Author Topic: My current problems with the Democratic Party:  (Read 1246 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline CC27

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6146
  • Reputation: +1745/-29
My current problems with the Democratic Party:
« on: October 16, 2015, 02:04:11 PM »
Quote
mmonk (50,119 posts)

My current problems with the Democratic Party:


Not defending Social Security and other safety net items pretending it has something to do with the deficits they run. Pretending Americans are currently protected from market manipulations and securities fraud presently. And there is "free trade" which isn't about trade, but reallocations of multinational corporate investments. These are very important issues to us that recognize these issues around the false fluffy talk without addressing these problems. The breach of trust a most serious matter. What will the party do with us and what we will do about the party?

Worried your free shit will go away?

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027263412

Offline Carl

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19838
  • Reputation: +1618/-100
Re: My current problems with the Democratic Party:
« Reply #1 on: October 16, 2015, 02:25:38 PM »

Offline Ralph Wiggum

  • It's unpossible that I'm a
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19494
  • Reputation: +2554/-49
Re: My current problems with the Democratic Party:
« Reply #2 on: October 16, 2015, 03:04:47 PM »
Social Security was designed as, maybe for lack of a better term, a pyramid scheme.  When FDR got it passed, the average mortality age of Americans was far lower.  Most were never expected to ever collect it.  It was an easy way for the government to quietly confiscate money from workers to fund the its programs.

As people started living longer, it all started to come due to the government.  SS is not in a "lockbox" or whatever ****ed up term you leftist goons call it.  The money floats wherever the government needs it.  If you ass clowns didn't major in feminist studies or English, you might know how to read a simple financial statement or a budget.

The explanation is even more complex, but those are the pertinent points.

Ralphie's civics lesson for lurking DUmmies on a Friday.  If you think I'm wrong, come on over & tell me SPECIFICALLY why.
Voted hottest "chick" at CU - My hotness transcends gender


Offline 98ZJUSMC

  • The Most Deplorable
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8424
  • Reputation: +436/-76
  • Now, with 99% less yellow!
Re: My current problems with the Democratic Party:
« Reply #3 on: October 16, 2015, 03:42:53 PM »
Social Security was designed as, maybe for lack of a better term, a pyramid scheme.  When FDR got it passed, the average mortality age of Americans was far lower.  Most were never expected to ever collect it.  It was an easy way for the government to quietly confiscate money from workers to fund the its programs.

As people started living longer, it all started to come due to the government.  SS is not in a "lockbox" or whatever ****ed up term you leftist goons call it.  The money floats wherever the government needs it.  If you ass clowns didn't major in feminist studies or English, you might know how to read a simple financial statement or a budget.

The explanation is even more complex, but those are the pertinent points.

Ralphie's civics lesson for lurking DUmmies on a Friday.  If you think I'm wrong, come on over & tell me SPECIFICALLY why.

I think the Big Guy needs to wheel his death bed into this thread and set these (D)Ummies straight on some Maths and shit......
              

Liberal thinking is a two-legged stool and magical thinking is one of the legs, the other is a combination of self-loating and misanthropy.  To understand it, you would have to be able to sit on that stool while juggling two elephants, an anvil and a fragmentation grenade, sans pin.

"Accuse others of what you do." - Karl Marx

Offline Boudicca

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5162
  • Reputation: +413/-61
Re: My current problems with the Democratic Party:
« Reply #4 on: October 16, 2015, 05:21:50 PM »
Social Security was designed as, maybe for lack of a better term, a pyramid scheme.  When FDR got it passed, the average mortality age of Americans was far lower.  Most were never expected to ever collect it.  It was an easy way for the government to quietly confiscate money from workers to fund the its programs.

As people started living longer, it all started to come due to the government.  SS is not in a "lockbox" or whatever ****ed up term you leftist goons call it.  The money floats wherever the government needs it.  If you ass clowns didn't major in feminist studies or English, you might know how to read a simple financial statement or a budget.

The explanation is even more complex, but those are the pertinent points.

Ralphie's civics lesson for lurking DUmmies on a Friday.  If you think I'm wrong, come on over & tell me SPECIFICALLY why.

