Passage In Nuke Deal May Allow Iran To Build Bomb Before Deal Expires

[Carl]

You mean barry lied again??

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10028023839

Mon Jul 18, 2016, 05:58 PM

Star Member Purveyor (28,965 posts)

Passage In Nuke Deal May Allow Iran To Build Bomb Before Deal Expires
VIENNA (AP) -- Key restrictions on Iran's nuclear program imposed under an internationally negotiated deal will start to ease years before the 15-year accord expires, advancing Tehran's ability to build a bomb even before the end the pact, according to a document obtained Monday by The Associated Press.

The document is the only text linked to last year's deal between Iran and six foreign powers that hasn't been made public, although U.S. officials say members of Congress have been able to see it. It was given to the AP by a diplomat whose work has focused on Iran's nuclear program for more than a decade, and its authenticity was confirmed by another diplomat who possesses the same document.

The diplomat who shared the document with the AP described it as an add-on agreement to the nuclear deal. But while formally separate from that accord, he said that it was in effect an integral part of the deal and had been approved by the U.S., Russia, China, Britain, France and Germany, the six powers that negotiated the deal with Tehran.

Details published earlier outline most restraints on Iran's nuclear program meant to reduce the threat that Tehran will turn nuclear activities it says are peaceful to making weapons.

MORE...

http://www.wptv.com/news/national/passage-in-nuke-deal-may-allow-iran-to-build-bomb-before-deal-expires

You mutts celebrated the mess,it will be your leftist hell holes blown to bits.

Response to Purveyor (Original post)

Mon Jul 18, 2016, 06:05 PM

Star Member Wounded Bear (8,936 posts)
1. I think this is alarmism...

As I recall it, the deal pushed their capability back 10 years, with a 1 year turnaround for bomb production. I don't see that being different.

Response to Wounded Bear (Reply #1)

Mon Jul 18, 2016, 06:47 PM

6chars (3,554 posts)
2. the difference is in the breakout time

after ten years, this lets them have a breakout time of 6 months or even less, instead of 1 year which was touted at the time of the deal. breakout time is the time it takes to go from having the capability of constructing bombs to actually having the physical bombs, e.g., by ramping up production. is that a good thing or a bad thing? depends on your perspective.

The muzzies will have a nuke long before that.

Response to Purveyor (Original post)

Mon Jul 18, 2016, 07:03 PM

jehop61 (1,130 posts)
3. Gee thanks

But this same thing was reported by the Repubs last year.

It is called reality.

Response to Purveyor (Original post)

Mon Jul 18, 2016, 07:10 PM

philosslayer (2,592 posts)
4. Nonsense

The President and Secretary Kerry knew exactly what they were doing.

Yeah they did,you are just too ignorant to understand it.

[Gina]

Response to Purveyor (Original post)

Mon Jul 18, 2016, 07:10 PM

philosslayer (2,592 posts)
4. Nonsense

The President and Secretary Kerry knew exactly what they were doing.

Exactly.  And y'all were ok with them hurting America.

[DumbAss Tanker]

Iran had no intention of paying attention to it, so the technicalities don't matter.  The sanctions are a dead letter, so they got what they wanted and no matter what they do now the 'Snapback' crap is just crap, it's as likely to happen as was the chance of the US going back to Viet Nam after the North invaded the South.

[thundley4]

Did Iran ever sign the agreement? Is it even valid or is it just another Obama giveaway to a Muslim Terrorist country?