I'm sorry, but lurking DUmmies, come on.
1. Tavernier claims to have specific knowledge of this man, but
2. She had to troll the medical examiner's website for his name, and meanwhile
3. She happens to KNOW that he was beaten beyond recognition, yet
4. There is no evidence that this person was killed AT ALL, let alone that he was mutilated beyond recognition.
I'm not a homicide detective, but it occurs to me that there are exactly two possibilities, given that NO OTHER PERSON IN THE WORLD can corroborate Tavernier's story:
(a) This story is complete and utter bullshit, OR
(b) The only way Tavernier can possibly have this information is if SHE DID IT HERSELF.
Here is where we get to the part where you people are stupid assholes:
The mere fact that a conservative is pointing out the utter stupidity of this moron's claim will only burnish your belief in her story.
We are no more than two generations away from "How do you know it didn't happen" being an acceptable theory of jurisprudence in American law, all thanks to morons like yourselves, lurking DUmmies.