Ralph, courtesy of wikipedia:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ponzi_scheme

Ponzi schemes occasionally begin as legitimate businesses, until the business fails to achieve the returns expected. The business becomes a Ponzi scheme if it then continues under fraudulent terms. Whatever the initial situation, the perpetuation of the high returns requires an ever-increasing flow of money from new investors to sustain the scheme.[1]

The scheme is named after Charles Ponzi,[2] who became notorious for using the technique in 1920.[3] The idea, present in novels (for example, Charles Dickens' 1844 novel Martin Chuzzlewit and 1857 novel Little Dorrit each described such a scheme),[4] was actually performed in real life by Ponzi who with his operation took in so much money that it was the first to become known throughout the United States. Ponzi's original scheme was based on the arbitrage of international reply coupons for postage stamps; however, he soon diverted investors' money to make payments to earlier investors and himself.[1]

Social Security as it currently exists is not for the benefit of future recipients, but has turned into the sole revenue for uncounted millions of its recipients who through no fault, or plenty of fault, of their own are unable to sustain any sort of life without that monthly check.  Meanwhile, the ratio of workers toiling only to have too much of their paychecks confiscated by an overarching federal bureaucracy in order to pay off grandpa and grandma monthly, shrinks year by year.  My young adult children have no confidence whatsoever that they will EVER see one thin dime of benefit money should they attain the then official Social Security Administration's criteria for full retirement benefits.

Eventually, if no one manages to reign in the excesses of our federal government, we as a nation will implode fiscally a la Weimer Republic or Zimbabwe (apologies to the CC'er who first mentioned them as examples since I don't recall the poster).  Obviously the liberals were fast tracked through the public education system since none of them seem to comprehend in the slightest the stark truth that monetary resources must exceed, or at least equal, money expended.
Sneaking into a country doesn't make you an immigrant any
more than breaking into someone's house makes you part of the family.
(Poster bolky from thehill.com blog discussion)

Offline Ralph Wiggum

  • It's unpossible that I'm a
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19494
  • Reputation: +2554/-49
Re: My current problems with the Democratic Party:
« Reply #5 on: October 16, 2015, 06:27:46 PM »
Ralph, courtesy of wikipedia:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ponzi_scheme

Ponzi schemes occasionally begin as legitimate businesses, until the business fails to achieve the returns expected. The business becomes a Ponzi scheme if it then continues under fraudulent terms. Whatever the initial situation, the perpetuation of the high returns requires an ever-increasing flow of money from new investors to sustain the scheme.[1]

The scheme is named after Charles Ponzi,[2] who became notorious for using the technique in 1920.[3] The idea, present in novels (for example, Charles Dickens' 1844 novel Martin Chuzzlewit and 1857 novel Little Dorrit each described such a scheme),[4] was actually performed in real life by Ponzi who with his operation took in so much money that it was the first to become known throughout the United States. Ponzi's original scheme was based on the arbitrage of international reply coupons for postage stamps; however, he soon diverted investors' money to make payments to earlier investors and himself.[1]

Social Security as it currently exists is not for the benefit of future recipients, but has turned into the sole revenue for uncounted millions of its recipients who through no fault, or plenty of fault, of their own are unable to sustain any sort of life without that monthly check.  Meanwhile, the ratio of workers toiling only to have too much of their paychecks confiscated by an overarching federal bureaucracy in order to pay off grandpa and grandma monthly, shrinks year by year.  My young adult children have no confidence whatsoever that they will EVER see one thin dime of benefit money should they attain the then official Social Security Administration's criteria for full retirement benefits.

Eventually, if no one manages to reign in the excesses of our federal government, we as a nation will implode fiscally a la Weimer Republic or Zimbabwe (apologies to the CC'er who first mentioned them as examples since I don't recall the poster).  Obviously the liberals were fast tracked through the public education system since none of them seem to comprehend in the slightest the stark truth that monetary resources must exceed, or at least equal, money expended.
Another good term for it, thanks!
Voted hottest "chick" at CU - My hotness transcends gender