Send Us Hatemail ! mailbag@conservativecave.com
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
magical thyme (13,896 posts) http://www.democraticunderground.com/10141338838QuoteIowa margin between Clinton, Sanders shifts as errors foundSource: DesMoines RegisterParty Chairwoman Andy McGuire the day after Monday's caucuses said no review would be conducted, and that Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s narrow victory over Bernie Sanders is final. But as errors are being discovered, the final tally is being changed, party officials confirmed to The Des Moines Register Friday morning. "Both the Sanders and Clinton campaigns have flagged a very small number of concerns for us, and we are looking at them all on a case-by-case basis," Iowa Democratic Party spokesman Sam Lau told the Register.Read more: http://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/elections/presidential/caucus/2016/02/05/iowa-margin-between-clinton-sanders-shifts-errors/79877898/ They cite one error being corrected in the article, in Grinnell precinct. Original tally had been Clinton 8; Sanders 18. Corrected tally is Clinton 7; Sanders 19. It was due to a math error, which was something I wondered about in the video where caucus goers who were not present were counted. They were doing the math manually there; not even an effing calculator!
Iowa margin between Clinton, Sanders shifts as errors found
Star Member Dragonfli (8,337 posts) 8. If this process happened in just a few places (not caught on camera) and it wouldn't take manyThen Hilary won by cheating...errr I mean poor math skills on the part of her buds back at the offices where these things are flipped. No wonder Ms HRC 2016 vanity license plate put such a lid on transparency, there are things that if revealed might change the winner of a primary. If the errors recovered revealed Hill won more delegates you know damn well we'd have transparency up the ass.
orpupilofnature57 (14,788 posts) 3. And this is how the stats of the country would go because of BIASED agendas and Single celled desire to Win, with the truth being just part of the cost .
earthside (6,259 posts) 9. I'm think more all the time that Sanders won outright. As the Des Moines Register said ... something "smells" in Iowa. I wonder if it is demonstrated that Bernie won by a couple tenths of a percent if the Hillarians will talk about a win being a win ... or will they then want to settle for a tie?
You just got to sit back and laugh and laugh and laugh....Source: DesMoines RegisterParty Chairwoman Andy McGuire the day after Monday's caucuses said no review would be conducted, and that Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s narrow victory over Bernie Sanders is final. But as errors are being discovered, the final tally is being changed, party officials confirmed to The Des Moines Register Friday morning. "Both the Sanders and Clinton campaigns have flagged a very small number of concerns for us, and we are looking at them all on a case-by-case basis," Iowa Democratic Party spokesman Sam Lau told the Register.Read more: http://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/elections/presidential/caucus/2016/02/05/iowa-margin-between-clinton-sanders-shifts-errors/79877898/ They cite one error being corrected in the article, in Grinnell precinct. Original tally had been Clinton 8; Sanders 18. Corrected tally is Clinton 7; Sanders 19. It was due to a math error, which was something I wondered about in the video where caucus goers who were not present were counted. They were doing the math manually there; not even an effing calculator! Just to be clear- Hillary won with 49.6% of the vote... Bernie had 49.4%Who really cares about a vote or two when the margin is that large?
Mandate!
Whats bernies excuse?CMD
