This was just an exceptionally lame attempt to show why libs should vote for the bern-out over billary. Both sides over there are always looking for some angle to try and show why their candidate is the only one who can win the GE. Of course, conservatives expressing their opinions over the radio and TV pose a threat to liberalism and, in their world-view, the advancement of a progressive America. Thus you get "there is nothing on this planet that will increase their ratings and hence their income than a Hillary Clinton Presidency." Note the fumesucker primitive didn't say Sanders. The fumesucker primitive, a big bern-out supporter, doesn't feel the same way about a Sanders presidency. He doesn't say if conservative radio and Fox's audience size would drop with the bern-out, just that billary's would cause it to go up.
The fumesucker primitive should stick with the theory that the corporate media want billary to win to keep the money flowing in and to appease the libs who, without a Republican in the WH to rant and rave at, will do the bidding of the 1% without much resistance. He'll get more mileage from that theory with his fellow primitives.
The berns think they can get crossover votes from Republicans nationwide because in Vermont, one of the few states that still has a sizable portion of the left-leaning Rockefeller Republicans that are farther left than the whole of Rockefeller Republicans, they'll vote for the bern. Convoluted thinking.
The billarys are correct in that some Rockefeller Republicans will vote for her, but that will be off-set by the number of dems who won't vote for her. They may not vote Republican, but they won't vote for her.
But never underestimate the stupidity of the American voting public, They put Dear Leader in twice, which tells you there's a whole lot of idiots out there who would vote for billary.
.
