http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x3818232Yeah, right.
sfexpat2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Mon Aug-18-08 06:59 PM
Original message
If I PROMISE to stfu about the anthrax case until Wednesday
would you all consider digging what I put up @ OpEdNews? We've been a couple of days ahead of most of the net and about week ahead of the corporati.
August 18, 2008
The Bruce Ivins coverage, not so good.
By Doug's ex-wife; her real name deleted
Memo to the our print press: Stop believing your faxes from the FBI about the anthrax case. They’re just making you look really, really bad.
David Willman at the L.A. Times put out what is being called “an independent investigation†of the anthrax case and man, I’m so glad my life doesn’t depend on it.
“Records show that the FBI missed signs pointing to Ivins in the deadly mailings: He used a restricted lab at key times and failed to provide a sample or report a supposed spill. The investigation instead remained locked on a former Army researcher."
http://www.latimes.com/news/science/la-na-anthrax15-200...
Where do we begin? Sorry, David. The FBI lied to you about Ivins’ samples. He turned in the right sample but the FBI screwed up the labwork, as was reported in the New York Times this weekend. Then the FBI turned around and lied about it on CSPAN. This is the Bush Justice Department, after all. You believed them?
http://www.opednews.com/articles/The-Bruce-Ivins-covera...
I'm trying to figure out what's going on here; this anthrax case seems to be Doug's ex-wife's new
cause celebre; she's obsessed with it.
Perhaps she got bored with defending Yugo Chavez and that corrupt ex-governor of Alabama and Central American terrorists, and moved on. She espouses some of the weirdest things.
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Mon Aug-18-08 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. If you stop talking about it
Who will I talk to about it? Keep the info coming and interest alive.
MadrasT Donating Member (532 posts) Mon Aug-18-08 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. Please don't stfu
I'll DIGG it anyway! If people don't want to read about the anthrax fiasco, they don't have to click on the topic... I've enjoyed your posts.
SpookyCat Donating Member (262 posts) Mon Aug-18-08 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
11. Please don't.
This story must get more play. This is terrifing to me, adn the media is either spinning or ignoring it completely.
I'll do whatever you need to keep it alive.
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Mon Aug-18-08 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
14. What made you think you had to stfu?
Primitive ennui with the subject; it doesn't seem to be a great attention-getter on Skins's island.
