In a post-show discussion posted online, Fox News Channel's "Special Report" got heated when Kirsten Powers called out fellow panel regular Charles Krauthammer for being a pro-war neoconservative. Krauthammer denies it and Steve Hayes goes on the attack.
CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER: If John McCain is a neo-con, then what could the word possibly mean? If John McCain and Dick Cheney, George Bush, Condoleeza Rice, Colin Powel, the sort-of four of them are the ones who led us to war in Iraq, are neo-cons, then explain to me what exactly a neo-con is.
KIRSTEN POWERS: Charles, you know what a neo-con is. I mean, this is kind of silly--
STEVE HAYES: It is not.
KIRSTEN POWERS: You both know what a neo-con is and you both know neoconservatives--
CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER: Can you define it?
KIRSTEN POWERS: They're people who mostly used to be liberals, who became Republicans over foreign policy, they are more hawkish on foreign policy, Irving Kristol, [*Bill Kristol's father] is a neo-con. You're a neo-con, [Charles]. Why are you acting like we don't know-- like there are no neo-cons?
Paul Wolfowitz is a neo-con--
STEVE HAYES: Is Dick Cheney a neo-con?
KIRSTEN POWERS: I don't think he was before he got in there-- The neo-cons did, were, it is just mind-boggling to me that you. Are you trying to suggest there was not a group of people that were articulating that we needed to attack Iraq and that they were not part of the neoconservative movement.
BRET BAIER: No. But the definition of neo-con is what, someone who always wants to go to war?
KIRSTEN POWERS: Somebody who, I think, is hawkish on foreign policy--
BRET BAIER: Is Hillary Clinton a neo-con?
KIRSTEN POWERS: Wait, wait, wait, guys, can I finish a sentence? It is somebody who I think is hawkish on foreign policy and who had a view --maybe the view has changed-- for a quite a period of time that we could spread Democracy. I think they were behind the 'Democracy-spreading' idea that George W. Bush endorsed, that we could remake the middle east through American power.
It is something Obama has bought into, Hillary has bought into, but I think there is clearly a neo-consaervative movement. People at Commentary Magazine are neo-cons, I don't think that that is. To say they all want to go to war all the time I don't think that is right, but there is a neo-conservative movement that almost every time an issue comes up, the solution is for us to get involved militarily in some fashion, whether it is arming people or actually invading as in Iraq.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2015/04/16/kirsten_powers_vs_krauthammer_you_know_what_a_neocon_is_youre_a_neocon_why_are_you_acting_like_you_dont_know.html