for almost a decade. He also has recently been hosting a "The Five" type show on Newsmax every weeknight. During his radio gig, he'll often cite a news story and mention the author with a "journalist" and additionally remark that he's using quotation marks with his fingers. They aren't really journalists: Just water carriers for their preferred opinon.
Pretentious journalists are the ruination of the media landscape. Other than a few select good ones.
